Author

Topic: [ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 148. (Read 303553 times)

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
From what I've seen, spooky minimum quota is 3 (I'm not entirely sure on this one though, I could be completely wrong and it probably depends on what those three are, if one of them is to say you want to halt all trades you've been doing recently due to personal circumstances, darkstar_ goes through everyone's post history enough to see it and probably allow some leniancey on the removal of your place here).
Someone had about 3 posts every week for a month I think before darkstar kicked them. There's not much point in you taking up someone else's slot if you're not going to make that many posts here.

There is no minimum. If you post three posts every week, and they're mediocre, then you'll get removed eventually. If you post three really good posts a week, that's fine with me.

With the issue of there being 59 spaces (and not 60), this i due to the original campaign wanting to take 55 people. There were then 4 people of greater trust that got accepted here (or a bit of darkstar indecision between some great posters) so the spots were extended to beyond maximum capacity.


There's technically 55 spots but I have permission to increase the spots available if needed.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828

...
I only noticed this signature campaign about a month ago. I will patiently wait until someone gets kicked off. I like the terms of this campaign because there is no post quota. Although I am a rather prolific poster, I don't like the pressure of having to post 20+ posts a week in certain sections, or face getting paid nothing at all. I wish more campaigns were run like this.

I agree with you but while it would be nicely convenient for posters, it probably isn't as great for the promoters. If you can make good posts, but you're more casual, and another user makes posts of equal or maybe even less quality but posts a lot more than you, I'm pretty sure the latter is more attractive from a promoter standpoint. So while we can only wish there are more lenient campaigns like this one, there probably won't, hell even for this one, I'm sure if you post below (a hidden minimum) quota for long enough you'd probably lose your spot..

But in the mean time, if I only post 1 qualifying post, I would get paid 70K sats. Not zero. Also, many signature campaign participants post absolute garbage or plagiarized content in order to meet their quotas. It's a constant battle. It's why the merit system was introduced in the first place. Also, if someone is posting absolute garbage, I am likely to stop reading and move on to the next post and don't even notice the banner underneath the post. In many threads, where I see post after post of garbage, I just move on to another thread and miss any possible gold flecks.
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
I agree with you but while it would be nicely convenient for posters, it probably isn't as great for the promoters. If you can make good posts, but you're more casual, and another user makes posts of equal or maybe even less quality but posts a lot more than you, I'm pretty sure the latter is more attractive from a promoter standpoint. So while we can only wish there are more lenient campaigns like this one, there probably won't, hell even for this one, I'm sure if you post below (a hidden minimum) quota for long enough you'd probably lose your spot..

From what I've seen, spooky minimum quota is 3 (I'm not entirely sure on this one though, I could be completely wrong and it probably depends on what those three are, if one of them is to say you want to halt all trades you've been doing recently due to personal circumstances, darkstar_ goes through everyone's post history enough to see it and probably allow some leniancey on the removal of your place here).
Someone had about 3 posts every week for a month I think before darkstar kicked them. There's not much point in you taking up someone else's slot if you're not going to make that many posts here.
I think the average is probably somewhere between 10-30 (I haven't checked the spreadsheet recently so can't be sure).

If you're a legendary who has been here for a while, that means there's at least 750 posts out there with your signature on them, one of thos posts is probably most likely in a topic where it will be seen by other people (a lot of guests will search stuff and come accross certain things, such as, if someone like me stopped posting in the technical support boards and someone did a google search for the forum for that specific issue they'd then see my thread and see the "chipmixer" signature). Similarly, someone like TheQuin would have his signature in the freebitco.in thread quite a lot so someone going "hmmm, lets try some gambling but the casino is illegal in my country and I did kc on an exchange to get the money" will see thequin's signature and think "aha! I'll use that to obfuscate my transactions" - a lot of people use bitcoin mixers, some people in trading probably use it to hide a strategy they have that's quite profitible for example so the exchange won't block it (or shouldn't) because they're stil getting their fee...


With the issue of there being 59 spaces (and not 60), this i due to the original campaign wanting to take 55 people. There were then 4 people of greater trust that got accepted here (or a bit of darkstar indecision between some great posters) so the spots were extended to beyond maximum capacity.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 452
Check your coin privilege

...
I only noticed this signature campaign about a month ago. I will patiently wait until someone gets kicked off. I like the terms of this campaign because there is no post quota. Although I am a rather prolific poster, I don't like the pressure of having to post 20+ posts a week in certain sections, or face getting paid nothing at all. I wish more campaigns were run like this.

I agree with you but while it would be nicely convenient for posters, it probably isn't as great for the promoters. If you can make good posts, but you're more casual, and another user makes posts of equal or maybe even less quality but posts a lot more than you, I'm pretty sure the latter is more attractive from a promoter standpoint. So while we can only wish there are more lenient campaigns like this one, there probably won't, hell even for this one, I'm sure if you post below (a hidden minimum) quota for long enough you'd probably lose your spot..
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
@Coolcryptovator,
As well, you really don't need someone to die in order to try your luck and take their place. Make your own stand and achieve/earn it. You don't really need to rely upon someone's removal from the campaign to ^win their position", there are specifics already mentioned in OP that you can join if you're trustworthy. Another part is "total amount of users allowed to be enrolled", and I didn't found a post but there's something like there used to be 50-55 participants only who were allowed to join (in terms of number) but the number increased because there are many high quality posters whom Darkstar_ couldn't ignore. Wink

I don't think the term "trustworthy" means someone who simply has a good post history. I thought trustworthy meant you go above and beyond that. Perhaps by establishing a very good trust rating or being a DT member. Also, I think being a staff member in good standing also could qualify. Perhaps my interpretation is wrong. I will be honest, I only noticed this signature campaign about a month ago. I will patiently wait until someone gets kicked off. I like the terms of this campaign because there is no post quota. Although I am a rather prolific poster, I don't like the pressure of having to post 20+ posts a week in certain sections, or face getting paid nothing at all. I wish more campaigns were run like this.
legendary
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1273
Apologies for inconvenience. I appreciate your comment's.  Once I sent PM to manager I didn't checked spreadsheet, I was just checking that and clicked a user. Unfortunately he had got red tag last day, that's the reason for my application here. Sorry again

A reply through a quote:
I keep watching this signature campaign from some time but is always full. Tried to apply via PM some time ago but I am not a very trusted member of the community and my application was rejected.

I have a few questions and if anybody can answer, I will be grateful.

Shall I apply once again in this thread and wait for approval? Is there a waiting queue? If there is a free slot how the new particpant is determined?

The best way probably is to check on Sunday. Payments (and removals) are generally done at the same time, which is some time on Saturday. I generally keep applications open until Monday or Tuesday. There's no waiting queue.

My selection criteria is based on a few things:
- Whether your posts will actually be read/seen
- Post quality
- Trust/recognition
- Sections you post in

Sending a PM to DarkStar_ does not improve your chances. In fact, it may even make your future opportunities worse. I signed up, the last time it opened. But I was not considered on the second list/phase. Cry Grin

Not being on my "second phase list" doesn't mean your post quality is bad. It's just that there's such a large number of people who have good quality that I have to be more picky in an attempt to narrow it down.

@Coolcryptovator,
As well, you really don't need someone to die in order to try your luck and take their place. Make your own stand and achieve/earn it. You don't really need to rely upon someone's removal from the campaign to ^win their position", there are specifics already mentioned in OP that you can join if you're trustworthy. Another part is "total amount of users allowed to be enrolled", and I didn't found a post but there's something like there used to be 50-55 participants only who were allowed to join (in terms of number) but the number increased because there are many high quality posters whom Darkstar_ couldn't ignore. Wink
copper member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
Bit of an odd rule if you ask me. It should be require two members as often these things are handbags at dawn between individuals.

Campiagn managers usually apply some sort of cooling off period for this thing based on my experiecne of waht I've seen on th forum. Sometimes a week or two or a mongh to see if the user reduces the negative (i.e someone gives a countering positive or he negative is removed).
HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4361
Just noticed HabBear has got negative trust from OgNasty yesterday. According to rules perhaps he will remove from signature.
Bit of an odd rule if you ask me. It should be require two members as often these things are handbags at dawn between individuals.

You don't say? Roll Eyes
Quote
Trusted feedback

User   Date   Risked BTC amount   Reference   Comments
suchmoon   2018-11-21   0.00000000         This is a counter to OgNasty's negative. Once again Og is negging someone for saying things he doesn't like. Ignore his feedback and mine.
OgNasty   2018-11-20   0.00000000   Reference   Alleging that nonnakip is an alt of mine with no evidence. Claiming I pat myself on the back by giving nonnakip credit for his achievements. Was given a long time and multiple chances to issue apology for being wrong.
hero member
Activity: 2184
Merit: 531
Of course, not my business and this is Darkstar_'s decision but...hilariousandco is right, give the man at least a few mourning days till Saturday, for god's sake!!!

Mourn? It's a bonus payment for forum posts not some important career matter. You get kicked you find another one.
He must really want in if he checks user profiles for trust and infringements always ready to take their spots. An interesting individual no doubt.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science

BTC Address (must be SegWit): 1K7NeCvEu9TU1drBPgA6dby3NP8enyfBJt


At least remove the "must be segwit" text Wink

Segwit are the addresses starting with 3 (compatible) and bch (fullsegwit)
They allow you to use cheaper transaction fees

I suggest you get a wallet that supports it, and use the compatible one.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1218
Change is in your hands
Quote
Apologies for inconvenience. I appreciate your comment's.  Once I sent PM to manager I didn't checked spreadsheet, I was just checking that and clicked a user. Unfortunately he had got red tag last day, that's the reason for my application here. Sorry again

Lol, you don't have to apologize for anything. You did nothing wrong...
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 2226
Signature space for rent
Would you jump in his grave as fast?
"Ahh yes, time for the daily trust check-up routine!"
Dug it, and danced on it with Badbear's boots. Ruthless.
You've just become Sr Member and thus eligible for one slot
A grave that pays handsomely, I wouldn't waste a second to jump in Tongue

Apologies for inconvenience. I appreciate your comment's.  Once I sent PM to manager I didn't checked spreadsheet, I was just checking that and clicked a user. Unfortunately he had got red tag last day, that's the reason for my application here. Sorry again
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1218
Change is in your hands
Quote
Would you jump in his grave as fast?

A grave that pays handsomely, I wouldn't waste a second to jump in Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
~

You've just become Sr Member and thus eligible for one slot (no more slut puns this time as it's not the right mood fot those), you've checked profiles for possible rule breakers, sent a pm to Darkstar_ (?) and managed to post a non-segwit address with your application in just one day?
Quite the busy bee.


Of course, not my business and this is Darkstar_'s decision but...hilariousandco is right, give the man at least a few mourning days till Saturday, for god's sake!!!



legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 2037
Would you jump in his grave as fast?

Dug it, and danced on it with HabBear's boots. Ruthless.



sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 452
Check your coin privilege

Would you jump in his grave as fast?

I wasn't going to mention it but your post cracked me up a second time.

The spreadshet has fifty-nine members. I just couldn't help a hysteric laughter when I read that post because I imagined him wake up every morning going like : "Ahh yes, time for the daily trust check-up routine!"
global moderator
Activity: 3990
Merit: 2717
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Just noticed HabBear has got negative trust from OgNasty yesterday. According to rules perhaps he will remove from signature.


4. Getting negative trust from DT2+ or spamming will cause you to be removed without payment.

Although I send PM to manager morning(after upgrade my rank) but I wasn't aware about red tag of old participant.  

I would like to try my luck. On addition all of merit by earn I joined forum after implemented merit system. Hope manager will consider me.


Username: Coolcryptovator
Post Count: 1443 ( include this post )
BTC Address (must be SegWit): 1K7NeCvEu9TU1drBPgA6dby3NP8enyfBJt

Edit: Apologies for SegWit address, I haven't used it. If this is must required then I will create if accepted and recommend by manager. I will update signature if accepted.

Thanks




Would you jump in his grave as fast?
legendary
Activity: 3234
Merit: 5637
Blackjack.fun-Free Raffle-Join&Win $50🎲
Just noticed HabBear has got negative trust from OgNasty yesterday. According to rules perhaps he will remove from signature...

Hi DarkStar_,
Here's my application for your consideration...

Even if one member is got red trust from DT member it does not automatically mean that there is free spot in this campaign, especially if it is marked as FULL. Posting applications before campaign manager announce a free spot actually does not make sense, except in case of exceptional user as stated in campaign rules.

Quote
Note: If the campaign is full, but you are a very trusted member of the community, feel free to apply. I recommend PMing me to get a faster response. Those who obviously do not meet the requirements may be blocked/blacklisted.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 452
Check your coin privilege
Bit of an odd rule if you ask me. It should be require two members as often these things are handbag at dawn between individuals.
No matter what the reason is, red trust on an account doesn't look good on ChipMixer.

It's true I guess, it works just like a brand. No one wants to be affiliated with a potentially harmful member. The cause of the red trust might be completely subjective, but if someone indeed starts abusing it, he eventually will get punished himself. Karma goes around as they say.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
Bit of an odd rule if you ask me. It should be require two members as often these things are handbag at dawn between individuals.
No matter what the reason is, red trust on an account doesn't look good on ChipMixer.
Jump to: