And, i couldn't care less if whitehats dump the ETC, going with most people from ETC chain logic, they earned it.
That is correct, but we now know that there is no distinction between the "white hats" and the "DAO hacker". They are the same kind of people. The irony is that the so-called white hats were associated (even remotely) with the ETH foundation, which went to hardfork ETC into ETH for exactly the purpose of undoing what they are now shown to do in any case.
This kills off the little bit of "moral high ground" that the ETH foundation and their "white hat collaborators" assigned themselves, namely "undoing theft even if that means giving up our own engagements of immutability". In other words, the authors of the ETH hard fork are now found to adhere to the same principles of functioning as the DAO hacker and ETC, while their whole forking business was based upon their claim to be "of a different morality".
In fact the red line one can find in the ETH movement is that, even more than the DAO hacker, ANYTHING goes: not just playing by the hidden tricks in the game, but even altering the game, lying and cheating, as long as one can profit.
In fact, the ETH foundation has played "trustlessness" on an even higher level than was originally anticipated in trustless games. Brilliant !