I have been lurking quietly whilst waiting to see if Alia would send me a PM. I expressed my such intents to several people, including theymos.
This has not occurred; and I can no longer sit this out when issues are being deliberately confused by certain persons. OP is a liar, and I have first-hand knowledge that #1887512 “scam_detector” is maliciously stating false and incorrect information:
From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.
nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!
It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me. I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert. Whether a troll got lucky, or something
else is going on here, I do not know.
I have more to say about new developments since my last post. Will do. Immediately, I must make a few things clear for the record:
- I am a pseudonymous user. I connect to this forum through Tor; and I am quite careful about my identity. Nobody on this forum (except me) has any idea whatsoever of my age, the continent on which I am physically situate, etc. To suggest that I publicly discussed meeting another user IRL is preposterous. If you wish to call me a liar: Put up or shut up. Cough up a link to the post.
- The attacks on aTriz’s signature campaign contract are clearly spurious. aTriz saw a rising-star user account, made a business decision, and locked in a contract. I don’t see what’s so difficult to understand about that. I also don’t see any evidence that it occurred otherwise.
- I see that Alia immediately latched onto (at least) three points which I stated in my prior posts: Care in determining innocence versus guilt, avoidance of a lynch mob (as to which I had linked a djb essay), and my off-the-cuff “little brother” hypothesis. This would occur either in case of total innocence (and some astonishing coincidences), or total guilt. theymos has suggested what I believe to be adequate means for the person controlling account #1764044 to adequately demonstrate that an Alia exists, is a 19-year-old girl, and has a 15-year-old brother. In the absence of that demonstration being made, I will book bets0 on 1000000:1 odds that the IP evidence is conclusive. Stranger things have happened, but—oh so very rarely. Curiously enough, an innocent person would also understand how bad this looks.
For one thing I take responsibility: I quite deliberately did what I could to bring another account instant fame and a rather high-level circle of admirers.
My first, last, and only concern is the truth here. It is clear to me that
somebody is opportunistically mud-slinging with lies and distorted half-truths amidst a very serious investigation. That is distracting from the focus on aforestated first, last, and only concern.
Note: I do not here reach the issues about the gambling script because frankly, I do not understand enough gambling. Having interacted with RGBKey in Dev & Tech, I trust his technical correctness, and will defer to that.
(I will make a follow-up post with some interesting questions...)
P.S., quick question: Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”. Why? On what evidence?
0. For the record, this is a rhetorical flourish amidst all the gambling discussion. I am not actually booking bets on this.
