Flat Earth - page 110. | Bitcointalksearch.org

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3990

Merit: 1385

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 07:09:39 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on January 31, 2019, 04:55:53 AM

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 02:34:51 AM

... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.

At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.

^^^ Quit your bullshit!

The claim Earth is in motion has been experimentally falsified by Michaelson & Morley, the rebuttal by globalists of "muh relativity" has also been experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier. That the Earth is stationary is established science that can be proven by anybody with a gyroscope (reactive to a 15 deg/hr rotation).

The claimed rotation of the Earth would cause everybody to get seasick if it were true, we can most certainly feel the ~14 grams of force that would be present if we were spinning, not to mention all the other claimed motions and accelerations we're supposedly experiencing.

I know that the earth is in motion, in all kinds of directions. I drive down the road, but I and the car are quite motionless. The earth just zooms by.

Cool

lightlord

donator

Activity: 3228

Merit: 1226

★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Lets stay on the topic of Earth and its claimed motion instead; your checkmate is showing.

Flat Earth Origins: The Michelson-Morley Experiments -- https://youtu.be/fxB5vY-RpGo

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on February 01, 2019, 08:01:02 AM

^^^ This is why I promote violence; the consensus is the result of organized crime and there's no alternative action.

Btw where is the dome in that picture you just linked? I thought it was a mirror no?

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

If you're measuring something with calipers the reading taken is not a matter opinion nor is it decided by consensus. In this case [M&M] we're measuring the motion of the Earth with an interferometer; the Earth does not move.

In other news...

Elvis Presley Sings About Flat Earth -- https://youtu.be/vsa0-a7YLvk

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3990

Merit: 1385

^^^ When you and organized crime try to reason things out together, are you trying to reason with organized crime? Or is organized crime trying to reason with organized crime (FE people).

The biggest hate and kill post-er in this thread is, ah, ah, ah, ah, YOU! That's a crime you are doing. My question is, are you organized?

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

You can't reason with organized crime any more than you can reason with a tapeworm. If muggles is caught red-handed, he's going to cry "I dun do nuffin" all the way to the gas chamber and that's a fact.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3990

Merit: 1385

^^^ You must be a Muslim. If people won't believe things your way, you want to kill them. Am I right?

So what if a person is wrong in some of his understanding and ideas? EVERYBODY is wrong in some of his understanding and ideas. EACH ONE OF US has some understanding and knowledge that we believe is true, but it isn't.

So, you want to take away freedom of people to believe as they want? And then you start to do it by talking about killing them? When are you going to actually start to carry out the killing you are talking about in this thread? Astargath doesn't talk like this except as protection from you talking like this first.

Now that you are finally understanding that you could be wrong about FE, and about maintaining others in freedom, and about your life in general, what are you going to do? Are you going to commit suicide? Don't end your life without talking to your funny farm counselor first. You are more valuable alive than dead.

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ This is why I promote violence; the consensus is the result of organized crime and there's no alternative action.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on February 01, 2019, 06:54:59 AM

^^^ D&P's replication of Sagnac's experiment took rotating frames of reference into account and the results falsified SR beyond any reasonable doubt. The only one in checkmate here is you.

The Earth is flat and motionless.

Lies, it didn't. Instead all scientists accepted relativity and gravity. Check mate.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ D&P's replication of Sagnac's experiment took rotating frames of reference into account and the results falsified SR beyond any reasonable doubt. The only one in checkmate here is you.

The Earth is flat and motionless.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on February 01, 2019, 03:40:32 AM

^^^ You getting paid per post or something? My reply to the off topic post in regards to Moore's Law (the number of transistors in ICs doubles every year) has nothing to do with Einstein, his theory of relativity or the M&M experiment.

Your quoting wiki's semetic screeching about how relativity wasn't a direct response to M&M's experiment shows what a massive fag you are. Dufour & Prunier falsified relativity with their experiment and, Einstein is quoted as saying relativity was in fact a direct response to M&M. Einstein like Newton also implied that he didn't believe his own bullshit theory.

The Earth does not move, period. Get a mechanical gyroscope that reacts to a 15 deg/hr rotation and prove the Earth is stationary yourself! Also before you start screeching about ultra-sensative ring-laser and mems gyroscopes, they're picking up the "aether drift" documented in the M&M experiment.

'' Dufour & Prunier falsified relativity with their experiment'' No they didn't. check mate. Build a rocket go to space and observe the planet from there. Take a video of the dome and prove the earth is flat.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ You getting paid per post or something? My reply to the off topic post in regards to Moore's Law (the number of transistors in ICs doubles every year) has nothing to do with Einstein, his theory of relativity or the M&M experiment.

Your quoting wiki's semetic screeching about how relativity wasn't a direct response to M&M's experiment shows what a massive fag you are. Dufour & Prunier falsified relativity with their experiment and, Einstein is quoted as saying relativity was in fact a direct response to M&M. Einstein like Newton also implied that he didn't believe his own bullshit theory.

The Earth does not move, period. Get a mechanical gyroscope that reacts to a 15 deg/hr rotation and prove the Earth is stationary yourself! Also before you start screeching about ultra-sensative ring-laser and mems gyroscopes, they're picking up the "aether drift" documented in the M&M experiment.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 09:10:20 AM

^^^ Not an argument and honestly I don't ever recall referencing Moore's Law in any way, the current physical limit 6 nm IIRC and new technology will be required to maintain the trend.

Absolutely off topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment

''The extent to which the null result of the Michelson–Morley experiment influenced Einstein is disputed. Alluding to some statements of Einstein, many historians argue that it played no significant role in his path to special relativity,[A 24][A 25] while other statements of Einstein probably suggest that he was influenced by it.[A 26] In any case, the null result of the Michelson–Morley experiment helped the notion of the constancy of the speed of light gain widespread and rapid acceptance.[A 24]''

Funny that it even helped Einstein with his theory, LUL.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ Not an argument and honestly I don't ever recall referencing Moore's Law in any way, the current physical limit 6 nm IIRC and new technology will be required to maintain the trend.

Absolutely off topic.

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 07:59:16 AM

^^^ He's claiming the Earth is motion and that one of the many accelerations we're claimed to be experiencing is too small to be of any consequence. How is my response (established scientific proof we're stationary) irrelevant you fucking cocksucker?

Claim a rim velocity of 66k MPH? Kill yourself now!

''established scientific proof we're stationary'' Perhaps in your youtube videos that's true, the established scientific evidence has been that the earth is not stationary for more than one hundred years, just like gravity is a scientific theory, there is no such thing as an unproven theory, otherwise it wouldn't be a scientific theory.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^^ The pipul is strong with this one!

He's claiming the Earth is motion and that one of the many accelerations we're claimed to be experiencing is too small to be of any consequence. How is my response (established scientific proof we're stationary) irrelevant you fucking cocksucker?

Claim a rim velocity of 66k MPH? Kill yourself now!

edit:
Also on a side note, the bulge that gives fake ba'al Earth its wonderful pear shape would be undulating with an up & down motion to the tune of ~14 miles every 12 hours haha haha! Talk about high tide!

Astargath

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 645

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 07:09:39 AM

Quote from: odolvlobo on January 31, 2019, 04:55:53 AM

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 02:34:51 AM

... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.

At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.

^^^ Quit your bullshit!

The claim Earth is in motion has been experimentally falsified by Michaelson & Morley, the rebuttal by globalists of "muh relativity" has also been experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier. That the Earth is stationary is established science that can be proven by anybody with a gyroscope (reactive to a 15 deg/hr rotation).

The claimed rotation of the Earth would cause everybody to get seasick if it were true, we can most certainly feel the ~14 grams of force that would be present if we were spinning, not to mention all the other claimed motions and accelerations we're supposedly experiencing.

He explains it to you, what you asked for and then your reply is some irrelevant experiment that has nothing to do with whjat he said, admit your defeat.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Quote from: odolvlobo on January 31, 2019, 04:55:53 AM

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 02:34:51 AM

... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.

At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.

^^^ Quit your bullshit!

The claim Earth is in motion has been experimentally falsified by Michaelson & Morley, the rebuttal by globalists of "muh relativity" has also been experimentally falsified by Dufour & Prunier. That the Earth is stationary is established science that can be proven by anybody with a gyroscope (reactive to a 15 deg/hr rotation).

The claimed rotation of the Earth would cause everybody to get seasick if it were true, we can most certainly feel the ~14 grams of force that would be present if we were spinning, not to mention all the other claimed motions and accelerations we're supposedly experiencing.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4522

Merit: 3426

Quote from: notbatman on January 31, 2019, 02:34:51 AM

... you can't even come up with bullshit to explain the acceleration from the change in speed every 12 hours due to the 66.6k MPH claimed orbit around the Sun.

At a certain time at the equator, you are traveling in a direction at about 65.6k mph, and then about 67.6k mph in that direction 12 hours later. The change in speed is about 2000 mph over 43200 seconds, which is an overall acceleration of about 0.0463 mph/s. That's nothing compared to falling, at 21.8 mph/s, which is why we don't fly off the earth. If we accelerated at that rate when we started walking, it would take over a minute just to get to a normal pace of 3 mph.

Topic: Flat Earth - page 110. (Read 1095196 times)