So you mean that those 6% (or 9%) were older than 60 in 99,9% of the cases and older than 80 also in the vast majority of cases. So those are the healthy persons dying from COVID. Healthy 80-something year-olds.
Please stop just making up things you want to be true without presenting any evidence.
I don't know how you have the gall to say that when you are blatantly making up things you want to be true without presenting any evidence. You're presenting isolated statistics that don't prove anything.
That I have not presented evidence? I have presented you with WHO articles, articles published in Nature, in the BMJ. You are the one who only attends to isolated data so that they reinforce what you previously want them to demonstrate.
US stats:
Among decedents aged <65 years, 83.1% had one or more underlying medical conditions.
17% of those who died aged under 65 had no underlying health conditions.
UK stats:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathswithnounderlyingconditionsbyagebandAttention drawn to table 6a.
Of 542 deaths in age range 0-44, 101 (18.6%) had no underlying health conditions.
Of 457 deaths in age range 45-49, 91 (19.9%) had no underlying health conditions.
Of 847 deaths in age range 50-54, 123 (14.5%) had no underlying health conditions.
Yes, older people and those with comorbidities have a higher risk of death from COVID (and I never claimed otherwise), but young people
are dying, healthy people
are dying, and young healthy people
are dying.
And you keep going on and on with the bullshit of spouting isolated statistics here to supposedly prove the things you'd like to be true. Well, they aren't. That is, of the people who have less than a 1% chance of dying, of those 15 to 20% supposedly have no underlying health conditions.
So statistically, that's fucking shit close to 0 no matter how you look at it.
I don’t trust any of those statistics from those who want us locked down..
For me this is not a matter of trust. Lies dammed lies and statistics. The links he is putting are isolated statistics that don't mean anything.
We've had this argument quite a lot over the last year.
My answer has always been: don't look at reason for death, look at number of deaths from any reason.
You haven't read the article published in the World Health Organisation that I've put before. I'll put it again:
https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdfIt basically says that mortality from COVID is not much different than mortality from the flu.
That peak is because anyone who died was labeled as the cause of death: "COVID". There was a video around of the Irish parliament where an MP was questioning someone from Health and one by one he picked apart how alleged COVID deaths were labeled. Basically if you are 95 years old, have terminal cancer, die and test positive for COVID they put the cause of death as COVID.
Edit: It's taken me some time to find it, but I've finally found it. Otherwise some people were going to say that I was making this up:
https://www.facebook.com/MichaelMcNamaraTD/posts/3840557722640402This is his Facebook page the MPs Facebook page.