Topic: ETH hardfork incoming. - page 14. (Read 19070 times)
Hold on, if we hardfork and you can redeem DAO tokens for ETH at 100:1 again, wouldnt be a good idea to buy a bunch of DAO right now when the price is VERY low and redeem it for ETH afterwards for crazy profits?
It is the worst ideas. But the bitcoin had many hard forks before, it is doing very well now. Ehtereum is still young.
Bitcoin never had a HF. 2010 was a SF , and 2013 We decided to reject the HF and stay on the original chain!
It is high time the community to alert thieves that will not be tolerated. To attract people to the idea of bitkoin must observe basic human norms.
What will be next step? Court of any country?
I also agree that thieves should not get stolen eth, but hardfork is the worst ideas.
It is the worst ideas. But the bitcoin had many hard forks before, it is doing very well now. Ehtereum is still young.
It is high time the community to alert thieves that will not be tolerated. To attract people to the idea of bitkoin must observe basic human norms.
What will be next step? Court of any country?
I also agree that thieves should not get stolen eth, but hardfork is the worst ideas.
It is high time the community to alert thieves that will not be tolerated. To attract people to the idea of bitkoin must observe basic human norms.
Shouldve bought Monero.
getting the new save heaven ?
... some found NAUT at Polo ...
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1010
Professional Native Greek Translator (2000+ done)
Guys hard fork is almost always a bad idea.
We were about to run our project on Ethereum.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
No. We the community will decide if we want the fork. If you do not agree with the fork, you can run the old codes.
We were about to run our project on Ethereum.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
Well spoken, so how can you ensure he's not moving lots of coins to himself ....
We were about to run our project on Ethereum.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
After hard fork I'm not sure it is a good idea.
I don't understand how can anyone use blockchain which could be hardforked by creator's decision.
This is very interesting..
As they say - IF they can somehow 'FIX' this.. (rollback / blacklist / some other thing) it means any government that wants it's ETH back can 'FIX' that too.. very dangerous.
I think Ethereum should 'NOT GET INVOLVED'. At all. The truth is that the ETH network is running completely fine.
Let DAO sort it out if they can. And if not.. a lesson learned.
hmm..
This will probably send us(crypto) back a few years in credibility though..
It is not that simple as you say. Vitalik was one of its Curators along with many others, he put his credibility on the Dao. If it was someone elses project i could agree with you, but he is part of the team and for that i aspect him to take responsability for it. Ethereum is a much larger project, it is not about ETH only, thinking small like that will never get ETH the future it is designed for, btw smart contracts is all about that otherwise it is only a coin.
In retrospect he shouldn't have allowed himself to become so closely tied to the project. And the DAO should have limited themselves to a much smaller max ETH investment the way Digix did.
Shouldve bought Monero.
There was no hack, and there is no 'hacker'. There is someone who owns what I would call a spin-off DAO.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Investors agreed to give their ETH to whomever it was who figured out how to take them up on their offer.
Read this carefully.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
Read this carefully.
The terms of The DAO Creation are set forth in the smart contract code existing on the Ethereum blockchain at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413. Nothing in this explanation of terms or in any other document or communication may modify or add any additional obligations or guarantees beyond those set forth in The DAO’s code. Any and all explanatory terms or descriptions are merely offered for educational purposes and do not supercede or modify the express terms of The DAO’s code set forth on the blockchain; to the extent you believe there to be any conflict or discrepancy between the descriptions offered here and the functionality of The DAO’s code at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413, The DAO’s code controls and sets forth all terms of The DAO Creation.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
Maybe they can use another exploit to get the coins back instead of a fork.
That would be fair, and seems entirely possible given how bug-ridden The DAO and many other Ethereum contracts seem to be.
There was no hack, and there is no 'hacker'. There is someone who owns what I would call a spin-off DAO.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Investors agreed to give their ETH to whomever it was who figured out how to take them up on their offer.
Read this carefully.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
Read this carefully.
The terms of The DAO Creation are set forth in the smart contract code existing on the Ethereum blockchain at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413. Nothing in this explanation of terms or in any other document or communication may modify or add any additional obligations or guarantees beyond those set forth in The DAO’s code. Any and all explanatory terms or descriptions are merely offered for educational purposes and do not supercede or modify the express terms of The DAO’s code set forth on the blockchain; to the extent you believe there to be any conflict or discrepancy between the descriptions offered here and the functionality of The DAO’s code at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413, The DAO’s code controls and sets forth all terms of The DAO Creation.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
Maybe they can use another exploit to get the coins back instead of a fork.
There was no hack, and there is no 'hacker'. There is someone who owns what I would call a spin-off DAO.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Don't buy the propaganda.
Investors agreed to give their ETH to whomever it was who figured out how to take them up on their offer.
Read this carefully.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
Read this carefully.
The terms of The DAO Creation are set forth in the smart contract code existing on the Ethereum blockchain at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413. Nothing in this explanation of terms or in any other document or communication may modify or add any additional obligations or guarantees beyond those set forth in The DAO’s code. Any and all explanatory terms or descriptions are merely offered for educational purposes and do not supercede or modify the express terms of The DAO’s code set forth on the blockchain; to the extent you believe there to be any conflict or discrepancy between the descriptions offered here and the functionality of The DAO’s code at 0xbb9bc244d798123fde783fcc1c72d3bb8c189413, The DAO’s code controls and sets forth all terms of The DAO Creation.
(Unless someone can point to a bug in the EVM that executed the code improperly, but I haven't seen any such claim.
How can one even discuss the possibility of a hard fork? Nothing's wrong with ethereum's code.
I think the hard fork to make sure the hacker cannot move the stolen Ethereum is good. I will run the new code.
Nope.. it's a DAPP isn't it ?
A centralized ICO shit coin scam on top of another centralized ICO shit coin scam..
Proof ?
The fact a roll back is even possible.
Funny part is neither is a crypto-currency. LOL
And what was the point here Investards ?
I don't suppose it was a.... decentralized crypto-currency ?
Not only that , but the central masters are looking to Hunt down and DOXX any opponents to their HF.
https://twitter.com/DanDarkPill/status/743789597482692608
Don't betray your masters you mETH users!
Its going to be a bit late to do a hardfork once that eth gets dumped. Im noticing some people are still buying atm. I guess they never got the news yet.
TheDao is not ETH. They are betting that ETH will survive whatever happens to the DAO. It is a sensible bet IMHO.
Nope.. it's a DAPP isn't it ?
A centralized ICO shit coin scam on top of another centralized ICO shit coin scam..
Proof ?
The fact a roll back is even possible.
Funny part is neither is a crypto-currency. LOL
And what was the point here Investards ?
I don't suppose it was a.... decentralized crypto-currency ?
What's so wrong with a good old fashioned fund freeze / rollback?
Ripple did it, and look where they are today:
One of the top crypto's in the world!
Who controls "your" coins?
Those 2 Chinese bitcoin miners?
The Ripple Gods?
Maybe "The Ethereum Community"?
Ripple did it, and look where they are today:
One of the top crypto's in the world!
Who controls "your" coins?
Those 2 Chinese bitcoin miners?
The Ripple Gods?
Maybe "The Ethereum Community"?
Ripple is a laughing stock and has been since day 1.
It is regarded as the started of all these ICO scams.
Your comment is retarded .
Jump to: