Topic: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds - page 15. (Read 135649 times)

Could you do a review of Degens.com which is a competitor to Fairlay if you've got a moment? Thanks!

https://github.com/Fairlay/FairlayPythonClient/blob/master/client.py#L264

Is someone using their API? I'm having trouble with the signature as described here: https://fairlay.com/api/#/private/?id=private-servers.

Does anyone have a working example code for Python 3? I would be very grateful.

Detailed review of Fairlay you can read here: http://sportstatist.com/fairlay-review/

Im not referring to bitcoin network. i m referring to not receiving an email to confirm my withdrawal , ie not withdrawal in effect.

could Fairlay have a look at the way their system works in terms on email sent to confirm withdrawal?

Sometimes they usually take a while, but I imagine it is for the Bitcoin network, I have usually made withdrawals with great success, wait anyway, what time have you been waiting for? Recently I made a withdrawal here so I tell you that everything went well.

Hi,

does anyone have issue with their withdrawal?  i cant do any since i dont receive the email to confirm

Mr. Degen please post the transaction ID so we can examine your claim sir.  Also where did you send this from the 100,000 USD btc?

Could this be you Mr. Degen?  https://www.ccn.com/100000-bitcoin-loss-bitgo-engineer-sim-hijacked/

The biggest mistake online casino victims can do is listen to extremely mentally ill bitcointalk accounts like mu_enrico!


This extremely mentally ill bitcointalk account believes that anyone dealing with game-protect is at a high risk of losing money, even though we are since 3,5 years active with over 500 online casino scam reports received and no one ever lost money while dealing with game-protect!

^^^ Noooo, Game-Protect offers bullshit and false sense of security.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=874254

Do not give any money to Game-Protect for whatever reason

Enforcement of valid claims using all available legal options.


Game Protect offers to play with consumer protection service inclusive = no costs for claimant at Fairlay.

If someone missed it, we still can try to enforce it, but the claimant has to contribute something for the enforcement effort and costs.

Sorry for my ignorance, but what is "consumer protection service"? Was this a real option for OP?

I want to write a final bit to point out what eventually most people who care should see, and I don’t want Fairlay to be fully excused for handling this terribly from the beginning:

#1) I asked them to return my funds to any address that it had been deposited from, I asked that and it had been suggested by everyone here and SBR for the last 6 weeks, to do this now while pretending they did nothing wrong is absurd

#2) they still never provided any information in terms of what I was accused of or who the third party was. They seem to continue to leak information without giving me any further insight, compromising security of my transactions to an unknown third party

#3) given that they still have not provided me any additional information, their comment that I was “unable to rebut” their assumption is false bc they never even gave me an opportunity. I was also never presented with any evidence

#4) there’s still no evidence that a law enforcement agency was involved, especially given the fact that all my information was handed out to a troll box, to SBR and to a third party

#5) it’s hypocritical that Fairlay has asked me in their emails to not disclose anything in public when they are not even guaranteeing a safe return of my funds to me, and that they are providing false information to the public to clear their name and save face (primarily that I wasn’t able to rebut anything. They asked for a phone number to reach me and when I gave that they did not call me, nor provide any further detail).

#6) didn’t they claim that I have no access to an exchange, and if my funds are of questionable origin, how do they know that they are returning to an exchange? And if it’s an exchange how is it a questionable origin?

#7) for them to give further information and further complicating me securing funds to other parties that may not be true is not their place

#8) I was just asked a few days ago about my identity and other personal details, so how could they even have been so sure that this third party had the right person..

Whether you believe me or not, the above is based on facts and logic. Even SBR has confirmed a lot of what I have complained about, including the fact that no information was given to me.

In my opinion this is no real solution for me as the customer, and it’s also not absolved them of their wrongdoings themselves, including potentially disclosing details on a supposed law enforcement investigation

Interesting. Do you think there would be enough liquidity for cricket props? That's the main issue to consider when on-boarding new sports / leagues / markets to an exchnage - "will there be enough interest and liquidity in the new offering?"

Apart from the match odds, I would prefer these specific markets:

- Draw no bet(For tests)
- Total runs in a specific over
- Total runs by team and specific batsman
- Wicket in a specific over etc

Basically, I would love to see more Cricket props markets which I regularly bet on.

Yes, we second that. Dealing with these issues is not easy, even for honest operators like FairLay, as we posted elsewhere.

Cricket is a really interesting exchange sport. A question - apart from basic Match Odds markets, what markets would be top of your list to see supported?

Have been using your exchange for quite sometime recently and I liked the speed at which your customer care clears my doubts. I have primarily been betting on the soccer markets and I had no issue getting orders matched.

Can you specify if Cricket markets will get added in the future? That would be an excellent addition in my opinion.

We'd like to publish the following update on the degen1 case for anyone interested:

 Decision has be made to return the roughly 100K USD deposit  of degen1 to the address it was sent from. Degen1 could not rebut our presumption that the funds are of questionable origin.  We therefore decided to reject his deposit and close his account permanently. Degen1 is not allowed to use our site again. The address his deposit is returned to belongs to an exchange.

 All involved parties have been notified that the transaction will be released to the Bitcoin network on September 20th giving everyone time to make necessary preparations.

Can confirm I know nothing, also Fairlay would have flexed those muscles by now if they had told me - they would have claimed so. SBR also is aware that I do not know

as I understood you told some guys on SBR about what's going on , I don't have a single idea why SBR has the right to know what's going when degen doesn't know ( unless Degen knows and not telling us  )

not sure if this will be ok or not , but can you at least share some basic info with one of the DTs here ? I honestly don't like the situation even though I never faced a single problem with Fairlay

in the previous case you just reported that one of your users was using the site to wash btc , so not sure why this time there is no info at all