Author

Topic: Economic Totalitarianism - page 103. (Read 345738 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 22, 2015, 12:35:38 AM
Bringing it back OT: Isn't this what a POW system represents: Input of time + space (energy?) = symbolic output?

That's a labor theory of value and, thus, inaccurate. PoW merely ensures that one's (monetary) interests are best served through a coin and not against it (for the non-trivial investment that is the common PoW-coin mining operation).
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1036
Facts are more efficient than fud
July 22, 2015, 12:31:43 AM
Please stop feeding that troll who wants to pump his nebulous Great Empire Coin™ into every discussion that is proximate to the nature of money and society. It is burying this thread in pages and pages of neologisms and obscure philosophical quotes which are all OT of this thread which as stipulated in the opening post of this thread is supposed to be about practical solutions to Economic Totalitarianism. (note I have been very patient with him over the past year, so please don't accuse me of not being open to tangential discussion)

I just wish he would stop his apparently intentional efforts to take practical discussion off on philosophical abstractions which are often not even clearly correct or at least not precisely relevant. I mean we are in a crisis mode right now and need to focus our energies on tangible efforts.

I have debated Chomsky for example on Hume. I aced the course in Philosophy at the university and even I have corrected an IQ test on a philosophical test question. I can go there, but please not here and not now. Because for one reason is I am a reductionist and will pour energy into sieving the generative essence which consumes much effort, especially when we are referring to the wide open abstractions of philosophy.

The solution is simple and it will never become a reality. All value is based on time.

Isn't that essentially all you are born with? Time (*and space)? Perhaps this is why the idea (value) of martyrdom is so powerful: you sacrifice your current time and space for a chance to expand your value into the greater expanse of communal time and space?

Bringing it back OT: Isn't this what a POW system represents: Input of time + space (energy?) = symbolic output?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 22, 2015, 12:10:44 AM
The solution is simple and it will never become a reality. All value is based on time.


Quote from: Eric Schechter (Professor Emeritus, Math Department, Vanderbilt University), "Potential versus Completed Infinity:
Its History and Controversy," 2009
Potential infinity refers to a procedure that gets closer and closer to, but never quite reaches, an infinite end.

Quote from: Epicurus (341‒270 BCE)
The wealth required by nature is limited and is easy to procure; but the wealth required by vain ideals extends to infinity.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
July 21, 2015, 11:25:20 PM
Please stop feeding that troll who wants to pump his nebulous Great Empire Coin™ into every discussion that is proximate to the nature of money and society. It is burying this thread in pages and pages of neologisms and obscure philosophical quotes which are all OT of this thread which as stipulated in the opening post of this thread is supposed to be about practical solutions to Economic Totalitarianism. (note I have been very patient with him over the past year, so please don't accuse me of not being open to tangential discussion)

I just wish he would stop his apparently intentional efforts to take practical discussion off on philosophical abstractions which are often not even clearly correct or at least not precisely relevant. I mean we are in a crisis mode right now and need to focus our energies on tangible efforts.

I have debated Chomsky for example on Hume. I aced the course in Philosophy at the university and even I have corrected an IQ test on a philosophical test question. I can go there, but please not here and not now. Because for one reason is I am a reductionist and will pour energy into sieving the generative essence which consumes much effort, especially when we are referring to the wide open abstractions of philosophy.

The solution is simple and it will never become a reality. All value is based on time.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 10:51:37 PM
http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/01/u-s-vs-china-tax-system/

http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2014/06/30/china-agrees-fatca-compliance.html

http://www.forbes.com/sites/taxanalysts/2015/01/13/chinas-fiscal-roadmap-tax-like-america/

Fatca is the seed planted by uncle Sam which will eventually develop into a global tax system, it builds the foundation for them to launch their NWO coin, to streamline tax collection and crush terrorism, tax evasion and underground activities which the masses will be begging for after the global economy melts down.

After 2020, try to invest in Asia if you can hide it from your home countries' capital controls and virtual/proxied internment of yourself where ever you may roam.

There is supposed to be a bank secrecy law in the Philippines, but it doesn't apply any more if you are an American:

http://globalnation.inquirer.net/126363/u-s-and-ph-sign-anti-tax-evasion-pact

As I said, Asia will bottom by 2020, because it has much more upside:

http://business.inquirer.net/195694/aquino-signs-into-law-2-economic-game-changers
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 10:12:28 PM
Greece will default.

No it won't!

Your model of the goal and outcome is wrong. Read my my post at the following link:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11937734

The entire EU will brought into debt crisis and only then will there be a monetary reset in a NWO slavery system.

Dumb ass European people can't even see what is so obvious to me since 2010 when I predicted this outcome.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 21, 2015, 06:12:18 PM
I quoted the post for you. Edited prior message.

It was the friction of high fixed capital investment of the Industrial Age which prevented optimal network scaling.

You write as though such “friction” could be indeliberate and unplutocratic.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 21, 2015, 06:04:05 PM
Money does not inherently beget State…


For a presumption of existence, the acknowledgment of nonexistence would seem lunacy.

"tates" (generalizethis), as well, are not "physical" (generalizethis) and, therefore, cannot, within the real, "wield physical force" (generalizethis): those subject to the "virtual reality" (i.e., hyperreality [i.e., any network of symbols that, exclusively, references symbols]) do so (in reality, not in effect [for their collective delusions about the constitution of Real]).

Quote from: Plato, _Euthyphro_, 380 BCE
Soc. We shall know better, my good friend, in a little while. The point which I should first wish to understand is whether the [capital] or [money] is beloved by the [1‱] because it is [money], or [money] because it is beloved of the [1‱].
(Germaneness mine.)
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 06:01:01 PM
Please take your Biblical preaching and existential philosophical wanderings to own thread. It is OT here. Start a thread on that and I will join you over there.

Money does not inherently beget State and is compatible with tribalism. I am working on that paradigm shift now. I explained already upthread(in Economic Devastion because I attempted to move the discussion there please) that technology and not money is what caused the current state-of-affairs.

Your theory of money and economy is too myopic.

Quote from: Winston Churchill
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

A heterarchical currency enables every individual holder of the currency to draw against the balance of every other holder of it. In the case of the G.E. coin, an individual holder's inflation of the monetary base (effectively) draws capital from other holders in accordance with the magnitude of their GEC holdings, mitigating each holder's personal losses while, simultaneously, maximizing their provision. (Furthermore, it incentives one to minimize [perhaps, through destruction] its currency holdings.)

Let me see if I can bring this thread back on topic.

The above quote was an OT post to an OT discussion in the Economic Totalitarianism thread. I wish we attempt to discuss monetary theory in an appropriate thread, so readers can follow threads.

The entire point of my (AnonyMint's) seminal essay linked from the opening post of this thread, is that production in the Industrial Age and prior epochs required great economies-of-scale in fixed capital, e.g. factories, mechanized farming, Egyptian slaves for pyramid building, etc..

Production in the Knowledge Age is the creation of new knowledge (not just the consumption of existing, although learning is a form of knowledge creation), e.g. software, 3D printing/CNC mill design patterns, marketing, writing, etc.. This notion (genre) of production can not be financed with interest bearing capital (read my seminal article!), and the capital resides with the individual and not with economies-of-scale (e.g. The Mythical Man Month).

Thus the generative essence of the problem has been not money nor free market capitalism itself, but the power that the technological state of mankind imparted to money.

The Knowledge Age is solving this problem.

Money will return to its roots (as an improvement over non-fungible barter) of being a unit-of-exchange, and less of a store-of-value.

This is the why Industrial Age and socialism are going totalitarian into a NWO, one-world reserve and governance outcome (go big or die is their necessary mantra). Because the paradigm is dying.

So we don't want an anti-money (whom can free-for-all coinbase nilly-willy debase faster race into the abyss) shitcoin that is designed to perniciously, self-destruct into a mutual chaos. Instead you want a money that is designed to primarily to be the best unit-of-exchange and which has extensive ability to resist totalitarianism. Money must debase and the best way is when it debases the most for those who do not transact so as to encourage the greatest unit-of-exchange. The power-law distribution of wealth is a pump that must be constantly reprimed, i.e. the concentrated wealth must be pumped back out to the masses to spend it again so it can return to those who concentrate wealth via their greater skill, fortitude, effort, etc..

Stay tuned...that money (with extensive mathematical innovations over any existing altcoin and potentially a Bitcoin killer) is coming soon to a cinema near you...
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 21, 2015, 05:59:25 PM
You always come back to the idiotic theme of the only economy is no economy, i.e. man is an island.


Tribe is hyperreal and begets possession. Possession is [hyper-]real and begets money. Money is hyperreal and begets state. State is [hyper-]real and begets hyperreality.

Quote from: Epicurus (341‒270 BCE)
Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist.

For a presumption of existence, the acknowledgment of nonexistence would seem lunacy.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 05:53:43 PM
Economy is the controlled implosion of conceived value, via the infinite blueshift of idle want, within a social Schwarzschild wormhole that terminates with one's person.

You always come back to the idiotic theme of the only economy is no economy, i.e. man is an island.

Even the Bible recognizes for example in the Parable of the Talents that not conducting trade and commerce is more evil than burying your talents (capital or shekels) in a hole.

The following explicitly argues against producing everything yourself and instead build economies-of-scale and trade:

Leviticus 19:19  Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Knowledge could but approximate existence.
July 21, 2015, 05:25:57 PM
I have debated Chomsky for example on Hume. I aced the course in Philosophy at the university and even I have corrected an IQ test on a philosophical test question. I can go there, but please not here and not now. Because for one reason is I am a reductionist and will pour energy into sieving the generative essence which consumes much effort, especially when we are referring to the wide open abstractions of philosophy.


(The fitness, as it pertains to the debate of color, of the blind is that of the non-Postmodern Epicurean as it pertains to the debate of ontology—illusory [i.e., non-veridical])

Quote from: Epicurus (341‒270 BCE)
The wealth required by nature is limited and is easy to procure; but the wealth required by vain ideals extends to infinity.

Quote from: Deuteronomy 23:19‒20 (Darby)
Thou shalt take no interest of thy brother, interest of money, interest of victuals, interest of anything that can be lent upon interest: of a foreigner thou mayest take interest, but of thy brother thou shalt not take interest; that Jehovah thy God may bless thee in all the business of thy hand in the land whither thou goest to possess it.

Economy is the controlled implosion of conceived value, via the infinite blueshift of idle want, within a social Schwarzschild wormhole that terminates with one's person.

Quote from: Epicurus (341‒270 BCE)
He who is not satisfied with a little, is satisfied with nothing.

All gain should seem infinitesimal relative to the More of boundless want—a demigod.
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
July 21, 2015, 10:43:34 AM
Thanks for the replies/edits TPTB. Very interesting.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 09:05:34 AM
Military on the streets of the US seems like a highly probable thing.  The govt going to war with veterans/gun owners too is causing backlash.

No longer is the US gvt acting like they have all the time in the world to act.  I think their attacks on gun owners will continue, as they are trying to make it illegal for large segments of the population to own a gun.  I think this is how they plan to further the unrest in the US.

I think not until late 2017 or perhaps 2018. And the worst of war probably not until 2019 - 2023 or maybe even after 2024 for the worst for the West. Note in my prior post that Asia will strengthen after 2020 while the West will collapse. Perhaps proxy wars with China and Russia from 2018 to 2023 (e.g. Ukraine and Baltic states, plus the South China sea issue in SE Asia), and then some hot wars in the West from 2024 to 2032 (China and Russia attack directly the USA and Europe?). Two stages of international war akin to WW1 and WW2. Also ISIS in the Middle East.

The economic side of the crisis has to worsen much more before the blood shed begins. Our first challenge is hurdling the economic downturn and warfare (capital controls and expropriation). That is what drives the unrest and eventually war.

Need time for the ratcheting.

Edit: Armstrong posted about Wesley Clark's quip and related it to internment camps:

http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/35243
http://www.armstrongeconomics.com/archives/35146
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
July 21, 2015, 09:02:52 AM
Also, does you modeling predict more social unrest?  It seems like the US has been preparing for this for some time, will there be some sort of false flag/computer bug/ cyber attack that will spur things this fall?

Armstrong does also incorporate a Cycle of War model and yes it is pointing the 2017 as the start of intra- (aka civil unrest) and international war. Also about that time or 2018 is Pandemic Cycle (backtested since beginning of recorded human history as are all of Armstrong's models) is pointing to potentially a pandemic (perhaps war will spread it as was the case for how the Black Death entered Europe).

With that model was able to pinpoint Ukraine and the start of issues in Ukraine precisely and long before it was on the news or on anyone else's radar.

People are not ready. We are heading into some serious shit and soon.

I agree, some strange stuff is going on.  I stopped following the "alternative media" crowd because they seemed to be the only ones pointing to growing social unrest, but it seems like a lot of the things they had been saying are looking like reality.  I have been following their reports again for the past few months.  Military on the streets of the US seems like a highly probable thing.  The govt going to war with veterans/gun owners too is causing backlash.

No longer is the US gvt acting like they have all the time in the world to act.  I think their attacks on gun owners will continue, as they are trying to make it illegal for large segments of the population to own a gun.  I think this is how they plan to further the unrest in the US.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 08:49:56 AM
Also, does you modeling predict more social unrest?  It seems like the US has been preparing for this for some time, will there be some sort of false flag/computer bug/ cyber attack that will spur things this fall?

Armstrong does also incorporate a Cycle of War model and yes it is pointing to 2017 as the start of intra- (aka civil unrest) and international war. Also about that time or 2018 is Pandemic Cycle (backtested since beginning of recorded human history as are all of Armstrong's models) is pointing to potentially a pandemic (perhaps war will spread it as was the case for how the Black Death entered Europe).

With that model he was able to pinpoint Ukraine and the start of issues in Ukraine precisely and long before it was on the news or on anyone else's radar.

People are not ready. We are heading into some serious shit and soon.


The cascade model is that the instances of debt crises throughout the EU will accelerate

Okay so what instances are going to happen in 2015 to accelerate things? Greece appears, for now, to be deferred until 2016.

I haven't been studying it that closely (so much crap lurking and my head is in the programming sand), but the instances will accelerate (even in 2015) and come from all over the place, especially in 2016.

Probably some rating agency downgrade, Basel deadline, or something just after the Europeans get back from summer vacations after August. Something big will happen in September. Armstrong will probably home in on it soon. I'll be paying attention and bump the thread once I am aware of it. I remember something Armstrong wrote about a requirement on Greece that comes in August or September...

This exhale on Greece will be very short-lived. The episodes of calm will become shorter and shorter, and volatility will increase and increase. October is the BIG BANG.

P.S. Note I prepended to my prior post.

Edit: I maintain move to dollar cash until after October. Then on those lows move to dollars, US stocks, gold, and crypto. After 2017, my only hope is on crypto. After 2020, try to invest in Asia if you can hide it from your home countries' capital controls and virtual/proxied internment of yourself where ever you may roam.

Edit#2: Armstrong's computer model for the Euro chart points to a big event in September (the Composite bar at top row) with Volatility increasing in August after quieting in July which will be very significant Long-term and Directional change in September:



I believe he called for 0.85 level so perhaps it will break down through to the lowest purple trendline sometime between November and January. Note the bright yellow Trading cycle in February, so that might be the low for the Euro?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
July 21, 2015, 08:46:14 AM
The cascade model is that the instances of debt crises throughout the EU will accelerate

Okay so what instances are going to happen in 2015 to accelerate things? Greece appears, for now, to be deferred until 2016.


I am wondering the same thing.  Are there going to be more "debt restructurings" for countries like Italy, Portugal, Spain?  Do the huge stock losses in China have any bearing on these countries and their debt?

Also, does you modeling predict more social unrest?  It seems like the US has been preparing for this for some time, will there be some sort of false flag/computer bug/ cyber attack that will spur things this fall?
legendary
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
July 21, 2015, 08:34:09 AM
The cascade model is that the instances of debt crises throughout the EU will accelerate

Okay so what instances are going to happen in 2015 to accelerate things? Greece appears, for now, to be deferred until 2016.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 262
July 21, 2015, 08:19:10 AM
To me it appears 2015.75 will be the beginning of a federalized Europe and eliminating cash, all signs are pointing towards totalitarianism despite the European peoples wishes.

http://www.lejdd.fr/Politique/Francois-Hollande-Ce-qui-nous-menace-ce-n-est-pas-l-exces-d-Europe-mais-son-insuffisance-742998

Agreed. 2016-2017 is the ratcheting of the cascade for submission of sovereignty for EU nations.

For the USA, that will come later in 2017-2018 with the peak ingress of safe haven seeking capital-chasing-capital ducks stampede in from the periphery and with the allegedly closet-lesbian, ashtray-hurling, führer Hellary Slimeton at the "Little Village" socialism, concentration camps "either you are with us or against us" profiling helm.

Note Asia will also experience a sharp downturn (shrinkage of their export markets, corporations sold huge bond issues denominated in dollars and $usd will appreciate) but unlike the Western nations which are burdened with fiscal debt, Asia's excessive debt load is only at the corporate level (even in China because bankrupt LGOs should be viewed as separate from the central government and can be politically thrown overboard in defaults/writedowns) and can be defaulted. Thus Asia will bottom 2020 and start rising again. While the Western nations are politically embroiled in a fiscal debt morass NWO from which there is no escape other than a Knowledge Age for those who avail of it.

However, Asia will lead the NWO because Asia is top-down run by fascist taipans. Thus the real antithesis to the NWO is the Knowledge Age and not Asia's fiscal and youthful demographics buoyancy that is being harvested by the taipans.

Question about 2015.75. It seems Greece and its creditors have managed to extend-and-pretend into 2016, and that looked to be the most obvious source of sovereign debt contagion. (Of course it is still possible this latest bailout deal will unravel.) Is there another one?

My model of the Euro crisis is that TPTB created the Euro currency union separate from a fiscal union, to enable the model for cascade into a NWO.

They pumped debt into the overvalued nations then as the usury compounded coupled with the appreciation of the Euro that outran their incapacity to produce, the impending defaults forced a choice of increasing the debts or defaulting.

The EU banking model was set up such that the member nations would have no realistic choice but to accept ever increasing debt bailouts (coupled with austerity which accelerates the need for more debt bailouts). TPTB have forced the national fiscal balance sheets to assume this debt and they are metastasizing this debt load throughout the EU into the northern balance banks and also eventually entirely on the northern fiscal balance sheets:

see also this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=xu5sTyAXyAo#t=526

It is interesting that Ireland will pay billions for decades in a modern form of
Danegeld and only a select few insiders aware of the flow. Expect the flow to increase
until it can no longer be hid.  

Simultaneously TPTB set up the Basel rounds of increasingly strict banking disclosure and mark-to-market Tier capital classifications which are being staged phased in to ratchet the cascade contagion.

The cascade model is that the instances of debt crises throughout the EU will accelerate until all the nation-states are incapacitated by debt on their fiscal balance sheets, at which point they will have entirely submitted their sovereignty to the EU and ECB.

So the contagion will not be a debt default until it encompasses a default of all the EU nations, and at that point there will be monetary reset with sovereignty submitted to the EU, wherein all the debts will be written down using the ECB.

I predicted this in 2010 with the widely syndicated essay:

http://www.coolpage.com/commentary/economic/shelby/Understand%20Everything%20Fundamentally.html#europe

You will probably need a week or two of studying the thread slowly.

I will be the first to admit I needed a week to fully absorb the following works of AnonyMint.

The Rise of Knowledge
Understand Everything Fundamentally

Together these are quite simply the most insightful piece of economic theory I have ever read.

If the author is right and I think he is we are all in the midst of a tragedy of epic proportions.  It is sad unstoppable and will devastate the lives of much of humanity.Once you understand the basics of the modern financial system you are ready to move on to Anonymint's more complex writings and ideas. I would start with

Understand Everything Fundamentally

Understand everything fundamentally covers the broader principle of collectivism and its dangers including the tragic consequences of our current economic trajectory. It also covers the principles of centralization and degrees-of-freedom in the economy. Next up is

The Rise of Knowledge

The rise of knowledge is in my opinion the very best of Anonymint's writing. In it he covers finance and why the role of finance and debt will progressively decline in the future. It is a compelling argument that describes how and why humanity will eventually and inevitability break free of the chains of finance and unrestrained collectivism and enter an age of knowledge.

CoinCube Highlights:
Information is Alive
The Entropic Theory of Life
A Defense of Socialism
The Birth of Contentionism


legendary
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1001
July 21, 2015, 08:08:24 AM
To me it appears 2015.75 will be the beginning of a federalized Europe and eliminating cash, all signs are pointing towards totalitarianism despite the European peoples wishes.

http://www.lejdd.fr/Politique/Francois-Hollande-Ce-qui-nous-menace-ce-n-est-pas-l-exces-d-Europe-mais-son-insuffisance-742998
Jump to: