I liken the country of El Salvador to a person whose only exit is to invest in Bitcoin and who dreams of becoming rich. El Salvador is a small country and its livelihoods are limited. It's a poor country. The country's economic wheels are working difficult as a result of natural disasters and crises.
You seem to be describing Bukele's approach to bitcoin as if it were an all or nothing strategy - like a last swing for the homerun - and that does not seem to be the case... Sure, El Salvador has given a lot of emphasis to bitcoin, yet it did not get rid of the dollar - and it also did not get rid of it's own native currency, since that had already largely taken place 20 years previously.
We might be able to concede that Bukele was coming into a situation in which the country had been driven into some bad circumstances, infrastructurally and also what seems to have been the wide-spread crime issues (and even gangs shaking down businesses and contributing to lack of confidence for any business to want to invest into El Salvador), so there are ways in which it could be characterized that Bukele is working on ways to fix the infrastructure and to stop the getting poor more quickly aspects of the prior country situation... so in that regard, bootstrapping bitcoin is likely a good thing - but there is infrastructure building that seems to be happening too.. rather than merely blindly hoping/praying that bitcoin saves El Salvador from its previous situation.
President Bukele is someone who makes sacrifices for his country and the revolution he made with Bitcoin is a proud situation for his country.
This is a more fair characterization.
Making Bitcoin a Central Bank reserve carries some dangers.
Yeah.. but that is not what seems to be happening. We do not have exact transparency into El Salvador's ways of holding BTC, yet it seems that the amount of treasuries in bitcoin is pretty damned small, relatively speaking.
There are likely ways that we could attempt to measure the many ways that El Salvador is investing into bitcoin, but if we were ONLY to look at treasuries, bitcoin is a very small part - and maybe we do need to look at a variety of ways that El Salvador is investing into bitcoin - but even El Salvador's attempt to ween itself from various debts that it holds in order to create bitcoin related debt rather than relying on various outside dollar banks such as the IMF and the world bank, so there are ways that critics like to characterize El Salvador as if it were going all in bitcoin (which is not the case), even though it seems to be fair to say that El Salvador is surely aimed at engaging in policies and investments to attempt to take back aspects of its sovereignty (through ongoing bitcoin investments and emphasis) to free itself from what it has identified as outside influences that have historically been sucking the sovereignty out of El Salvador and like countries.. and there is no reason to believe that the outside influences of those international banking institutions are striving change their behaviors and to allow El Salvador to really exist as a sovereign.
So many countries, sovereign in name ONLY, and El Salvador is employing a bit of a dance in terms of it's saying that it is exercising its sovereignty when it is choosing bitcoin and developing around bitcoin as a parallel system.
Namely Bitcoin is a volatile investment vehicle and has no stabilization. Therefore it is risky at this stage for Bitcoin to determine the fate of a country.
So what? The mere fact that bitcoin is volatile likely means that there are needs to manage position size rather than to refrain from taking a position in it.
I would consider it normal for Bukele to add Btc to its reserves in case of Bitcoin's Spot ETF approval but right now this is risky. President Bukele will write his name in history as a revolutionary in the following years.
You seem to NOT really understand what El Salvador is doing, and you seem to think that there is a need for El Salvador to fuck around with trying to time the BTC market with various short term happenings (that may or may not end up happening)..
Yeah, El Salvador likely screwed up a bit in its arrogance in the way that it was investing into bitcoin in the earlier days and suggesting that it was betting on bitcoin going to $100k in 2021 or whatever might have had been their way of framing their entrance into bitcoin, yet it seems that El Salvador had invested into bitcoin in such a way that it has been showing that it is into bitcoin in the long term rather than fucking around with various short term bitcoin happenings, and sure maybe an ETF will happen and maybe it will not, but who cares? Bitcoin is going to survive in either case, and even likely be a good long term investment, whether or not various spot ETFs are approved in the USA (that will likely pump BTC bags in the short term).