Topic: Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam! - page 18. (Read 6718 times)

1) The less customers I get, the more manageable my workflow is

2) If a deposit is larger, I tend to be much more conservative and aim for a lower ROI, which leads to a much lower loss rate

3) I can make expotentially more money with much less work

Hopefully that makes it clear. If you really, really want to do it, then with theymos's permission, I'll gamble with small amounts for maybe a window of 48 hours, and livestream the thing while blurring out the script. I'm not a generous person; I didn't just randomly give you 0.01 BTC for free. I gave it to you because I made money off your money, and was rewarding you for it.

I want to understand this:  Other than the simple business consideration of keeping your customer base small and thus manageable, what difference would it make to take, say, 1.2 BTC from whale_of_a_bettor plus 0.02 BTC from me, and gamble 1.22 BTC with proceeds split appropriately?

---

Actually, no:  My point is to inquire as to whether doubling 0.01 BTC for me was an investment on conning a rich mark.

In her very first PM to me, Alia said that I must be rich.  I never contradicted this; I let her make her own assumptions.  Only after she required 1.2 BTC from me upfront for a deal I had seen to be profitable, I regrettably had to inform her that I do not have that kind of money to invest.  I really don’t.

My PM inbox got a bit quieter after that...

For the tax thing, I was misinformed. Until RHavar told me, I did not know that it was illegal everywhere. Upon knowing this, I shut it down immediately. I'm still continuing my script thing - just off this forum. I promised this to theymos via PM and I'll keep my word. If anyone NOT on the forum wishes to do business with me (gambling-related), then they are free to. For now, my main focuses will be the cam shows, lending service, currency exchange service, and so on.

If I understand nullius's point correctly,he wants to know who are the investors you found on the forum who invested 1.2 BTC in that service ? Since you said you have found investors and are not accepting participants anymore,you should have some sort of proof right ?

Also,hasn't it become a thing now that you open shady threads and once criticised by reputed /high ranked members on the forum you just stop the service ? You did same with your Tax-Crap thread,you tried to argue with others while Rhaver shut you down resulting in that thread being locked (just like your other threads).Shady,Shady as it can get.

The minimum investment has had been set in place in order to give me a better reward for the time I put in. Although, I am no longer accepting new investors anymore, and am stopping the service on this forum entirely.

The investors in question are not persons who gambled with you while the thread was open, but rather, the investors for whom you shut the thread down.  After which you told me that if I wanted back in on the game, minimum investment was 1.2 BTC.  Oops, I forgot to mention that before.

Could you have brought a substantial return on 1.2 BTC for me, as you did with my 0.01 BTC?  Too bad, I’ll never know...

(I have a few other potential replies upthread; but I wanted to address that quickly.)

Why is "girl" in bold? Sexist prick.

Lack of proof of collateral: show me how to sign a message from a BCH wallet using blockchain.info, and the same for ETH. I will do so.

Misrepresentations: I maintained that in the long run, the script is EV-, and in the short run, it is mostly profitable.

Lack of proof of possession of the Dell laptop: although I sent the purchase receipt, I admit that I no longer possess it, as I maintained this whole time.

Fake investors: nullius is fake? SyGambler is fake? TelevisionLover is gake? I added my brother there to gain credibility, which may have been wrong of me, but to be fair, I do gamble for him a lot, and the amount has been larger than 2 BTC.

Holy shit! Thanks for the comedy gold everyone 

I don't think this would be a very good idea. A skype interview could quickly turn from the interviewer trying to confirm that alia really has a brother who used the forum to getting extorted if there is an alleged minor involved. Especially considering that her "brother" watched her gamble in what could have been a sexually explicit show.

I am willing to check on skype.
I am surprised that a 19 year old girl knows so much about opsec and burner laptop  even Alexandre Cazes did not knew so much about these.

The world turns on its head, and we got drama coming out of ALL orifices here - even Quickseller coming off as empathetic 

You know,they can always ask someone 15 year old kid to be with them on the call and claim that they're favours and their younger brother.Also I find it amusing how a "15" year old can leave a feedback like this on their "elder" sisters account.



I don't know what you'll make of it but as far my opinions while dealing with this account is considered,I would stay away from them.

That Dave's Wallet Recovery exchange was embarrassing, but alia still insists that a Skype interview will exonerate her. I have a sort of script written for the interviewer: PM me if you're a somewhat-notable member and are willing to do it.

I will address all of this during my break, which is in 36 minutes.

She posted a picture of a MacBook that matched the description of what she was selling with her writing a post in this thread upthread. I think this is address.

The lack of proof of collateral when you tried to take your prior loan.

The misrepresentations regarding your gambling scripts (that you later corrected in this thread when called out on it).

This thread which appears as if you are trying to subtly trying to get people to engage in tax fraud (with your help).

The lack of proof of possession of the Dell laptop, although I will give you this one, even though I am hesitant to believe it was sold.

The almost certain fake investors in your naked gambling thread. This is actually a fairly major reason why I believe you are not who you say you are -- if you are a camgirl, I would understand that some people might get off on you doing this, however if you are not, then you may have been paying a camgirl to do this for you, and closing the thread will both reduce this expense, and make an appearance of trustworthiness. Also, you claim that your brother was one of your customers (WTF?). 

There are probably more.

Correct.I don't even know why are we investing so much time into another shady account who  hasn't scammed yet but shows the tendency that they might.

- How many things have you addressed so far ?
 Things you need to "address"
 - Picture of your Dell Xps (Don't bullshit that it's already "sold", pretty sure you didn't give customer 30 minutes delivery ETA just like McD)
 - Picture of your MacBook that is on the sale thread.
 - Your Github account which you claim to have done wonders creating "Erc tokens".And the ICO's link which you say raised some million bucks as you were the part of their team.
 - You said you know the backend algo of a gambling website ,this is a security flaw and should be reported to the owner of the website.Taking advantage of it by ctreating a script is untrustworthy
    behaviour.
 - I find it stupid that in one post you claim 'money is not a problem for you' and in the second you are selling verified fake paypal accounts for 60 bucks.Like do you think we are idiots  around here ? Go   away from the forum!

I can't fake a video interview. Real-time, people can request me to do handsigns, write messages, do gestures, so on and so forth.

I have a serious question for you.  I’m not trying to be mean, and I’m not being sarcastic here.

After my attempt to exonerate you backfired—yes, that’s what it was;⁰ and yes, that’s what happened—why would anybody spend the time and most importantly, risk their own credibility if they get fooled?

I can think of a few ways in which a very determined scammer could try to fool the video interview here.  No, I do not want to suggest any!  So, interviewer’s astuteness versus scammer’s shrewdness—who wants to risk that?

Thus, I am asking you politely and sincerely, Alia:  Do you have any other means to provide credible exculpatory evidence?

---

0. Protip:  Deliberately trying to prove somebody innocent is an excellent investigative technique for those who aim to be fair, both ways.  If the person is innocent—well, then you just saved an innocent person from a false accusation.  Few acts could be nobler.  Whereas if the person is even a little bit guilty, the probabililty approaches 1.0 that the attempt will not only fail, but backfire and blow up in a blaze of guilt.

---

I called that the threshold issue.

If it could be adequately proved that the #1764044 “alia” account is controlled by a 19-year-old girl, and the #974658 “favours” acount is controlled by a 15-year-old boy, and they are brother and sister—then, other issues could be reached.  (For me, actually, the primary issue would then become why she lied about Dave’s Wallet Recovery.  Another Dave with “the best” “wallet recovery service”?  Oh, come on.  I was not born yesterday!)

If not, then there is absolutely nothing else to discuss about either of these two accounts.  Red-tag and roast.