Author

Topic: FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread - page 289. (Read 69354 times)

legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Japan has demographic reasons why its challenged in any improvements, they have one of the oldest average age populations.  Somewhere like India with a majority of the population 30 or below should be able to improve far quicker with the mass of available people in the right age group.   That factor is probably a large part of what drives the eternal economy in footbal; that throws forward stars into world cup level football.  Clubs can buy stars, nations must produce quality at every level down to beginners to advance at their best.

We have a tendency to give undue importance to demographics. The current world champions have a population of 45 million, while India and China, with a combined population of 2,800 million failed to even qualify for the FIFA World Cup. In football, it is quality that matters and not the quantity. There are countries such as United States and Saudi Arabia, which are populous as well as rich. But these countries are not considered as superpowers in football. Once again, it proves that population and money can help only up to a certain extent.

Japan has remained as one of the most rapidly ageing countries for the last 2-3 decades. Only very recently the birth rate in some of the other countries (such as South Korea and Taiwan) went down below the level of Japan. All that said, Japan is still a country with 125 million people (3x the population of Argentina). So why the Japanese team is so weak. One reason maybe that the local league is not that strong. But then Argentina also doesn't have a very good local league. Most of their players depend on the UEFA leagues, such as EPL, Serie A, La Liga and Ligue 1. 
STT
legendary
Activity: 4172
Merit: 1462
Japan has demographic reasons why its challenged in any improvements, they have one of the oldest average age populations.  Somewhere like India with a majority of the population 30 or below should be able to improve far quicker with the mass of available people in the right age group.   That factor is probably a large part of what drives the eternal economy in footbal; that throws forward stars into world cup level football.  Clubs can buy stars, nations must produce quality at every level down to beginners to advance at their best.
hero member
Activity: 2646
Merit: 548
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
~snip~
The weakest zone without a doubt it South Asia. We have a bunch of countries that are all ranked below 100 as per FIFA. And the fun fact is that this zone has a population of 2 billion, and has one of the most rapid population growth rates for any part of the globe. In Asia, the football strongholds are the middle-eastern countries (including Iran) and East Asia (Japan and South Korea). Australia is more like an outlier which has shown enormous growth over the years. And then we have Central Asia (especially Uzbekistan) which has also shown significant improvement.


I would argue that the weakest zone is Oceania.

Australia was winning all the time there, and that's why they went to Asia, as a step up.

So, by that logic, Asia would be better than Oceania. All those small islands don't really have amazing squads. New Zealand is probably the best one now by far, and it's still sub-par.
This list is of the year 2021. Now this could've got big difference. Based on the ranking it looks like the first six teams on the list could easily make its entry as the number of participants have been increased. Based on the updated list there were little changes.



I believed China to have good team based on their competing performance in the Olympics, big the thing is different with football. Most welcome the Arab nations have given much importance to football and they're placed at the lead position.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1092
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
I just think the reason why FIFA is also adding World Cup participants besides making football more evenly distributed globally is also the economic factor with more and more countries participating will increase the number of countries that want to buy broadcast rights from existing matches, we know that FIFA is becoming one of the sports organizations that is always aiming for big profits especially the world cup is a valuable tournament, so seeing that there will be more and more weak teams participating in the world cup later is not the concern of FIFA because that is the concern of the participating countries.

To me, it seems like FIFA added more national teams mostly because there are many national teams in the world that could never be a part of the world cup in history and that's why they added more teams to let them give a chance to a part of the world cup. but this will surely decrease the quality of the world cup and it can be a reason for many strong teams to have easy games against the teams they couldn't be a part of the world cup normally.
I have a different thought to this matter though, I personally feel that FIFA decided to add more national team to the 2026 world cup solely because the tournament will be hosted in three different countries, and having just a few national teams divided amongst this three countries that would be hosting the world cup simply means that each of these countries might not have enough games to host, this i believe is the reason why FIFA felt the need to add more national team to game, so that each of this countries(Canada, Mexico and USA) will all have a good number of team playing on each.

But then, I still agree with your point though, adding more teams have given opportunities to some teams that have never gotten the chance to play in the world cup before.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1981
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
What is the injustice? Name the countries that are strong enough to get to the World Cup but they don't have enough tickets? I think that you are unlikely to name such teams from the Asian region that would be stronger than the corresponding teams from Europe. The World Cup should be a tournament of the strongest teams in the world, and not a festival of teams that get a ticket only because of geography.
Not wanting to discredit the other teams, but I also agree with holding a world cup selecting the best teams, in a way, practice football in their country.

Well, an interesting factor that I noticed in this last World Cup, several teams are evolving and standing out in the World Cup, especially in Qatar, in my entire life I would never have imagined that Morocco could reach where it did in the World Cup.

With these various events happening, various teams (weak or strong) are training hard, for a chance to participate in the world cup and surprise everyone!

By the way, speaking of discrediting... you know, there is such a Champions League tournament?  Grin
The irony is that for a long time many clubs have been participating in it that not only are not champions of their countries, but do not even get into the top three. As a result, this tournament "starts" with the playoffs and most of the group games suck. With the World Cup everything is the same and now it will be even worse.
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 824
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>POR
The broadcast rights for the World Cup are purchased by a lot of countries that are not represented. However, it probably costs less than a broadcast right to a participating country. The additional number of participants per region is still unknown to me, but I anticipate that Europe and CONCACAF will receive more. It may be unfair to countries that are stronger than those from other regional confederations, such as Asia, but were unable to qualify for the World Cup. Additionally, more fans are anticipated to attend, which will result in increased revenue for FIFA and the host country.

What is the injustice? Name the countries that are strong enough to get to the World Cup but they don't have enough tickets? I think that you are unlikely to name such teams from the Asian region that would be stronger than the corresponding teams from Europe. The World Cup should be a tournament of the strongest teams in the world, and not a festival of teams that get a ticket only because of geography.
Not wanting to discredit the other teams, but I also agree with holding a world cup selecting the best teams, in a way, practice football in their country.

Well, an interesting factor that I noticed in this last World Cup, several teams are evolving and standing out in the World Cup, especially in Qatar, in my entire life I would never have imagined that Morocco could reach where it did in the World Cup.

With these various events happening, various teams (weak or strong) are training hard, for a chance to participate in the world cup and surprise everyone!
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
I just think the reason why FIFA is also adding World Cup participants besides making football more evenly distributed globally is also the economic factor with more and more countries participating will increase the number of countries that want to buy broadcast rights from existing matches, we know that FIFA is becoming one of the sports organizations that is always aiming for big profits especially the world cup is a valuable tournament, so seeing that there will be more and more weak teams participating in the world cup later is not the concern of FIFA because that is the concern of the participating countries.

To me, it seems like FIFA added more national teams mostly because there are many national teams in the world that could never be a part of the world cup in history and that's why they added more teams to let them give a chance to a part of the world cup. but this will surely decrease the quality of the world cup and it can be a reason for many strong teams to have easy games against the teams they couldn't be a part of the world cup normally.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1981
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The broadcast rights for the World Cup are purchased by a lot of countries that are not represented. However, it probably costs less than a broadcast right to a participating country. The additional number of participants per region is still unknown to me, but I anticipate that Europe and CONCACAF will receive more. It may be unfair to countries that are stronger than those from other regional confederations, such as Asia, but were unable to qualify for the World Cup. Additionally, more fans are anticipated to attend, which will result in increased revenue for FIFA and the host country.

What is the injustice? Name the countries that are strong enough to get to the World Cup but they don't have enough tickets? I think that you are unlikely to name such teams from the Asian region that would be stronger than the corresponding teams from Europe. The World Cup should be a tournament of the strongest teams in the world, and not a festival of teams that get a ticket only because of geography.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 34
Despite fifa has increased the number of teams that will be participating in the 2026 World competition doesn't mean every national team will be participating in the world cup. Their are competition teams are supposed to play and get qualify that must make them to qualify for the 2026 World Cup.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 273
Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
I just think the reason why FIFA is also adding World Cup participants besides making football more evenly distributed globally is also the economic factor with more and more countries participating will increase the number of countries that want to buy broadcast rights from existing matches, we know that FIFA is becoming one of the sports organizations that is always aiming for big profits especially the world cup is a valuable tournament, so seeing that there will be more and more weak teams participating in the world cup later is not the concern of FIFA because that is the concern of the participating countries.
The broadcast rights for the World Cup are purchased by a lot of countries that are not represented. However, it probably costs less than a broadcast right to a participating country. The additional number of participants per region is still unknown to me, but I anticipate that Europe and CONCACAF will receive more. It may be unfair to countries that are stronger than those from other regional confederations, such as Asia, but were unable to qualify for the World Cup. Additionally, more fans are anticipated to attend, which will result in increased revenue for FIFA and the host country.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
I just think the reason why FIFA is also adding World Cup participants besides making football more evenly distributed globally is also the economic factor with more and more countries participating will increase the number of countries that want to buy broadcast rights from existing matches, we know that FIFA is becoming one of the sports organizations that is always aiming for big profits especially the world cup is a valuable tournament, so seeing that there will be more and more weak teams participating in the world cup later is not the concern of FIFA because that is the concern of the participating countries.
hero member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 960
~snip~
The weakest zone without a doubt it South Asia. We have a bunch of countries that are all ranked below 100 as per FIFA. And the fun fact is that this zone has a population of 2 billion, and has one of the most rapid population growth rates for any part of the globe. In Asia, the football strongholds are the middle-eastern countries (including Iran) and East Asia (Japan and South Korea). Australia is more like an outlier which has shown enormous growth over the years. And then we have Central Asia (especially Uzbekistan) which has also shown significant improvement.


I would argue that the weakest zone is Oceania.

Australia was winning all the time there, and that's why they went to Asia, as a step up.

So, by that logic, Asia would be better than Oceania. All those small islands don't really have amazing squads. New Zealand is probably the best one now by far, and it's still sub-par.
hero member
Activity: 1554
Merit: 824
The Alliance Of Bitcointalk Translators - ENG>POR
Did I mention Pakistan in my comment? Did I say there is no interest in football in any Asian country? On the contrary, I noticed how much football has progressed in many Asian countries, and I particularly highlighted Japan, South Korea and China. However, the fact remains that this development is not balanced and equal in all Asian countries, and I stand behind it.
Football is definitely not the number one sport in India, as far as I heard from the interview with their Croatian coach Stimac.
the world cup is a very prestigious event and many people are crazy about it, even the average country in the world is investing heavily in preparation for the 2026 world cup but it's a shame that football is not a popular sport in india but cricket even though they have a large population and it's impossible not to have big football talent there

korea, japan, saudi arabia, australia are countries that have always been representatives of asia because in these countries football is their main focus

Reading your comment, I also agree with what you said...
These countries are references for ""being on the Asian continent"", but a country that can become a reference and also have an improved technical level of football is China!
Do you believe that China will be able to become some kind of football reference in the world in the future?

Or is this impossible to happen?
hero member
Activity: 1806
Merit: 722
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
ASEAN zone is the most weakest football in Asian without any participants team yet during FIFA World Cup edition except Australia move to ASEAN zone last several years, there are not doubt with how enthusiasm for football very high with supporter always full in stadium where their national team playing home.

I hope with slot added for FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States give chance for ASEAN national team get chance participants there and have one or two years time preparing for qualifier stage, I sure between Indonesia, Thailand or Vietnam have opportunity will be success on qualifier group stage.

The weakest zone without a doubt it South Asia. We have a bunch of countries that are all ranked below 100 as per FIFA. And the fun fact is that this zone has a population of 2 billion, and has one of the most rapid population growth rates for any part of the globe. In Asia, the football strongholds are the middle-eastern countries (including Iran) and East Asia (Japan and South Korea). Australia is more like an outlier which has shown enormous growth over the years. And then we have Central Asia (especially Uzbekistan) which has also shown significant improvement.


Taking a quick look at this report from top Asian teams and how they performed during the recent world cups I can say most of the Asian teams even Japan as the first team on the list and first team of Asia mostly failed to pass the staging phase of the world cup and this shows us the gap between Asian teams and Europian teams except for South Korea where they could even be in the semi-final match for once. That's the reason to say increasing the number of teams in the world cup can't be good because there will be more weak teams there.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 109
1xBit.. recovered their reputation
Did I mention Pakistan in my comment? Did I say there is no interest in football in any Asian country? On the contrary, I noticed how much football has progressed in many Asian countries, and I particularly highlighted Japan, South Korea and China. However, the fact remains that this development is not balanced and equal in all Asian countries, and I stand behind it.
Football is definitely not the number one sport in India, as far as I heard from the interview with their Croatian coach Stimac.
the world cup is a very prestigious event and many people are crazy about it, even the average country in the world is investing heavily in preparation for the 2026 world cup but it's a shame that football is not a popular sport in india but cricket even though they have a large population and it's impossible not to have big football talent there

korea, japan, saudi arabia, australia are countries that have always been representatives of asia because in these countries football is their main focus
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1981
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The weakest zone without a doubt it South Asia. We have a bunch of countries that are all ranked below 100 as per FIFA. And the fun fact is that this zone has a population of 2 billion, and has one of the most rapid population growth rates for any part of the globe. In Asia, the football strongholds are the middle-eastern countries (including Iran) and East Asia (Japan and South Korea). Australia is more like an outlier which has shown enormous growth over the years. And then we have Central Asia (especially Uzbekistan) which has also shown significant improvement.


It certainly looks very funny (outside of the top four teams are generally so weak that average teams from other regions will probably beat them 7-0 effortlessly). But this is all a consequence of cultural traditions - for example, if you take the game of Go, then the Asian region will be in the top, and all other regions, including Europe and the USA, will be deep below. I don't know if something will change over time or not, but it would be good if football were globalized and not concentrated in Europe.
hero member
Activity: 1428
Merit: 538
ASEAN zone is the most weakest football in Asian without any participants team yet during FIFA World Cup edition except Australia move to ASEAN zone last several years, there are not doubt with how enthusiasm for football very high with supporter always full in stadium where their national team playing home.

I hope with slot added for FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States give chance for ASEAN national team get chance participants there and have one or two years time preparing for qualifier stage, I sure between Indonesia, Thailand or Vietnam have opportunity will be success on qualifier group stage.

The weakest zone without a doubt it South Asia. We have a bunch of countries that are all ranked below 100 as per FIFA. And the fun fact is that this zone has a population of 2 billion, and has one of the most rapid population growth rates for any part of the globe. In Asia, the football strongholds are the middle-eastern countries (including Iran) and East Asia (Japan and South Korea). Australia is more like an outlier which has shown enormous growth over the years. And then we have Central Asia (especially Uzbekistan) which has also shown significant improvement.


I haven't seen much of Uzbekistan yet. I can't even remember whether I saw them play ever, but yes there is a whole different part of the world developing and may soon be participating in major soccer events. It is unexpected that China is so low in the ranking. Usually they are sports focused and they have also been buying European top players for a lot of money since quite a while ago. Also a fun fact is that the women's national soccer team from China was one of the best in the world for a very long time, the men's national soccer team only managed to qualify once for the World Cup final round in the entire history. Who would have thought that?
legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1016


I didn't say that there is no interest in football in Asia, only that in some Asian countries such as India, Nepal, Bhutan... there is no football tradition and great public and media interest in that sport.
Of course, I know that in Japan, South Korea and China huge amounts of money are invested in football and because of this there is a great interest from the media, the public and sponsors, but this is not the case in all Asian countries and the differences between the countries are huge.
Without basic infrastructure and the right organization, as well as finances and sponsors, there is no development of football to the professional level, and this is a fact that everyone understands.

You are not right in saying that. Have you heard of Mini Brazil in Layari - Karachi Pakistan.
They are crazy for football. Many people love football. After seeing the craza for football UK professional did visit Pakistan to teach football to these kids. Also see the decoration which is done in Layari during the football 2023 world cup

Did I mention Pakistan in my comment? Did I say there is no interest in football in any Asian country? On the contrary, I noticed how much football has progressed in many Asian countries, and I particularly highlighted Japan, South Korea and China. However, the fact remains that this development is not balanced and equal in all Asian countries, and I stand behind it.
Football is definitely not the number one sport in India, as far as I heard from the interview with their Croatian coach Stimac.
The matter is really to think, the national football teams of the countries of the Asian continent are failing to qualify themselves for the World Cup. The efforts of these teams are great, if FIFA takes a little more responsibility and puts time behind these teams, we can get some new teams from the Asian continent in the next World Cup.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1824


I didn't say that there is no interest in football in Asia, only that in some Asian countries such as India, Nepal, Bhutan... there is no football tradition and great public and media interest in that sport.
Of course, I know that in Japan, South Korea and China huge amounts of money are invested in football and because of this there is a great interest from the media, the public and sponsors, but this is not the case in all Asian countries and the differences between the countries are huge.
Without basic infrastructure and the right organization, as well as finances and sponsors, there is no development of football to the professional level, and this is a fact that everyone understands.

You are not right in saying that. Have you heard of Mini Brazil in Layari - Karachi Pakistan.
They are crazy for football. Many people love football. After seeing the craza for football UK professional did visit Pakistan to teach football to these kids. Also see the decoration which is done in Layari during the football 2023 world cup

Did I mention Pakistan in my comment? Did I say there is no interest in football in any Asian country? On the contrary, I noticed how much football has progressed in many Asian countries, and I particularly highlighted Japan, South Korea and China. However, the fact remains that this development is not balanced and equal in all Asian countries, and I stand behind it.
Football is definitely not the number one sport in India, as far as I heard from the interview with their Croatian coach Stimac.
full member
Activity: 1050
Merit: 110


I didn't say that there is no interest in football in Asia, only that in some Asian countries such as India, Nepal, Bhutan... there is no football tradition and great public and media interest in that sport.
Of course, I know that in Japan, South Korea and China huge amounts of money are invested in football and because of this there is a great interest from the media, the public and sponsors, but this is not the case in all Asian countries and the differences between the countries are huge.
Without basic infrastructure and the right organization, as well as finances and sponsors, there is no development of football to the professional level, and this is a fact that everyone understands.

You are not right in saying that. Have you heard of Mini Brazil in Layari - Karachi Pakistan.
They are crazy for football. Many people love football. After seeing the craza for football UK professional did visit Pakistan to teach football to these kids. Also see the decoration which is done in Layari during the football 2023 world cup
Jump to: