Pages:
Author

Topic: Experience is needed before one can gist/talk about gambling (Read 602 times)

hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 552
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
There could be some general gamble incidents that a non gambler must have witnessed which they can discuss it with other gamblers and they could even lie about the situation as if they were the ones that had the experience, meanwhile they only witnessed it. That's to say, there are some general gambling incidents and events that a non gambling without any gambling experience can actually discuss and gist about with others.
Although, it's not every type of gambling that a non gambler can talk about without having the experience.
It’s just a discussion. No harm in participating in it even if you are a beginner or an expert already. But you should be willing to learn. Whatever event they saw, it  might not actually be what happened in real life and only those experienced ones will be able to determine what actually happened to them in a specific project.

The expert ones will be able to give valuable insights that not beginners will be able to share the same level of their success.

It might just be a discussion but the ability to give value ideas and thoughts will be based on the experience that the person must have heard, it's not just about witnessing some gambling events but it's also about contributing positivity is gist related to gambling. Take for example, some non gamblers who make post on this board, you could tell through their comments that they don't have real experience in gambling. Take for example, when some gamblers are talking about poker games and strategy and you have not played the game before and doesn't know any strategy about the game, there is no way you can contribute to such discussions.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1092
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
It truly sucks when you find out that some are talking about what they don't know anything about, yet you will still discover that this same people are making mouth and boasting on that same thing or wrong mentality, instead of them to accept being wrong or take time to make research and findings on how true is what they are saying, that is why some post here as well could be termed spamming or trolling when they have no direction or meaning.

Yup that's right, it's really annoying when we see someone telling something but it doesn't make sense, for some people they might think that what the other person said is true but for those of us who have experienced it of course we can definitely tell the difference about whether they are saying something true or just nonsense, and for me personally I usually just smile listening to that kind of nonsense, but yes as long as it doesn't harm me and doesn't waste a lot of my time then for me it's not really a problem, on the other hand yes I can also agree with what you said that it is not uncommon for us to find posts here that discuss gambling but do not have content or questions related to gambling, and I also often assume that it seems like they are not gamblers.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 3152
LE ☮︎ Halving es la purga
::///::Your opinion is welcomed!

It all depends on the type of bet itself, it is not the same to talk about a traditional game like Crash, than to talk about what kind of strategies you follow in BJ, the same happens with sports betting, it is not the same to bet once than to do it 1000 times, but ironically it is possible that that single bet of the newbier  represents lifetime earnings expert gambler...

So, at the end of the tunnel your experience is defined by your success... experience in games of chance does not mean earnings for the average player.
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 6
I agree completely with you because it takes someone who has experienced something to talk about it because the person has for knowledge of it because you can't talk about something that you have no knowledge of so before you can engage people to talk about gambling related activities for must have sufficient information and be knowledgeable in the topic of discussion
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 227
Otherwise, why would one be bold enough to talk about gambling with others who have better and recent experience than you who have no idea nor have ever tried to gamble away some few bucks just to have a story to tell?
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.

Not in all type of gambling discussion because there are some discussions that does not need you to have experience because you can join the conversation and still be making sense. We have different types of gambling activities and while some of them need you to be knowledgeable about what is being discussed, others do not. You do not need to be knowledge on how to play dice games before you can join a conversation about those type of games but without having the right skills and knowledge about poker games, you will be seen as a fool when you try to discuss with those that are with years of experience playing poker. The same thing happens when you try to play some games that you do not have the experience to play, you will flop
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 521
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
It truly sucks when you find out that some are talking about what they don't know anything about, yet you will still discover that this same people are making mouth and boasting on that same thing or wrong mentality, instead of them to accept being wrong or take time to make research and findings on how true is what they are saying, that is why some post here as well could be termed spamming or trolling when they have no direction or meaning.
full member
Activity: 756
Merit: 217
When a person talks about a certain topic, there should be a level of understanding and convincing power to your audience, to your listeners. Gambling is not an exception. You can only make your topic more realistic if you share your personal experience on that, and not just everything is gained from research and studies. Your audience will find it more engaging to join in the discussion also if there are personal attachments on the topic.
You have to know that everyone make their opinions in the gambling base on what they understand in the gambling, I know very well that gambling discussion people engage on it due to the way they understand gambling from their own angle, now, if I want I'm creating topics of gambling I have to create it in such way that the audience or readers will understand exactly my points, and I have to put it to a way that I know of gambling, that is why I said everyone have it own way of explaining gambling base on their understanding.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1192
OP likes to classify people, put labels on them, compare sizes. Am I right, OP? Cheesy

So, I could say that if you want to talk about Crypto, you should have at least x amount invested and need to be at least x years on the market. Would that be fair?
Why wouldn't you allow newbie gamblers to share their experience? It's not like they're telling you how to play, but even if they do, maybe they found something that you've missed?
You don't need to be old to be smart, the way you don't need to be experienced to have the right to take part in a conversation about something.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Although I do not think it compulsory for one to have personal gambling experience but for one to be able to have a conversation with others who do gamble, there must have been research on the topic, there must be some understanding of the rules and techniques involved in gambling, there must be knowledge of the gambling industries recent trends, statistics and upgrades, there must also be the knowledge of responsible gambling practices and all the potential risks involved with it.
Otherwise, why would one be bold enough to talk about gambling with others who have better and recent experience than you who have no idea nor have ever tried to gamble away some few bucks just to have a story to tell?
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.

Your opinion is welcomed!

Just like every professional, gambling has its terminologies and processes. You cannot understand some of the concepts of gambling unless you have read about or applied them. As you keep gambling, your level of experience will keep increasing until you become very knowledgeable about gambling. It is also important to note that the gambling sector is vast, so you might not understand everything about it. People who focus on sports betting might know little about casino games. So before you engage in any discussion, you have to ensure that you have experience in that gambling area.
hero member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 674
Although I do not think it compulsory for one to have personal gambling experience but for one to be able to have a conversation with others who do gamble, there must have been research on the topic, there must be some understanding of the rules and techniques involved in gambling, there must be knowledge of the gambling industries recent trends, statistics and upgrades, there must also be the knowledge of responsible gambling practices and all the potential risks involved with it.
Otherwise, why would one be bold enough to talk about gambling with others who have better and recent experience than you who have no idea nor have ever tried to gamble away some few bucks just to have a story to tell?
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.

Your opinion is welcomed!

I agree with the context, one needs to have prior experience in talking about gambling and it seems that this applies to other fields as well, one must have at least a few times of gambling to talk about his strategies and experiences and not just rely on “other people's words” or just a story from others without himself experiencing it of course it is a silly thing, just like I am here gambling and talking to forum members on gambling boards, if I do not have basic experience in gambling then I will be confused to convey opinions to discuss, so I will classify it as mandatory.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1192
Although I do not think it compulsory for one to have personal gambling experience but for one to be able to have a conversation with others who do gamble, there must have been research on the topic, there must be some understanding of the rules and techniques involved in gambling, there must be knowledge of the gambling industries recent trends, statistics and upgrades, there must also be the knowledge of responsible gambling practices and all the potential risks involved with it.
Otherwise, why would one be bold enough to talk about gambling with others who have better and recent experience than you who have no idea nor have ever tried to gamble away some few bucks just to have a story to tell?
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.

Your opinion is welcomed!

Having "recent experience" at playing slots does not necessarily make you a profitable player, as it is entirely controlled by odds calculated outside of the players control and set by the casino. If you played slots 10 years ago, you're often playing exactly the same games, maybe with a slightly different skin, as the casinos offer now. Other games like original blackjack and roulette are also weighted towards the house as well, had their rules defined decades ago and will not suddenly become profitable to a long term player today, so again - you can pass comment on these things if you only gained your experience decades ago. Sports betting might be the odd exception, but even that has a lot of resources against individual players, so the advice is usually good.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 2025
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Your opinion is welcomed!

Any opinion is welcomed if it's honest. With that said, it doesn't matter how much experience someone has, knowledge, or wagered amounts in various casinos... the only thing that matters is that someone writes honestly and doesn't lie.

Experience is gained by doing something, the longer we do it, the more experience we will have... this is achieved gradually and over time. So I don't have anything against newcomers, as long as they are fair & honest players.

Funnily enough, this conversation could be held perfectly about any topic which does not have anything to do with gambling and it would be still applicable. When one talks about other people who allegedly have a minimum of experience, they assume they have no ill-intention or reason to lie about it, whether we talk about gambling, betting, science, partaking in sports or whatever other topic.
Though, if one talk about gambling and betting and at the same time one likes to touch the topic of strategies, it cannot ignored how much luck plays on the result of the session and whether gamblers get home with or without money.
We need also to be aware it is easier for people to talk about their earnings than winning than their losses on casinos, that is a fact and if we have several people around us talking positively on their casino experiences, it could influence on our own choices on how much to gamble and how often we gamble.

If someone talks continuously on their earnings and not about losses, it is probable that person is not even as much as a gambler as they say they are.
sr. member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 259
There could be some general gamble incidents that a non gambler must have witnessed which they can discuss it with other gamblers and they could even lie about the situation as if they were the ones that had the experience, meanwhile they only witnessed it. That's to say, there are some general gambling incidents and events that a non gambling without any gambling experience can actually discuss and gist about with others.
Although, it's not every type of gambling that a non gambler can talk about without having the experience.
It’s just a discussion. No harm in participating in it even if you are a beginner or an expert already. But you should be willing to learn. Whatever event they saw, it  might not actually be what happened in real life and only those experienced ones will be able to determine what actually happened to them in a specific project.

The expert ones will be able to give valuable insights that not beginners will be able to share the same level of their success.
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 799
Although I do not think it compulsory for one to have personal gambling experience but for one to be able to have a conversation with others who do gamble, there must have been research on the topic,
In my honest opinion, I must confess that a practical experience with gambling can never be overemphasize when it comes to having an interactive gambling discussion with gamblers. Because the truth of the fact is that gambling is not like Mathematics, whereby with just a theoretical knowledge, you are good to engage in meaning discussion, unlike gambling whereby both the theoretical and practical is crucial to be successful.

Quote
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.
Yes, that's true, because gambling just like every other professional fields has it's own terminologies, which can be easily noticeable if truly an individual is indeed knowledgeable in that field. Because what makes an individual a good gambler is his/her ability to make strategic analysis about the outcome of a gaming event.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1191
Your opinion is welcomed!

Any opinion is welcomed if it's honest. With that said, it doesn't matter how much experience someone has, knowledge, or wagered amounts in various casinos... the only thing that matters is that someone writes honestly and doesn't lie.

Experience is gained by doing something, the longer we do it, the more experience we will have... this is achieved gradually and over time. So I don't have anything against newcomers, as long as they are fair & honest players.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
I think that when one has a prior gambling experience somehow, it qualifies such a one to openly gist/talk about it and even share strategies that may be accepted and logical enough.
If we talk about experience and gambling, in general it makes sense, this is not only needed for gambling, applying for jobs and other activities also prioritizes experience, Thus, whatever we do, the experience is in line with what we want to do, for this reason we generally see that every gambling industry has reviews about those who have experience in gambling.

From the basis of experience, anyone can tell what they have experienced in gambling, both strategies and also the types of games they often play. Yes, there is nothing wrong if experience is important in gambling.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 552
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
There could be some general gamble incidents that a non gambler must have witnessed which they can discuss it with other gamblers and they could even lie about the situation as if they were the ones that had the experience, meanwhile they only witnessed it. That's to say, there are some general gambling incidents and events that a non gambling without any gambling experience can actually discuss and gist about with others.
Although, it's not every type of gambling that a non gambler can talk about without having the experience.
full member
Activity: 2268
Merit: 182
I don’t think that experience is needed to talk about gambling. You don’t know how to fly a plane, but still you talk about the flying experience of pilots, right? As we don’t have the option to practically do the task, hence we acquire the theoretical knowledge about it.
even theoretical, i don’t think anyone would be interested in listening to people with not much experience because they don’t think they are credible enough to share their sentiment

imagine being a pilot and someone telling you what to do when flying the plane based on their theoretical knowledge and never experience of flying a plane do you think that pilot will listen at all? no he won’t
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 518
I believe someone always has to start somewhere so I do understand if someone who has never really gambled share their opinions and weigh in on the discussion but at the same time they should definitely disclose that they’ve never experienced gambling and that they are only there to learn.

I also think that nothing can beat the knowledge of someone who has first hand experience when it comes to gambling or casinos.


Less experienced gamblers can still also share their limited ideas, but I think the reason why OP and some gamblers don't like them is probably because of their arrogant behavior, pretending they are more knowledgeable. In fact, I encountered that kind of personality and insisted he was right despite being wrong. I don't like them either. But for newbies who are willing to listen and accept that they are new, well, they are welcome to give their opinions or questions.
Perhaps I'm willing to open a discussion when I notice he has a strong interest, but if not, I simply skip. 
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 106
🌀 Cosmic Casino


Maybe for bragging rights?

Here in our community you easily spot a non-gambler (with gambling signature) posting about certain topics that is very obvious that they haven't experience it.
When it’s a requirement for weekly payment, many users clearly haven’t got much option but to try and meet up with the gambling posts requirements and yeah, it’s easy to spot those.
One other aspect that you can note a difference is in the fact that, not many users are both casino and sportsbook gamblers. Most users are exclusive on one side and I can say for myself, I’m more of a sportsbook gambler because, I find it to come with much ease and some predictable nature than the casino gambling which is more luck and difficult to have any logical prediction about it.
Pages:
Jump to: