Topic: Flat Earth - page 619. (Read 1095196 times)

Thank You for your thought.


I can see craters with naked eye during the night that can only be explainable with solid structure of the "object Moon" described as we see it.

That is true that everyting that emits light that we know is liquid or not solid (the Sun, the starts, the quarks, others...).

Is the Moon giving its own light?

Probably, and if the Moon is giving its own light and being solid that will be the first object of this nature ever observed on Earth.

"And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."
- Gen 1:16


Best regards.

The creator is the one who put things in motion and so initiated the reaction
You are part of the reaction.

Unfeasible
The moon is not a solid object.

I'm accusing you because questions about the Creator: in my family this question has always been answered as a "Faith answer" (believe it or not). Is your own personal thoughts and that is it.

I'm trying to discuss reality and what has been teached us since our birth: the Earth is round and we landed on the Moon.

I'm trying to reply their questions with their own methodology: SCIENCE (or Scientism if you prefer).

"Globe Vs Flat"

Did we land on the Moon???

If the Moon is 500 miles away that is very possible: and if they did and we all believe that the Moon is 300,000 miles away we think that they are great men for doing that!

The Moon is 500 miles away. (and the Firmament is the limit)

Did we land on the Moon?

Your thoughts...

Best regards.

^^^


No, actually I sat down and starting typing my thoughts out into a post and posted it. Then I saw Boobies question and contemplated answering it. Then I hit reply to answer boobies question and it said there were two new posts in red letters. I read the new posts and one was an accusation about me, a false accusation.

Now I'm writing this response instead of answering boobies question.

You are not argumenting: you are putting an higher question because you cannot answer mine.

I tried to stay with my feets on the ground:

• we cannot leave the Firmament
• Moon and Sun are inside the Firmament

By then the Moon is no more than 500 miles away and the "Moon Landing" could be totally feasible.

Don't talk about the creator if you don't know: try to find him with the things that are real.

Is the "Moon Landing" real??? PROBABLY IT IS if the Moon is 500 miles away.

THE FIRMAMENT IS THE LIMIT.


Best regards.

There are questions, a lot of questions. A big one is about the creator(s) and all I can do at this point is speculate and the following is speculation.

I'm going to use the there are no forests on flat earth as a starting point. When I saw this I instantly recalled features from maps of the ocean floor I had seen while reading up on possible sites for ancient megalithic stone structures back in late 2013. At the time I reasoned that the features I was seeing were the result of the computer software that stitched the radar images together, my mind couldn't comprehend engineering on that scale.

If we look at fractals they are self-similar at the different scales; they don't repeat but they do rhyme. I think the ancient Greeks got it right (I know they got the Flat Earth part right) and the creator(s), God(s) are giant(s).

Yes and in the "Globe Model" the firmament are the Van Allen belts.
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt

Best regards.

What is the firmament? Who made it and whats it made of? Must be super strong to be able to hold in all of the air we breath and keep out whatever is beyond. There must be some explanation for this dome. That is what you guys are talking about when you mention the firmament right?

You are not thinking: "Moon Landing Hoax" is based on the ROUND SPINNING EARTH MODEL.

Moon and Sun are NOT Millions Miles away they are, by far, 500 miles away and that distance is very reachable with modern propulsion systems.

The Firmament is the limit and Moon and Sun are inside it.

If you think: the Illuminati love to use REALITY are they own strenght by playing on different points of view.

The Sun and the Moon are inside the Firmament and by landing on the Moon that WE THINK ARE MILLIONS MILES AWAY they put themselfs as KINGS while they just traveled 500 miles circa to reach it.

Lies are dangerous because of that: they landed on the Moon (maybe) but the Moon is not 300,000 miles away, it is 500 miles away and now we think they are great because they did what no one else did before, while it was a simple trip anybody can do.

The point is that probably the Moon is WORTHLESS and there is nothing you can gain by plainting bases in there, while going there and return is probably a journey of 6-8 hours.


Best regards.

When you pull the string it says, "Please pee in my mouth, daddy!"

No, and no.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=no+one+has+ever+gone+to+the+moon

Ah, she gets off on it, i see

What a dumb fucker.!

A seasoned cattle abuser will have a extra large purse

If the Sun and Moon travel around INSIDE the Firmament, wouldn't be possible that the Moon is ACTUALLY REACHABLE with propulsion systems like we SUPPOSEDLY used in 1969 to land on the Moon?

Think about it:

• we cannot leave the Firmament
• Moon and Sun are inside the Firmament

Could the "Land on the Moon" be feasible and already been done in 1969???

Your thoughts...


Best regards.

She's here because she likes the abuse.

She has no interest in educating herself.

She loves cow shit, sperm, and purses.

The best part is just hitting the ignore link under the user ID of the people who have no reason to be here and you no longer have clutter the flat earth feed with the religious science fiction crowd.    Works great.  Makes reading this thread far more interesting.

The recent posts that have come up regarding refraction, looming, and atmosplane effects are quite interesting and is good science.  People are out attempting to duplicate what has been observed and noted for quite some time with modern technology looking for the mythical curvature of the earth and finding none.  Again real science being carried out.  There is no reason to accept fantasy explanations from 500 years ago when you have resources at your fingertips today that provides data that was not available when these ideas were first dreamed up. 

Refraction and looming is a huge piece of the puzzle among many other factors should raise questions for everyone on both the ball and flat earth debate.  People should be going back to the drawing board and rethinking these experiments and go back and take a fresh look.  So instead of doubling down on fake science how about doing what many people are starting to do now which is gather in groups and conduct some real science.

I love what I am seeing happening in the flat earth community.  We have active members and groups that are out doing good stuff.  A lot of this is expensive work to do.  So my hats off to them.  We should probably talk with some of these groups and help them raise funds to help offset some of the costs they are taking to do this.  That might be a conversation to kick off at some point to see what can be done to help. 

Ur the one being mocked massively!!!
Thats the funny bit

All the info you need can be found within the pages of this thread.!!
As we have told you many times  EDUCATE YOURSELF!!!!
Why are you here ?

Fake Moon Landing | As Seen On TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QM7ebcR3-xE

Lookup a documentary called "A funny thing happened on the way to the moon".  You will find a great deal of what we have been told was a lie.  The claim today for the reason to lie about the moon missions was due to the Cold War and that this story about landing on the moon managed to diffuse the situation that was heading for WWIII here on earth between the USA and USSR.  This is a plausible excuse for making it up as the situation was quite complicated.  The Russians were claiming to have done things with their space program that the US space program was struggling to accomplish.  So I don't put anything past them to create the moon landing hoax.   The evidence continues to grow that the moon landings never happened.  And if you watch that documentary you will see how they created one of the round images of the earth that you are referring to.  

Oh and the image of the earth from the moon that you have seen is all image manipulated.  What you have is a fine example of an image of "earth" inserted into the picture.  You can find lots of info online about the copy and paste earth in the shot from the moon.  It really is sad.  I guess NASA didn't realize that technology like this would be in the hands of normal people one day and that they would figure out how to use it to see the image layers and manipulation.  It really is very easy to prove today that the images are all fake.  NASA does not even deny that the images you see of the earth from space are all manipulated images.  If you decide to follow the bread crumbs this far you will start to see how deep this rabbit hole goes.  If NASA has done even a fraction of what they claim then how hard is it to turn a camera back toward the earth  and give us a clear, clean, un-manipulated image of earth from space?  

With today's technology we should have HD cameras on the moon sending back images live stream 24/7 of the earth.    Sadly all we get are CGI and photo shop fakes.   And yet people think these cheap looking fakes are real.  Even Hollywood does a better job of faking space than NASA does.