Author

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 214. (Read 2164327 times)

copper member
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
January 30, 2017, 03:30:54 AM
I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)

is this the 3gb version getting almost 300 sol?


Hi Amph,

Nope it's the 6GB version (Gigabyte WindForce).
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
January 30, 2017, 03:28:49 AM
I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)

is this the 3gb version getting almost 300 sol?
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
January 30, 2017, 02:44:47 AM
It appears that your gpu is only consuming 80% of 120% you gave it. And running at pretty high clocks. What brand/model card is it?
copper member
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
January 30, 2017, 02:35:08 AM
hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)




In AfterBurner you just clic the number on the Core Clock slider, (+145 in this case), You enter your parameter +145 then ENTER. Then clic the check mark to activate.
power limit 126??? explain!

sublimus' print-screen is from his GTX 1070 settings.
For 1060 max PL is 116.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
January 29, 2017, 05:07:18 PM
Tesla K80 has different SM/CM mode I think 5.3.. he maybe not supported this in his build.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
January 29, 2017, 04:44:27 PM
Miner doesn't seem to work on Tesla K80 cards :

ERROR: Cannot run workers.
INFO: Detected new work: fa216655b6e120c8978e
INFO: Detected new work: ec5660fa9f73f980fd4a

Kepler not supported ?
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 100
January 29, 2017, 05:12:37 AM

hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?
[/quote]

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?
[/quote]

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550
[/quote]

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)
[/quote]




In AfterBurner you just clic the number on the Core Clock slider, (+145 in this case), You enter your parameter +145 then ENTER. Then clic the check mark to activate.
[/quote]
power limit 126??? explain!
[/quote]

Even if the Power Limit is at 126% it doesnt mean that the GPU uses it all.
But if it ever needs it, Power will be available to it so it will not crash.
IMO it makes sense to starve GPUs to save energy only if you have a farm (25 rigs or more-economies of scale). So with my 2 rigs I'm not doing it just to save $0.25/month.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
January 29, 2017, 04:35:32 AM
hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)


https://s28.postimg.org/tdphcsjst/Afterburner.jpg

In AfterBurner you just clic the number on the Core Clock slider, (+145 in this case), You enter your parameter +145 then ENTER. Then clic the check mark to activate.
power limit 126??? explain!
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 100
January 28, 2017, 05:06:58 PM
hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)




In AfterBurner you just clic the number on the Core Clock slider, (+145 in this case), You enter your parameter +145 then ENTER. Then clic the check mark to activate.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
January 28, 2017, 03:03:57 PM
hi! I have 1060. I have 225 Sol / 265 in boost. what could be wrong?

How much do you get from your 1060 with other miners?

I've already posted this before, but on average you should see 285-295 sol/sec @ 90W.

Settings:
  • Power Limit: 75
  • Core: +185
  • Memory: + 550

tell me please, core +185 from base freq (1500) or boot freq (1860) My GPU after start mining auto boost to 1860 Mhz. Sry for my Eng)
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 100
January 28, 2017, 12:12:22 PM
Greetings,

I'm new to mining. I'm having a problem with the miner (tried both 0.1.0b and 0.2.0b). I'm on Win 10 Pro Anniversary Update (1607) and using Palit GTX1070 Jetstream on stock and could only get max ~390 Sol/s.
I use default setting: miner --server zec-apac.suprnova.cc --user xxx --pass xxx --port 2142 --cuda_devices 0
I tried several drivers: 372.90, 375.63, 376.33, and 378.49. They gave me the same results.
Is this common or is there any workaround?

Here's the screenshot: https://s23.postimg.org/9le1techn/0_1_0b.png

Thanks Cheesy

Try switching over to Flypool. Your hash rate should improve up to 405 H/s. (450H/s oc)
Also, use a server on the same continent you are.

use version 0.2.0b, add --solver 0.
I'm having stable 450 sol/s on my asus, gigabyte and pny cards.
Asus i pushed to 470-480 at some point but had to lower the OC settings to get an average of 450 sol/s Otherwise the cards are not stable..

In fact if anyone is interested i'm building custom 2700 sol/s rigs for $3200 including shipping.


Do you have a website?
sr. member
Activity: 489
Merit: 253
January 28, 2017, 10:10:30 AM
I'm getting about 250 Sol/s on gtx 970 with 0.2.0b, i think i'm gonna let it run for a few hours  Grin
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
January 28, 2017, 01:34:59 AM
Greetings,

I'm new to mining. I'm having a problem with the miner (tried both 0.1.0b and 0.2.0b). I'm on Win 10 Pro Anniversary Update (1607) and using Palit GTX1070 Jetstream on stock and could only get max ~390 Sol/s.
I use default setting: miner --server zec-apac.suprnova.cc --user xxx --pass xxx --port 2142 --cuda_devices 0
I tried several drivers: 372.90, 375.63, 376.33, and 378.49. They gave me the same results.
Is this common or is there any workaround?

Here's the screenshot: https://s23.postimg.org/9le1techn/0_1_0b.png

Thanks Cheesy

Try switching over to Flypool. Your hash rate should improve up to 405 H/s. (450H/s oc)
Also, use a server on the same continent you are.

use version 0.2.0b, add --solver 0.
I'm having stable 450 sol/s on my asus, gigabyte and pny cards.
Asus i pushed to 470-480 at some point but had to lower the OC settings to get an average of 450 sol/s Otherwise the cards are not stable..

In fact if anyone is interested i'm building custom 2700 sol/s rigs for $3200 including shipping.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
January 28, 2017, 01:23:25 AM
0.2.0 is 2-4% quicker, on 1070.
For my EVGA NVIDIA 1070 miner EWBF 0.2 is slower (by about 20 - 30 Sol / s per graphics card).


force solver 0. It was the same for me when it picked solver 1 by default.
full member
Activity: 240
Merit: 100
January 27, 2017, 07:08:06 PM
Are you running stock clock or overclock ?
I was running on stock clock.

Try switching over to Flypool. Your hashrate should improve up to 405 H/s. (450H/s oc)
Also, use a server on the same continent you are.
Hey, thanks! It worked somehow. It fluctuated, but I could reach ~400 H/s. I also tried to OC it using the setting here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/gtx-1070-overclock/ and managed to reach ~460 H/s. I don't know yet if it's stable or not, though. Here's the screenshot:
https://s29.postimg.org/degsvct4n/0_2_0b.png

Have fate.  Grin
Do not forget that ambiant room temp. is also a performance factor.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
January 27, 2017, 04:58:36 PM
When a new version ?
I want 400 Sol/s for GTX 980  Grin
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
January 27, 2017, 01:31:04 PM
Are you running stock clock or overclock ?
I was running on stock clock.

Try switching over to Flypool. Your hashrate should improve up to 405 H/s. (450H/s oc)
Also, use a server on the same continent you are.
Hey, thanks! It worked somehow. It fluctuated, but I could reach ~400 H/s. I also tried to OC it using the setting here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/gtx-1070-overclock/ and managed to reach ~460 H/s. I don't know yet if it's stable or not, though. Here's the screenshot:
https://s29.postimg.org/degsvct4n/0_2_0b.png
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
January 27, 2017, 04:16:41 AM
Do you think FlyPool is better than DwaefPool ?

@Joblo : any news about improvment hashrate ?

Yeah dwarfpool is shit nowadays, very unstable, much better to go with flypool or suprnova.

Otherwise it's EWBF not Joblo (cpuminer-opt)  Grin
I used SuprNova several weeks and it is the same results  than DwarPool (for me : 2 x GTX 1070, Ubuntu 16.04, CUDA Cool.
I will try FlyPool, thanks.

Edit : my apologies for the mistaken with the pseudos :-).
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
January 27, 2017, 03:27:13 AM
Do you think FlyPool is better than DwaefPool ?

@Joblo : any news about improvment hashrate ?

Yeah dwarfpool is shit nowadays, very unstable, much better to go with flypool or suprnova.

Otherwise it's EWBF not Joblo (cpuminer-opt)  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
January 27, 2017, 03:13:40 AM
Do you think FlyPool is better than DwaefPool ?

@Joblo : any news about improvment hashrate ?
Jump to: