I agree with you, and that's typically what we do when our choices come down to slavery or death, we walk away from it all and let it crash and burn, we call it a dark age, and I feel we are heading towards one, perhaps it's already begun.
It seems we've been check mated in the game of life, or maybe I'm too pessimistic.
Topic: Economic Totalitarianism - page 9. (Read 345738 times)
Who agrees with me that the goal of defeating the powers-that-be with a blockchain should not be the goal?
Create something popular with a viable business model. Even use a blockchain for the properties it can provide such as being both a speculation and a unit-of-exchange, but just forget about this nonsense ideology of defeating Soros with a blockchain. It isn't going to happen.
Help them spread crypto-currency over the globe, then maybe they won't mind you are offering an alternative to their Bitcoin plan. But don't go in thinking you can defeat the powers-that-be with technology.
Decentralization for enabling a huge ecosystem because no one has to trust the a centralized entity is good. Decentralization for trying to defeat the globalists is suicide.
Any agree or disagree?
It has been an important learning process for me.
There is absolutely no way you could get the Trump supporters to believe their savior Wikileaks is actually the source of their enslavement. You wouldn't even be allowed to get the message out to them.
There is no way you could create a popular Internet service and prevent it from being be co-opted by the elite.
You simply won't be allowed to.
We all here pretend we could be free. We won't succeed. None of us. Look yourself in the mirror and ask if you've come to grips with your enslavement or if you are still in denial.
If you've swallowed the blue pill, then there is nothing to say to you. If you've swallowed the red pill as I have, then its time to realize you are only free when you need nothing, not even to eat. When you walk away with nothing into the wilderness, then you are free. Free to die, free to be attacker by parasites and predators, and free to go hungry.
There is absolutely no way you could get the Trump supporters to believe their savior Wikileaks is actually the source of their enslavement. You wouldn't even be allowed to get the message out to them.
There is no way you could create a popular Internet service and prevent it from being be co-opted by the elite.
You simply won't be allowed to.
We all here pretend we could be free. We won't succeed. None of us. Look yourself in the mirror and ask if you've come to grips with your enslavement or if you are still in denial.
If you've swallowed the blue pill, then there is nothing to say to you. If you've swallowed the red pill as I have, then its time to realize you are only free when you need nothing, not even to eat. When you walk away with nothing into the wilderness, then you are free. Free to die, free to be attacker by parasites and predators, and free to go hungry.
Create something popular with a viable business model. Even use a blockchain for the properties it can provide such as being both a speculation and a unit-of-exchange, but just forget about this nonsense ideology of defeating Soros with a blockchain. It isn't going to happen.
Help them spread crypto-currency over the globe, then maybe they won't mind you are offering an alternative to their Bitcoin plan. But don't go in thinking you can defeat the powers-that-be with technology.
Decentralization for enabling a huge ecosystem because no one has to trust the a centralized entity is good. Decentralization for trying to defeat the globalists is suicide.
Any agree or disagree?
More Trump accusers have been revealed to be liars. Seems everyone that supports Clinton is lying to someone (even if that is just themselves ... swallow the blue pill).
Expect the political establishment in the USA to do something very drastic between now and Nov. 8.
I have a new perspective now, given Julian Assange's video:
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/784171749164224512
And this:
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787373770738536448
The-powers-that-be appear to be trying to force the USA political establishment to escalate in Syria against Putin, in order to futilely attempt to defeat Trump.
And the elite want to lay the entire coming economic collapse and escalation of Middle East proxy war in Trump's lap, so he and the patriotic, conservative "obstructionists" can be blamed for the misdeeds of the banksters and establishment that set up all this failure over the past decades.
Expect the political establishment in the USA to do something very drastic between now and Nov. 8.
I have a new perspective now, given Julian Assange's video:
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/784171749164224512
And this:
https://twitter.com/LogicalCampaign/status/787373770738536448
The-powers-that-be appear to be trying to force the USA political establishment to escalate in Syria against Putin, in order to futilely attempt to defeat Trump.
And the elite want to lay the entire coming economic collapse and escalation of Middle East proxy war in Trump's lap, so he and the patriotic, conservative "obstructionists" can be blamed for the misdeeds of the banksters and establishment that set up all this failure over the past decades.
Getting inside the minds of the elite:
It is interesting to read more of what Hillary said in the private speech to bankers and their ilk on page 93:
What Hillary fails to comprehend in her idealistic quest for the perfect harmonious global village, is that when you hand out welfare checks to everyone that shows up at the border, the pre-existing citizenry don't want to pay for it while losing their jobs to these parasites. The banksters are quite happy for us to run up our debt to finance it until it collapses, because they privatize the profits and socialize the cost of the losses.
America was built from immigration where everyone had to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.
The problem with these globalists is they make it all sound great and idealistic even to fool themselves, whilst as long as they can always profit and steal in the guise of idealism, then it is the "obstructionists" that are at fault in their view!
Just before the above quote, Hillary was preaching the idealism of three pillars of society: free market, governance, and community (civil sector).
That was an excellent look into the illogical mindset of idealistic bullshit Liberals.
Quote from: Hillary Clinton
And what I really resent most about the
obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of
America. They see America in a way that is no
longer reflective of the reality of who we are.
They're against immigration for reasons that have to
do with the past, not the future. They can't figure
out how to invest in the future, so they cut
everything. You know, laying off, you know, young
researchers, closing labs instead of saying, we're
better at this than anybody in the world, that's
where our money should go. They just have a
backward-looking view of America. And they play on
people's fears, not on people's hopes, and they have
to be rejected. I don't care what they call
themselves. I don't care where they're from. They
have to be rejected because they are fundamentally
unAmerican. And every effort they make to undermine
and obstruct the functioning of the government is
meant to send a signal that we can't do anything
collectively. You know, that we aren't a community,
a nation that shares values.
I mean, American was an invention. It
was an intellectual invention, and we have done
pretty well for all these years. And these people
want to just undermine that very profound sense of
who we are. And we can't let them do that.
obstructionists is they have such a narrow view of
America. They see America in a way that is no
longer reflective of the reality of who we are.
They're against immigration for reasons that have to
do with the past, not the future. They can't figure
out how to invest in the future, so they cut
everything. You know, laying off, you know, young
researchers, closing labs instead of saying, we're
better at this than anybody in the world, that's
where our money should go. They just have a
backward-looking view of America. And they play on
people's fears, not on people's hopes, and they have
to be rejected. I don't care what they call
themselves. I don't care where they're from. They
have to be rejected because they are fundamentally
unAmerican. And every effort they make to undermine
and obstruct the functioning of the government is
meant to send a signal that we can't do anything
collectively. You know, that we aren't a community,
a nation that shares values.
I mean, American was an invention. It
was an intellectual invention, and we have done
pretty well for all these years. And these people
want to just undermine that very profound sense of
who we are. And we can't let them do that.
What Hillary fails to comprehend in her idealistic quest for the perfect harmonious global village, is that when you hand out welfare checks to everyone that shows up at the border, the pre-existing citizenry don't want to pay for it while losing their jobs to these parasites. The banksters are quite happy for us to run up our debt to finance it until it collapses, because they privatize the profits and socialize the cost of the losses.
America was built from immigration where everyone had to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps.
The problem with these globalists is they make it all sound great and idealistic even to fool themselves, whilst as long as they can always profit and steal in the guise of idealism, then it is the "obstructionists" that are at fault in their view!
Just before the above quote, Hillary was preaching the idealism of three pillars of society: free market, governance, and community (civil sector).
That was an excellent look into the illogical mindset of idealistic bullshit Liberals.
While looking up legislation on internet freedom, I found the following somewhat broad overreach:
PROTECT IP Act of 2011
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/968/text
"(ii) the Internet site - conducts business directed to residents of the United States; and harms holders of United States intellectual property rights."
OK, the bill got squashed, which is a story in itself, but then there's this:
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/hillary_clinton_and_internet_freedom/
"There are many people who can credibly claim to defend Internet Freedom; Obama officials are not among them - Glenn Greenwald"
"But when ideas are blocked, information deleted, conversations stifled, and people constrained in their choices, the internet is diminished for all of us. What we do today to preserve fundamental freedoms online will have a profound effect on the next generation of users."
"Those are the acts of a government and a State Department seeking to block access to and discussion of evidence of their own wrongdoing and to punish as criminals those who reported it."
The above suggests that absent major political change in the USA, there'll be more of this,
which brings me to the prospects for the US leadership contest.
A couple of days ago there was a news video link between an journalist and what appeared to be
a girl in "Aleppo", pleading for the International Community to no longer idly stand by and do nothing.
At that point, I was reminded of many other victims of recent conflicts, and of Benghazi.
If I've recalled correctly, even a direct line to the second most powerful person on
this planet failed to get any effective action in the midst of the Benghazi firefight.
Everybody makes mistakes, everybody has regrets about things they did or didn't do.
The difference is in recognising the mistake for what it is and in the character growth that happens.
"What difference does it make?" suggests this learning process is not in place for HRC,
and it suggests no understanding of the military mindset.
If I'm reading the runes correctly, at least some faction of TPTB is rethinking its constituency,
and advocating change, but they may have a problem. It is this : "You're going to Jail"
For that political change to happen, TPTB have to be sure that they aren't going to jail,
and there's no way to ensure that, without a deal. And if anybody gets a deal, everybody
gets a deal.
And if everybody gets a deal, then for the internet, it's the same old, same old ...
BTW, More on the Syrian refugees and the totalitarian-lite profiteering here:
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2016/10/14/the-generators-agent-provocateurs-opportunists-of-the-refugee-crisis/
PROTECT IP Act of 2011
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/senate-bill/968/text
"(ii) the Internet site - conducts business directed to residents of the United States; and harms holders of United States intellectual property rights."
OK, the bill got squashed, which is a story in itself, but then there's this:
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/hillary_clinton_and_internet_freedom/
"There are many people who can credibly claim to defend Internet Freedom; Obama officials are not among them - Glenn Greenwald"
"But when ideas are blocked, information deleted, conversations stifled, and people constrained in their choices, the internet is diminished for all of us. What we do today to preserve fundamental freedoms online will have a profound effect on the next generation of users."
"Those are the acts of a government and a State Department seeking to block access to and discussion of evidence of their own wrongdoing and to punish as criminals those who reported it."
The above suggests that absent major political change in the USA, there'll be more of this,
which brings me to the prospects for the US leadership contest.
A couple of days ago there was a news video link between an journalist and what appeared to be
a girl in "Aleppo", pleading for the International Community to no longer idly stand by and do nothing.
At that point, I was reminded of many other victims of recent conflicts, and of Benghazi.
If I've recalled correctly, even a direct line to the second most powerful person on
this planet failed to get any effective action in the midst of the Benghazi firefight.
Everybody makes mistakes, everybody has regrets about things they did or didn't do.
The difference is in recognising the mistake for what it is and in the character growth that happens.
"What difference does it make?" suggests this learning process is not in place for HRC,
and it suggests no understanding of the military mindset.
If I'm reading the runes correctly, at least some faction of TPTB is rethinking its constituency,
and advocating change, but they may have a problem. It is this : "You're going to Jail"
For that political change to happen, TPTB have to be sure that they aren't going to jail,
and there's no way to ensure that, without a deal. And if anybody gets a deal, everybody
gets a deal.
And if everybody gets a deal, then for the internet, it's the same old, same old ...
BTW, More on the Syrian refugees and the totalitarian-lite profiteering here:
http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2016/10/14/the-generators-agent-provocateurs-opportunists-of-the-refugee-crisis/
It definitely wouldn't be surprising, in my opinion, if the FATC Act starts to push more people to buy from companies online using cryptos then they're more than likely going to start paying more attention to that, and that isn't necessarily something that I or a lot of other people want to see happening. The longer the feds can stay out of Bitcoin the better imo.
The Feds are coming after Bitcoin any way. I argue that Bitcoin was created by the elite because it enables digital tracking of everything.
You don't really believe this notion of "Satoshi Nakamoto" being some lone guy in his garage? Come on, get real. In any case, it doesn't matter. Bitcoin is the 666 digital kill switch.
But Bitcoin isn't the only possible crypto-currency. There are others with anonymity.
Actually I don't think anonymity should be the goal. We are going to move to a digitally tracked world. There is nothing anybody can do to stop that. Revelations can't be avoided. It is a natural progression of the species of man to destroy himself.
Embrace it. Profit. Live and die. Pray.
Quote
Quote
I would argue that it will play out over a longer period of time.
Here is the Jewish view on the future and how it will play out.
http://www.beingjewish.com/soul/future.html
Here is the Jewish view on the future and how it will play out.
http://www.beingjewish.com/soul/future.html
If I believe it, does that alone make it real.
It makes it real for you
That was my point. ;-)
Btw, the following points by Freeman Dyson are going to tantalize your mind:
https://www.edge.org/discourse/dawkins_dyson.html
Now I understand why Eric S. Raymond (160 IQ) said he felt like the slow kid in the family when he ate breakfast with the Dysons.
Dyson is speaking about what you had pointed out about a balance between evolving too fast and losing too much information versus not evolving fast enough.
As it turns out, Dyson is correct that evolving too fast remains always the outcome (see his reply to Richard Dawkins), as nature routes around the mature species by chaotically rendering it extinct.
Thus I was correct to favor a higher rate of disobedience within the species and also because Dyson seems to be correct that horizontal transfer is exponentially faster than Darwinian evolution! I need to spend some more time thinking about all the implications of this and make a followup to my article "INformation is Alive!".
I would very appreciate if you'd make a comment post about these matters. I don't have time to think it out right now.
I'd still love to collaborate with you more. My back is against the survival wall at the moment.
Dyson declared in 2000 that he is a non-denomination Christian. They say his IQ is in the 180 range.
I don't have as high an IQ as him (I lack the memory and fast computational engine), but I share his love for being a contrarian and I do seem to have a very IQ in terms of mapping concepts in my mind (but I first have to get rid of all the symbols and other translational noise that clutters my parallel visualization engine, because I don't have an exceptional IQ in the realm of I/O and sequential processing).
He got too many negatives and he's already shown people who he is. There is no way voters are going to buy into he's evolving. 70% of women voters dislike him and minorities.
You need to stop watching the mass media and develop your atrophied brain stem.
The polls are a farce. Trump is going to get 60+% of the vote when we go to the polls. It is going to shock the world, except if the elite can rig the election process (which they also tried to do for the BREXIT vote).
The mass media is clearly trying to over emphasize false, fabricated allegations against Trump and under emphasize the severity of the Wikileaks incriminations.
Parade of the accusers
Such a blanket denial has prompted a steady stream of women to come forward to assert that Mr Trump's actions do, in fact, reflect his candid words. Jessica Leeds, who accused Mr Trump of fondling her on an airplane, said she practically jumped out of her skin when she heard Mr Trump deny any improper behaviour.
The Trump campaign has promised that it will release evidence that the accusers are fabricating their claims - and Mr Trump in several speeches has issued blanket denials. So far, however, the sum total of evidence levelled against the growing list of women coming forward ...
"Believe me, she would not be my first choice," he said at a North Carolina rally on Friday.
Believe me, that line isn't going to win him any votes.
Hacked to pieces
You'd be hard-pressed to notice over the din of the travelling circus the Trump campaign has become, but the Clinton team also spent the week weathering a scandal of its own. Thanks to the release by Wikileaks of emails possibly acquired by Russian hackers, the public has been given an inside view of the Clinton campaign - and the picture it paints is often unflattering.
Campaign operatives obsess over messaging and even individual tweets, they mull negative campaign tactics, try to resolve staff infighting and speculate on ways to inspire a liberal revolt within the Catholic Church.
The emails - assuming they are authentic
Such a blanket denial has prompted a steady stream of women to come forward to assert that Mr Trump's actions do, in fact, reflect his candid words. Jessica Leeds, who accused Mr Trump of fondling her on an airplane, said she practically jumped out of her skin when she heard Mr Trump deny any improper behaviour.
The Trump campaign has promised that it will release evidence that the accusers are fabricating their claims - and Mr Trump in several speeches has issued blanket denials. So far, however, the sum total of evidence levelled against the growing list of women coming forward ...
"Believe me, she would not be my first choice," he said at a North Carolina rally on Friday.
Believe me, that line isn't going to win him any votes.
Hacked to pieces
You'd be hard-pressed to notice over the din of the travelling circus the Trump campaign has become, but the Clinton team also spent the week weathering a scandal of its own. Thanks to the release by Wikileaks of emails possibly acquired by Russian hackers, the public has been given an inside view of the Clinton campaign - and the picture it paints is often unflattering.
Campaign operatives obsess over messaging and even individual tweets, they mull negative campaign tactics, try to resolve staff infighting and speculate on ways to inspire a liberal revolt within the Catholic Church.
The emails - assuming they are authentic
So Hillary's horrific orchestration of 1000s of beheaded and limbless women and children is merely "unflattering" and questionably "authentic", while the false, fabricated allegations against Trump are a "steady parade" that reflect he is really a horrible person.
Yeah right. Only someone without a functioning brain stem and married to an ideology could fall for that one.
We know that latest October-surprise allegations against Trump are fabricated because a woman who is abused and not making any signals about it with no witness for a decade or more, and then suddenly coming out to reveal this exactly to the day of the Wikileak releases in order to overshadow the news media, is simply not plausible. Women who are abused show signs and indications of this from the get go and they talk to others about it within a very short period of time after the incident, as did all of the accusers of Bill Clinton and Hillary.
And we know the Wikileaks email releases are incriminating and factual, because they are Clinton's own words and she has not denied writing nor deleting those 33,000 emails. We have for example the President of the Haiti on camera saying that Hillary and Bill stole all the $billions that was donated to Haiti:
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/north_america/2016-u-s-presidential-election/president-of-haiti-exposes-clintons-corruption-pocketing-98-of-the-money-donated-for-relief/
The people who do no research and listen to sound bites from the mass media, are babbling idiots including the otherwise very smart Tom Hanks.
I am really suspicious of this CIA cyber war with Russia, why would the CIA do it & not the NSA?
It sounds so corny and fake, I expect they will find """"evidence"""" of Russia conspiring to rig the election.
It sounds so corny and fake, I expect they will find """"evidence"""" of Russia conspiring to rig the election.
War with Russia and Yemen
What is Trumps position on Fatca? Just wondering, does he mention it?
He is probably not talking about it because it probably won't win him any votes and he probably knows he would be extremely threatening to the globalists:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-20/shocking-reason-fatca-and-what-comes-next
I suspect he will dismantle it if he can.
The desperation of the Clintons is being forced onto center stage by Wikileaks. Wonder what the escalation will be once they realize their sleaze strategy has backfired??
Weekly fabrications might even be too much for people without a functioning brain stem to not smell funny.
But let's face the facts. The elite are not going to allow him to go too far. It is going to be very interesting to see which choice they use to terminate Trump.
These latest groping and genital thrusting fabrications are going to backfire on the elite. The desperation of the mass media is all too obvious for anyone with a brain stem, which surprisingly doesn't include Tom Hanks.
Wikileaks should release Clinton emails bi-daily, so that the media has to invent a new fabrication every 2 days. That would do more to expose how ridiculous the media is now. But the switch to weekly releases was very strategic by Wikileaks to force the media to weekly reveal what a farce they are.
These latest groping and genital thrusting fabrications are going to backfire on the elite. The desperation of the mass media is all too obvious for anyone with a brain stem, which surprisingly doesn't include Tom Hanks.
Wikileaks should release Clinton emails bi-daily, so that the media has to invent a new fabrication every 2 days. That would do more to expose how ridiculous the media is now. But the switch to weekly releases was very strategic by Wikileaks to force the media to weekly reveal what a farce they are.
Weekly fabrications might even be too much for people without a functioning brain stem to not smell funny.
What is Trumps position on Fatca? Just wondering, does he mention it?
He is probably not talking about it because it probably won't win him any votes and he probably knows he would be extremely threatening to the globalists:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-20/shocking-reason-fatca-and-what-comes-next
I suspect he will dismantle it if he can.
The desperation of the Clintons is being forced onto center stage by Wikileaks. Wonder what the escalation will be once they realize their sleaze strategy has backfired??
Weekly fabrications might even be too much for people without a functioning brain stem to not smell odorous.
But let's face the facts. The elite are not going to allow him to go too far. It is going to be very interesting to see which choice they use to terminate Trump.
These latest groping and genital thrusting fabrications are going to backfire on the elite. The desperation of the mass media is all too obvious for anyone with a brain stem, which surprisingly doesn't include Tom Hanks.
Wikileaks should release Clinton emails bi-daily, so that the media has to invent a new fabrication every 2 days. That would do more to expose how ridiculous the media is now. But the switch to weekly releases was very strategic by Wikileaks to force the media to weekly reveal what a farce they are.
These latest groping and genital thrusting fabrications are going to backfire on the elite. The desperation of the mass media is all too obvious for anyone with a brain stem, which surprisingly doesn't include Tom Hanks.
Wikileaks should release Clinton emails bi-daily, so that the media has to invent a new fabrication every 2 days. That would do more to expose how ridiculous the media is now. But the switch to weekly releases was very strategic by Wikileaks to force the media to weekly reveal what a farce they are.
Weekly fabrications might even be too much for people without a functioning brain stem to not smell odorous.
What is Trumps position on Fatca? Just wondering, does he mention it?
...
iamnotback
You and others have long suffered reading that Bearing Guy OROBTC loves diversification. As long as it appears that Bitcoin is free of "taint of .gov" than that BTC is indeed a great asset holding.
I do not have the time & inclination (nor even the proper skills) to go deep into the rabbit holes to determine truth of this or that. So, until further notice, BTC is a good place for me to be. Especially with, as you point out, with the odious FATCA laws. At some point, even without the USA cratering, many other countries will reject FATCA at least in part if they would welcome US investment. Unfortunately Peru may not particularly be a good candidate, as their taxation authorities have imposed hard to avoid taxation policies (via computers and the 'Net).
Without Trump to bring America back, there are very other few places to hide.
iamnotback
You and others have long suffered reading that Bearing Guy OROBTC loves diversification. As long as it appears that Bitcoin is free of "taint of .gov" than that BTC is indeed a great asset holding.
I do not have the time & inclination (nor even the proper skills) to go deep into the rabbit holes to determine truth of this or that. So, until further notice, BTC is a good place for me to be. Especially with, as you point out, with the odious FATCA laws. At some point, even without the USA cratering, many other countries will reject FATCA at least in part if they would welcome US investment. Unfortunately Peru may not particularly be a good candidate, as their taxation authorities have imposed hard to avoid taxation policies (via computers and the 'Net).
Without Trump to bring America back, there are very other few places to hide.
Re: FATCA will drive the world to crypto-currency
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/taxes/when-the-back-office-becomes-bigger-than-the-front-office-it-is-time-to-die/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/launching-socrates-new-payment-system/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/taxes/when-the-back-office-becomes-bigger-than-the-front-office-it-is-time-to-die/
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/launching-socrates-new-payment-system/
We also had Bill Gross recommend Bitcoin, Japan reduce tax on it, and Russia's Finance minister indicate he thinks Bitcoin may become acceptable in Russia later.
Perhaps readers need a summary to perk their interest.
The point is that if you want to sell internationally, then the payment providers are not going to be able to handle your business. You will need to accept something else. But what else?
We need a crypto-currency that is in the hands of millions and easily accessible for international commerce.
The point is that if you want to sell internationally, then the payment providers are not going to be able to handle your business. You will need to accept something else. But what else?
We need a crypto-currency that is in the hands of millions and easily accessible for international commerce.
I was a volunteer at age 26 under Perot in Ventura Country before the 1992 election. I went door-to-door talking to old ladies and anyone who would let me inside for chat. Then Perot dropped out and I swore never to waste my effort on politics again. I tried to stop Bill Clinton and NAFTA in 1992, but they just "keep coming twice as many as a while ago"...
Trump is serious. And thus he has my support.
Here is what I looked like at age 26:
Now I am twice the age.
...
If Trump wins, iamnotback, he would likely understand the value of GENIUS. He would also likely be quite favorable to productive people coming back to the USA.
He would welcome you home.
Hillary? You are for sure on a List of hers. As am I. But, we are not prepared to move to Peru just yet. It would take one HELL of a bad presidency under Hyena Rodent Klinton to push us out. But it could happen. My wife and I are already dusting off our draft of "Plan B" just in case.
Of course it would be my great preference that "CC-Resurgam" (if Trump wins) leave the USA rather than my "estrellita" and me (under Hillary).
If Trump wins, iamnotback, he would likely understand the value of GENIUS. He would also likely be quite favorable to productive people coming back to the USA.
He would welcome you home.
Hillary? You are for sure on a List of hers. As am I. But, we are not prepared to move to Peru just yet. It would take one HELL of a bad presidency under Hyena Rodent Klinton to push us out. But it could happen. My wife and I are already dusting off our draft of "Plan B" just in case.
Of course it would be my great preference that "CC-Resurgam" (if Trump wins) leave the USA rather than my "estrellita" and me (under Hillary).
Atheists, nihilists, liberals, and Clinton supporters are incapable of perceiving that they've lost control of their own thoughts and have become mind controlled zombies.
This is the end of the world underway now in the final stages. <--- Click that link. VERY IMPORTANT TO READ
I am not sure if the final stage after world war 3 will happen swiftly over 7 years, or if it will play out over a longer period of time.
I remember from the Abomination of the Desolation correlated with the birth of Israel and the peace accord with Egypt, we were able to pinpoint from the prediction in the Bible an approximate date of Jesus's return sometime around 2024 afair. Marshall Swing claimed last year to have pinpointed the year more accurately, but I am not sure if the man has all his marbles intact or not.
This is the end of the world underway now in the final stages. <--- Click that link. VERY IMPORTANT TO READ
I am not sure if the final stage after world war 3 will happen swiftly over 7 years, or if it will play out over a longer period of time.
I remember from the Abomination of the Desolation correlated with the birth of Israel and the peace accord with Egypt, we were able to pinpoint from the prediction in the Bible an approximate date of Jesus's return sometime around 2024 afair. Marshall Swing claimed last year to have pinpointed the year more accurately, but I am not sure if the man has all his marbles intact or not.
More dirt on the Clintons...
You can tell the heart of a man the way he looks after his CHILDREN?..
Now remember America you want someone to look after you so your children have a bright future?.
Well if you think HILARY will look after your children think again..Because she should of looked after this child?..
I never even knew he had a son
BANISHED - Bill Clinton's 'Son' Speaks Out - YouTube
Video for bill clintons son speaks out
https://youtu.be/1vCXWoQDO8g?t=153
If you vote for her you are crazy..I wouldn't trust her to make my child's future great?..
Now remember America you want someone to look after you so your children have a bright future?.
Well if you think HILARY will look after your children think again..Because she should of looked after this child?..
I never even knew he had a son
BANISHED - Bill Clinton's 'Son' Speaks Out - YouTube
Video for bill clintons son speaks out
https://youtu.be/1vCXWoQDO8g?t=153
If you vote for her you are crazy..I wouldn't trust her to make my child's future great?..
Jump to: