Inertia does actually solve the delema we previously discussed, however it leads to new issues arising like in the center of earth (our would be sky) could never have celestial objects because inertia would apply to them to and drive them toward the surface. so if inertia is the sole cause of the "gravity" we experience why does it not also affect the sun, moon, other stars, or objects.
There are probably 2-3 or four inertia directions of acceleration. But at least two - Earth, and the rotating ball known officialy as the universe, or how the ancient people around the world call it a kosmos or in other words a sacrum. Other options are possibly glass sealing at the 100km known officialy as a Karman line, and the abyss officially reffered to as an iron melting ground inside the earth center. Ancient Babylonian knew it and they were drawing the cosmos just like that a balls within our ball. They were a very inept observers of the sky but thats just a digresion on my part here. Its totaly irrelevant what ancients believed I just want to spice things up, to make things from fascinating to awesome to explore.
Outside of three force of the inertia creating an interference pattern on a 3 layers of a ball, there is actualy a magnetic anhoring of a sun, moon and planets to a octaherdon in the interior of the Kosmos/sacrum/palace of God you name it. Just pick any large mythos - it all says a story about electricity. Electricity was sacred to the ancient people. All of their sacred building were elevated or somehow magneticly or electricly more active than the sorrounding area. Either by having been build near some silicon stones around, being elevated in relation to the enviroment or a natural enviroment having an arclike shape or an actual construction having a metal dome at its peaks or a massive bell inside. That is making us consider:
a) Some of the ancient people were a lot smarter than we account them for. At least few of the poeple were, but look around you - most of the people are dumber than dumb, just like its always were.
b) The God or angels told them something they had no idea of and they abused the knowledge so God cease to enlighten them about it.
c) The God has only told a few who were unable to share the knowledge to the masses.
And dont tell me im pushing some religious crap. I give you two options - one is atheistic, one is a devine explanation and its inspiration upon the world.
there are a lot of things wrong with the inverse earth theory and i just want to hear your point of view for them. i have enough information to know that it is an impossibility but will not hamper with your beliefs.
I would love to hear about them. Thats what the forum is for, to share the informations. Or as some think misinformation, but in the end misinformation is some kind of information isnt it? Just make a new thread and give me a link to it.
You say that gravity is the only pull force, what about polar bonding and other electronically created bonds due to charge polarity?
Its actualy a push force. Magnet is redirecting the space according to the inertia of the magnet. If its redirecting the force, its a push force in the end, something is pushing against something or towards something once you can draw lines of a force. You are unable to draw any lines of force in the gravity model. You must assume the gravity mean huge massive object and its center.
Gravity would be some kind of a push force if the world would be somewhat imbalanced and the only inertia would be to get everything into one big mass. But physicians says the opposite is happening - that the universe is expanding according to the Big Bang. I have an impression someone want to imply to us that the world is more random than it seems to us. Its not random at all most of the time but yet they keep on pushing that truck of crap.