I think this way because it would make sense with the security plans which have been taken lately by Bukele to cripple the criminal organizations that historically operate in El Salvador, with less crime and more financial insentives, there is more chances for a financial/turistic Hub to form, but it may take years.
El Salvador wants to become a "crypto paradise" just to help boost its economy. I'd say Bukele's efforts are starting to pay off, as tourists are visiting the country like never before. It was pretty smart to add Bitcoin to the government's balance sheet. If BTC "explodes" in market price, El Salvador could become one of the richest countries in the world. Everything will depend how long Bukele stays in power. If he is replaced by an "Anti-Bitcoin" successor, then all efforts achieved so far will be nothing but lost.
Central banks are already failing, so it should only be a matter of time before more countries follow El Salvador's footsteps by adopting BTC as legal tender. Who knows if we're closer to "hyperbitcoinization" than we've thought before? Just my thoughts
Given how polarized can some communities be on Bitcoin, it is probable that eventually someone who would not be very friendly towards Bitcoin takes the presidency, that is why Bukele has to take very seriously his work and incentivize people not to be afraid of new technologies and opportunities to put their country in the Map and catch the attention of both tourist and investors.
Also, I believe that the price of Bitcoin would not have much of an impact in long term comparison to what a well developed touristic industry, investor-friendly and crime free society can do for the future of the people of El Salvador. We are talking about macro-economics after all, the realized profits from speculation can help but the development of whole industries is what make countries great.
Bitcoin still seems to serve as a great talking-point in order to attempt to facilitate sound money kinds of ideas.. and responsibility and a lot of the things that go along with sound money as compared with the various shallow values that seem to go along with fiat money, debt and also fake pumpenings of systems to make it appear as if there is value when the values do not have a sound basis, except that it is using money borrowed from the future to make it look like the present is sound when it is not..
So I don't know.. if it is fair to say that bitcoin all by itself is not doing it, even though technically you are probably correct, yet a real true attempt at bitcoin does seems to facilitate stronger talking points over various aspects of our current status quo systems that are imploding upon themselves because of the extent of the debt that continues to be allowed to build and the failure/refusal to incentivize sound values (which seems to be what bitcoin does).