People say Bitcoin is too volatile..
We know who ..
Well, Kudos to Bitcoin Maxis like Natalie Brunell ..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PViqK_N2qIMGemini Summarization:
“This video is a debate between Natalie Brunell, a Bitcoin enthusiast, and Peter Schiff, an economist who argues for gold. The debate is about whether Bitcoin or gold is a better investment.
Brunell argues that Bitcoin is a superior investment to gold because it is:
Not controlled by any one entity: Bitcoin is a decentralized currency, not controlled by any government or bank. This makes it immune to manipulation and seizure.
A hedge against inflation: Bitcoin's supply is capped, which means that inflation cannot erode its value over time.
Easier to store and transport: Bitcoin can be easily stored in a digital wallet and transported anywhere in the world.
Schiff argues that Bitcoin is a worse investment than gold because it is:
Volatile: The price of Bitcoin has fluctuated wildly in recent years.
Not backed by any intrinsic value: Bitcoin is a digital currency that is not backed by any physical asset.
A bubble: Schiff believes that the price of Bitcoin is currently in a bubble and that it is likely to crash in the future.
The video also discusses the recent rally in the price of gold. Schiff believes that gold is a good investment because it is a safe haven asset that tends to perform well during times of economic uncertainty. Brunell acknowledges that gold has a long history of being a valuable asset, but she believes that Bitcoin is a better long-term investment.
Overall, the video is a good overview of the debate between Bitcoin and gold as investment vehicles.”
BTC>