Topic: Exclusion reason of Royse777 (Read 989 times)

Thanks for your honest reply. Appreciated.

---

I think its enough whatever discussed here.

I am going to lock threads to avoid further arguments.

Quoted for reference.

I have never threatened anyone in the real world and here.
Life is not complicated, life is easy if you know how.

I should actually ask you: "get rid of Yoshie" what is the threat to me.

My education has never brought something to court "if something is wrong or threatening we will solve it on the spot". That's our work system.

Personal: if you want it.

I don't like physical ... no need to explain.

I'm also the most lazy of dealing with women.

my age is enough to make you unconscious,ladies' room

Huh!
Am I reading you are working in government and you will come to me with your passport to meet in person and will show me something?
Is this a written threat to take me to the court when come to meet me in person? Or you will come to me to attack me physically?

---

All those about me in the quote were really unnecessary because  "I will keep Yoshie aside" does not mean getting rid of you. It meant that I am dealing with the Smarty pant and his pal TalkStar.

Hit the ignore button if you think I am boring, have arrogance and repetitive. So far I have nothing to learn from you I guess. How old are you anyway?

I see you are having hard time seeing Mr. Smarty panty is getting roasted here. His pal TalkStar left the ground though.

So you want to get rid of me.... that's a written threat to me.

You need to know, I have a permanent job (outside this forum), working in government.
I do not work in your house, as your slave, you want me to obey everything you say and suck your saliva, <<>>.

You know this forum......don't need to explain if you know....save your stupidity you don't need to be published in this forum.

You talk too arrogant and too stupid in your arrogance, repeating the same words every day, boring.

I judge you too close to your own destruction from your emptiness.
Do not be like a child who whines for ASI, a little adult, we deal with adults.

Do I need a passport to meet you in person, then (we) talk about "get rid of.

---

Sorry @Coolcryptovator is a bit off topic, he's fishing.

A simple PM would not create all these drama.

But when someone starts pointing to you and starts accusing you for something you never thought of then you just do not stay silent. I am still trying to understand the beef here against me. Are all these just because I excluded smarty pant and his pal?

Please anyone help me to understand.

Cheers,

Edit:
And have you guys noticed the timing of creating this topic? Not long after I created this topic: daddy issue or schooling?
Coincident or planed?
After all it was against his master.

I read this drama for several days. I don’t understand why it was so much noise. Every day, someone trusts and someone ceases to trust. On my list, there are weekly pros and cons, but few people come to the reputation with the proceedings.
Coolcryptovator, if you didn’t like something on the Royse777 trust list, you can do the same. Just put him a tilde and not wage war with even more people against him. I think you understand what I'm writing.
I respect the opinions of many people who are on my trust list. But if I see that people will cease to trust me, I will not involve the community in this matter.
Maybe I offended someone, but believe me, I will always prefer a bad peace than a big war.
Do not interact with each other anymore. The forum is great, and there are always people here who can understand and support everyone.

Thought so, very easy excuse. Yeah?

Let's play political. Am I obliged to give you an explanation?

But since I am not playing obliged game here unlike you:
Those I believe falls in your category are already in my trust list, don't you see your pal there?

In this particular case (quoted) I do not see any question I was asking but you are asking me. I see you need to seek help from Google again and this time to understand punctuation.  

---

You have a chance to prove your statements, ignoring is not going to bring much weight for you:


update
Excuse me, where am I talking about all? Are you in drug?

What am I missing here? Is there categories of users like cock suckers, tampon suckers and so on!
And you tell me who to include and who to exclude?

Is this a political meaning that you came up with?

Again you have this all fever here.
You, smarty pant, cool playing guy (don't get fool by thinking that I am complimenting you) =/= All
Yeah, could be: You == your pal TalkStar

So you are saying you became a master now? This sound all other users who are genuinely hunting for scams are your pupils. LOL

Which part is off topic?

more update
Your master here just done something.
If leaving a counter feedback and removing it later makes all these drama from you against me then what about this?
Oh yeah! You are not obliged. /reputation sucker

Due to that point I have been ignoring you replies, don't have enough time to reply same questions again and again. All the answers are on the main post.


Please don't insult all the scam hunters just because of me. Scam hunters just not hunting scams for merits or reputation. Because there is some scam hunters still hunting scams (including me), even they have earned more than 1000 merits. Its enough for Legendary ranks, also they have gained enough reputation. So why they are still hunting?

You are excluding multiple scam hunters means you indirectly support that scammers to whom we left negative feedback since you are on DT1.


I noticed you multiple time mention my pal, yes all scam busters are my pal. I won't mind it we have communication each others even out of forum. I like them and always try to support and I will support them.

And please stay on topics, seems you are going out of topic.

It was just a counter feedback which are still practiced by a lot of users in here despite in some of the users opinion is that counter feedback does not weight any value. Now opinions aren't meant to be the same.

---

Visual is always better if there is option.


I will keep Yoshie aside though but noticed Coolcryptovator and his pal TalkStar. Coincidentally both of them noticed it in the same evening/night.

This must be the fact you were talking about Mr. cool playing guy? /reputation sucker
And what about these topics:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/trust-system-abuse-by-tman-5225907
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/entrust-or-distrust-for-this-5226189
You do not see anything wrong that comes from your masters?
I don't see you to talk about it. (Oh Yeah, you did not notice these topics.)

Let me give you two friendly advise:
Learn to have your own voice.
Be fearless¹.

¹. Don't tell me that you were fearlessly hunting scammers in the past. You had nothing to lose in the past but to find a niche to gain reputation and earn merits to rank up.

The fact that Royse777 removed a controversial positive feedback is enough to say that the user is ready to correct their sent feedback and it doesn't mean that the user lacks knowledge of how the trust system works. Earlier we have seen many DTs doing mistakes while leaving negs and they worked on their ratings too and still are on DT1 so that's not a negative factor against them. Excluding someone from a trustlist too doesn't make them unworthy nor including someone (unless that person is a known scammer). Only thing that matters is their positive/negative ratings that are incorrect.

There is literally no need to announce your exclusions unless the person who you excluded cares about it. I don't think Royse777 even mentioned about your exclusions anywhere around, yet you are trying to suggest users to exclude him by creating a whole fucking thread in reputation based on, nothing but an bold move of him to let know others that straight away tagging is not always good if the crime is not proven otherwise. I think that was the reason for his counter on Best Change.

If you want to play political mobbing games better take them to PMs. Good for your repo here @Coolcryptovator.

Yes,  I clearly said this earlier. This thread is backfiring on the original postrr once you start to dig a little deeper.

Do people here really expect their words taken at face value. All claims, statements and assertions must be thoroughly scrutinized and analyzed to extract the possible fragments of truth they mutate into misleading traps.

Royce for admin position based on careful evalution of this drama.

If I see any retaliation here it is retaliatory exclusions by the mentioned trio and starting this thread...

So you are here to play political game with me? Seems like you have learnt a new vocabulary - "obliged" /reputation sucker.

Let's play the same game as you did in your last post:
Am I missing anything? Where is the guideline from theymos about this please? Point me sir if I am missing.

Did I say I worry about you being anywhere?

Has anyone said everyone will have the same judgements?

Did I say something has to be different for me?

Have I or anyone said that facts can be changed?

And what facts we are talking about here Mr. Smarty pant? I can play game all the day if you insist me. But please don't. I am happy to hangout with a small community I like, just around the corner of the forum.

You may not see me in reputation and meta board very often to throw mud to each others by taking some shelter of established members but this does not mean that I will be bad to play political game with you or anyone who are like you and your pal talkstar. Remember my birth in this community was way longer than you. You born not very long ago when all those merit suckers and trust suckers has started hanging around in the meta and reputation board with some useless merit begging threads and activities to get attention of the other forum members to have personal gains. Now see why I distrusted you and your pal? I am not playing "obliged" game here by the way.

Perhaps you need to learn another vocabulary: Retaliatory.
Seek help from Google.

Am I obliged? If no then you shouldn't expect.


Answer is above.

Am I missing something? Is there any guidelines or instructions from theymos about exclusion/inclusion ratio? Point me if I am missing.

All the problems have been described on main post. Doesn't necessary repeat again.

It has been described  as well. For again I believe we had not talk each other before BestChange issue. So I were against your action & reaction there. I suspect as a retaliatory you excluded me & YOSHIE. If my suspection is right then you may realise this is retaliatory or not.


I stated that perhaps other DT1 wouldn't agree with me, everyone have different judgments and opinions. Same as for you, it doesn't matter you are agree or not, fact will not change based on our beliefs.
Since I am not on DT1 you shouldn't worry about my exclusion list.

---

Off topic;
Perhaps sometimes we forget about what does mean ~exclude, +include and no action( means not include or exclude).

Let's not bring the things that are not related to these topic in my opinion. The Best Change response from you to me was here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53605122

The response was made to break the points I had here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53603746

And if I remember correctly then by then (before making the response) you changed your red to a neutral or entirely removed I guess after seeing my response for your red tag at that time. So your case is that: You are confuse (the way you change feedback based on the arguments) like hell on where to put red and where to put neutral or where to put positive.

Anyway, pointing to that post which was your response was enough instead of the wall of text you had in your last post bud.

---

Off topic:
If an ebay seller makes a mistake then you do not blame ebay as whole?
If an amazon seller makes a mistake then you do not blame the entire amazon company?

And you sir,
Can you find a feedback left by me which does look very inappropriate please?
Can you find a user who I have distrusted or trusted does look very inappropriate please?

/= You have problem for ~Coolcryptovator, ~TalkStar and ~YOSHIE?

Can I expect you to create separate topics for distrusting following users too?
1. ~iCEBREAKER (Trust: +6 / =0 / -2) (70 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Blazr (Trust: # +1 / =2 / -3) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW ~Royse777 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (0) 631 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. NEW ~Patatas (Trust: neutral) (111 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~wolwoo (Trust: +1 / =2 / -3) (445 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~mosprognoz (Trust: +6 / =1 / -1) (161 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

/= And from now on whoever you distrust, I expect separate topics for each exclusion?
/= And your distrust list (6) seems very little compared to your entrust list (25). Amazingly very few of us has this ratio of entrust and distrust list (25:6).

Nah! I don't like much too /s

This? Which one comes first to have a retaliatory mentality? If an action has done before or after?
Like if I distrust a user in my trust list after they distrust me or I entrust the user after they entrust me or I leave a favorable feedback after they left me a favorable feedback or I leave a red trust after they leave a red trust for me.

http://loyce.club/trust/2020-02-15_Sat_06.10h/366632.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=366632;dt

I am so confused with my retaliatory characteristics sir.

You think kinda?
This fella thinks he is an alpha from Baboon family and he is okay to smell his teen girl's tampon that just came out with rotten smelly blood and may be feels good to feel it on his d**khead.
He needs medical attention to live in a civilized society.

Basically I don't care about trust someone wants to trust or not, but now the story is different after I read the post @Royse777.

I will start the story of the campaign (BestChange) from the beginning.

Preliminary:

PROBLEM ONE:

Before the BestChange campaign, promoting on this forum, I first saw their involvement in a number of fraudulent customers on the BestChange site posted in 2017.

When the campaign started on this forum, I raised the topic about the BestChange site, Reputation: Topic: [Doubt the possibility of a scam] BestChange Bounty and Signature Campaign., To warn participants that you are promoting fraudulent sites, be careful because they do not use (escrow) most likely you are not paid, the main problem.

One by one the comments came, and I said if the campaign manager pays the first week and so on I will remove the trust for BestChange, I have already told @Royse777 about this.

the problem is that they pay on time to campaign participants. I revoked and closed the topic, finished.

---

PROBLEM TWO:

a second problem arises with something else still related to the BestChange site.

After a few days other accusations arose from @johhnyUA: Topic: About Bestchange [again]

So I reversed my direction 100% and I found other evidence about the trading site @BestChange, with the darkening of money.

Finally I don't trust him anymore about the BestChange site.

Proven to be deceptive.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53667163

With the struggle of the members here.

In the end the money was returned.

If, the topic of accusations against the BestChange site in reputation is not made by me, the possibility is that the money @ SergeyMalar is USDT 21,010, don't know, maybe it's gone.

Because @SergeyMalar has created a topic in local Russia, no one cares about it. thank you, for: @johhnyUA.

Thank you, to the members in this forum and DT who are fighting for the rights of others, so that @SergeyMalar can be happy with his family again.

---

However, this trust issue arises here, so, I don't know what @Royse777 has in mind about this trust.

---

PROBLEM THREE:

off topic:
I really don't care anymore about the BestChange campaign whether you want to be paid or not.

So right now, if I associate it with the red trust in (BestChange), I can't make a decision because there are 11 DT members currently in it.

I respect their decision in this matter.

For now I am just waiting for the results of the 11 DT, against (BestChange). In making a decision to delete or not. red trust

So now I have explained the point of the problem now.

I apologize to @Royse777 and all who are here about this problem.
If anyone is not happy.
Now everything is clear the point of the problem from where.

For the issue of trust @ Royse777 which does not trust me, as I mentioned in the initial post.

Yeah, TMAN went kinda crazy today with me poking him a little and mods deleting his posts n shit, and he had me thinking that he said you got banned, but it was just slippery tongue bullshit..

I am pretty familiar with the beginning of the Best Change situation but not the outcome thus far..
I didn't much like that they were tagged straight away either..



"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer." IMO

All I can smell is used tampon smell vagina in every single one of your posts roysecunt

You don’t even understand that countering doesn’t work any more you wanknozzle you have no business being on DY or even on the fucking forum.

That campaign ended up paying out and I removed the neg but for every campaign that pays out there will be 4 that wouldn’t in that situation,

Prevention is better than cure you fucko. Like your father should of worn a rubber instead of having to think about aborting you