^^^ I don't need to run a massive taxpayer funded scam, we've got eyes in the sky too.
The curvature was there before the CGI.
Topic: Flat Earth - page 27. (Read 1095196 times)
The curvature was there before the CGI.
^^^ "gyroscope reacts to the galactic center" <--- proof of senility.
Come on! Even Batman knows this.
^^^ I don't need to run a massive taxpayer funded scam, we've got eyes in the sky too.
Flat earth is a cult, same as the scientologist, the 7 days Adventists and others ...
I have read hundred of page of this thread without seeing one proof of the earth being flat.
The only proof you have advanced is that a P90 camera is the absolute truth and beat all the expensive satellite, spacial shuttles and gyroscopes that scientist have.
(Does the P90 also cure cancer and avoid the need of vaccine ? If so, I might buy one for me).
If you have, as you say, hundred of thousands, or millions of members. Why not setting up your own satellite?
SpaceX / Elon musk is doing it for $2,5 - 5 millions + cost of the satellite.
It wouldn't be to hard / expensive to build a satellite that is open source, built by flat earther (so no globe earther can put malicious code to modify the video stream), put some batteries, a small solar panel, a camera and a stream of communication with earth.
That way you can have the images from the sky to back your theory.
I have read hundred of page of this thread without seeing one proof of the earth being flat.
The only proof you have advanced is that a P90 camera is the absolute truth and beat all the expensive satellite, spacial shuttles and gyroscopes that scientist have.
(Does the P90 also cure cancer and avoid the need of vaccine ? If so, I might buy one for me).
If you have, as you say, hundred of thousands, or millions of members. Why not setting up your own satellite?
SpaceX / Elon musk is doing it for $2,5 - 5 millions + cost of the satellite.
It wouldn't be to hard / expensive to build a satellite that is open source, built by flat earther (so no globe earther can put malicious code to modify the video stream), put some batteries, a small solar panel, a camera and a stream of communication with earth.
That way you can have the images from the sky to back your theory.
^^^ "gyroscope reacts to the galactic center" <--- proof of senility.
^^^ The Bible, no that came after I saw earth was flat. You don't want to go there anyhow, there's not a single passage that supports the heliocentric model.
That's a fancy way to agree and disagree with yourself in the same two sentences. The Bible doesn't agree with flat earth. The wording has to do with salvation, not science.
The globe earth is going ~66.6k MPH around a globe sun in an elliptical orbit. The speed of 66.6k MPH is not constant it varies causing constant acceleration [and decceleration].
Now add a constant 1k MPH acceleration [and decceleration] at the equator from the rotation of the earth.
Finally there would be a few grams of centripetal force constantly trying to push you to the side from the rotation, if you're not on the equator. This however is kind of irrelevant considering the mad ~66.6k carnival ride the heliocentric model says we're on.
Place a basketball on the table. Place your hand on the ball, and turn the ball 1 full turn in 1 year. All the fantastic speeds you talk about mean nothing because everything is balanced almost perfectly.
The gyroscope is proven to react to 15 deg/hr, where's the rotation?
The camera has a robotic eye and the P900 can see too far, where's the curve?
https://i.imgur.com/qai0mqa.jpg
So says you.
If you happen to be sincere, and happen to not be in the funny farm, I really feel bad for you.
^^^ The Bible, no that came after I saw earth was flat. You don't want to go there anyhow, there's not a single passage that supports the heliocentric model.
The globe earth is going ~66.6k MPH around a globe sun in an elliptical orbit. The speed of ~66.6k MPH is not constant it varies causing constant acceleration [and decceleration].
Now add a constant 1k MPH acceleration [and decceleration] at the equator from the rotation of the earth.
Finally there would be a few grams of centripetal force constantly trying to push you to the side from the rotation, if you're not on the equator. This however is kind of irrelevant considering the mad ~66.6k MPH carnival ride the heliocentric model says we're on.
The gyroscope is proven to react to 15 deg/hr, where's the rotation?
The camera has a robotic eye and the P900 can see too far, where's the curve?
Also, you still haven't explained how a pressure gradient can exist next to a vacuum without a container!
The globe earth is going ~66.6k MPH around a globe sun in an elliptical orbit. The speed of ~66.6k MPH is not constant it varies causing constant acceleration [and decceleration].
Now add a constant 1k MPH acceleration [and decceleration] at the equator from the rotation of the earth.
Finally there would be a few grams of centripetal force constantly trying to push you to the side from the rotation, if you're not on the equator. This however is kind of irrelevant considering the mad ~66.6k MPH carnival ride the heliocentric model says we're on.
The gyroscope is proven to react to 15 deg/hr, where's the rotation?
The camera has a robotic eye and the P900 can see too far, where's the curve?
Also, you still haven't explained how a pressure gradient can exist next to a vacuum without a container!
^^^ Instead of spouting nonsense about a theory that's been experimentally falsified (relativistic gravity), why don't you explain to us how a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with a 15 deg/hr rotation doesn't register the claimed spin of the earth?
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 milewide radius flywheel with a 1,000 MPH rim speed don't cause it to instantly explode.
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 mile
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
Gyroscope explanation is easy. Most airplanes use gyroscopic action for guidance in one way or another. It works.
Relativity and gravity in theory have been falsified to the extent that these theories remain theories. Since they are theories, the falsification lies in their application to the REAL phenomenon of relativity and gravity. To say it in a simple way, there aren't many people who think about relativity and gravity theory. Rather, the people think about relativity and gravity. The theory might be wrong regarding reality, but it is right in that it is theoretical. But the reality includes real relativity and real gravity, which have nothing to do with something that is theoretical.
The answer regarding your flywheel is gravity. The earth is almost 8,000 miles in diameter. An object weighs very little less at the poles than it does at the equator. This alone shows that the centrifugal force is insignificant when compared with the force of gravity. So, why isn't everything crushed by gravity? Molecular resistance is much stronger than gravity. Gravity is the weak force with regard to molecular and atomic resistances.
Why is it that you can't take the spinning-ball-on-the-table example, and disprove it right at the example? It's because your whole idea of the way centrifugal force works is wrong. If you were right, the change in direction of the pistons in a car engine would cause the whole engine to explode. But the engine doesn't explode... so you are shown to be wrong.
"hey look it's an airplane!" isn't an explanation for the missing rotation.
Thanks for pointing out I stated the diameter but gave a radius, corrected. My point about sheer stress stands, this area of engineering is clearly out of your league. You're neck deep in theoretical bullshit and can't change a fucking light bulb to save your life bruh.
I can't make sense of your last paragraph, you appear to be rambling incoherently.
https://i.imgur.com/8F3cqut.jpg
The gyroscope is proven to react to 15 deg/hr, where's the rotation?
The P900 can see too far, where's the curve?
You are the one who keeps on using the example of the earth can't be moved from the Bible. There isn't any sheer stress on a globe the size of Earth, spinning at the slow speed of 1000 mph at its equator.
You can't understand my last paragraph, above, because you don't want to. You don't want to because you can't explain away the fact that the earth spins only one turn in 24 hours. This throws a monkey wrench into all your ideas of stress.
The P900 can't see at all. It's still the eye that sees. All your sight that leads you to believe there is no curve is flawed.
^^^ Instead of spouting nonsense about a theory that's been experimentally falsified (relativistic gravity), why don't you explain to us how a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with a 15 deg/hr rotation doesn't register the claimed spin of the earth?
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 milewide radius flywheel with a 1,000 MPH rim speed don't cause it to instantly explode.
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 mile
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
Gyroscope explanation is easy. Most airplanes use gyroscopic action for guidance in one way or another. It works.
Relativity and gravity in theory have been falsified to the extent that these theories remain theories. Since they are theories, the falsification lies in their application to the REAL phenomenon of relativity and gravity. To say it in a simple way, there aren't many people who think about relativity and gravity theory. Rather, the people think about relativity and gravity. The theory might be wrong regarding reality, but it is right in that it is theoretical. But the reality includes real relativity and real gravity, which have nothing to do with something that is theoretical.
The answer regarding your flywheel is gravity. The earth is almost 8,000 miles in diameter. An object weighs very little less at the poles than it does at the equator. This alone shows that the centrifugal force is insignificant when compared with the force of gravity. So, why isn't everything crushed by gravity? Molecular resistance is much stronger than gravity. Gravity is the weak force with regard to molecular and atomic resistances.
Why is it that you can't take the spinning-ball-on-the-table example, and disprove it right at the example? It's because your whole idea of the way centrifugal force works is wrong. If you were right, the change in direction of the pistons in a car engine would cause the whole engine to explode. But the engine doesn't explode... so you are shown to be wrong.
"hey look it's an airplane!" isn't an explanation for the missing rotation.
Thanks for pointing out I stated the diameter but gave a radius, corrected. My point about sheer stress stands, this area of engineering is clearly out of your league. You're neck deep in theoretical bullshit and can't change a fucking light bulb to save your life bruh.
I can't make sense of your last paragraph, you appear to be rambling incoherently.
The gyroscope is proven to react to 15 deg/hr, where's the rotation?
The P900 can see too far, where's the curve?
^^^ Instead of spouting nonsense about a theory that's been experimentally falsified (relativistic gravity), why don't you explain to us how a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with a 15 deg/hr rotation doesn't register the claimed spin of the earth?
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 mile wide flywheel with a 1,000 MPH rim speed don't cause it to instantly explode.
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 mile wide flywheel with a 1,000 MPH rim speed don't cause it to instantly explode.
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
Gyroscope explanation is easy. Most airplanes use gyroscopic action for guidance in one way or another. It works.
Relativity and gravity in theory have been falsified to the extent that these theories remain theories. Since they are theories, the falsification lies in their application to the REAL phenomenon of relativity and gravity. To say it in a simple way, there aren't many people who think about relativity and gravity theory. Rather, the people think about relativity and gravity. The theory might be wrong regarding reality, but it is right in that it is theoretical. But the reality includes real relativity and real gravity, which have nothing to do with something that is theoretical.
The answer regarding your flywheel is gravity. The earth is almost 8,000 miles in diameter. An object weighs very little less at the poles than it does at the equator. This alone shows that the centrifugal force is insignificant when compared with the force of gravity. So, why isn't everything crushed by gravity? Molecular resistance is much stronger than gravity. Gravity is the weak force with regard to molecular and atomic resistances.
Why is it that you can't take the spinning-ball-on-the-table example, and disprove it right at the example? It's because your whole idea of the way centrifugal force works is wrong. If you were right, the change in direction of the pistons in a car engine would cause the whole engine to explode. But the engine doesn't explode... so you are shown to be wrong.
^^^ Instead of spouting nonsense about a theory that's been experimentally falsified (relativistic gravity), why don't you explain to us how a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with a 15 deg/hr rotation doesn't register the claimed spin of the earth?
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 milewide radius flywheel with a 1,000 MPH rim speed don't cause it to instantly explode.
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
@sirazimuth I noticed you also invoked the "space pancake", no, space is a hoax think "snow globe".
After you're finished explaining that doozy you can explain how a pressure gradient can exist without a container next to a vacuum. There's nothing (including the falsified theory of gravity) to prevent everything from blowing off into space.
While you're at it you might also explain how the sheer forces present in a 4,000 mile
The shitty arguments you promote for a spinning globe earth and outer space are worse than those propped up to support the theory of evolution, worse by a factor of many magnitudes. You're a huge cuck and a sellout!
@sirazimuth I noticed you also invoked the "space pancake", no, space is a hoax think "snow globe".
About one thousand miles per hour at the equator, right?
Get a basketball. Place it on the table. Put your hand on it. Turn it 1 full turn in 24 hours. Now a turn of the globe doesn't seem so fast, does it? Your hand doesn't even fly off.
You FE jokers don't have enough sense to understand that gravity is way stronger than the little bit of centrifugal force from the spin of the earth.
Get a basketball. Place it on the table. Put your hand on it. Turn it 1 full turn in 24 hours. Now a turn of the globe doesn't seem so fast, does it? Your hand doesn't even fly off.
You FE jokers don't have enough sense to understand that gravity is way stronger than the little bit of centrifugal force from the spin of the earth.
All of these models have been proven wrong many times over.
2D Flat
3D Globe
Learn 4 D
Miegakure: a 4D game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGO12Z5Lw8s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyuRLmCphHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4ruHJFsb4g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGguwYPC32I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0WjV6MmCyM
2D Flat
3D Globe
Learn 4 D
Miegakure: a 4D game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGO12Z5Lw8s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyuRLmCphHc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4ruHJFsb4g
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGguwYPC32I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0WjV6MmCyM
^^^
It's a steel dome.
Gravity hijacks the electrical Coulomb force behind density and buoyancy.
Epstein hung himself on his knees.
It's a steel dome.
Gravity hijacks the electrical Coulomb force behind density and buoyancy.
Epstein hung himself on his knees.
ah, oookay then...got it...
Well, thanx for clarifying that dude.
Now I feel educated.....
^^^
It's a steel dome.
Gravity hijacks the electrical Coulomb force behind density and buoyancy.
Epstein hung himself on his knees.
It's a steel dome.
Gravity hijacks the electrical Coulomb force behind density and buoyancy.
Epstein hung himself on his knees.
Yeah yeah I already deleted mine along with the merit.How the fuck am I supposed to know he posted it already anyway?
No worries dude, didn't mean to stir up a hornets nest.... Ha! no pun intended... (or maybe it was... subconsciously, idk.. )
Reposting a meme as far as I know is absolutely not plagiarism. Otherwise half this forum would get banned.
It was your comment "this just in" that kinda rubbed me the wrong way, as I knew v8 had posted that meme like a year ago.(in this thread.... yeah, it's a loooooong phukking thread )
And yeah , unless you live on this forum 24/7 you wouldn't have known that, so all is forgiven. Its cool man.
Oh.... and to get back on topic....
The earth is flat, under a big dome made outta some strange stone material I forgot the name of.
The stars are projections on this dome (like a planetarium kinda deal) and the sun is 30 miles wide. Sextants prove it, doncha know.
The floating space pancake with dome covering is surrounded by antarctic glaciers protected by government mercenaries who will shoot you if you approach.
The moon landings and the space station are hoaxes perpetrated by the cgi folks at NASA. (for what reason, I have no phukking idea...ask batty)
Did I mention gravity doesn't exist?
Anyone who doesn't believe these facts can get in a hot oven, or if no ovens available, go rope yourself.....
Have I missed anything?
^^^ Thanks for rolling in the mud after you took your bath.
Proof the Earth is Round or Flat.
Bubbles !! Mix soap and water ==> so Earth found inspiration in soap bubbles.
World....!! Mix 3/4 water + 1/4 Earth ==> Flat Earth.
Easily explained.
Bubbles !! Mix soap and water ==> so Earth found inspiration in soap bubbles.
World....!! Mix 3/4 water + 1/4 Earth ==> Flat Earth.
Easily explained.
Jump to: