Topic: Ethereum, MaidSafe, NXT, anything else worth investing in, in 2014? (Read 5878 times)
Lots of NXT bagholders voting..
May 14, 2014, 04:28:50 AM
eXo,Qora,they are all great. 
May 01, 2014, 10:13:02 AM
Myriad solves the only "problem" with Bitcoin right now - centralization of mining in the hands of the few. At least this way even the large mining pools will be split in 5 ways.
May 01, 2014, 10:06:17 AM
Why not listed NEM, NXTL, ExoCoin
These coins have great advantages
These coins have great advantages
May 01, 2014, 09:38:51 AM
Don't put all the eggs in one basket. So all of them.
May 01, 2014, 07:35:27 AM
I'm not so familiar with any of them so I thank you for bringing this potential opportunity to my attention. I look forward to sharing my opinions when I have a better understanding of these new cryptos.
April 30, 2014, 11:47:59 PM
April 30, 2014, 06:33:26 PM
eXo, Qora, Counterparty, eMunie, Maidsafe, Skycoin, Etherium
April 30, 2014, 10:49:37 AM
Take a look at Exocoin ... very promising and active devs:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pospow-exocoin-exo-gen-20-dev-from-scratch-give-away-open-beta-430467
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pospow-exocoin-exo-gen-20-dev-from-scratch-give-away-open-beta-430467
April 30, 2014, 10:11:20 AM
So if I have to sum it up looks like Ethereum, NXT and MaidSafe are the 3 (potentially) hot things one can invest in 2014 if he wants to be in the position that bitcoin early adopters were in 2009?
Your thoughts?
Summer coin worth the investmentYour thoughts?
nope
April 30, 2014, 07:31:34 AM
So if I have to sum it up looks like Ethereum, NXT and MaidSafe are the 3 (potentially) hot things one can invest in 2014 if he wants to be in the position that bitcoin early adopters were in 2009?
Your thoughts?
Summer coin worth the investmentYour thoughts?
April 29, 2014, 11:18:18 PM
I think that the POS coins have a lot of potential but so far none has been perfect. NXT is awesome and doing some great things, but I wonder if NEM can make good where NXT has made mistakes. I really think that the best investment of 2014 will be the thing that nobody expects but has all the killer features and comes out of nowhere to surprise everybody..
April 29, 2014, 10:14:41 PM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
The IPO plan is just a plan for now. They have nothing set in stone and have even said they may change it if they think it is for the better. If you really don't like it, go suggest a better idea and say why. The developer(s) are really great when it comes to responding to questions and enquiries on the Skycoin thread. Also, it isn't released yet so there is no volume. You may be looking at the old 'Skycoin' that was released over a year ago.
I personally think that they should be releasing around 50% over multiple IPO's over a year then use the rest for bounties. This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme that everyone seems to be looking for but encourages people to get involved and contribute to the coin and meshnet rather than hoarding for the sake of profit.
Also, please don't say they will have 99% of the coins. They have said repeatedly that the coins will be distributed (not 100% but most) the coins over a number of years instead of 1 quick IPO that creates an unfair advantage to early adopters and causes later adopters to lose interest, much like Mastercoin and to some degree, NXT.
even 50% would be a total joke. If they keep 3-5% everything is alright.
Nobody knows if they will every give more coins to us. And a first IPO worth selling 1% for 50k$ is just pure greed.
That´s the worst IPO Plan in history.
Of course, and I should trust them not to dump the coins if the price increases?
You are so naive.
Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. —Proverbs 26:4
Not sure if troll or not but please just stop.
April 29, 2014, 09:20:09 AM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
The IPO plan is just a plan for now. They have nothing set in stone and have even said they may change it if they think it is for the better. If you really don't like it, go suggest a better idea and say why. The developer(s) are really great when it comes to responding to questions and enquiries on the Skycoin thread. Also, it isn't released yet so there is no volume. You may be looking at the old 'Skycoin' that was released over a year ago.
I personally think that they should be releasing around 50% over multiple IPO's over a year then use the rest for bounties. This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme that everyone seems to be looking for but encourages people to get involved and contribute to the coin and meshnet rather than hoarding for the sake of profit.
Also, please don't say they will have 99% of the coins. They have said repeatedly that the coins will be distributed (not 100% but most) the coins over a number of years instead of 1 quick IPO that creates an unfair advantage to early adopters and causes later adopters to lose interest, much like Mastercoin and to some degree, NXT.
even 50% would be a total joke. If they keep 3-5% everything is alright.
Nobody knows if they will every give more coins to us. And a first IPO worth selling 1% for 50k$ is just pure greed.
That´s the worst IPO Plan in history.
Of course, and I should trust them not to dump the coins if the price increases?
You are so naive.
April 29, 2014, 02:08:50 AM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
The IPO plan is just a plan for now. They have nothing set in stone and have even said they may change it if they think it is for the better. If you really don't like it, go suggest a better idea and say why. The developer(s) are really great when it comes to responding to questions and enquiries on the Skycoin thread. Also, it isn't released yet so there is no volume. You may be looking at the old 'Skycoin' that was released over a year ago.
I personally think that they should be releasing around 50% over multiple IPO's over a year then use the rest for bounties. This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme that everyone seems to be looking for but encourages people to get involved and contribute to the coin and meshnet rather than hoarding for the sake of profit.
Also, please don't say they will have 99% of the coins. They have said repeatedly that the coins will be distributed (not 100% but most) the coins over a number of years instead of 1 quick IPO that creates an unfair advantage to early adopters and causes later adopters to lose interest, much like Mastercoin and to some degree, NXT.
even 50% would be a total joke. If they keep 3-5% everything is alright.
Nobody knows if they will every give more coins to us. And a first IPO worth selling 1% for 50k$ is just pure greed.
That´s the worst IPO Plan in history.
April 28, 2014, 11:30:07 AM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
The IPO plan is just a plan for now. They have nothing set in stone and have even said they may change it if they think it is for the better. If you really don't like it, go suggest a better idea and say why. The developer(s) are really great when it comes to responding to questions and enquiries on the Skycoin thread. Also, it isn't released yet so there is no volume. You may be looking at the old 'Skycoin' that was released over a year ago.
I personally think that they should be releasing around 50% over multiple IPO's over a year then use the rest for bounties. This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme that everyone seems to be looking for but encourages people to get involved and contribute to the coin and meshnet rather than hoarding for the sake of profit.
Also, please don't say they will have 99% of the coins. They have said repeatedly that the coins will be distributed (not 100% but most) the coins over a number of years instead of 1 quick IPO that creates an unfair advantage to early adopters and causes later adopters to lose interest, much like Mastercoin and to some degree, NXT.
even 50% would be a total joke. If they keep 3-5% everything is alright.
Nobody knows if they will every give more coins to us. And a first IPO worth selling 1% for 50k$ is just pure greed.
That´s the worst IPO Plan in history.
April 28, 2014, 04:57:47 AM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
The IPO plan is just a plan for now. They have nothing set in stone and have even said they may change it if they think it is for the better. If you really don't like it, go suggest a better idea and say why. The developer(s) are really great when it comes to responding to questions and enquiries on the Skycoin thread. Also, it isn't released yet so there is no volume. You may be looking at the old 'Skycoin' that was released over a year ago.
I personally think that they should be releasing around 50% over multiple IPO's over a year then use the rest for bounties. This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme that everyone seems to be looking for but encourages people to get involved and contribute to the coin and meshnet rather than hoarding for the sake of profit.
Also, please don't say they will have 99% of the coins. They have said repeatedly that the coins will be distributed (not 100% but most) the coins over a number of years instead of 1 quick IPO that creates an unfair advantage to early adopters and causes later adopters to lose interest, much like Mastercoin and to some degree, NXT.
April 28, 2014, 04:27:39 AM
The "hot new thing" tends to fade.
In six to eight months the list will have 3,4, or 5 other names.
2009 is over and it cannot be recreated, sorry.
In six to eight months the list will have 3,4, or 5 other names.
2009 is over and it cannot be recreated, sorry.
That is the question discussed here. To give your 3, 4 or 5 names that will last in 1year time and the reasons.
April 28, 2014, 04:18:01 AM
The "hot new thing" tends to fade.
In six to eight months the list will have 3,4, or 5 other names.
2009 is over and it cannot be recreated, sorry.
In six to eight months the list will have 3,4, or 5 other names.
2009 is over and it cannot be recreated, sorry.
April 28, 2014, 04:11:43 AM
This is too weird. I got excited when I saw it debut but I think it was a mistake. Who the hell has 99% of the coins??? Why would the devs make a meshnet and then keep is value from the world?? Its worse than ripple. The way to do it, it to give 100% of the coins to the people. Otherwise this is just like tor but with distibuted hosting. Its a great idea but I think the devs are motivated by greed. No wonder to volume is so low.
Jump to: