Has El Salvador’s bitcoin gamble paid off?Coffee shop owner Gabe Gutierrez said bitcoin accounts for 5% to 10% of his sales.
coffee shop in San Salvador, the capital of El Salvador, customers come for freshly made coffee and packets of high-quality beans. And some pay in bitcoin.
The cryptocurrency has been legal tender in the Central American country for more than two years. Businesses are officially required to accept bitcoin, but patchy technology, limited internet access and a lack of enforcement means that only some do.
Coffee shop owner Gabe Gutierrez believes taking bitcoin payments has helped him attract customers.
“In a normal month, 5% to 10% of our sales are in bitcoin. The business impact has been very positive in that sense,” he said. “Obviously it’s bringing in revenue, but it’s not only that. It’s more convenient.“
President Nayib Bukele argued that adopting bitcoin would reduce dependence on the country’s other currency, the U.S. dollar, and make it cheaper to send and receive remittances — when migrants send home money to their family.
source Even though it can be interesting to see what is being said about bitcoin and El Salvador from various sources (including but not limited to MarketPlace.org), yet I doubt that it is as helpful to merely cite some pieces that have ambiguous descriptions without making some of your own commentaries.
Sure, I might not even like the tone of the article, but I really don't like the title of the article ...
Sure, it may well seem like gambling when a country goes against the grain of other countries and the powers that be, but the way that El Salvador got into bitcoin seems to be way more like an investment kind of approach rather than a gamble.. even though Bukele did have a tendency to act flamboyant about his decision to push El Salvador into bitcoin in a variety of ways....
You're right JayJuanGee, it's not about bringing an article here that matters in the name of having the latest development on what's going on, the reason for discussion is to have our own various opinions regarding anything we are seing trending on the internet or about El-Savador's bitcoin adoption, this is not a story that sounds that catchy to me as well because in El-Savador, there are many business enterprises that make use of bitcoin in their payment of service or goods and bitcoin has gone far beyond just seing a coffee shop accepting bitcoin, or maybe it's also sounds to his hearing as that of the bitcoin pizza or coffee when things weren't as this in the past that led to a massive story we all love to read about with bitcoin.
We should learn to do things in the appropriate manners and also try to read to understand and present our own point of view towards the discussion.
Don't get me wrong, I don't necessarily believe that super high analytical skills are required when posting a link, but the posting of links without any kind of commentary at all seems to be just failing/refusing to engage in any kind of thinking..
The assumption would be that the poster agrees with the article, otherwise why post the article, or alternatively if the poster did not agree with the article, there could be some commentary that is even short.. such as, I disagree with the article because of x, y and z reason, but I agree with the article for a, b and c reasons.. including that the article has some pretty cool pictures contained therein or whatever... . .that would at least attempt to show why the poster believes that the link/article might be relevant to the thread beyond our having to read the article and/or the linked materials and attempt to figure it out, even if it is obvious, it does not really say anything about why the poster chose to post it.
In the actual cryptoWODL post that I cited, it is quite unclear if any of the words in the post are his words, and every word seems to be from the article/link which is another problem that many posters have in terms of citing various substantive content and it sometimes is unclear if any of the words are the words of the poster... Why should any of the readers have to click on the link to figure it out? It should already be clear from the post if the words are being quoted or if they are words of the poster.