Why would I make an alt account to farm the ChipMixer campaign when
a) I've been somewhat inactive lately
b) I'm not close to reaching my 30 post quota on the higher paying Barista campaign (0.001BTC/post vs 0.00075BTC/post)
c) I have not reached my 30 post quota in the Bitsler campaign for a long period of time (over 2 months), which also paid more (0.00105BTC/post)
So you are saying that I've been making (or buying) alt accounts to farm a lower paying signature campaign when I can get paid more per post on my main? I'm not an economics expect, but that doesn't seem to be making a lot of sense.
Again, speaking of alts, who's your main account that didn't get accepted?
Check the Overview of Signature Campaigns. There are:
Bazista - 0.001BTC/post
Bitsler - 0.001BTC/post to 0.0011BTC/post
Ice Rock - 0.001BTC/post
Javvy - 0.001BTC/post
Xaurum Gamma - 0.0008BTC/post not counting altcoin tokens
DarkStar is responsible for our signature campaign and have our trust and exclusive control of escrow address 1ChipWGhJtEWCeSq3cra4HmKhvYqe8Tvty with around 3 BTC ($15,000).
We are not saying darkstar is stealing your escrow funds. Rather, he is enrolling his own alt accounts into the campaign to post with them and taking extra money from you behind your back.
stedsm
The user above did not post for 14 days (since September 29th). They also posted in sections which are not allowed in this campaign.
There are no sections that aren't allowed - go post to your dreams in the altcoin section if you'd like. They just aren't counted towards payment.
Umm, read my above posts?
[citation needed]
The forum counts someone as "waking up from inactivity" as more than 2 months IIRC. If I wanted to abuse the campaign, why did I not get my alt account to join earlier? Why did I not apply at the very start of the campaign where there were many open spots?
Read my above posts.
Because you are attacking my decision to accept the "random inactive member"? So you want me to:
1. Accept someone for no reason
2. When someone asks about it, remove that person or ignore the question instead of defending
3. Go to step 1