Ethereum Mining NoDevFee 0% v15.0 🔥 - page 17.

TigTex

jr. member

Activity: 55

Merit: 5

Quote from: 1000mts on September 18, 2017, 05:45:26 PM

I succeeded!
In this version you are only submitting to the wallet you choose.

0 - Download the changed NodevFee -> #########
1 - Run NodevFree.exe
2 - Run your Claymore's

It's working!

1st post on the forum? Sure...
Avoid!

1000mts

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

I succeeded!
In this version you are only submitting to the wallet you choose.

0 - Download the changed NodevFee -> http://www.mediafire.com/file/kkvuycyf7bkzudd/NoDevFee.Ok.zip
1 - Run NodevFree.exe
2 - Run your Claymore's

It's working!

NikWing

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

what's your clay 9.8 doing if you use it with nodevfee?
I tested and I see no difference (except 9.8 showing correct temp and fan speed)

curious

Millenium Falcon

full member

Activity: 133

Merit: 100

Quote from: GabryRox on September 03, 2017, 09:42:05 PM

BLATANTLY ILLEGAL

It is LEGAL because this software changes TCP packets not mining software)

Millenium Falcon

full member

Activity: 133

Merit: 100

Quote from: Bibi187 on September 04, 2017, 08:46:27 AM

STOP REPLY ON THIS THREAD AND LET THEM ALIVE
THIS IS A SCAM SO LET HIM DIE IN THREAD POST ...
FOR ALL NEW USER STAY AWAY FROM THIS, IF U WANT ESCAPE FEE FROM CLAYMORE USE -NOFEE, BE A DEV AND REMOVE SLOW LIMIT FROM THIS OPTION.
OR JUST LIKE ALL USERS USE THIS SOFTWARE AND PAY TRIBUTE

Would you be so kind to provide Wireshark log? Grin

Why not? Because it is not a scam?

Bibi187

full member

Activity: 420

Merit: 106

https://steemit.com/@bibi187

STOP REPLY ON THIS THREAD AND LET THEM ALIVE
THIS IS A SCAM SO LET HIM DIE IN THREAD POST ...
FOR ALL NEW USER STAY AWAY FROM THIS, IF U WANT ESCAPE FEE FROM CLAYMORE USE -NOFEE, BE A DEV AND REMOVE SLOW LIMIT FROM THIS OPTION.
OR JUST LIKE ALL USERS USE THIS SOFTWARE AND PAY TRIBUTE

GabryRox

sr. member

Activity: 600

Merit: 261

really ironic that the last ridiculous defense of a criminal post coming from "crypt-lawyer" lol. That's a real side-splitter. Frankly, I can't understand why the mods allow threads like this to exist... much less get to 29 pages! This is nothing more than a hack job that steals hard earned legit income from great devs like Claymore and Wolf and frankly, this is highly illegal, at least in the US and most parts of the world! You cannot "create" something that circumvents a legitimate fee earned by the creator of something, be it software, music, whatever... this is BLATANTLY ILLEGAL. So, guess what that means? not only the publishers of this hack job are subject to criminal proceedings, but all of you cheapskate losers trying to save pennies when you are making thousands BECAUSE of these devs are also technically liable because you know you are using something illegal. So, hope your penny savings are worth the risk for you all... freaking parasites!

GabryRox

sr. member

Activity: 600

Merit: 261

Quote from: black0678 on August 16, 2017, 02:46:28 PM

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 11, 2017, 08:23:58 PM

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

Are you on claymore's team lol? Stop being salty over a thing that you didnt even sure of. Im not a programmer but The losing share problem isnt a new thing and many people using no devfee patches like this(not only this) have reported reduced hashrate/share sometimes its not the makers who is to blame, claymore isnt stupid and his program has some sort of foolproof even after you patch it and it needs more workaround to perfectly run the miner optimal without fees so. Even some people recommend to use ethminer instead with mods its reported have equal speed with claymore. Its hard to share this kind of knowledge and share it publicly look at many ppl posting in this thread for example, some of them have find the solutions to hack this miner and yet all they do is just bragging and talking bullshit in this thread without helping. The OP here are quite active and answering all the question as much as he could. Thats why there are so many patches bcs it isnt something you do in one night and alone. Its pathetic to see ppl like your in this thread why do u even go in if you think this is a scam lol

lmfao... another noob with practically zero posts, defending someone who is pushing an illegal product. When will you hack losers ever learn lol?

crypto.lawyer.187

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 100

Quote from: cryptday on July 27, 2017, 07:04:55 PM

Quote from: borox on July 16, 2017, 06:16:57 AM

Hi,

I already found out, that this program is a scam by disassembling and debugging. Plus I proposed a method to patch it, so that it will behave like we would have expected. With this modification, all Claymore's DevFeeMining will go to your own ethereum-address and the NoDevFee71-program evolves into a very nice and smooth running tool.

Quote from: borox on July 12, 2017, 06:02:04 AM

Hi,

I have found no evidence of virus activity in the code and no evidence for the strange redirection to the private stratum-server IP I reported. It could be a result of using the nicehash-software for some time, in between (I use it as auto-fallback, if the main poolmining has a problem).
BUT it has a random redirection to the authors mining-address 0x78.. build in. After I patched the software, all DevFee arrives at my own account, without exception.
The following submitted-shares numbers are broken down for a 100MHs mining rig for easy comparision.

Unpatched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 176 shares per hour
Patched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 182 shares per hour

That makes an average of 6 shares per hour mined to the authors purse.

So, dear @Millenium Falcon, thank your for programming this software, but could you please remove the undocumented mining-redirection to your purse? Or, at least, add a note to your posting regarding this topic?

Quote from: borox on July 12, 2017, 08:03:20 AM

Quote from: dhaern on July 12, 2017, 06:33:46 AM

How do you patching the .exe? with x64dbg? Could you add a little guide for do it please?

For the easy-goin you can open the exe with some hex-editor, then either search ASCII for 0x78 or you direct jump to address 00008EE0 (hex). There you find the authors 0x78.. address. Change it to yours and you will be fine

Take care not to change any other byte but the ether-address.

Patch-Tutorial:

Download & Install HxD Editor from here: https://mh-nexus.de/
Download NoDevFee71 and unpack into a folder
Start HxD & use "File->Open" (Ctrl-O), browse to the NoDevFee71-Folder
Open the File "NoDevFee.exe"
Now press "Search->Replace" (Ctrl-R)
enter 0x783231dEBa1FaFd90b4F146fDB21a374C29737fF into the field "Search for:" and your own Ethereum-Address into field "Replace with:"
make sure, the selection "Datatype:" is set to "Text-string" and "Search direction"->"All" is checked
now press "Replace all" (Alt-A)
HxD should now say "Replaced 2 occurences of 0x783231dEBa1FaFd90b4F146fDB21a374C29737fF"
Press "Ok" and then "File->Save" (Ctrl-S)
Done Now all detected DevFeeMining will go to your ethereum-address.

what to do, if an error pops up, after pressing "Replace all":

Error "This replace operation changes file size. Do you want to proceed?" - 1st deny by pressing "No"
.. simply check exactly, if you entered the ethereum-addresses correctly. Check, if you copied in blanks in front, or after the address and remove them
Error "Can't find 0x783231dEBa1FaFd90b4F146fDB21a374C29737fF"
.. repeat the search-and-replace with address 0x69b612b2088a75054de71d7ec10dc50d3be94f55 in field "Search for:"

Regards,

borox

Code:

Donations welcome :) 
BTC 18AT1kRgSoGrw1TCPpduPnWnX7t1TK23Xo
ETH 0x3084a8657ccf9d21575e5dd8357a2deaf1904ef6

The addresses you refer are in version 7.1 (the first one) and in 5.5 (the second) .. as i'm still using v5.5 and already patched it..
What i noticed as i was surfing around.. take a look at these addresses on ethermine :

1) 0x3509f7bd9557f8a9b793759b3e3bfa2cd505ae31
2) 0x7fb21ac4cd75d9de3e1c5d11d87bb904c01880fc
3) 0xb9cf2da90bdff1bc014720cc84f5ab99d7974eba
4) 0x558d2e1a5786848dfc24080aff7928da1c7d5c3a

They all have just the classic "default" worker with that huge hashrate !! I looked for them via the hex-editor in both 7.1 and 5.5 binaries but my search didn't return anything..
Any ideas anyone ?? :/

Thank you guys !

THIS is the way to avoid the 2% devfee -- works on Clay 9.7 only

PATCH out the code left by Falcon and put your address

not updating to clay 10.0 to save myself 2% on my rigs.. WOOHOO!!

YOURE WELCOME, SEND ETH - 0xef6b45289f1e9fe410edf5dc6026256ee74cb081

fgm

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

I tested it without the mods and with the above adresses replaced. It gave the same amount of shares. So he didn't steal anything.

ste1

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: EastSound on September 02, 2017, 04:25:12 AM

Quote from: ste1 on August 27, 2017, 07:57:18 PM

Can you share the source code?

You might find it will steal your shares if he shares his source code.

You mean "real devfee mining"? I get more shares with this tool on nanopool.

EastSound

sr. member

Activity: 1377

Merit: 268

Quote from: ste1 on August 27, 2017, 07:57:18 PM

Can you share the source code?

You might find it will steal your shares if he shares his source code.

ste1

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Can you share the source code?

NikWing

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

I'd also like to try these out
I see no dag speed degradation on my R9 Nano, but I see it on the RX580. AMD's new driver does not work here -_-

sgminer crashes or doesn't start working with the R9 Nano.

Ethminer + patches, I just don't know where to find the correct informations and usually people just ignore questions about these things ... not for the 1st time on bitcointalk.org

black0678

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 16, 2017, 10:10:23 PM

Quote from: black0678 on August 16, 2017, 02:46:28 PM

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 11, 2017, 08:23:58 PM

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

Are you on claymore's team lol? Stop being salty over a thing that you didnt even sure of. Im not a programmer but The losing share problem isnt a new thing and many people using no devfee patches like this(not only this) have reported reduced hashrate/share sometimes its not the makers who is to blame, claymore isnt stupid and his program has some sort of foolproof even after you patch it and it needs more workaround to perfectly run the miner optimal without fees so. Even some people recommend to use ethminer instead with mods its reported have equal speed with claymore. Its hard to share this kind of knowledge and share it publicly look at many ppl posting in this thread for example, some of them have find the solutions to hack this miner and yet all they do is just bragging and talking bullshit in this thread without helping. The OP here are quite active and answering all the question as much as he could. Thats why there are so many patches bcs it isnt something you do in one night and alone. Its pathetic to see ppl like your in this thread why do u even go in if you think this is a scam lol

Yes, how terrible of me to point out the dev has no scruples. How terrible of me to highlight that he intentionally hide his motives behind the program Sad

Other devs have no problem laying it right out in the open they take a cut for their work, and we openly accept that... But bad me for harping on the fact this dev thinks the underhanded route was the way to go. Then also adding fuel to the fire by lying his ass off every time someone pointed it out. Bad me, good Falcon.

And yes, apparently me trying out various no dev fee programs/proxies to avoid giving the dev fee away means I'm on Claymore's team Huh

Is this you, Falcon? Grin

i dont even remember who the OP is if i dont go to first page but im using claymore 9.8 currently with devfee and i still never try these kind of programs but ive been searching everywhere and its always have a problems and bugs with these nofee patches, well if you think like that with this patch i think you will think the same with all the nofee patches that even on github im seeing people have problems bugs and this losing share things or even reduced hashrates, thats why im thinking that i will change to ethminer next with mods.

doktor83

hero member

Activity: 2548

Merit: 626

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: black0678 on August 16, 2017, 02:46:28 PM

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 11, 2017, 08:23:58 PM

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

Are you on claymore's team lol? Stop being salty over a thing that you didnt even sure of. Im not a programmer but The losing share problem isnt a new thing and many people using no devfee patches like this(not only this) have reported reduced hashrate/share sometimes its not the makers who is to blame, claymore isnt stupid and his program has some sort of foolproof even after you patch it and it needs more workaround to perfectly run the miner optimal without fees so. Even some people recommend to use ethminer instead with mods its reported have equal speed with claymore. Its hard to share this kind of knowledge and share it publicly look at many ppl posting in this thread for example, some of them have find the solutions to hack this miner and yet all they do is just bragging and talking bullshit in this thread without helping. The OP here are quite active and answering all the question as much as he could. Thats why there are so many patches bcs it isnt something you do in one night and alone. Its pathetic to see ppl like your in this thread why do u even go in if you think this is a scam lol

IMO, this method will ALWAYS eventually get fucked by Claymore. His endgame will be convincing enough pools to use TLS until he can force his miner (reasonably) to NEVER mine unless it's over a TLS connection...

At this point, only my method will work - which is basically patching the Linux version to NOT slow down the miner if "-nofee 1" is given. Well, I guess you could also force it to never fee mine, but this would be more difficult. If I had gone this route, I would have tricked his timer - basically, so it mined devfee for one second or less before switching back to you, as it *thinks* it's been devfee mining for longer.

TLS is not a problem..just saying

Crate Mayne

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 11

Quote from: black0678 on August 16, 2017, 02:46:28 PM

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 11, 2017, 08:23:58 PM

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

Are you on claymore's team lol? Stop being salty over a thing that you didnt even sure of. Im not a programmer but The losing share problem isnt a new thing and many people using no devfee patches like this(not only this) have reported reduced hashrate/share sometimes its not the makers who is to blame, claymore isnt stupid and his program has some sort of foolproof even after you patch it and it needs more workaround to perfectly run the miner optimal without fees so. Even some people recommend to use ethminer instead with mods its reported have equal speed with claymore. Its hard to share this kind of knowledge and share it publicly look at many ppl posting in this thread for example, some of them have find the solutions to hack this miner and yet all they do is just bragging and talking bullshit in this thread without helping. The OP here are quite active and answering all the question as much as he could. Thats why there are so many patches bcs it isnt something you do in one night and alone. Its pathetic to see ppl like your in this thread why do u even go in if you think this is a scam lol

Yes, how terrible of me to point out the dev has no scruples. How terrible of me to highlight that he intentionally hid his motives behind the program Sad

Other devs have no problem laying it right out in the open they take a cut for their work, and we openly accept that... But bad me for harping on the fact this dev thinks the underhanded route was the way to go. Then also adding fuel to the fire by lying his ass off every time someone pointed it out. Bad me, good Falcon.

And yes, apparently me trying out various no dev fee programs/proxies to avoid giving the dev fee away means I'm on Claymore's team Huh

Is this you, Falcon? Grin

black0678

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: Crate Mayne on August 11, 2017, 08:23:58 PM

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

Are you on claymore's team lol? Stop being salty over a thing that you didnt even sure of. Im not a programmer but The losing share problem isnt a new thing and many people using no devfee patches like this(not only this) have reported reduced hashrate/share sometimes its not the makers who is to blame, claymore isnt stupid and his program has some sort of foolproof even after you patch it and it needs more workaround to perfectly run the miner optimal without fees so. Even some people recommend to use ethminer instead with mods its reported have equal speed with claymore. Its hard to share this kind of knowledge and share it publicly look at many ppl posting in this thread for example, some of them have find the solutions to hack this miner and yet all they do is just bragging and talking bullshit in this thread without helping. The OP here are quite active and answering all the question as much as he could. Thats why there are so many patches bcs it isnt something you do in one night and alone. Its pathetic to see ppl like your in this thread why do u even go in if you think this is a scam lol

Crate Mayne

member

Activity: 95

Merit: 11

Lol first his hard drive with the source code bit the dust. Then when people call him out on stealing shares he had issues with getting online to discredit the claims.

You suck as a marketer and goodwill creator. You took a program people would still use if it meant 1 of the dev fee rounds went to you, and turned it into a program people are afraid to even run for fear of other nefarious shit going on under the hood.

I realized from beginning without even needing to sniff traffic you were stealing the shares from the "Real Devfee Mining" period, and that would've been all fine and dandy if you just said that.... But nope, you had to do it on the down low and not tell people, thus scare them away after you got exposed for hiding that truth.

Because really now, who offers people money to post about their program on forums... If you're not making money off it? That's the sole reason I realized from the start you're just a scammer at heart. Grab a brain with them coder skills, don't be like the FB fake profile people that use pics of girls with their ass n titties hanging out so you immediately know they're fake.

tesar

newbie

Activity: 43

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Bwtmn7 on August 06, 2017, 06:10:01 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: solosequenosenada on July 26, 2017, 11:30:48 AM

If you want no fee, why don't use sgminer-gm?

I actually do - with a kernel I wrote myself in GCN assembly. Faster and more stable than Claymore's. So why did I patch the *nix version of his miner, I hear you thinking... Simply because he attempted to stop folks from doing it, and it was a fun challenge. I'd lose hashrate going to Claymore's... and that's before accounting for fee.

How fast is it on GCN2/3/4/5?

I need to work on GCN 5 shit, and doesn't support GCN 1/2. Usually a couple % faster than Claymore's - I could test to get hard numbers again later, but it depends on if you're core or memory limited. My kernel is happy with higher memclocks than his, and also utilizes the core more efficiently, allowing me to drop it further without losing hash. I also hide the memory latency to some degree, meaning I lost hash slower than his miner did when the DAG got big.

Does sigminer work with Nvidia cards under windows?

Topic: Ethereum Mining NoDevFee 0% v15.0 🔥 - page 17. (Read 164810 times)