Topic: ==== Eligius, please pay my 200+ BTC ==== - page 6. (Read 12592 times)

Blasphemy...1st popcorn, then gummy bears, finally snow caps.

Wait....were we dealing with something important in this thread?

Oh, yeah that was it....Coke or Pepsi?

-Dave

Go for the Snow Caps next!

That's like saying that if someone wins the lottery 5 times in a row there is no real proof that they are cheating.

The funny thing is that he keeps asking for this 225 BTC for the few days he mined at Eligius after fixing whatever issue there may have been, but does say he'll return the the 429 BTC, as evidenced here http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17JkL94B2ngJg4QQZuiozDQjnxXB6B7yTc, that he was paid during between mid-March and May 3 while only finding two blocks.  And for anyone interested, more information in this post, https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7301154.

There is sufficient proof to easily hold up in a criminal court case, IMO.

Yea this is ridiculous.

Not only that but noone has any real proof of any of this.

whew...I'm stuffed on popcorn...this is getting good 

Yeah I imagine that or something very like it would be sufficient. Putting an expiration on the signature like that isn't a bad idea, either.

I wonder if the Eligius guys have your BruceXIE's somewhere... Maybe they should just turn it over to the authorities?  Seems like fraud, deceptive practices etc.

Brucexie,

Please pay me the 100 BTC I was cheated out of while mining at BTCGuild due to your 'defective' equipment.
1NGEBWTYndRkxTLVBuMcvJg2hJ3oURhdy8

After payment is received, I will be happy to support your claims against Eligius.

Because other than the obvious evidence you've spent the last hour or so claiming to be the owner and refreshing BTCTalk constantly to reply to various comments about what you should or should not do or should or should not have done, we have absolutely no reason to believe you are the true and rightful owner of the mined coins, or representing the owner of the mined coins.

Even ignoring the Eligius and BTCGuild accusations, for all we know, you are some random person wanting to troll us into thinking you have a claim on the lost coins. We have no reason to believe you have a right to speak for the owner of those two addresses. And frankly, without cryptographic proof, I don't believe you own either address. Nor should anyone else. This seems to be obvious to everyone but yourself at the moment, so I'm recommending you provide proof to add to the veracity of your claims.

If you need help and you want to make sure you're not doing anything risky, it is recommended you address names and locations and even dates when signing, so that others cannot just copy the message and paste it elsewhere attempting to prove to be you at a later date or time. Aside from that, for the purposes of verification, almost any signed message is sufficient as long as includes the claim in question (that you own both addresses). For example here's something you would NOT want to sign:


If you only signed that, then anyone who receives a copy can copy/paste it to any of their friends and attempt to claim to be you. So instead you should include details that link your BTCTalk account to the addresses. You can also specify date so that if someone tries to copy it, it'll look weird.

The following message should be safe to sign and post publicly for anyone to see (you can sign it with either address):

My government loves people who buy its electricity very much, especially who product no pollution.
bitcoin mining industry is one of them.

Anyone, who claim that he has enough authority to investigate into this thing, and think that refusal to give this signature is a block issue of such investigation, can PM/reply to me, and I give signature to him instantly.

My hunch is your government is just looking for reasons to shut down larger bitcoin mining operations.  I could be wrong though.

I explained why I don't want to make such proof in this post.
If you want's to buy something from me, and wants to pay to these address, I can help sign a message.

Every eligius block is tagged with "Eligius" ..

Because your refusal to answer most questions weakens your argument.  And producing a message signed by one or both of the addresses in question costs you nothing, and reveals nothing.  It would simply prove that you do in fact have standing to speak as (or on behalf of) the owner of those addresses.

For all we know, you could be just be a troll with no relation at all to this issue, other than you saw an opportunity to mess with us.  (And if so....  :slow clap:  Well played. :slow clap:)



grnbrg.

Here:

In that case you will be put in jail instantly.
Smart lawyer works everytime.