Pages:
Author

Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam! - page 22. (Read 6718 times)

copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
P.S., quick question:  Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”.  Why?  On what evidence?

As I have already said. It is nobody who has ever contacted you all in any wise! Instead of making me a culprit, you should rather worry about other things. But it was clear that will be distracted from the actual topic again.

It is you who is distracting from the actual topic.  You are dispoiling a scam investigation, not performing one.

Put up or shut up:

From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.

nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!


It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me.  I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert.  Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

Yes of course. It's always about you all. My God, what do you all really think you are?  Roll Eyes

Yes, it’s (in large part) about me.  My original instinct in that regard is borne out by the evidence of you telling bald-faced lies about me.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
OP is a liar. I am at college and can respond only tersely, but during a break I'll add some more.

I know that OP is a liar.  I know that, because I have first-hand knowledge that I have never met you and never claimed to.

My questions are about you.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 10
Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

I do not care what you think about me, if I was just lucky or anything else is going on Roll Eyes. I do not trust you for the same reasons why I do not trust aTriz!

P.S., quick question:  Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”.  Why?  On what evidence?

As I have already said. It is nobody who has ever contacted you all in any wise! Instead of making me a culprit, you should rather worry about other things. But it was clear that will be distracted from the actual topic again.

It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me.  I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert.  Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

Yes of course. It's always about you all. My God, what do you all really think you are?  Roll Eyes
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
I have been lurking quietly whilst waiting to see if Alia would send me a PM.  I expressed my such intents to several people, including theymos.

This has not occurred; and I can no longer sit this out when issues are being deliberately confused by certain persons.  OP is a liar, and I have first-hand knowledge that #1887512 “scam_detector” is maliciously stating false and incorrect information:

From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.

nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!

It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me.  I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert.  Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

I have more to say about new developments since my last post.  Will do.  Immediately, I must make a few things clear for the record:

  • I am a pseudonymous user.  I connect to this forum through Tor; and I am quite careful about my identity.  Nobody on this forum (except me) has any idea whatsoever of my age, the continent on which I am physically situate, etc.  To suggest that I publicly discussed meeting another user IRL is preposterous.  If you wish to call me a liar:  Put up or shut up.  Cough up a link to the post.
  • The attacks on aTriz’s signature campaign contract are clearly spurious.  aTriz saw a rising-star user account, made a business decision, and locked in a contract.  I don’t see what’s so difficult to understand about that.  I also don’t see any evidence that it occurred otherwise.
  • I see that Alia immediately latched onto (at least) three points which I stated in my prior posts:  Care in determining innocence versus guilt, avoidance of a lynch mob (as to which I had linked a djb essay), and my off-the-cuff “little brother” hypothesis.  This would occur either in case of total innocence (and some astonishing coincidences), or total guilt.  theymos has suggested what I believe to be adequate means for the person controlling account #1764044 to adequately demonstrate that an Alia exists, is a 19-year-old girl, and has a 15-year-old brother.  In the absence of that demonstration being made, I will book bets0 on 1000000:1 odds that the IP evidence is conclusive.  Stranger things have happened, but—oh so very rarely.  Curiously enough, an innocent person would also understand how bad this looks.

For one thing I take responsibility:  I quite deliberately did what I could to bring another account instant fame and a rather high-level circle of admirers.  My first, last, and only concern is the truth here.  It is clear to me that somebody is opportunistically mud-slinging with lies and distorted half-truths amidst a very serious investigation.  That is distracting from the focus on aforestated first, last, and only concern.

Note:  I do not here reach the issues about the gambling script because frankly, I do not understand enough gambling.  Having interacted with RGBKey in Dev & Tech, I trust his technical correctness, and will defer to that.

(I will make a follow-up post with some interesting questions...)



P.S., quick question:  Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”.  Why?  On what evidence?


0. For the record, this is a rhetorical flourish amidst all the gambling discussion.  I am not actually booking bets on this.

OP is a liar. I am at college and can respond only tersely, but during a break I'll add some more.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 3284
And you tested 10000$ worth script using...faucet...and recommend it. Roll Eyes
I profited in the 10 minutes I had it running. What else would you prefer that I say?

How about the fact that it was only tested for 10 minutes, you only gave it one try. You also seem familar with the gambler's fallacy, something you'd know would disprove her/his theory.

Your chance of winning does not increase at all when you hit a red streak of something. Instead it stays the same.

So based on that your method is already not working.

This is the famous gambler's fallacy. Gamblers tend to think that they are able to beat the house because after each loss their chance of winning rises. But that is mathematically not true because each event is independent of what happened before that.



I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

No. You claim that you are consistently able to with 10% ROI, or more. You do not mention any loss, but you do mention that "you cannot go wrong with it". The only "golden" scripts imo are the positive EV ones that worked on bustabit v1, and whatever clones of the site exist now. Even +EV scripts can and will lose, such as EDGE_NXTAE, which was a +EV script. It at one point was down 2 BTC, despite playing +EV and had no promises of guaranteed 10% ROI.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 2614
If you don’t do PGP, you don’t do crypto!
I have been lurking quietly whilst waiting to see if Alia would send me a PM.  I expressed my such intents to several people, including theymos.

This has not occurred; and I can no longer sit this out when issues are being deliberately confused by certain persons.  OP is a liar, and I have first-hand knowledge that #1887512 “scam_detector” is maliciously stating false and incorrect information:

From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.

nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!

It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me.  I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert.  Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

I have more to say about new developments since my last post.  Will do.  Immediately, I must make a few things clear for the record:

  • I am a pseudonymous user.  I connect to this forum through Tor; and I am quite careful about my identity.  Nobody on this forum (except me) has any idea whatsoever of my age, the continent on which I am physically situate, etc.  To suggest that I publicly discussed meeting another user IRL is preposterous.  If you wish to call me a liar:  Put up or shut up.  Cough up a link to the post.
  • The attacks on aTriz’s signature campaign contract are clearly spurious.  aTriz saw a rising-star user account, made a business decision, and locked in a contract.  I don’t see what’s so difficult to understand about that.  I also don’t see any evidence that it occurred otherwise.
  • I see that Alia immediately latched onto (at least) three points which I stated in my prior posts:  Care in determining innocence versus guilt, avoidance of a lynch mob (as to which I had linked a djb essay), and my off-the-cuff “little brother” hypothesis.  This would occur either in case of total innocence (and some astonishing coincidences), or total guilt.  theymos has suggested what I believe to be adequate means for the person controlling account #1764044 to adequately demonstrate that an Alia exists, is a 19-year-old girl, and has a 15-year-old brother.  In the absence of that demonstration being made, I will book bets0 on 1000000:1 odds that the IP evidence is conclusive.  Stranger things have happened, but—oh so very rarely.  Curiously enough, an innocent person would also understand how bad this looks.

For one thing I take responsibility:  I quite deliberately did what I could to bring another account instant fame and a rather high-level circle of admirers.  My first, last, and only concern is the truth here.  It is clear to me that somebody is opportunistically mud-slinging with lies and distorted half-truths amidst a very serious investigation.  That is distracting from the focus on aforestated first, last, and only concern.

Note:  I do not here reach the issues about the gambling script because frankly, I do not understand enough gambling.  Having interacted with RGBKey in Dev & Tech, I trust his technical correctness, and will defer to that.

(I will make a follow-up post with some interesting questions...)



P.S., quick question:  Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”.  Why?  On what evidence?


0. For the record, this is a rhetorical flourish amidst all the gambling discussion.  I am not actually booking bets on this.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 10
And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.
No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.
You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.
Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.

I believe I have explained enough why I trust neither you nor aTriz nor any of the other people (your enemies (QS, OG etc.) (so ridiculous that ADULT people have "enemies" on the internet)) who are constantly
have to fight their controversy in this forum.  Roll Eyes It does not make any sense to argue with you all anyway. All of you always want to be right. Like toddlers. Grow up and do not bother us with your fight.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.
I don't see your 9/10 times disclaimer anywhere in your thread. Nor is that stat correct assuming a 1% house edge (most likely, and assuming there are not any kind of YOLO-type bets )

It's based on my, and clients', experiences.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.
I don't see your 9/10 times disclaimer anywhere in your thread. Nor is that stat correct assuming a 1% house edge (most likely, and assuming there are not any kind of YOLO-type bets )
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.
No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.
You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.
Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.

He's just a cock with a vendetta against you and aTriz, and he's using me to get people to subconsciously be distrustful of you.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.
No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.
You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.
Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 10
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.
I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

mdayonliner, you deserve to be painted red. You are accusing some very upstanding members of shady shit without proof. Don't be a pussy.

Call me what you want, but I'm not one of the user mentioned here.

Please do not send sMerits to this account! This account is only to find and expose scammer.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.
I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

mdayonliner, you deserve to be painted red. You are accusing some very upstanding members of shady shit without proof. Don't be a pussy.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 10
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.
I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 115
Lowest EVER interest lending! (Use escrow always)
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Lauda's go to answer for anyone critical of him is that they are an alt of QS. If you look through his history he will never give a straight answer (at least publicly, where he can be called out) to concerns that people bring up.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.
I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

See, the scammer is attempting to derail the thread in several subtle ways.
Pages:
Jump to: