Topic: Flat Earth - page 622. (Read 1095196 times)

i am asking are the scientific implications of the double slit experiment. and FYI it isnt photon particle/ wave duality, for they are particles not waves. however the implication what they act as waves when being tested or not is fundamental to superposition such as that involves Schrodinger cat. which is an explanation of Heisenberg theory for sure, but it goes beyond that. so instead of just asking me to repeat my question with information you found on google, you might do well to tell me what are the implications of these findings and tests.


a lot of what you just said would be impossible in a hollow earth (where we live on the inside of the earths crust. so i am confused as to your stance on the matter.

Im recently by the impression of the Thoeria Apophasis channel. The guy there thinks that gravity is a magnetic phenomen and magnetic force is just transfiguration of a space. Its all about finding the inertia line of the magnetic force.

As you may or may not know, at least the magneto guy from Theoria Apophasis knows that a water and a glass is a condensor. That means that it can be electricaly charged. The guy does not think we live inside earth. I think he did not thought about that. His ideas makes sense why we do have electrifical discharges between the glass sealing with water above making it works as a condensor and the earth full of iron inside.

His idea is that every electric phenomen is a distortion, and he think that everything is an electric phenomen. If the glass sealing is distorted it create electricity as it is a capacitor that is able to do that. As you know the electricity creates a magnetic field from the flow of the electric current. And that force is directed towards the earth. Below the earth should be another electric current and the point where both magnetic force "colide" creating the point of inertia.  The "center of gravity" should be way below the sea level where both magnetic fields find their inertia point where the magnetic force is strongest. If this theory is true, below a certain level below the sea the pressure should be lower if it happens to be past the "center of gravity". That would have prove it once and for all that the gravity is an electrical phenomen.

And that would make sense as gravity is the only force that is a pull force in the physics world, everything else is a push force. If it would be proven experimentaly that would make every force in the universe a push force.

I need to really learn more about this guy idea about the gravity, but I think this guy is the closest to the truth about gravity as you can get. Maybe I understood something wrong about his ideas so sorry about that but that is my knowledge about it for today. Ill learn more.

What is the poles magnetic force you ask? It could be the result of the either a) rotating sky, and its like the similiar mechanism like in moving earth b) octahedron that is supposed to be in my "theory" is having the highest magnetism at its peaks and those are directed towards the poles.

Just waddle back to the kitchen and make us some sandwiches, alright princess?

Smoke some midol tablets and have a glass of wine before lunch, please.

There, there. It's just that dress that makes you look fat, pumpkin.

 

@przemax, you are the guy who wants to believe in hollow earth right? if so have you found a solution as to why the further down in the ocean you go the more pressurized it is instead of revealing the pressure that would be necessary for your theory?

@BobLawBlaw  you are outmatched here, i disagree with przemax's belief however he is more intelligent then you, and can have a decent conversation.
so when you ask him what he knows about "Science" and the big bang or dark matter. i guarantee you know nothing beyond the superficial aspects you learned from the big bang theory (the TV show not the theory)

If you believe you do have an intellectual mind then tell me why double slit experiment is a keystone of quantum physics, and explain the result of Schrodinger's cat theory in regards to a superposition.

It is easy to cherry pick topics to stump another person

Ps. i will know if you just google shit. your knowledge seems to be limited to making insulting memes

Are you on cocaine or crack? Dude.... quit. It kills your brain cells. Leave your two brain cells thats left. You will need them not to take shit in your pants unvoluntarily.

If you would have more brain cells than 2, maybe 3, you would know that to disagree with scientists I need to know what they say. Do I? Yes I know what they say, I understand what they say and I sometimes disagree but mostly agree with them.

On the other hand if you dont know what scientists say or dont understand them like you do, all you have as an option is to agree with them on everything. Or disagree with them on everything like flatties do. That is the illusion of the consensus.

I knew the only thing you will say is that a scientific sanhendryn dont agree with what I say is like a death to credibility. Thats all you can do? Weak.

I dont reject anything. You are not aware how troubled is the world of science and how much they dont know. They admitt they dont know. You just view things as magical that you dont have any idea of. Just like primitive people were defending their voodoo magicians. They were just at rage when someone opposed the voodo magic. They propably said that its ridiculous to opose 100k years of believing in power of  a magical dick sticking to a doll.

For 100% I know a lot more about science than you do. I know what they claim what DM and BB is. Do you? Do you have any understanding other than a fear of voodoo magic?

I say that all science is valid - at least the one that is based on facts and observations and logic. Some science especialy after the Einstein is not based neither of facts, neither of observations neither of logic. Its based only on assumptions. Its like modern magic. So if I dismiss any science its just a theory of relativity, quantum physics, Copernicus, Kepler and theory of evolution. Every other theory is completly fine and scientifical.

What is so dumb about believing in something? Prove it its dumb. If you cant prove it its not me who is dumb here.

If its so clearly dumb as you say it is, you should have an easy job to prove its folly.

Why do you think im dumb? I own you all in arguments, but be my guest and die ignorant I dont give a fuck about you. Just dont accuse of being something im clearly not.

I suppose thats true.! Only boobLooblaw  know's for sure.
we'll ave to wait till he's finished whacking off tho

I heard that too. We'll see what BoobLawblaw says about it.

It's probably like bringing a pen knife to a sword fight.

Shorty gets his bum stabbed terrible.

I must admitt im very much shocked with the level of creativity of those answers. Good job. I cant prove you are wrong on that. You can disprove the flat earth if you would want. But you wont going to do it and wont travel to the south hemisphere to check things yourself.

1. Yes they are in line with a flat Earth, but only in the northern hemisphere because of the disc map is semi ok at measuring the distance at north hemisphere. Its actualy a very convenient to flat earthers as most of them a) dont travel much b) live in northern hemisphere. Just travel to the south hemisphere and check out yourself that the data is misleading there.

2. How convenient for an answer. The things you should see you dont because there is some weird light property that flat earthers has invented. Where to read about the property of light you suggest. Any research about that? On what distances the light travels?

3. I dont know if you are aware that there is actualy a base out there that has an order to shoot at will at any trespassers. They are serious about it , and you say that they have all that surface covered with a radar and troops ready to with loaded up weapons? That would have cost a fortune in my opinion to do. From a military stand point of view your story is little hard to believe. There should have to be at least 8 military bases out there if not more in your version of the story, for every direction possible just to be able to shoot down any trespasers. Can you imagine how big of budget that is? That is a terrain largely surpasing the USA territory to guard.

4. I challange you to prove that the flights people claim to have are fake.

5. Thats actually weird. People can see a stars but only those that are convenient to you. Those others are just distant enough to not see them. That is some answer - true, but only if you show some evidences that light dont show objects that are surpasing some distance.

a) 3000 miles? Where did you get that number from? Its insanely high. What do you think is a Karman line at 100km? There are footage of rockets at least slowing down at that heights or outrightly stops. Just dont tell me its fake. You cant just invent new laws and facts before you have any explanation why the previous ones are incorect.

b) we can agree that the earth is motionless here, but some weird property of light is just a nono. Saying that light cant travel longer than some distance is highly improbable. Im not saying its impossible, but you must admitt that light functioning properly until it becomes problematic then you invent new laws, is kind of a fishy.

Is the light just disapearing? What is the light? Is it a group of photons or something else? If they are photons are they just poof and gone? How come light have distance? Thats a very creative statement. Im open minded, but its hard to consider even for me to have a light just poof and gone.
People at equator can see the south star at the height of your dome at 3000 miles and the distance to the south pole of 6000miles. Square distance using simple trigonometry is 4500 miles of light visibility and yet you say that people cant see a sun in the night because its too far? Is it too far at a distance of 4500 miles? Do you know what kind of distances that is? I could see a whole Europe using some strong telescope. That is seriously wrong "science" here. Fuck the logic. Even seeing a stars at 3000 miles distances is a hell of a lot to see. Im going to buy myself a telescope and Im going to watch the Moscov in some Polish mountains.

Why the earth is flat, and why I don't talk about it anymore! - Michael Tellinger on the Russell Scott Show
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDmgrOmF5oM
Michael Tellinger briefly explains why the Earth is not a ball, before explaining why he has decided to stop talking about it.

I think the earth is round. because the ball can not float in the air forever will surely fall to the ground. But if this continues to be discussed will not be completed and there is no meeting point, when asked about the flat earth? I answered all the power of god almighty only knows.

---

1. The seasonal cycles are very much in line with a flat Earth and a yearly solar cycle that varies between the tropics.

2. Yes there is more than perspective at work, the atmosphere limits the distance light can travel.

3. Radar and intel.

4. Fake flights, fake distances and fake times.

5. See answer #2.

a. The dome has a ceiling of 3,000 miles and rockets are not going to hit it. FYI you can buy meteorites with some of the golden oxide coating still on it oh, and you better be filthy rich if you want one with golden oxide chunks on it.

b. The evidence says the Earth is flat and motionless, to say otherwise is the ignorant position here.

He should know...its the one with the smallest cock!!!.....i think that's how it works.

If you don't know, go ask them. I'll wait.

Which one of your dads is your mom?

Bonus meme:

I have a lot more understanding than you it seems so visit that forum more frequently. I know that a force has a direction. Isnt it the direction of the gas movement is the direction of the force. No? Ofcourse it is.

I think you mean a third law of motion made by newton that is in action here. Yes it is in action if you have two masses. One mass is a exhausted gas produced by a propulsion and the other mass is the mass of the atmoshperic gas. If you dont have the atmospheric gas what is the second mass that a third newton law is talking about?


FLAT EARTHER tells me im confused and cant read. Oh shit..... Give me a break will you?


I dont want to be rude but you have just ignored my arguments against the flat earth like:


1. Sun is shining on a half of the earth In the march/september and only 33% or less in July and 66% or more in December on flat earth model. Does it change its shape or what? No its not only nasa lies, you can check that yourself by counting the sunrise/sunset periods.
2. You should see a sun in the night in flat earth model. If its only a matter of "rules of perspective" as you were implying
3. How could you guard a south pole and have a military bases there if its the biggest continent with the surface bigger than the rest of the world?
4. How come that Australia flights takes less time than they should in the flat earth model? The airplanes should have a lot higher speed than the speed of sound. If those passangers airplanes would reach a speed of sound their wings would likely fall off.
5. Polar stars that should be able to be seen from all surface of the flat earth. They are not.

Yes you are a winner.

We might live in an enclosed motionless surface but:
a) All those rockets hitting the oxide coating should make the coating fall off in few places showing us the ugly iron shit.
b) flat earth theory has a lot of counterarguments which all of them you just completly ignore.
 
You are like this guy,



Dumb people agrees with you. YAY!. Congratulations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot