Would you have known about Ethereum if it was NOT super PUMPED by some Rich guys etc ?
Think about it & what that means..
Probably not, but then again how many would have known about Bitcoin back in 2013 if it wasn't pumped to $270 by (I believe) the Winklevoss twins. That brought in a lot more people that helped to push it to $1,200 later the same year. So why would this be any different? If it follows BTC's pattern, this initial pump will be sold off quite hard and then it will stabilize and grow more naturally.
The question now is, was this latest ETH rise equivalent to BTC's first $270 pump, or the second more spectacular $1,200 pump?
Not vaguely comparable in the slightest.
You are comparing the innovator first coin with coin #7,001 (yes thousands have been made)
That is silly ass bullshit and i know damn well that those Twins had fuck all to do with it.
I watched it go to $50 for the first time and before and after.. i was here buddy.
Your full of shit.
So what you are basically saying is you think that the stage Eth is currently at is most comparable to BTC's first rise to $50?
This is indeed interesting as I was originally figuring Eth was roughly operating on roughly a 1/20th scale of BTC, meaning that the $15 recent peak equated to BTCs $270 top and that we could expect to see a ~$60 peak this summer. According to your view on things this actually would be closer to 1/3 scale and we could potentially be looking at a $400 top...