Pages:
Author

Topic: eMunie - page 6. (Read 6632 times)

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
July 22, 2013, 10:54:31 AM
#85
But what if i dont want to fork it?  Can't i just make a change to the current code without forking it? Is there a procedure i have to follow to do this?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
‘Try to be nice’
July 22, 2013, 10:37:31 AM
#84
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.

We use them because they're part of the existing financial system. I can pay my bills straight from my bank. It's easy to explain my bank account on my taxes. Everyone accepts Paypal.

Bitcoin (and altcoins) aren't part of the existing financial system. (If I ever make big profits in Bitcoin, I dread figuring out how I'm supposed to list it on my taxes.) But I still bother with Bitcoin because it's a truly decentralized solution that no one is in control of. There's no chance of some company changing their terms of service and closing my account. There's no chance someone is going to suddenly change the minting rate and make mine worthless. There's no chance that my funds will be seized by mistake, or a system error on a bank's part out of my control leaves me unable to access it for a while. There isn't going to be a buggy mandatory Bitcoin update ever.

If you make a new altcoin without the decentralized part, why should anyone bother? There are already many solutions like banks and Paypal that aren't decentralized and are already extremely well integrated with the existing financial frameworks.

So im a developer who has a great improvement for bitcoin, i am able to take the source code add in my improvement and then release it for people to start using?

I'm not in this argument either way , but yes technically you can , and if more people use your client than the existing client I understand that you will fork the blockchain no ?   Has this not happened many times ?
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Independent Analyst
July 22, 2013, 10:04:59 AM
#83
Funny how some individuals here try to undermine emunie, because they know it's such an evolved system from Bitcoin, that once it's open source (which means a grown beast that can tackle hunting on its own, not just baby needing nurture) it will blow every single crypto currency currently in existence out of the radar.

I bet while these trolls moan and whine here, the same time they are probably lurking around emunie forum under different usernames... pathetic.

Are you saying the only reason anyone would criticize this is because they're scared of how good it is?


lol

They are trying to protect their "precious" stash of BTC/LTC, because when emunie succeeds, Bitcoin will be history.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Still the Best 1973
July 22, 2013, 10:03:57 AM
#82
Funny how some individuals here try to undermine emunie, because they know it's such an evolved system from Bitcoin, that once it's open source (which means a grown beast that can tackle hunting on its own, not just baby needing nurture) it will blow every single crypto currency currently in existence out of the radar.

I bet while these trolls moan and whine here, the same time they are probably lurking around emunie forum under different usernames... pathetic.

Are you saying the only reason anyone would criticize this is because they're scared of how good it is?


lol

My momma always said that the only reason people make fun of me is because they're jealous.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 22, 2013, 09:59:18 AM
#81
Funny how some individuals here try to undermine emunie, because they know it's such an evolved system from Bitcoin, that once it's open source (which means a grown beast that can tackle hunting on its own, not just baby needing nurture) it will blow every single crypto currency currently in existence out of the radar.

I bet while these trolls moan and whine here, the same time they are probably lurking around emunie forum under different usernames... pathetic.

Are you saying the only reason anyone would criticize this is because they're scared of how good it is?


lol
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Independent Analyst
July 22, 2013, 09:55:02 AM
#80
Funny how some individuals here try to undermine emunie, because they know it's such an evolved system from Bitcoin, that once it's open source (which means a grown beast that can tackle hunting on its own, not just baby needing nurture) it will blow every single crypto currency currently in existence out of the radar.

I bet while these trolls moan and whine here, the same time they are probably lurking around emunie forum under different usernames... pathetic.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
July 22, 2013, 07:55:03 AM
#79
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.

We use them because they're part of the existing financial system. I can pay my bills straight from my bank. It's easy to explain my bank account on my taxes. Everyone accepts Paypal.

Bitcoin (and altcoins) aren't part of the existing financial system. (If I ever make big profits in Bitcoin, I dread figuring out how I'm supposed to list it on my taxes.) But I still bother with Bitcoin because it's a truly decentralized solution that no one is in control of. There's no chance of some company changing their terms of service and closing my account. There's no chance someone is going to suddenly change the minting rate and make mine worthless. There's no chance that my funds will be seized by mistake, or a system error on a bank's part out of my control leaves me unable to access it for a while. There isn't going to be a buggy mandatory Bitcoin update ever.

If you make a new altcoin without the decentralized part, why should anyone bother? There are already many solutions like banks and Paypal that aren't decentralized and are already extremely well integrated with the existing financial frameworks.

So im a developer who has a great improvement for bitcoin, i am able to take the source code add in my improvement and then release it for people to start using?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 22, 2013, 06:53:02 AM
#78
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.

We use them because they're part of the existing financial system. I can pay my bills straight from my bank. It's easy to explain my bank account on my taxes. Everyone accepts Paypal.

Bitcoin (and altcoins) aren't part of the existing financial system. (If I ever make big profits in Bitcoin, I dread figuring out how I'm supposed to list it on my taxes.) But I still bother with Bitcoin because it's a truly decentralized solution that no one is in control of. There's no chance of some company changing their terms of service and closing my account. There's no chance someone is going to suddenly change the minting rate and make mine worthless. There's no chance that my funds will be seized by mistake, or a system error on a bank's part out of my control leaves me unable to access it for a while. There isn't going to be a buggy mandatory Bitcoin update ever.

If you make a new altcoin without the decentralized part, why should anyone bother? There are already many solutions like banks and Paypal that aren't decentralized and are already extremely well integrated with the existing financial frameworks.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
July 22, 2013, 06:26:51 AM
#77
He never said eMunie was going to compete with banks or PayPal. He is saying those are closed source systems but you use them.


Lohoris i see u dodged the ripple question?
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
July 22, 2013, 05:15:21 AM
#76
So eMunie is intending to compete with banks and Paypal? Bitcoin only got nearly as far as it did because it's decentralized. Bitcoin isn't very legally tied with the existing banking systems. If you're going to remove Bitcoin's real advantage while also being in its legal gray area... good luck.
Exactly.

But he's a PR troll so he'll keep finding excuses, dodging the real problems, and flooding us with bullshit.
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1023
July 22, 2013, 01:00:24 AM
#75
ripple for better or worse has shown closed source can have some value.....even though the float is small

I thus think there is room for Emunie with closed source for a not insubstantial number of people.
I also think Emunie will go open source long before an more surely than XRP
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
July 22, 2013, 12:10:48 AM
#74
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out:
Quote
The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
blah blah blah lies and misdirection.

decentralised = no single points of failure, can be replicated indefinitely.

as long as it's closed source, it has a single point of failure.

so, stfu.


Please tell me how you refuse to use a bank, credit card, debit card, or Paypal.

If you think you are fooling anyone, think again.

You think you are a part of something great and part of a 'cool' team? You are not. We fix problems with or without some nobodies approval, whether that includes someone of a lower IQ such as yours, or even someone that may have a higher IQ that you will not be able to have a running conversation with.

So, please go do some reading and until then, stfu Wink

So eMunie is intending to compete with banks and Paypal? Bitcoin only got nearly as far as it did because it's decentralized. Bitcoin isn't very legally tied with the existing banking systems. If you're going to remove Bitcoin's real advantage while also being in its legal gray area... good luck.
legendary
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
July 21, 2013, 10:30:23 PM
#73
No one ever said it's going to be closed source forever, shall I make it bold and clear that it's ONLY CLOSED_SOURCE FOR 12 MONTHS?
Then it is centralised, hence totally pointless, for 12 months.
Come back in 12 months, thanks.


I'm sorry didn't you try your own ripple gateway? Isn't ripple still closed source?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2025557


oh wait you failed? awwww so a bitter troll.....no wonder you hate so much.

So now we all know why you're such a self proclaimed expert on single points of failure, you stare at one everyday..... Shocked
sr. member
Activity: 383
Merit: 250
July 21, 2013, 10:18:02 PM
#72
when will start that eMoonie?
sr. member
Activity: 436
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
July 21, 2013, 10:01:41 PM
#71
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out:
Quote
The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
blah blah blah lies and misdirection.

decentralised = no single points of failure, can be replicated indefinitely.

as long as it's closed source, it has a single point of failure.

so, stfu.


Please tell me how you refuse to use a bank, credit card, debit card, or Paypal.

If you think you are fooling anyone, think again.

You think you are a part of something great and part of a 'cool' team? You are not. We fix problems with or without some nobodies approval, whether that includes someone of a lower IQ such as yours, or even someone that may have a higher IQ that you will not be able to have a running conversation with.

So, please go do some reading and until then, stfu Wink
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Independent Analyst
July 21, 2013, 09:13:13 PM
#70
he calls wikipedians liers... no pointing talking sense with this guy..  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
July 21, 2013, 06:58:44 PM
#69
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out:
Quote
The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
blah blah blah lies and misdirection.

decentralised = no single points of failure, can be replicated indefinitely.

as long as it's closed source, it has a single point of failure.

so, stfu.


Didn't u try to set up some sort of exchange for ripple?  So u against closed source unless u can make some money with it?
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Bitgoblin
July 21, 2013, 05:33:15 PM
#68
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out:
Quote
The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
blah blah blah lies and misdirection.

decentralised = no single points of failure, can be replicated indefinitely.

as long as it's closed source, it has a single point of failure.

so, stfu.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Independent Analyst
July 21, 2013, 03:08:06 PM
#67
Cough, cough... for those claiming they know what "decentralised" means, I shall point this out:
Quote
The meaning of decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is applied...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
sr. member
Activity: 588
Merit: 250
July 20, 2013, 02:50:12 PM
#66
no source code available? forget it
Pages:
Jump to: