Seems like everyone has an agenda in this thread, myself included tbh.
Will be interesting to see what comes of this, I'm slightly concerned by how long it's dragging on for (plus the fact the site has been taken down, rather than just having the betting feature disabled) but I'm somewhat confident that the admin will sort this out eventually.
Topic: EveryDice.com | 0.99% Edge - Instant Cashout - Invest - Referral - Mobile - Fair - page 20. (Read 72081 times)
May 28, 2014, 04:16:47 AM
May 27, 2014, 07:03:19 PM
Stay cautious guys. Don't trust anyone with large amounts of coins.
Present company excepted of course!
May 27, 2014, 06:47:28 PM
Saw this coming a mile away.
Stay cautious guys. Don't trust anyone with large amounts of coins.
Stay cautious guys. Don't trust anyone with large amounts of coins.
May 27, 2014, 06:36:07 PM
1DiCe1, maybe you can open a separate thread on this issue alone to bring more attention to this
May 27, 2014, 04:59:59 PM
http://www.everydice.com no longer redirects to http://hamster-334.getforge.io/ and the 1Dice1's bet history is accessible once again on http://everydice.getforge.io/log_1dice1.html.
OP hasn't logged in his account since May 25, 2014, 02:23:36 PM.
At this stage, I can only hope he is really busy doing the internal investigation, and hope 1Dice1 can get his bitcoin.
Good luck to all having balances on the site.
OP hasn't logged in his account since May 25, 2014, 02:23:36 PM.
At this stage, I can only hope he is really busy doing the internal investigation, and hope 1Dice1 can get his bitcoin.
Good luck to all having balances on the site.
May 27, 2014, 04:59:50 PM
still no money or response from admin..
May 27, 2014, 04:36:31 PM
Something smelled to me about this site right away I remember. I never played here.
Look at the FIRST thing in the OP about features of the site:
"As low as 0.99% house edge!"
What the heck does that even mean? The way it's written it means that maybe 1 bet you make will have a .99% house edge but your next bet could have a 99% house edge! and judging by the plays here recently some bets had a -100% house edge.
Look at the FIRST thing in the OP about features of the site:
"As low as 0.99% house edge!"
What the heck does that even mean? The way it's written it means that maybe 1 bet you make will have a .99% house edge but your next bet could have a 99% house edge! and judging by the plays here recently some bets had a -100% house edge.
May 27, 2014, 03:11:45 PM
This site is over...get it once and forever
Agreed. Good thing I divested everything and withdrew when "the 1dice crisis" started.
May 27, 2014, 03:08:39 PM
This site is over...get it once and forever
May 27, 2014, 03:02:54 PM
Well, the site says when they re-open they will allow withdrawals but not rolling, so I'm not sure what they are talking about. Maybe they're talking about a little delay before allowing rolls again?
This thread is funny though, there were so many cheerleaders early on and I was thinking to myself, "Why? they are a totally new site and with such a low house edge it is dangerous." Guess I was right, I don't see them anywhere now...
PS-might want to take "instant cashout" out of the thread title...LOL
This thread is funny though, there were so many cheerleaders early on and I was thinking to myself, "Why? they are a totally new site and with such a low house edge it is dangerous." Guess I was right, I don't see them anywhere now...
PS-might want to take "instant cashout" out of the thread title...LOL
May 27, 2014, 02:59:01 PM
Do you guys think they will reopen and allow withdraws?
May 27, 2014, 02:58:22 PM
I believe I did tell you that some people are against any gambling, especially dice site, that has under a 2% or 1% house edge. It appears the 1dice guy took advantage of that and nailed you. If you can't PROVE 100% that the guy cheated then that's too bad and you have to pay him. If there is no proof of cheating, then I would say the investors need to take the hit. It's called investing for a reason, it's not called "guaranteed profit".
True. Investing is often risky, if can't take the risk, better go with fixed income deposit.
And with CrowdDice , you will never worry about not getting your winnings.
May 27, 2014, 02:38:28 PM
I believe I did tell you that some people are against any gambling, especially dice site, that has under a 2% or 1% house edge. It appears the 1dice guy took advantage of that and nailed you. If you can't PROVE 100% that the guy cheated then that's too bad and you have to pay him. If there is no proof of cheating, then I would say the investors need to take the hit. It's called investing for a reason, it's not called "guaranteed profit".
Yes, they need to pay that out if they did not have or want to pay, they shouldnt let him bet/win so much. Its rly inresponsible from them. I hope he gets paid.
May 27, 2014, 02:34:52 PM
I believe I did tell you that some people are against any gambling, especially dice site, that has under a 2% or 1% house edge. It appears the 1dice guy took advantage of that and nailed you. If you can't PROVE 100% that the guy cheated then that's too bad and you have to pay him. If there is no proof of cheating, then I would say the investors need to take the hit. It's called investing for a reason, it's not called "guaranteed profit".
May 27, 2014, 02:23:34 PM
Yes, thank you. So if you knew the secret seed, because you knew what the hash is before the roll, you could mathematically figure out what the result of the roll would be and bet accordingly. Is that the gist of it?
If you remove the bit I struck out, then yes, you've got it.
The only bit you got wrong is that knowing the hash of the secret seed doesn't let you find the secret seed itself. To find the secret seed you need to gain access to the server somehow, or be told it by someone.
The point of a hash is that it is one way.
If I tell you I'm thinking of a secret, and its hash is 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6 then you can't figure out what the secret is without guessing a whole bunch of times, hashing each guess, and seeing if it gives you 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6.
But when I tell you later that my secret was 'this is my secret', you can hash that, and see that it gives you that same long string of text, and be pretty certain that I'm telling you the truth.
There's a chance that some other secret would give the exact same hash, but it's almost impossible to find two secrets with the same hash.
(In this example I used sha-1 for the hashing because it produces shorter hashes; in practice people use sha-256 or sha-512 which produce longer outputs making 'collisions' even less likely).
Collision of Sha-256 is highly unlikely. With the current computational power, it is more unlikely than the entire human race being wiped out in the next second or so, if my memory servers me right.
So just so I understand correctly, you're saying get really big bomb = getting all the bitcoins?
I've got work to do...
May 27, 2014, 01:59:24 PM
Yes, thank you. So if you knew the secret seed, because you knew what the hash is before the roll, you could mathematically figure out what the result of the roll would be and bet accordingly. Is that the gist of it?
If you remove the bit I struck out, then yes, you've got it.
The only bit you got wrong is that knowing the hash of the secret seed doesn't let you find the secret seed itself. To find the secret seed you need to gain access to the server somehow, or be told it by someone.
The point of a hash is that it is one way.
If I tell you I'm thinking of a secret, and its hash is 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6 then you can't figure out what the secret is without guessing a whole bunch of times, hashing each guess, and seeing if it gives you 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6.
But when I tell you later that my secret was 'this is my secret', you can hash that, and see that it gives you that same long string of text, and be pretty certain that I'm telling you the truth.
There's a chance that some other secret would give the exact same hash, but it's almost impossible to find two secrets with the same hash.
(In this example I used sha-1 for the hashing because it produces shorter hashes; in practice people use sha-256 or sha-512 which produce longer outputs making 'collisions' even less likely).
Collision of Sha-256 is highly unlikely. With the current computational power, it is more unlikely than the entire human race being wiped out in the next second or so, if my memory servers me right.
May 27, 2014, 12:04:03 PM
Yes, thank you. So if you knew the secret seed, because you knew what the hash is before the roll, you could mathematically figure out what the result of the roll would be and bet accordingly. Is that the gist of it?
If you remove the bit I struck out, then yes, you've got it.
The only bit you got wrong is that knowing the hash of the secret seed doesn't let you find the secret seed itself. To find the secret seed you need to gain access to the server somehow, or be told it by someone.
The point of a hash is that it is one way.
If I tell you I'm thinking of a secret, and its hash is 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6 then you can't figure out what the secret is without guessing a whole bunch of times, hashing each guess, and seeing if it gives you 1b8f391a4813d911de3f94d624ccdc82c12fc6a6.
But when I tell you later that my secret was 'this is my secret', you can hash that, and see that it gives you that same long string of text, and be pretty certain that I'm telling you the truth.
There's a chance that some other secret would give the exact same hash, but it's almost impossible to find two secrets with the same hash.
(In this example I used sha-1 for the hashing because it produces shorter hashes; in practice people use sha-256 or sha-512 which produce longer outputs making 'collisions' even less likely).
May 27, 2014, 03:34:28 AM
You guys kinda had it coming investing with a "newbie" account. Just sayin....
May 27, 2014, 03:29:24 AM
I was watching that 4747 playing, he started to play after 1Dice1 won a lot from the site should've deposited a lot(20 or 30 BTC maybe).
I doubt at least 4747 knew how to win or why he would deposited that much when even 1Dice1 couldn't withdraw?
If he deposited 20-30 coins and won 50 coins this is not statistically improbable. Once AGAIN I recommend NO ONE EVER play on this site again.I doubt at least 4747 knew how to win or why he would deposited that much when even 1Dice1 couldn't withdraw?
The funny part is that theres a good chance everydice runs with everyone's funds here because the way they have handled this they know their business is DONE.
May 27, 2014, 03:25:56 AM
Let's at least watch the cold wallet addresses.
https://blockchain.info/address/1EDCWwzPzuT5v9hmxCwrW5hCDWFyGcdpeg and https://blockchain.info/address/1EDCWx4aJ5bT3ztma8wqT3CyTRbd9uSA8K
Once again,
https://www.mtgox.com/
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.605957 and
http://media.coindesk.com/2013/11/Inputs.io-bitcoins-stolen.png
http://coinbet.cc/
http://hamster-334.getforge.io/
They all share something similar, no? These are the game over screens of various scams. We have Mt.Gox, BS&T, Inputs.IO, Coinbet.CC and perhaps, EveryDice.
https://blockchain.info/address/1EDCWwzPzuT5v9hmxCwrW5hCDWFyGcdpeg and https://blockchain.info/address/1EDCWx4aJ5bT3ztma8wqT3CyTRbd9uSA8K
Once again,
https://www.mtgox.com/
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.605957 and
http://media.coindesk.com/2013/11/Inputs.io-bitcoins-stolen.png
http://coinbet.cc/
http://hamster-334.getforge.io/
They all share something similar, no? These are the game over screens of various scams. We have Mt.Gox, BS&T, Inputs.IO, Coinbet.CC and perhaps, EveryDice.
Jump to: