Topic: Extending "~" to peers of your untrustees through association - Why? - page 2. (Read 865 times)

Roger that, all is clear now. I remember I saw your topic last days, but I didn't make a connection after reading your reply here. Thank you for clarifying things up.


Thank you for the precious information, suchmoon! As always, your inside info on various subjects gangs are true assets! I'll take into consideration then the thick skinned gang as well, as I see Foxpup doesn't mind that some of her gang members are also parts of other gangs.

Also, where did you find that picture, man? Did you just create it? I'll wear it as avatar with first occasion (meaning if I'm banned from the signature campaign lol)!

Gem!
This is why I see you and LoyceV has 4k+ merit :-P

I did not want to piss off LoyceV with unsolicited PM with the fear if he reports me :-D

It's the sexiest gang on Bitcointalk, that's for sure.



But I'll let you in on a secret. Thick skin is a merit magnet.

You saved my life bud, I am going to send a PM LoyceV right now :-P

I did read your OP bud but you got me wrong here 100% :-D

It was not meant for you and timelord but I was purely talking about the recent exclusion drama against me that did not end well. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/exclusion-reason-of-royse777-5225802
I should have provided a link in my last post :-)

Thank you for the advice, suchmoon, I was thinking the same. I was just a bit curious though and hoped maybe he would give a rational explanation (although it is obvious there is no such explanation).

About the gang, thank you as well for the tip, maybe I'll adhere to that one as well, but I'm also loyal to the Dalton gang, who controls the merits here. It is a strong one, as you already know Capo di tutti capi aka Foxpup is a great gang leader!

Different people use their trust lists for different reasons.

Mine is purely based on:

Included = I want to see your opinion.

Not included = meh

Excluded = I don't want to see your opinion.

Nothing more and nothing less.

AFAIK LoyceV has the skin about as thick as the snow on top of Monterosa in February.

Royse777, I think you didn;t read OP well.


I didn't state anywhere that "Timelord2067 excluded me so I am excluding him". I only stated that I observed that he and nullius excluded each other and afterwards this leaded to having me as a "collateral".

Besides, I also stated that I'm not interested in any way to change his decision; I was only curious if he admits that I "fell as a collateral" after his dichotomy with nullius.


Regarding gangs - choose careful the gang you want in!

Where is the gang :-P
I need to interview someone who has The Thickest skin around LOL

Anyway @OP: Inclusions and exclusions are someone's own right to practice. If you do not agree with their list then you take your step accordingly with your own list. Creating topics like X excluded me for so I am excluding/adding them don't really end up very well without much drama.

Some users have thinner skin than others and some are full-blown conspiratards thinking that the whole world is out to get them and that a friend of an enemy is an enemy.

I suggest you join the thick-skinned gang and stop worrying about small details like that. Don't pester for explanations of inclusions/exclusions, that never works.

I'm starting this thread as I observed this bizarre behavior at some forum users.

Context:

Case 1
- user A distrusts user B
- user B has a connection of any kind with user C (let's suppose they reply to each other in different posts in a respectful manner, or user B gives merits to user C)
- user A has no conflict / dichotomy with user C
Result: as a "consequence" of step 2, user A distrusts user C as well.

Case 2
- user A has an argue with user B
- user B has a connection of any kind with user C (let's suppose they reply to each other in different posts in a respectful manner, or user B gives merits to user C)
- user A has no conflict / dichotomy with user C
- as a "consequence" of step 2, user A extends his antipathy to user C.

The transitivity is a fundamental characteristic of mathematics and logic. Thus, if A = B and B = C, then A = C. However, this rule doesn't apply to people.

---

Explicit context:
Case 1
- Timelord2067 started distrusting nullius 5 weeks ago, according to loyce.club; at the same time interval, nullius started distrusting Timelord2067 as well
- nullius has a connection with me (he merited some of my posts; I translated some of his precious work in Romanian; we talked to each other in a friendly / respectful manner in various topics etc.)
- Timelord2067 and I never had any conflict; the only time when we interacted was in a friendly manner, in one of my topics, when he also merited me
- Timelord2067 becomes aware of the connection between me an nullius, seeing we respectfully talk to each other (also in the above mentioned topic)

Result: Timelord2067 starts distrusting me two weeks ago. I tried to PM him, telling him that without trying to change his opinion (which I was not), I only kindly ask him to explain his decision. Why? Of course, he didn't answer, as he was embarrassed (most likely) to admit that his judgement is "if A = B and B = C, then A = C" and that he applies it to people as well.

Besides, it seems that a similar thing happened also to Timelord2067 and he didn't appreciate. Now he is doing the exact same thing to others. There is a saying in Romanian - "don't do to others what you don't like". I guess he didn't know it.