[ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 190.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Payments for this week have been sent. Here's the payment transaction: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/d16610fca378cd2a38eb99c91d969ade551228129f1c0ff850c94bd65a3bb0a5

Quote from: AdolfinWolf on January 20, 2018, 09:00:46 AM

I'm changing to Segwit aswell.

New adress,

Code:

bc1qmqz93sjvdxdnnacplrgn0lzun05tzjumklnlnp

I can't sign a message from my previous adress, as it belonged to Poloniex.com, however if you want i'd be able to sign a message from one of my adresses i staked months ago.

Updated, thanks for making the switch.

AdolfinWolf

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1427

I'm changing to Segwit aswell.

New adress,

Code:

bc1qmqz93sjvdxdnnacplrgn0lzun05tzjumklnlnp

I can't sign a message from my previous adress, as it belonged to Poloniex.com, however if you want i'd be able to sign a message from one of my adresses i staked months ago.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: BitHodler on January 18, 2018, 09:50:08 AM

bc1qxw7gmjzf5neuuryugqd03sc4k863ad3unsdk53

That's my SegWit contribution. I moved the funds from the non SegWit address to the SegWit address, which should be a confirming factor.

Updated, thanks for making the switch. For future reference, this is the transaction that sweeps all non SegWit funds.

Quote from: Stedsm on January 18, 2018, 07:54:05 AM

Here's my signed message for an update to my address:

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Stedsm updating his legacy BTC address 19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv to his new bech32 address bc1qw9jzfa0wyjflxlq9e9cuyy6gj32hwcmzsxftn5
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Bitcoin address: 19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv
Signature: HyhqLKOKa2evKHh6jzBR+wp+FpTW4s/ArxP+Kabxt4B8RLR8GJhJj6VfRc+L74Bdemjm1rnXjoU+26+ekVg5Ss8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Please confirm and update, thanks.

Updated, thanks for making the switch.

BitHodler

legendary

Activity: 1526

Merit: 1179

bc1qxw7gmjzf5neuuryugqd03sc4k863ad3unsdk53

That's my SegWit contribution. I moved the funds from the non SegWit address to the SegWit address, which should be a confirming factor.

Stedsm

legendary

Activity: 3052

Merit: 1273

Here's my signed message for an update to my address:

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Stedsm updating his legacy BTC address 19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv to his new bech32 address bc1qw9jzfa0wyjflxlq9e9cuyy6gj32hwcmzsxftn5
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Bitcoin address: 19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv
Signature: HyhqLKOKa2evKHh6jzBR+wp+FpTW4s/ArxP+Kabxt4B8RLR8GJhJj6VfRc+L74Bdemjm1rnXjoU+26+ekVg5Ss8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Please confirm and update, thanks.

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: cellard on January 16, 2018, 12:48:31 PM

Quote from: 1Referee on January 16, 2018, 08:34:13 AM

Not even the more popular block explorers seem to allow me to look for my address. Roll Eyes

I am new to segwit and became confused today about if the address should or shouldn't show up, it turns it was just block explorers not being up to date with things, but the good news is I found out you can use btc.com to look for bech32 addresses, I tried my address and it shows up so it seems to be working fine?

I am not entirely certain on this, but if you put in the legacy version of a segwit address (changing a "bc1" or "3" at the beginning to a "1").
As old daemon wallet versions are supposed to be able to handle transactions ONCE THEY ARE CONFIRMED. Though it would depend on the architecture of the block explorer and may return a " can't decode output/input/transaction error"

cellard

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1252

Quote from: 1Referee on January 16, 2018, 08:34:13 AM

Not even the more popular block explorers seem to allow me to look for my address. Roll Eyes

I am new to segwit and became confused today about if the address should or shouldn't show up, it turns it was just block explorers not being up to date with things, but the good news is I found out you can use btc.com to look for bech32 addresses, I tried my address and it shows up so it seems to be working fine?

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 15, 2018, 04:19:00 PM

Quote from: Pursuer on January 15, 2018, 03:20:23 AM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2018, 11:50:21 AM

No worries, it will only become a requirement either never, or some time after Bitcoin Core supports it in a new version.

encouraging people to use SegWit is good but using it should always be optional. it was opt-in after all.

True, but is there any reason not to use it? Not really, given that nested addresses are backwards compatible, and offer almost the same benefits as bech32. Either way, it probably won't become an requirement.

I disagree with that. You should slowly force adoption for the sake of the network. This campaign is optional for people, Segwit doesn't have to be. For example, today is the last day that I allow legacy addresses.

Quote from: 1Referee on January 16, 2018, 08:34:13 AM

It's a shame that barely any service has adopted Segwit yet.

Encapsulated Segwit support != bech32 support. Even Core does not have many of the features for bech32 (e.g. sign/verify message) and most of the software is directly using it or based on it.

1Referee

legendary

Activity: 2170

Merit: 1427

I have updated Electrum, and have directly generated myself a Segwit address to be part of the Segwit squad. Cool

Code:

bc1qmstu82u22rhf5carza9052skyr8ar83c4f4g3e

It's a shame that barely any service has adopted Segwit yet. Not even the more popular block explorers seem to allow me to look for my address. Roll Eyes

darkangel11

legendary

Activity: 2478

Merit: 1360

Don't let others control your BTC -> self custody

Sure, signing with the old address is optional, especially if your account is not in the seclog (and it isn't), but it's fun. Gives your post that little bit of a personal touch. Cool

That's why I'll choose the more troublesome way of switching to a segwit address: 3F981FK189zWFA9fB2oMLs7dVtcGeFJBj3

Code:

1MG7qGaYpDBLuBKLiSbHB72sK4Cd8z5H7a

Code:

H3cCfPW1FJPjIpBKJOiAnAQRRZFfhqM6e4ZqM9JCxd7ZZMrHGNz6rG3jao5ECcGBoShdw/ikoJPzZjN10BnEsjs=

Code:

darkangel11 switching address from 1MG7qGaYpDBLuBKLiSbHB72sK4Cd8z5H7a to 3F981FK189zWFA9fB2oMLs7dVtcGeFJBj3

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: gentlemand on January 15, 2018, 04:39:00 PM

Ok. I'll give Segwit a whirl too. This is my new address - 37d1ZQVYmxVSrweXcyioyPgxNv1cZDrbgq

I can't be arsed to sign the old one so you'll have to assume I haven't been hijacked. And it's my problem anyway.

Don't see any red flags, so address updated. Thanks for making the switch!

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3015

Welt Am Draht

Ok. I'll give Segwit a whirl too. This is my new address - 37d1ZQVYmxVSrweXcyioyPgxNv1cZDrbgq

I can't be arsed to sign the old one so you'll have to assume I haven't been hijacked. And it's my problem anyway.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: Pursuer on January 15, 2018, 03:20:23 AM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2018, 11:50:21 AM

No worries, it will only become a requirement either never, or some time after Bitcoin Core supports it in a new version.

encouraging people to use SegWit is good but using it should always be optional. it was opt-in after all.

True, but is there any reason not to use it? Not really, given that nested addresses are backwards compatible, and offer almost the same benefits as bech32. Either way, it probably won't become an requirement.

Quote from: Pursuer on January 15, 2018, 03:20:23 AM

Finally succeeding in upgrading my Electrum...
New address

Code:

bc1qcfle4cvagdsfvk20w5v8h8javw2ucg22cue72u

Signature from the old one:

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Pursuer changing my bitcoin address on 2018-1-15
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Bitcoin address: 146vFp1nePNtpxfefNcNtaEvTjNhytNrnT
Signature: H73RocUX1kQf3BEz+P7WxoejhauVHnJPcYbOwm8SnDIuIcNnBSnYd5GgddN+BpgsXJnxVyoHLOmE+MXrWtn4Q4Q=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quote from: Rahar02 on January 15, 2018, 12:10:45 PM

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Rahar02, I would like to change my bitcoin address for Chipmixer campaign to the new segwit address: bc1qf7zhzckwr2nymljs5m7tdm0qx7nwslg5sde30p
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
15P9VjPfSvJSmojfSKD7hxLXexxCJvJC4N
Signature : H63LMNHYMP8rITe6aj0UcgMPSzzQW6N/Fs/Uq3wNOThbdeaErWcYX4zIh9NZTLCloILoQd3nz8UZWdCFW13bDMY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Updated.

Rahar02

hero member

Activity: 910

Merit: 523

Since I have been using electrum for a while, here mine.

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Rahar02, I would like to change my bitcoin address for Chipmixer campaign to the new segwit address: bc1qf7zhzckwr2nymljs5m7tdm0qx7nwslg5sde30p
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
15P9VjPfSvJSmojfSKD7hxLXexxCJvJC4N
Signature : H63LMNHYMP8rITe6aj0UcgMPSzzQW6N/Fs/Uq3wNOThbdeaErWcYX4zIh9NZTLCloILoQd3nz8UZWdCFW13bDMY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

If most exchanges and wallet developers enable segwit address, and everyone willing to use it, we won't end with over 154K unconfirmed transactions on the mempool. Hopefully, more people aware of this matter.

Pursuer

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1163

Where is my ring of blades...

Finally succeeding in upgrading my Electrum...
New address

Code:

bc1qcfle4cvagdsfvk20w5v8h8javw2ucg22cue72u

Signature from the old one:

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Pursuer changing my bitcoin address on 2018-1-15
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
Bitcoin address: 146vFp1nePNtpxfefNcNtaEvTjNhytNrnT
Signature: H73RocUX1kQf3BEz+P7WxoejhauVHnJPcYbOwm8SnDIuIcNnBSnYd5GgddN+BpgsXJnxVyoHLOmE+MXrWtn4Q4Q=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 14, 2018, 11:50:21 AM

No worries, it will only become a requirement either never, or some time after Bitcoin Core supports it in a new version.

encouraging people to use SegWit is good but using it should always be optional. it was opt-in after all.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: LoyceV on January 14, 2018, 05:50:04 AM

I've been wanting to use SegWit for a while now, but Bitcoin Core doesn't have native support yet.

Build the current master and you will have both SegWit (default) and bech32 if you want to.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3284

Quote from: LoyceV on January 14, 2018, 05:50:04 AM

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 13, 2018, 11:18:19 PM

I strongly encourage you to switch to using a SegWit address (and learn about it if you haven't yet)

I've been wanting to use SegWit for a while now, but Bitcoin Core doesn't have native support yet.
I don't really want to switch to Electrum entirely, but i can use it as an extra wallet.

No worries, it will only become a requirement either never, or some time after Bitcoin Core supports it in a new version. If you want to switch now though, I believe you can build from master on the repo which has the planned SegWit additions merged already.

Quote from: TheQuin on January 14, 2018, 06:13:06 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on January 14, 2018, 05:50:04 AM

Note: when using SegWit, you can no longer sign messages from that address.

You can sign a message if you use a native Segwit bech32 address. Of course to verify it someone will need to be using a wallet that supports these. Hopefully, Core will not make us wait too much longer for 0.16.0.

Soon™. Plan seems to be for May 1, 2018 at the latest, but will probably be earlier.

Quote from: HeRetiK on January 14, 2018, 06:47:26 AM

I too would like to update my BTC address to a SegWit enabled one.

-reformatted-

Code:

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is HeRetiK updating his legacy BTC address 14wcruSDsiwSyHSRoC4cAb4UqTAJdGSJ5V to his new BTC address 33jr6swgJxHwyFTgXKcv7kbKSy4du8Yt8r
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
14wcruSDsiwSyHSRoC4cAb4UqTAJdGSJ5V
H2u10EdpxkL0VhSUxiK26TxiIaNT1sjlLetR8FRTBhmaf72eV2lqXlQLjWimpaZ80SPBmuczXjhygIGU+GyZjnQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Thank you and ChipMixer for running this awesome campaign!

Done.

HeRetiK

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 2178

Playgram - The Telegram Casino

Hi DarkStar_,

I too would like to update my BTC address to a SegWit enabled one.

old address:
14wcruSDsiwSyHSRoC4cAb4UqTAJdGSJ5V

new address:
33jr6swgJxHwyFTgXKcv7kbKSy4du8Yt8r

verification message:

Code:

This is HeRetiK updating his legacy BTC address 14wcruSDsiwSyHSRoC4cAb4UqTAJdGSJ5V to his new BTC address 33jr6swgJxHwyFTgXKcv7kbKSy4du8Yt8r

signature:

Code:

H2u10EdpxkL0VhSUxiK26TxiIaNT1sjlLetR8FRTBhmaf72eV2lqXlQLjWimpaZ80SPBmuczXjhygIGU+GyZjnQ=

Thank you and ChipMixer for running this awesome campaign!

TheQuin

hero member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 883

Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2

Quote from: LoyceV on January 14, 2018, 05:50:04 AM

Note: when using SegWit, you can no longer sign messages from that address.

You can sign a message if you use a native Segwit bech32 address. Of course to verify it someone will need to be using a wallet that supports these. Hopefully, Core will not make us wait too much longer for 0.16.0.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: DarkStar_ on January 13, 2018, 11:18:19 PM

I strongly encourage you to switch to using a SegWit address (and learn about it if you haven't yet)

I've been wanting to use SegWit for a while now, but Bitcoin Core doesn't have native support yet.
I don't really want to switch to Electrum entirely, but i can use it as an extra wallet.

Note: when using SegWit, you can no longer sign messages from that address. You can Stake your Bitcoin address here before switching to SegWit.

Quote from: BTCforJoe on January 13, 2018, 11:38:16 PM

First, amazing job on selecting participants and pruning the members of this campaign. I actually took the time to check out the members’ posts, and I’m amazed at the post quality of the majority of the members here

I use ChipMixer's signature as an indicator of posts that are worth reading.

Topic: [ENDED] ChipMixer Signature Campaign | Sr Member+ - page 190. (Read 303553 times)