Pages:
Author

Topic: Flat Earth - page 33. (Read 1095196 times)

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 12, 2019, 09:18:17 PM
^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.

Assuming that you are simply making a mistake, and not being a troll or deceptive in some way, your quoted post^^ is exactly why you are wrong. People long ago saw anomalies in the simple tests. So they developed complex ones. The complex tests prove emphatically that the earth is a globe, or nearly such.

Forget the simple tests. They are misleading you.

Cool

OK boomer,

   The super-zoom cameras used in the "simple" test are complex new technology, your "but, but, long ago goy" doesn't cut it. We've measured the distance to the horizon with a P900 and it's not consistent with the globe model.

legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
November 12, 2019, 02:23:58 PM
Could the Flat Earth be in a bubble(shield) placed by its CREATOR for our total protection?

Could what I perceived as dome be a bubble for full protection? Was told about the protection, and I immediately perceived a transparent dome shaped stuff... Maybe I didn't perceive the full picture...

The bubble is the envelope of the atmosphere. The Van Allen Belts protect from the radiation of the sun. The gigantic size of space makes the odds of a large body hitting the earth to be unlikely.

Cool
Ucy
sr. member
Activity: 2674
Merit: 403
Compare rates on different exchanges & swap.
November 12, 2019, 01:04:24 PM
Could the Flat Earth be in a bubble(shield) placed by its CREATOR for our total protection?

Could what I perceived as dome be a bubble for full protection? Was told about the protection, and I immediately perceived a transparent dome shaped stuff... Maybe I didn't perceive the full picture...
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
November 12, 2019, 12:20:52 PM
^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.

Assuming that you are simply making a mistake, and not being a troll or deceptive in some way, your quoted post^^ is exactly why you are wrong. People long ago saw anomalies in the simple tests. So they developed complex ones. The complex tests prove emphatically that the earth is a globe, or nearly such.

Forget the simple tests. They are misleading you.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 12, 2019, 10:32:21 AM
^^^ That's where you're wrong friendo, a simple distance to the horizon test is enough proof to debunk the globe. Everything out of an astrophysicist's mouth after that is falsified nonsense.

NASA is a propaganda agency run by satanists.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
November 12, 2019, 10:16:14 AM
^^^ Well I stand corrected, it looks like NASA did get mentioned a few times. However, the instances don't really back up TwitchySeal's assertions regarding the interviewer. Clearly Twitchy was just talking shit to dissuade anybody from clicking on the video and seeing one of his high priestesses dragged through the mud. But hey, good work standing up for your little buddy and finding those timestamps skipper!

That interview was a beautiful example IMO of an astrophysicist getting called out on their absolute nonsense; it showed how they can't defend against even modest criticism. If she wasn't totally full of horse pucky then she could have just answered the questions instead of rage-quitting and demanding that nobody ever see the interview.

These vampires burst into flames under direct sunlight, cheers to the author of the video!

This shows nothing. She might have been having an off day. Astrophysicist aren't necessarily expert debaters. She might be a plant. Much of every field of physics isn't known. So, saying something is proven because other things aren't known is simply foolish.

Why do you constantly use political science to try to proof other science? Political science says that you should lie as cleverly as you can... but anything to outtalk your opponent. That's about all you do regarding FE. You don't have any FE proof of FE.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 12, 2019, 07:39:48 AM
^^^ Well I stand corrected, it looks like NASA did get mentioned a few times. However, the instances don't really back up TwitchySeal's assertions regarding the interviewer. Clearly Twitchy was just talking shit to dissuade anybody from clicking on the video and seeing one of his high priestesses dragged through the mud. But hey, good work standing up for your little buddy and finding those timestamps skipper!

That interview was a beautiful example IMO of an astrophysicist getting called out on their absolute nonsense; it showed how they can't defend against even modest criticism. If she wasn't totally full of horse pucky then she could have just answered the questions instead of rage-quitting and demanding that nobody ever see the interview.

These vampires burst into flames under direct sunlight, cheers to the author of the video!
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
November 11, 2019, 11:26:28 PM
^^^ Odd, I don't recall him mentioning NASA during the interview. Can you provide a timestamp for when he talks about them?

29:02 - I’m sure this is just an error with NASA.

40:07 - You say its healthy to trust photos and images from bodies like NASA.

56:50 - NASA said they can’t go to the moon because they lost the data.
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
November 11, 2019, 11:11:52 PM
^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?

The only thing that annoyed me was near the end when he started rattling off observations made by other people and expected her to accept them. I enjoyed the placement of the clip the Big Short.

Anyway, here are some of the ridiculous assertions:

22:19 — Gravity is strong enough to hold the moon in orbit but astronauts can float about.

29:05 - There’s a problem with it because the earth is too small.

30:20 - The moon was photographed at the same time in Australia and Florida. How is that possible? … One of these locations shouldn’t be able to see it.

33:12 - This is the only phenomenon in our experience here in this reality where the shade is smaller than the object casting it. So you can do a million experiments  with shadows. The shadow is never smaller than the object casting it.

50:35 - I’m not claiming anything … I'm just asking questions (which was not true) ...

He asserted that the earth was flat.
can you back that claim with a video timestamp? I'm curious as I don't recall him directly making that assertion.

While he may not have directly asserted that the earth is flat, he certainly was presenting evidence that it is flat.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 11, 2019, 03:14:32 PM
^^^ Odd, I don't recall him mentioning NASA during the interview. Can you provide a timestamp for when he talks about them?

Speaking of NASA check it out "the handmaiden of Satan" herself:



   Michelle Thaller - NASA's High Priestess of Scientism -- https://youtu.be/AoulNfxTcXc


You should go back and watch it again since you don't seem to remember anything he said.  Perhaps you were distracted by all the memes.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 11, 2019, 11:45:46 AM
^^^ Odd, I don't recall him mentioning NASA during the interview. Can you provide a timestamp for when he talks about them?

Speaking of NASA check it out "the handmaiden of Satan" herself:



   Michelle Thaller - NASA's High Priestess of Scientism -- https://youtu.be/AoulNfxTcXc
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 11, 2019, 06:10:03 AM
^^^ So if it's documented that you can see Chicago at 50 miles and, it goes against the calculated predictions the globe model makes, what about it is a ridiculous assertion?

I still don't recall him directly asserting that the earth was flat.

He was there to argue that the Earth is flat and that we shouldn't believe all the evidence that NASA has documented is real... with an astrophysicist that works for NASA.  Ridiculous.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 11, 2019, 05:42:35 AM
^^^ So if it's documented that you can see Chicago at 50 miles and, it goes against the calculated predictions the globe model makes, what about it is a ridiculous assertion?

I still don't recall him directly asserting that the earth was flat.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 11, 2019, 05:06:47 AM
^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?

He asserted that the earth was flat.

can you back that claim with a video timestamp? I'm curious as I don't recall him directly making that assertion.

It was when he was blabbering on about how he knew some guys that could see chicago from 50 miles away and could not detect that the earth was round over a big lake even after all their calculations.

legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 11, 2019, 04:55:31 AM
^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?

He asserted that the earth was flat.

can you back that claim with a video timestamp? I'm curious as I don't recall him directly making that assertion.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 2093
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
November 11, 2019, 04:33:20 AM
^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?

He asserted that the earth was flat.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 11, 2019, 04:11:52 AM
^^^ Can you give an example of a ridiculous assertion that he made? What exactly do you feel annoyed you the most?
legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
November 11, 2019, 01:35:35 AM
This is beautiful.
Astrophysicist RAGE QUITS During Interview With Undercover Flat Earther (waykiwa. By: Red Pill phil -- https://youtu.be/l4hjWa4w-lQ

Yeah, his questions were getting annoying and he was making ridiculous assertions. I'm not surprised that she got frustrated with his nonsense and decided to stop.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
November 10, 2019, 11:59:03 PM
This is beautiful.



Astrophysicist RAGE QUITS During Interview With Undercover Flat Earther (waykiwa. By: Red Pill phil -- https://youtu.be/l4hjWa4w-lQ
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 1385
November 09, 2019, 08:37:11 PM
^^^ Maintain that attitude. It will be more peaceful for you, since they won't let you out of the funny farm anyway.

Cool
Pages:
Jump to: