Topic: Electric Vehicles (Read 8117 times)

Honda Is Futuristic Inovativ for electric car vehicle.. its most famos in the world

Edwin Gray made an electric motor that used far less electricity than other electric motors. At times his motor produced more electricity than was needed to make it run. See http://free-energy.ws/edwin-gray/. Google "Edwin Gray motor."

i have not your pic post
but iam interest to electric verihicles

my nearest charging point is about 60km away so it wouldn't be very practical to have one but i like the idea of them. however if it's for environmental reasons you'd be doing the world much more of a favour by buying an old car and keeping it on the road forever. i hate to think of the amount of filth and waste produced making a new electric vehicle.

what i'd really like is something like a self driving uber that you order and shows up at your door. i don't like driving any more and i'd prefer to be reading a book or staring out of the window. i think it's gonna be here sooner than we expect.

I am not fan of electric vehicles, but i like everything new anyway.

Even Tesla's SUV is now faster than a Lamborghini http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-08-23/tesla-releases-world-s-fastest-production-car-0-to-60-in-2-5-seconds?utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-business

I 'd love if electric vehicles become part of public trasnsport

I will get one , i want it.

It's definitely imperfect, but electric vehicles are more fuel efficient to operate. Electric motors are far more efficient at power transmission than combustion engines (though rotary engines can come close), and even counting the cost of charging them, tend to consume less fuel than a traditional vehicle. It's not orders of magnitude better, it's at best an incremental improvement. But as interest grows, I think that power generation by less intrusive and more decentralized means will become more popular. I see them as a step in a positive direction, rather than a solution by themselves.

Also, most have things like regenerative braking that extends the battery charge cycle.

I'm not sure on what electronic vehicles actually do?
Carbon Dioxide and other things such as sulphur dioxide are released by the combustion of the fuel to make the car, so unless you fit it with solar panels (which are expensive and a 60kW solar panel is more expensive than some electric cars)!
Also, if you get a flat battery, you can't get it to start as easily, you either need a spare battery or another erson with a full battery to help you and destroy their battery in the process (over time)!

I like to here how engine works, don't appriciate electric vehicles...

i read that in Norway they gonna ban non electric vehicles, ou would still be able to drive it if you bought it before, but to buy one in Norway, because of eco concerns. I think it is a bit severs law, but they are serious about it.

Im going to buy electic car in the future when i got some money. But it seems they are not gonna release this in my country cause of high electricty charge. But its very good tho. Its eco friendly, no pollution and no noise. Petroleum is the main source of energy of any vehicles in my country. Hopefully this vehicles can be available soon here.

I want this Sway trike.

http://electricmotorcycleclub.com/sway-electric-motorcycle-trike-shark-tank/

Need more BTC. 

What's up with you guys and the illuminati? Next thing I will hear is that the illuminati will not allow you to poop because they can't make money out of it!

I have a bit of a quibble here. I'm in favor of electric vehicles, and not too opposed to fuel burners. But the planet is just fine. It was here before us, and it will be here after we're part of the fossil record.

The problem is saving ourselves, and current lifeforms on this planet. And of course, getting off of it.

The Arab nations do not have near as much influence on this as the 'western' nations, to be honest. They have a lot of petroleum, and they use it to enrich themselves. But, given the necessity and continuing growth of polymer use, oil used as fuel is wasteful, not just because of the environmental concerns. To my mind, it's far more valuable for everything it's used for EXCEPT fuel.

The large energy conglomerates resist change because they (wrongly) think it will hurt them, and (rightly) that it will reduce their ability to control things and people. For something as high tech as oil refinement and it's associated disciplines, they're an incredibly luddite group.

If they were to switch to renewable fuels, such as ethanol (just one possibility) and various blends of vegetable oils and such for general fueling, the cost would actually be on par with that of refining crude oil. The changeover would be very expensive, but not prohibitively so, and they would in a decade be able to produce more fuel at lower cost than with the current paradigm. They'd come off as heros. However, this is not easy, simple, or without risk, and those are the things they look at.

Further, they fear (rightly) that people will figure out that they can make these fuels themselves, for their own needs, at relatively low expense. They fear decentralization even more than the banks do.

Electric vehicles do almost nothing to address that. They are perceived as environmentally freindly (a debateable proposition), but they still require the consumption of fuels elsewhere to charge the batteries. This is not, as noted above, and unsolvable problem, but it's one that the energy conglomerates can kick down the road as long as the PERCEPTION of lower emissions is in place.

To my mind, electric vehicles are a step in the right direction, but only part of a comprehensive solution. Electric motors are vastly more efficient at transmission of force than gasoline motors, but their energy consumption is actually somewhat higher. As electric vehicles continue to be develooped, that inefficiency is coming closer to parity, and likely will eventually exceed the efficiency of gasoline engines. It has already exceeded the efficiencies of ethanol/methanol conversions (though that too, is underdeveloped).

In any event, breaking the stranglehold that the energy conglomerates currently have is not going to happen because of the rising popularity of electric vehicles. It affects them not at all, or positively because of the requirement for more electrical power.

Decentralization of the power grids is a much more useful approach to fixing the massive environmental problems of the current paradigm, and it's doable. But it requires people at large to get educated, get smart, and start building shit. Slogans and bandaids are NOT going to fix the problems.

Electric vehicles are future and one of the ways to save the planet. They would be in much more massive use by now if there wasn't so much money involved regarding oil and strong influence of rich Arab countries whose existance depends on oil.

We could utilize more renewable sources of energy so we aren't using primary sources of energy like fossil fuels.

It's said that these vehicules are environment friends but I think if all people will use them so electricity demand will increase as well as the energy needed to provide it (with all its emissions and problems)...
So, it's better to optimize the primary energy sources.

When first electric cars came out, some people were conserned about blind people being unable to know these cars were comming. Some people proposed that these cars should emit a sound similar to convensional cars.

But now that cars have automatic pilots and stuff, it became kind of irrelevant...