EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 279. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Rastamany

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: EWBF_ on December 10, 2016, 07:58:26 AM

Quote from: Rastamany on December 10, 2016, 07:51:05 AM

Thanks!!
Work fine (for now Wink

) on Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 750 Ti stock @ 58 sol/s for 38W on Dwarfpool.com

It is bad comaitible with dwarf right now.

For now, apparently it work! Have you seen a problem with Dwarfpool?

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: Rastamany on December 10, 2016, 07:51:05 AM

Thanks!!
Work fine (for now Wink

) on Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 750 Ti stock @ 58 sol/s for 38W on Dwarfpool.com

It is bad comaitible with dwarf right now.

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: dtawom on December 10, 2016, 12:49:31 AM

Any chance you could add cuda 2.0+ support to your next revision? I suspect that my 580 rig would do pretty well with your miner.

BTW your miner is awesome, the 2% is well worth it, I've not got your miner running on three of my machines which were only getting @ 80 h/s per machine with Silentarmy v5. Now I'm getting @ 200 h/s per machine.

Before my R9 fury's were the best h/s with Claymore, but now with your miner the best h/s per watt efficiency looks like the 1080, but the 1070 seems to be the better buy when you consider up front cost.

Anyway thanks again for an epic miner.

Compiled for comute 2.0 but i have not tested it.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9EPp8NdigFiMDN6bUhPYTNOcTg

Rastamany

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Thanks!!
Work fine (for now Wink

) on Ubuntu 16.04 and GTX 750 Ti stock @ 58 sol/s for 38W on Dwarfpool.com

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

just linux and bug fixes

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: EWBF_ on December 10, 2016, 06:59:53 AM

New version plus linux. Info in first post.
Stock clocks:

this version has some form of boost over the others? or just linux and bug fixes?

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

Quote from: bensam1231 on December 10, 2016, 02:42:54 AM

EWBF how much more performance do you think you can squeeze out of 1070s? Do you believe there is a lot of room left for optimizations? Do you have plans for continuing to increase performance in newer versions of your miner?

If just optimize algorythm then 3 - 10%

EWBF_

full member

Activity: 198

Merit: 160

New version plus linux. Info in first post.
Stock clocks:

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Quote from: jk_14 on December 10, 2016, 05:44:18 AM

Quote from: EWBF_ on December 09, 2016, 08:45:59 AM

Your question about linux? Linux version will be soon today or tommorow.

we are waiting...

We are aware that he said when time comes there will be.
So please stop asking over and over again... be patient and wait.,

jk_14

legendary

Activity: 1292

Merit: 1000

Quote from: EWBF_ on December 09, 2016, 08:45:59 AM

Your question about linux? Linux version will be soon today or tommorow.

we are waiting...

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: QuintLeo on December 10, 2016, 05:02:19 AM

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 03:30:47 AM

Quote from: Amph on December 10, 2016, 01:58:39 AM

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 01:05:40 AM

Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...

ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock

well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test

its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done.
Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future

I'd not bet that - ZEC doesn't seem to be QUITE as memory-system limited as ETH is, but it's definitely not completely compute-bound and the 1070 doesn't have a faster memory system than the top-end RX 480s.

the 1080 is now faster than the 1070 on equihash, so global memory dependency is almost gone.

QuintLeo

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1030

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 03:30:47 AM

Quote from: Amph on December 10, 2016, 01:58:39 AM

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 01:05:40 AM

Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...

ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock

well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test

its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done.
Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future

I'd not bet that - ZEC doesn't seem to be QUITE as memory-system limited as ETH is, but it's definitely not completely compute-bound and the 1070 doesn't have a faster memory system than the top-end RX 480s.

reb0rn21

legendary

Activity: 1901

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Amph on December 10, 2016, 01:58:39 AM

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 01:05:40 AM

Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...

ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock

well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, yuou should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test

its same on default, just turbo will boost a lot less because of TDP and temp limit then ETH and LBC, i hope some more GPU work optimization can be done.
Also I hope ~350sol for 1070 in future

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

EWBF how much more performance do you think you can squeeze out of 1070s? Do you believe there is a lot of room left for optimizations? Do you have plans for continuing to increase performance in newer versions of your miner?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: reb0rn21 on December 10, 2016, 01:05:40 AM

Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...

ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock

well heavy oc is normal to have insane power but at stock the power is not high at all, you should not consider OC environment when doing consumption test

JL97786

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on December 07, 2016, 07:33:21 AM

How is the rate on the pool. Confirmed? 333SOl/s will make it faster than the nicehashminer and the claymore miner on AMD cards.. (new world record)

Yeah, almost, I have both Fury X and GTX 1080...I got 330 on Fury X on claymore 8.0, and the claymore 9.1 bumps it to 367. But this does become the new efficiency king though, both in terms of power and memory bandwidth. The nicehash eqm is truly garbage for GTX 1080, they got bad sol/s on gTX 1080 and only know how to say GDDR5X is bad and so on. But I don't know why, I can't move my GTX 1080 core clock up when using this moner at this point, maybe I should reinstall driver later. Only getting 260 Sol/s with my GTX 1080, but I don't know if all the troubles came from putting AMD and Nvidia in the same machine lol. Also interesting is that whenever I run miner on GTX 1080, my screen's response becomes ridiculously slow, like almost half second lag Sad

reb0rn21

legendary

Activity: 1901

Merit: 1024

Pls don`t say its low power consumption, I measured some ETH, LBC and nicehash ethash...

ewbf use most power for GPU so far, sure you can undervolt but miner is depending on speed of GPU and memory, heavy OC can do 290-300 on 1070 maybe even over 310 but that would be insane TDP and clock

dtawom

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Any chance you could add cuda 2.0+ support to your next revision? I suspect that my 580 rig would do pretty well with your miner.

BTW your miner is awesome, the 2% is well worth it, I've not got your miner running on three of my machines which were only getting @ 80 h/s per machine with Silentarmy v5. Now I'm getting @ 200 h/s per machine.

Before my R9 fury's were the best h/s with Claymore, but now with your miner the best h/s per watt efficiency looks like the 1080, but the 1070 seems to be the better buy when you consider up front cost.

Anyway thanks again for an epic miner.

blzflkn

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

Quote from: dafyk on December 09, 2016, 12:55:51 PM

Quote from: blzflkn on December 08, 2016, 09:42:43 PM

I'm pulling in 12 sol/s on a gt 730, compute 3.5

On windows 10 with cuda toolkit 8.0 installed and using 375.86 diver i am getting "CUDA: Device: 1 GeForce GT 730 Not compatible!�" Embarrassed

Win 7 with 375.70 driver for me. Cuda 8.0 installed as well.

kavjlaeg

newbie

Activity: 66

Merit: 0

Quote from: jiggytom on December 09, 2016, 09:33:17 AM

he's aware that its not working on miningrigrentals, please search the thread before posting duplicative comments.

you are not right :/
This miner is working with the miningrigrental pool.
The miningrigrental pool have start port is 3333, after connect to the pool, it assigns you a NEW working port.
You must specify a working port in *.bat

ps, my working *.bat
miner --server eu-01.miningrigrentals.com --user kavjlaeg.35273 --pass x --port 50435

Topic: EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner - page 279. (Read 2164327 times)