Pages:
Author

Topic: EveryDice.com | 0.99% Edge - Instant Cashout - Invest - Referral - Mobile - Fair - page 23. (Read 72089 times)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
ED, blame user for your own coding error is not the way to do business.

I strongly recommend that you pay 1DiCe1 ASAP and end this mess.

Dice site is a lucrative business, but Trust is Gold here.

Act soon before it's too late.

legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
tl;dr 1Dice1 was screwed by ED and made to pay for ED's own negligence. Everyone needs to boycott ED and spread the word that the owner is not to be trusted under any circumstances.


Given the unsatisfactory resolution to this, it will be up to this community to make sure everyone knows that ED is a shady operator, and to make sure no one gambles there. Basically, the ED website was faulty, according to the website owner himself, and so if you won during the "faulty period", your winnings won't be paid out. That's awfully convenient. However, everyone who lost in that time is out of luck. ED is keeping your money. That's the first two pieces of BS.

The next piece is that this sets up a BS precedent on ED. It is now established that winnings can be denied because of website owner negligence. 'Yeah, I guess you could see the seed or something because we didn't code our website correctly, so we're not gonna pay you the money you won.' This incentivizes website owners to code intentional faults into their website so they have an excuse to deny payments to big winners if they want to.

On a related note, can someone explain to me how it is possible to game the system if you can see the site seed? This is completely unrelated to the merit of my points, I just want to understand this argument. Am I understanding it incorrectly, or don't sites like JD and LuckyNumber publish the seed? How can they publish the seed, but ED's seed needs to remain a secret?

The fact remains that if the seed was supposed to be hidden and it wasn't, that's the site owner's fault, not 1Dice1's fault. But I don't believe 1Dice was gaming the site. He's not a technical computer guy. Some people have been talking to him outside of this forum and ED chat to try and help him track down ED owner if necessary, and we asked him to find the IP address in the mails he was exchanging with ED owner, and he had no idea what we were talking about or how to do it. We had to have him forward the mail so someone could do it for him. If he can't find something simple like an IP address, I doubt he could find a site seed, assuming he even knew what that was.

hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 500
Here's whats gonna happen. 1.) ED will refund investors, 2.) Reduce max bet into 0.5%, 3.) Rework commission structure.

Then we wont have shit like this again.


ed, how is the progress, can i get my coins soon?
I offer to buy your account for 4 BTC if you're interested.

And reduce a massive payout to a sum that is, relatively speaking, peanuts? Seems a bit suspicious to me.

1Dice has 90-150BTC stuck, and I'd doubt he would accept your offer. It's less than what he put into ed.

Precisely. The offer would have to be significantly better for it to become a serious one that would require consideration.

Is ruru a stakeholder in EveryDice? Perhaps an associate?

We would all like to wipe out a debt for a tiny fraction of the amount owed...


Cryptopher, I guess you are right. ruru is either a big investor or a staff of ED...
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Here's whats gonna happen. 1.) ED will refund investors, 2.) Reduce max bet into 0.5%, 3.) Rework commission structure.

Then we wont have shit like this again.

You forgot me ruru, what about me? i made my coins legit, isnt this a theft?

Agree

ED, you should pay 1DiCe1 's fair winnings. otherwise your trust is in garbage.

And if you really can't pay it in full right now, maybe you guys can schedule a term payment, say monthly 30BTC until all amounts are paid. I guess 1DiCe1 might be OK with that.


hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 500
Here's whats gonna happen. 1.) ED will refund investors, 2.) Reduce max bet into 0.5%, 3.) Rework commission structure.

Then we wont have shit like this again.

You forgot me ruru, what about me? i made my coins legit, isnt this a theft?

Here's what gonna happen. 1.) ED ruins its own reputation 2.) Existing and potential gamblers will switch to other places.  Grin
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
Here's whats gonna happen. 1.) ED will refund investors, 2.) Reduce max bet into 0.5%, 3.) Rework commission structure.

Then we wont have shit like this again.

You forgot me ruru, what about me? i made my coins legit, isnt this a theft?
full member
Activity: 139
Merit: 100
GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!
Here's whats gonna happen. 1.) ED will refund investors, 2.) Reduce max bet into 0.5%, 3.) Rework commission structure.

Then we wont have shit like this again.
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 500
WOW, this is ridiculous. so everytime someone win big on your site, you might just find another "bug" and refuse the payment.

That is such an "easy" way of running a dice site  Grin



Pretty much so.

To everyone playing or planning to play on ED: Your winnings MAY BE reversed at any time but not your losses.

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
WOW, this is ridiculous. so everytime someone win big on your site, you might just find another "bug" and refuse the payment.

That is such an "easy" way of running a dice site  Grin

hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 500
As expected, seems that i wont get my coins:

Quote
P-4718
I understand but please see due to coding error we will be forced to refund to all investors possible.

1DiCe1
how you know i used that error

P-4718
We are not 100% if you did 1dice
but its unfair to the investors and by law we have to Sorry.

1DiCe1
i think so i used game rules and i did all fairly

P-4718
Due to a problem within the code some people were able to see the seed.
We can not confirm if 1dice did no
but due to the problem found we will reset the website back.

Admin, you made errors and have no idea whether someone has used it at all, and now you simply use it as an excuse to deny payment.
Wow, it is just ridiculous...

EDIT: fixed the quotes
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 502
Then everydice should refund the 30 coins that 1dice1 lost.
newbie
Activity: 19
Merit: 0
As expected, seems that i wont get my coins:

Quote
P-4718
I understand but please see due to coding error we will be forced to refund to all investors possible.

1DiCe1
how you know i used that error

P-4718
We are not 100% if you did 1dice
but its unfair to the investors and by law we have to Sorry.

1DiCe1
i think so i used game rules and i did all fairly

P-4718
Due to a problem within the code some people were able to see the seed.
We can not confirm if 1dice did no
but due to the problem found we will reset the website back.

1DiCe1
reset site or do whatever but give me my fair earned coins

P-4718
as i said it has been unfair to the investors and is only right we correct this.

1DiCe1
unless you can prove i cheated or whatever you will had to pay your errors, not me
this is unfair
23:20

P-4718
I understand but please see due to coding error we will be forced to refund to all investors possible.

P-4718
We only get a small % so are unable to refund from our own pocket.
We will prove the issue ASAP.

P-4718
Please understand we are not 100% sure if 1dice used the loop hole or not but i can confirm it has now be patched.

1DiCe1
if you cant demostrate i cheated, then you have to pay your errors thats it
so give me my coins i made fairplaying

P-4718
We are not part of the bankroll and only receive a small percent.
Sorry everyone i must leave but this will be resolved in 24 hours! Thank you. Tony & Eddy

Is possible to sue in court?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
12CDKyxPyL5Rj28ed2yz5czJf3Dr2ZvEYw
So you addressed the first part of my point. I stand corrected on that.

I agree with you on the rest of your point:

Quote
This bet "verification" ED is talking about sounds only like an attempt to find an reason not to pay. If someone lost money to ED and requested a "verification" of all the bets, how do you think that would have went down? Everyone would have accused them of just being butthurt over losing money and there would have been a whole lot of "well you knew the risks of gambling, yada yada..." What a ridiculous double standard. ED advertises "provably fair" so how is there a need for verification in a provably fair system? In the event of a site leak or whatever everyone is on about, that's the site owner's fault. You can't tell gamblers "you knew the risks of gambling, it's your loss for being bad at it" then not tell the site owner "you knew the risks of running a gambling website, it's your loss for being bad at it."

It's not my place to address that.  I run the biggest BTC dice site, Just-Dice.com;  I first came up with the idea of having visitors bankroll the site which everydice and many others have copied (and usually messed up), so when I saw you misunderstanding how that works I stepped in to explain it better.

As for regularly proving solvency, of course that's a good idea.  Any site that doesn't do it should be treated with suspicion.  It's easy to do, so why not do it?

Every Sunday Just-Dice publishes a list of investor balances, so you can check that your investment is included in the total, and we keep the coins in a well known address which we have signed with a message proving it is ours, so you can check that we really do have them all.

JD is as safe as it gets for a Bitcoin casino

Quote

Every Sunday Just-Dice publishes a list of investor balances, so you can check that your investment is included in the total, and we keep the coins in a well known address which we have signed with a message proving it is ours, so you can check that we really do have them all.

That's the way to do it.

Does JD take a percentage of all wagered bets (win or lose) like ED did, or only percentage of profit?

"Commission is charged when profits are divested, or at midnight (UTC) on Sunday each week, whichever happens sooner. Commission is never charged twice on the same profits. For example if you invest 100 BTC and it grows to 110 BTC by the end of the first week, you will be charged 10% of your 10 BTC profit. If your remaining 109 BTC investment then shrinks to 105 BTC over the next week, you will not be charged any commission at the end of that week. And then, if it grows to 119 BTC by the end of the 3rd week, you will only be charged 10% commission on the new 10 BTC of profit over the previous high of 109 BTC. At any point you could divest up to your original investment of 100 BTC without being charged commission since we consider that when divesting you divest the original investment first, and profits later."

BTW 1Dice1 was referred so someone made 5BTC out of its betting?

Did someone else win more than 0.5 on ED so far?
I did, 0.84 had, but lost some
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
So you addressed the first part of my point. I stand corrected on that.

I agree with you on the rest of your point:

Quote
This bet "verification" ED is talking about sounds only like an attempt to find an reason not to pay. If someone lost money to ED and requested a "verification" of all the bets, how do you think that would have went down? Everyone would have accused them of just being butthurt over losing money and there would have been a whole lot of "well you knew the risks of gambling, yada yada..." What a ridiculous double standard. ED advertises "provably fair" so how is there a need for verification in a provably fair system? In the event of a site leak or whatever everyone is on about, that's the site owner's fault. You can't tell gamblers "you knew the risks of gambling, it's your loss for being bad at it" then not tell the site owner "you knew the risks of running a gambling website, it's your loss for being bad at it."

It's not my place to address that.  I run the biggest BTC dice site, Just-Dice.com;  I first came up with the idea of having visitors bankroll the site which everydice and many others have copied (and usually messed up), so when I saw you misunderstanding how that works I stepped in to explain it better.

As for regularly proving solvency, of course that's a good idea.  Any site that doesn't do it should be treated with suspicion.  It's easy to do, so why not do it?

Every Sunday Just-Dice publishes a list of investor balances, so you can check that your investment is included in the total, and we keep the coins in a well known address which we have signed with a message proving it is ours, so you can check that we really do have them all.

JD is as safe as it gets for a Bitcoin casino

Quote

Every Sunday Just-Dice publishes a list of investor balances, so you can check that your investment is included in the total, and we keep the coins in a well known address which we have signed with a message proving it is ours, so you can check that we really do have them all.

That's the way to do it.

Does JD take a percentage of all wagered bets (win or lose) like ED did, or only percentage of profit?

"Commission is charged when profits are divested, or at midnight (UTC) on Sunday each week, whichever happens sooner. Commission is never charged twice on the same profits. For example if you invest 100 BTC and it grows to 110 BTC by the end of the first week, you will be charged 10% of your 10 BTC profit. If your remaining 109 BTC investment then shrinks to 105 BTC over the next week, you will not be charged any commission at the end of that week. And then, if it grows to 119 BTC by the end of the 3rd week, you will only be charged 10% commission on the new 10 BTC of profit over the previous high of 109 BTC. At any point you could divest up to your original investment of 100 BTC without being charged commission since we consider that when divesting you divest the original investment first, and profits later."

BTW 1Dice1 was referred so someone made 5BTC out of its betting?

Did someone else win more than 0.5 on ED so far?
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
EOS Auctions
You should provide the coins to a trusted escrow, the amount of 1dice1's balance and deduct it from his balance. After a reasonable time has passed the escrow releases the funds (I'd say a couple days) to 1dice1 UNLESS you provide proof that he cheated. You delaying his funds is truly unreasonable 100%. If your excuse was true then you should be working 24/7 into his case. Not getting offline and coming back every 12 hours. Should be around the clock if you are really going to delay payment.

I personally played at everydice twice but after this definitely will not play ever again here. It is bullshit what you are doing. It has been 3 days. If you worked 24 hours straight I guarantee you would have your decision by now.

Checking that provably fair system is works might not take a long time, but other than that we did many things. One of the example is the leak of site seed, this not only involve technical checking and ensure our server has not been compromised, but also questioning all team member involved in the project. We cannot assume this is the case (and lets not), but it is better to be safe than sorry.

As you might noticed, few hours ago the site profit goes down ~50 BTC again, this happened after some manual withdrawal. We know that the previous bet event is mathematically unrelated to the future event, so thinking that site will win after losing is fallacy, however, this is quite much for a coincidence. We are really sorry for the inconvenience, but for a moment we will have to ensure everything is legit. The roll function of P-4747 and 1DiCe1 also has been disabled.

EveryDice, it has been more than 24 hours, you must pay 1Dice1. Period.

I run a scratchticket gambling site. When I started my site, I was fully aware of the risks that variances mean to the house bankroll. On my site, I have a background process that runs that tells me when a betters results (wins/losses) are exceptionally lucky. If you are outside 4 standard deviations from the norm, that's pretty damn lucky. These results are flagged for manual review. However, unless I can PROVE fraud within 12 hours of so, I must pay out. This is the risk the house takes when it develops (or licenses) its software and puts in place its security procedures. If someone rips you off, than it is still your fault and if you can't prove fraud within 12 hours, pay him. This is the cost of business. When you find out how they did it, fix it. But for now, you are completely killing your own site by undermining every ounce of trust everyone has in you.

My guess is that if I ran a statistical analysis on the betting history you released for 1Dice1, it would show the guy (gal) is damn lucky but statistically within the reasonable realm of possibilities. Pay him unless you can 100% prove fraud.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
See I personally don't think everydice is looking into rolls, they are considering the ethical decision at hand:

1. Run with the funds since no one knows their identity.
2. Payout 1dice1 and the site ends cause no one trusts them and no one thinks the site is fair or whatever.

Either way the site goes down. So how much guilt is the point where they won't scam is the real question? For 300 BTC thats quite a hefty sum for someone who no one knows and could disappear with.

I agree. That's why I quickly divested my investment and cashed out 2 days ago, when 1Dice won 100 BTC.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Acc bought - used solely for signature testing
See I personally don't think everydice is looking into rolls, they are considering the ethical decision at hand:

1. Run with the funds since no one knows their identity.
2. Payout 1dice1 and the site ends cause no one trusts them and no one thinks the site is fair or whatever.

Either way the site goes down. So how much guilt is the point where they won't scam is the real question? For 300 BTC thats quite a hefty sum for someone who no one knows and could disappear with.
legendary
Activity: 1789
Merit: 1008
Keep it dense, yeah?
Seems no one get's bigger point, people will lose trust into all sites if ED runs away and doesn't pay and this includes JD as well.

That's a bit of a bold statement. EnjoyDice has only been running a couple of months therefore it should be treated with the risks of anything that is not proven over time.

There are a fair few other, established dice games out there that protect themselves from this happening. If the owner of EnjoyDice does a runner with his funds then that damages the reputation of ED only, not the other, more established dice games.

I kind of understand zahra's point.
After gox is down, everyone are more aware of the problem of storing bitcoin on exchanges and they kind of trust bitstamp, btc-e and all other exchanges less.

Similarly, if ED runs away with all bitcoin, people may be more hesitated to invest their money in bankroll of JD or other casinos.

Fair enough point about the bankroll aspect, but after Gox went tits up did people stop using BTC-E, Bitstamp, Huobi etc? Of course not. Did people stop storing funds on these exchanges? Probably a few, but the majority of users won't have flinched.

I think that EveryDice's reputation is in tatters now, at least for those who are witnessing this unfold. I don't know how 1Dice amassed so much in winnings so soon, but assuming it is legit then ED is dead in the water.

hero member
Activity: 603
Merit: 500
Seems no one get's bigger point, people will lose trust into all sites if ED runs away and doesn't pay and this includes JD as well.

That's a bit of a bold statement. EnjoyDice has only been running a couple of months therefore it should be treated with the risks of anything that is not proven over time.

There are a fair few other, established dice games out there that protect themselves from this happening. If the owner of EnjoyDice does a runner with his funds then that damages the reputation of ED only, not the other, more established dice games.

I kind of understand zahra's point.
After gox is down, everyone are more aware of the problem of storing bitcoin on exchanges and they kind of trust bitstamp, btc-e and all other exchanges less.

Similarly, if ED runs away with all bitcoin, people may be more hesitated to invest their money in bankroll of JD or other casinos.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
Maybe unnecessary to point out, but name is "EveryDice," not "EnjoyDice."

If the owner of EnjoyDice does a runner with his funds then that damages the reputation of ED only, not the other, more established dice games.

But I agree with you, it doesn't necessarily damage the reputation of other dice sites. Maybe a good opportunity for smaller site to swing in and save the day, make a name for itself, good PR by covering some of 1D1's losses. But this is maybe unreasonable to assume.
Pages:
Jump to: