Pages:
Author

Topic: excavator by NiceHash - multi-algorithm NVIDIA GPU miner [1.5.6a] - page 36. (Read 179296 times)

newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
New version 1.2.9a: https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases

  • further phymem.sys bug fixes
  • added algorithm CUDA daggerhashimoto
  • bug fixes

CUDA daggerhashimoto:
1070 low TDP, high mem = 33.1 MH/s
1060 low TDP, high mem = 24.7 MH/s

We encourage all NVIDIA miners to start experimenting with algorithm parameters for dual mining (one worker should be daggerhashimoto in this case, another worker any other algorithm - but not equihash).

Thanks for the new version, however I still have the exact same problem as before....
sr. member
Activity: 463
Merit: 250

[09:23:10][0x000016d8][warning] net | Net error: JSON member "error" not expected type: Array



Run with full file logging, then when you see this error, past log file here. We will know exactly whether eu1-zcash.flypool.org or lbry.suprnova.cc does not honor stratum protocol (most likely flypool, we've had issues with their ignorance in past).

Yeah I am getting the same error or nanopool or ethpool, cant run anything. Sorry dont know how to enable loggin, first time using your miner Smiley
EDIT: Dwarfpool also not working
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 512
New version 1.2.9a: https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases

  • further phymem.sys bug fixes
  • added algorithm CUDA daggerhashimoto
  • bug fixes

CUDA daggerhashimoto:
1070 low TDP, high mem = 33.1 MH/s
1060 low TDP, high mem = 24.7 MH/s

We encourage all NVIDIA miners to start experimenting with algorithm parameters for dual mining (one worker should be daggerhashimoto in this case, another worker any other algorithm - but not equihash).

Is there any way to update the miner Nicehash uses to the new Excavator ?

If I simply copy the new version into the excavator folder under BIN it doesn't work.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
New version 1.2.9a: https://github.com/nicehash/excavator/releases

  • further phymem.sys bug fixes
  • added algorithm CUDA daggerhashimoto
  • bug fixes

CUDA daggerhashimoto:
1070 low TDP, high mem = 33.1 MH/s
1060 low TDP, high mem = 24.7 MH/s

We encourage all NVIDIA miners to start experimenting with algorithm parameters for dual mining (one worker should be daggerhashimoto in this case, another worker any other algorithm - but not equihash).
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520

[09:23:10][0x000016d8][warning] net | Net error: JSON member "error" not expected type: Array



Run with full file logging, then when you see this error, past log file here. We will know exactly whether eu1-zcash.flypool.org or lbry.suprnova.cc does not honor stratum protocol (most likely flypool, we've had issues with their ignorance in past).
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
To dual hash, I suppose you could start up two instances of the program instead ?

No need to run 2 miners, just add another algorithm and assign worker for it in the command file.
In the near future it will be as simple as adding a second job in my GUI.

(screenshot showing dual mining on a single card)
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
To dual hash, I suppose you could start up two instances of the program instead ?
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10
Hi guys, question for the devs, does the miner contain any sort of "protection" against being ran in an hidden shell ?
While i was developing the GUI i wanted to have the excavator run inside of it as a child process for more seamless experience, while excavator actually works, its not submitting shares, am i right to suspect this a built in protection again people wanting to use the miner in a malicious way?
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
I am trying to double mine equihash and lbry on the same card, a 1070, with the following json batch:

{"time":0,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["equihash","eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333","walletaddress.pass"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.add","params":["lbry","lbry.suprnova.cc:6256","-u username.worker -p pass"]}
   ]},
   {"time":3,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.add","params":["0","1"]}
      
      
   ]},
   {"time":5,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"device.set.power_limit","params":["0","90"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"device.set.core_delta","params":["0","160"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"device.set.memory_delta","params":["0","600"]}
   ]},
   {"time":10,"loop":10,"commands":[
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"worker.print.speed","params":["1"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"algorithm.print.speeds","params":["0"]},
      {"id":1,"method":"device.get","params":["0"]}
   ]}
]

And I get the following error. Can someone please explain what it means and what I am not doing right?

Welcome to NiceHash Excavator
Opening website
Starting Excavator...

======================= www.nicehash.com =====================
            Excavator v1.2.5a GPU Miner for NiceHash.
       Copyright (C) 2017 NiceHash. All rights reserved.
Developed by djeZo and zawawa with help and contributions from
         pallas, Vorksholk, bitbandi, ocminer, Genoil
======================= www.nicehash.com =====================

Build time: 2017-06-14 00:49:03
Build number: 388
Provided startup commandline:
        excavator.exe  -c default_command_file_zec+lbry.json -d 2 -f 6 -p 0 -wp 38080 -wi 127.0.0.1 -wa

[09:23:09][0x00002afc][info] Log started
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][error] opencl | Failed to load AMD Display Library.
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][error] opencl | Failed to initialize AMD Display Library.
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][info] Unable to access PCIe buses. Run miner as administrator instead.
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][error] opencl | Failed to load phymem.
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][error] opencl | Please disable driver signature enforcement and run miner as administrator.
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][info] core | Found CUDA device: GeForce GTX 1070
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][info] http | Listening on 127.0.0.1:38080
[09:23:10][0x00002afc][info] core | Initialized!
[09:23:10][0x000016d8][info] net | Connecting to 94.23.60.113:3333 (eu1-zcash.flypool.org)
[09:23:10][0x000016d8][info] net | Connecting to 193.70.45.182:6256 (lbry.suprnova.cc)
[09:23:10][0x000016d8][info] net | Connected!
[09:23:10][0x000016d8][info] net | Connected!
[09:23:10][0x00002184][info] net | Authorized as t1WQduq77tSNbi1gkFikpVSosdidpqeRvQ9.acer
[09:23:10][0x00002184][info] algo-lbry | New job '12c5', diff=128
[09:23:10][0x000016d8][warning] net | Net error: JSON member "error" not expected type: Array
[09:23:11][0x000016d8][info] algo-equihash | New job '5e149a17e632576b96dd', diff=470.588
[09:23:13][0x000031c4][info] wrkr0-0 | Algorithm: CUDA-equihash parameters: M=0
[09:23:13][0x00000b38][info] wrkr0-1 | Algorithm: CUDA-equihash parameters: M=0
[09:23:20][0x000016d8][info] core | Device #0-0 speed: 200.265252 H/s
[09:23:20][0x000016d8][info] core | Device #0-1 speed: 202.361624 H/s
[09:23:20][0x000016d8][info] core | Algorithm 'equihash' total speed: 402.595872 H/s
[09:23:20][0x000016d8][info] core | Algorithm 'lbry' total speed: 0.000000 H/s
[09:23:24][0x000016d8][info] algo-equihash | New job '74f1df24526f8c528ffe', diff=470.588
[09:23:29][0x000016d8][info] net | Share #10 accepted
[09:23:30][0x00002184][info] core | Device #0-0 speed: 203.353550 H/s
[09:23:30][0x00002184][info] core | Device #0-1 speed: 210.116037 H/s
[09:23:30][0x00002184][info] core | Algorithm 'equihash' total speed: 413.384144 H/s
[09:23:30][0x00002184][info] core | Algorithm 'lbry' total speed: 0.000000 H/s
full member
Activity: 349
Merit: 102
Question for zawawa.  I get slightly better speeds with spmod lbry ccminer, 501 vs 485.  He does have 1.7% fee or something though, but still.  Any settings I can play with for a 1080ti ?

Yes, increase number of blocks, you will get some more, but picture will be more laggy that is why we used lower values of number of blocks.

We have some great news; daggerhashimoto has been implemented and is reaching really great speeds with very low power consumption; 1070 115W ~33 MH/s and 1060 73 W ~25 MH/s

I guess you used optimization from davilizh too..

Does that mean mining ETH on nvidia with excavator is possible now? Is there a release available?
legendary
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
Question for zawawa.  I get slightly better speeds with spmod lbry ccminer, 501 vs 485.  He does have 1.7% fee or something though, but still.  Any settings I can play with for a 1080ti ?

Yes, increase number of blocks, you will get some more, but picture will be more laggy that is why we used lower values of number of blocks.

We have some great news; daggerhashimoto has been implemented and is reaching really great speeds with very low power consumption; 1070 115W ~33 MH/s and 1060 73 W ~25 MH/s

I guess you used optimization from davilizh too..
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
Thanks, I will try that, much appreciated.  great work too btw.

Edit:  So yeah small speed increase, worth it, did 4096 and 8192 on 1070/1080ti.  If its too high ill just get low diff shares correct ? 
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
We have some great news;
any update on linux version?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 520
Question for zawawa.  I get slightly better speeds with spmod lbry ccminer, 501 vs 485.  He does have 1.7% fee or something though, but still.  Any settings I can play with for a 1080ti ?

Yes, increase number of blocks, you will get some more, but picture will be more laggy that is why we used lower values of number of blocks.

We have some great news; daggerhashimoto has been implemented and is reaching really great speeds with very low power consumption; 1070 115W ~33 MH/s and 1060 73 W ~25 MH/s
legendary
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
Question for zawawa.  I get slightly better speeds with spmod lbry ccminer, 501 vs 485.  He does have 1.7% fee or something though, but still.  Any settings I can play with for a 1080ti ?
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Why is the bundled excavator program w/in Nicehash has the batch file setting pointing the BTCADDR to 3DJhaQaKA6oyRaGyDZYdkZcise4b9DrCi2?
Does it mean that my GPUs are mining for someone?

Hahaha, and you want it be yours by default?

I saw same stupid question in Claymore miner thread.
You made my day again :-D
Just want to know if this setting is normal that i need not be alarmed.
You don't need to be sarcastic if you don't want to answer.

Thoses address are plaeholder, an example address (but a real). That means you must replace them if you are using this bat.
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
Why is the bundled excavator program w/in Nicehash has the batch file setting pointing the BTCADDR to 3DJhaQaKA6oyRaGyDZYdkZcise4b9DrCi2?
Does it mean that my GPUs are mining for someone?

Hahaha, and you want it be yours by default?

I saw same stupid question in Claymore miner thread.
You made my day again :-D
Just want to know if this setting is normal that i need not be alarmed.
You don't need to be sarcastic if you don't want to answer.
member
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Missing around 50% hashrate for my 7950

i'm usually getting 210 h/s on other miners

https://i.gyazo.com/e83edcc1e976624cee33298a2bc6a6bd.png

thanks
member
Activity: 85
Merit: 10


Hi guys, i have spent a couple of days working on my own GUI for the excavator, its long way from finished but i wanted to show you what i have so far.
Currently i can't really move too much further than this as i am waiting for a critical API bugfix in the excavator.

What do you guys think of it so far?

Are you not using MahApps?

Looks good though, pretty much what i was thinking of doing!

I am using nwjs (as that's the one i got most experience with), also in the future it could be converted to a "web page" (as now the miner can only serve the index.html) which isn't really suitable for a more complex GUI.
While i made decent progress on the GUI, i am still waiting on the algorithm.add API fix which prevents me from testing most of the features, just placeholder routines everywhere Cry
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10


Hi guys, i have spent a couple of days working on my own GUI for the excavator, its long way from finished but i wanted to show you what i have so far.
Currently i can't really move too much further than this as i am waiting for a critical API bugfix in the excavator.

What do you guys think of it so far?

Are you not using MahApps?

Looks good though, pretty much what i was thinking of doing!
Pages:
Jump to: