well google drive told me it did contain a virus.... does it?
Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 14. (Read 2164326 times)
well google drive told me it did contain a virus.... does it?
If I put //localhost:42000 in browser it show the statistics in browser but how to access that from internet?
You would need to forward port 42000 to your machine internal IP on your router, which is a bad idea since it's accessible by anyone and it opens up your machine to attacks. A better option would be to run a VPN server on your machine so you can connect to it from the internet or use RDP software like TeamViewer.
Thanks I already replaced TeamViewer with VNC because the last is considerably lighter.
If I put //localhost:42000 in browser it show the statistics in browser but how to access that from internet?
You would need to forward port 42000 to your machine internal IP on your router, which is a bad idea since it's accessible by anyone and it opens up your machine to attacks. A better option would be to run a VPN server on your machine so you can connect to it from the internet or use RDP software like TeamViewer.
https://i.imgur.com/6pbzw2r.png
Win7 MITM EWBF with --devfee 0.
Should I wait some weeks before devfee share appear?
Screenshots above are clear evidence that in 24h test --devfee 0 under Windows 7 is working as expected, i.e. no dev shares at all.
Test ended. MITM switched off. --devfee on previous value. Mining on.
Yep right! with --fee 0 (not --devfee 0)
this MITM allows to monitor real fee (so no problem if you don't want to redirect it) but useful to track it anyway
I suppose you could also provide us the same screenshot with defaut dev fee (2%) right?
because to me the default 2% looks more like 10% in fact...
https://i.imgur.com/OPYEbMS.png
https://i.imgur.com/wsFxSPR.png
If I put //localhost:42000 in browser it show the statistics in browser but how to access that from internet?
From, what I understand from the patenting process, which is the closest analogy.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
What do you smoke, dude?
eheh I guess it should be moved here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.28594214
(it seems to be linked to a debate about GPL and fees between chup and bensam)
From, what I understand from the patenting process, which is the closest analogy.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
What do you smoke, dude?
From, what I understand from the patenting process, which is the closest analogy.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
It is acceptable too look at other people's patents, for inspiration.
As long as you can come up with an alternative solution, a person or company is on safe ground.
The purpose of patents is not too stop improvements or innovation or discoveries.
Merely, to give the person with the perfect solution to that task a decent percentage of the fruits of their genius for finding a solution that cannot be surpassed.
From, everything that has been posted, it does not look like patent infringements are occurring.
EWBF's work is noticeable different.
https://i.imgur.com/6pbzw2r.png
Win7 MITM EWBF with --devfee 0.
Should I wait some weeks before devfee share appear?
Screenshots above are clear evidence that in 24h test --devfee 0 under Windows 7 is working as expected, i.e. no dev shares at all.
Test ended. MITM switched off. --devfee on previous value. Mining on.
Yep right! with --fee 0 (not --devfee 0)
this MITM allows to monitor real fee (so no problem if you don't want to redirect it) but useful to track it anyway
I suppose you could also provide us the same screenshot with defaut dev fee (2%) right?
try use this on bat file before command for mining
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
for windows, don't forget set and = (or setx that doesn't use = for forever;writes to reg) or it just complains blarg not a command
Code:
set some_env_var=some_env_val
whats all this for ?
Environment variables used by OpenCL which affect how GPU specific functions function.
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
You found pool that pays You based on GPU memory occupancy?
I am using Awesome Miner with automatic switching pools. Actually I am mining on MiningPoolHub and the problem is happening. All of my GTX1070 ti have the same problem. With AWBF's can't use 100% of the memory load. with the other engines they uses 100%.
Any help would be really appreicated.
try use this on bat file before command for mining
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Thanks for the advice! My settings are the same already. Just the GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 is set at 0. I will now try to set it at 1 and let you know. Thanks!!
try use this on bat file before command for mining
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
for windows, don't forget set and = (or setx that doesn't use = for forever;writes to reg) or it just complains blarg not a command
Code:
set some_env_var=some_env_val
whats all this for ?
Hello,friends
Find out how much it will cost bitcoin, read new pots about Bitcoin Volume Analysis on https://icovoting.com/news/bitcoin-volume-analysis-moment-of-truth-20012018
Find out how much it will cost bitcoin, read new pots about Bitcoin Volume Analysis on https://icovoting.com/news/bitcoin-volume-analysis-moment-of-truth-20012018
Why shill BTC related thing in altcoin miner thread? Get gooder with scammy stuffs.
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
You found pool that pays You based on GPU memory occupancy?
I am using Awesome Miner with automatic switching pools. Actually I am mining on MiningPoolHub and the problem is happening. All of my GTX1070 ti have the same problem. With AWBF's can't use 100% of the memory load. with the other engines they uses 100%.
Any help would be really appreicated.
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
for windows, don't forget set and = (or setx that doesn't use = for forever;writes to reg) or it just complains blarg not a command
Code:
set some_env_var=some_env_val
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
You found pool that pays You based on GPU memory occupancy?
I am using Awesome Miner with automatic switching pools. Actually I am mining on MiningPoolHub and the problem is happening. All of my GTX1070 ti have the same problem. With AWBF's can't use 100% of the memory load. with the other engines they uses 100%.
Any help would be really appreicated.
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
You found pool that pays You based on GPU memory occupancy?
I am using Awesome Miner with automatic switching pools. Actually I am mining on MiningPoolHub and the problem is happening. All of my GTX1070 ti have the same problem. With AWBF's can't use 100% of the memory load. with the other engines they uses 100%.
Any help would be really appreicated.
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
You found pool that pays You based on GPU memory occupancy?
Hi! I have a problem with EWBF's.
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
I have a rig with GTX 1070 ti. When I use, for example, claymore dual, the MEMORY LOAD USAGE is always at 100%. When I use EWBF's the MEMORY LOAD USAGE drops to 82/85%. I tried every possible overclock combination but nothing works.
can you help me to fix this problem and use the memory load at 100%?
thanks!
Win7 MITM EWBF with --devfee 0.
Should I wait some weeks before devfee share appear?
Screenshots above are clear evidence that in 24h test --devfee 0 under Windows 7 is working as expected, i.e. no dev shares at all.
Test ended. MITM switched off. --devfee on previous value. Mining on.
What driver is the most stable driver?
Ubuntu Linux 16.04 with the recent kernel, EWBF 0.3.4, nvidia 375= working for 3-4 wks (or more) at the time with no interruption.
Thank you. You are the only one that saw my post. I see that there are numerous 375 versions. They range from Nov 2016 to Jul 2017. Does it matter which one or just the 375 part is important?
Code:
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:graphics-drivers/ppa
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt install nvidia-375
sudo nvidia-xconfig -a --cool-bits=28 --allow-empty-initial-configuration --enable-all-gpus
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt install nvidia-375
sudo nvidia-xconfig -a --cool-bits=28 --allow-empty-initial-configuration --enable-all-gpus
the last two strings as per @averagehumanoid on zcash forum
works beautifully so far
What driver is the most stable driver?
Ubuntu Linux 16.04 with the recent kernel, EWBF 0.3.4, nvidia 375= working for 3-4 wks (or more) at the time with no interruption.
Thank you. You are the only one that saw my post. I see that there are numerous 375 versions. They range from Nov 2016 to Jul 2017. Does it matter which one or just the 375 part is important?
Jump to: