/Enlighten me
You don't know?? The thread you posted a link here doesn't know either? Goodness gracious me oh my!
Getting back to reality though, what efforts have you made to track the bitcoins that have been stolen?
Topic: [Flag] Bruno AKA Phinnaeus Gage, Gleb Gamow, YuTü.Co.in, Bitcoin 100 & ??? - page 3. (Read 1766 times)
May 27, 2020, 10:53:24 PM
You don't know?? The thread you posted a link here doesn't know either? Goodness gracious me oh my!
Getting back to reality though, what efforts have you made to track the bitcoins that have been stolen?
May 27, 2020, 10:40:22 PM
So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?
I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.
We all agree on that, so let's not bicker splitting infinitives.
At this point, given the Bruno Hacker has knowledge of BCT and Bitcoins, who's writing style does the hacker remind you of?
Where did the donated funds for the Plead go to nearly a week ago?
/Enlighten me
May 27, 2020, 10:24:29 PM
So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?
I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.
We all agree on that, so let's not bicker splitting infinitives.
At this point, given the Bruno Hacker has knowledge of BCT and Bitcoins, who's writing style does the hacker remind you of?
Where did the donated funds for the Plead go to nearly a week ago?
May 27, 2020, 10:20:32 PM
One "can" be a subset of the other.
So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?
I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.
May 27, 2020, 10:13:13 PM
One "can" be a subset of the other.
So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?
May 27, 2020, 10:10:33 PM
It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.
Enlighten me.
One "can" be a subset of the other.
May 27, 2020, 10:07:24 PM
It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.
Enlighten me.
May 27, 2020, 07:44:09 PM
It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.
May 27, 2020, 06:41:10 PM
Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.
I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I understand your point although.
Thank you for your comment @Pffrt - I'm not sure how we can convince BitcoinGirl.Club as the evidence is very clear: The scammer has control of the funds as well as the account. Those funds have not been used as intended to cover funeral/transportation expenses.
It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.
Quote
I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.
Bitcoin 100 has been identified as an alt of Bruno and has been discussed already.
Sorry Timelord2067 and Pffrt. I really want to protect Bruno's intellectual asset but not this way which interprets wrong to me. I just can't make up my mind. But nutildah's flag looks better and the reference is also somehow excusable. I supported nutildah's flag and I want to move on that way brothers.
I will wish theymos to lock his account so that no other shithead get access of any of his account unless anyone proves that they are from family and possible next of kin.
May 27, 2020, 05:10:21 PM
Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.
I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I understand your point although.
Thank you for your comment @Pffrt - I'm not sure how we can convince BitcoinGirl.Club as the evidence is very clear: The scammer has control of the funds as well as the account. Those funds have not been used as intended to cover funeral/transportation expenses.
It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.
Quote
I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.
Bitcoin 100 has been identified as an alt of Bruno and has been discussed already.
May 27, 2020, 10:55:07 AM
May 27, 2020, 10:39:13 AM
Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.
I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I uunderstand your point although.
May 27, 2020, 07:54:53 AM
Phinnaeus Gage - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1911
Gleb Gamow - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1912
YuTü.Co.in - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1913
Bitcoin 100 - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1915
Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.Gleb Gamow - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1912
YuTü.Co.in - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1913
Bitcoin 100 - Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1915
It says:
Quote
Phinnaeus Gage violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Phinnaeus Gage did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around April 2020. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.
The real Bruno never did that to us. Supporting this flag for me is hurting the real Bruno. Sorry, I can not do that. The wording of this flag really do not go in a way to oppose it too.P.S: I have opposed flag for Gleb Gamow, YuTü.Co.in since there are no evidence that those accounts are compromised. I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.
May 26, 2020, 08:59:55 PM
Wait, these accounts are not locked down when made "in memoriam"?
Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
The special title and VIP status were given to Bruno's accounts as a one off. It's not part of a bitcointalk policy AFAIK. Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
Most websites don't have a plan set in stone for when a person behind an account dies. Let alone bitcointalk, where most users are pseudonymous and don't connect their IRL self with their forum handle.
But my view is that it makes more sense to leave the account untouched after the person's death other than lock it. The deceased might have had plans for the account that were not announced to the admins anyway so why hinder that possibility.
I seem to remember a post now that if the account started posting it would be stripped of the VIP or some such thing, It just seems to make sense to lock a account that has been memorialized. Someone could hack it and then go and edit all the posts otherwise. I'm pretty sure Satochi's account is locked so it is an option.
I think we are being punked.
May 26, 2020, 08:42:32 PM
Wait, these accounts are not locked down when made "in memoriam"?
Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
The special title and VIP status were given to Bruno's accounts as a one off. It's not part of a bitcointalk policy AFAIK. Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
Most websites don't have a plan set in stone for when a person behind an account dies. Let alone bitcointalk, where most users are pseudonymous and don't connect their IRL self with their forum handle.
But my view is that it makes more sense to leave the account untouched after the person's death other than lock it. The deceased might have had plans for the account that were not announced to the admins anyway so why hinder that possibility.
May 26, 2020, 08:18:05 PM
Wait, these accounts are not locked down when made "in memoriam"?
Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
Well that seems like a pretty amateur oversight.
May 26, 2020, 06:34:54 PM
I will respond to everyone's comments later today - I've got other IRL stuff that needs doing first.
If anyone does have the ear of @theymos, perhaps you can whisper in their ear that I have a thread here: [BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality warning of accounts being hijacked after a person has died. If theymos is reading this, can I suggest that any account that's confirmed, or at least suspected of having died have their password changed with a 20+ random string of characters and their email details removed (but recorded for confirmation) so that anyone who tries to hack in is unable to do so.
Thanks.
If anyone does have the ear of @theymos, perhaps you can whisper in their ear that I have a thread here: [BitCoinTalk][COVID-19] Grim Reality warning of accounts being hijacked after a person has died. If theymos is reading this, can I suggest that any account that's confirmed, or at least suspected of having died have their password changed with a 20+ random string of characters and their email details removed (but recorded for confirmation) so that anyone who tries to hack in is unable to do so.
Thanks.
May 26, 2020, 04:44:45 PM
Probably a close relative have managed to know all of his passwords after he passed away?
Probably a close relative would have come here to say "Thank you all for donations", you know...Probably a close relative have managed to know all of his passwords after he passed away?
at a glance seen from: ( Phinnaeus Gage[Bpip] ), Since @Bruno was declared dead, no changes have occurred with the @Phinnaeus Gage account, except in 2018, changing passwords and e-mails, currently there has been no change.I'm just opening up in several possibilities here, it might not be a close relative but someone who is close with Bruno so close that he/she is trying to impersonate him and trying to make him look alive. As we can all see his passworld and email remain unchanged so really Bruno might just have gave his account and email to someone close to him. But my point really is this guy using Bruno's account is an impersonator and is trying to scam people thinking that he is alive and well.
May 26, 2020, 03:52:52 PM
I called the Boersma Funeral Home, and the person who answered confirmed that he knew Bruno, and he had passed. I just thought people would like to know so we can end the speculation about Bruno himself.
May 26, 2020, 03:06:41 PM
No, and you can see that the account hasn't been touched in two years. I any of that changes I will make sure to announce it publicly as the whole point of me holding the account was to make sure it's not misused (it was in DT2 at the time). But I kinda doubt that Bruno - awesome as he was - will be able to pull a Jesus here and come back from the dead.
The OP knows the situation with Gleb Gamow (see his feedback ratings on the account) so there was no reason whatsoever for that flag.
If Gleb Gamow account was held by you why there was a thread about both his accounts having a VIP tag as the real user was not even holding the Gleb Gamow account. I have seen you confirming that you are holding the account for a long time but why the VIP tag when the real owner was not holding the account. The OP knows the situation with Gleb Gamow (see his feedback ratings on the account) so there was no reason whatsoever for that flag.
Bruno might not have pulled the Jesus stunt but just like you have possession of Gleb Gamow account what is the certainty that Bruno did held the Phinnaeus Gage account
.Probably a close relative have managed to know all of his passwords after he passed away?
at a glance seen from: ( Phinnaeus Gage[Bpip] ), Since @Bruno was declared dead, no changes have occurred with the @Phinnaeus Gage account, except in 2018, changing passwords and e-mails, currently there has been no change.Jump to: