These clubs have had their heritage and indeed it is somewhat spiritual. The fans and their craze and the emotion that goes into these games is on another level. That is why gambling on these games is common and has become regular from majority of sports players out there.
Some game lovers might disagree here that the heritage is being destroyed by gambling and the fan-craze, but I see these things as one fuels the other and if you have craze you will have betting happening too and its good for the games and the companies that run them.
Overall, we should do our part in preserving the heritage.
Topic: Football Heritage is Some How Spiritual - page 5. (Read 574 times)
Let's use club like Manchester City as an example, Manchester City is a club that really knows the kind of players they want, same thing with the kind of coaches they want. Manchester City always go for quality and they do not fall below their standard of managing a player hoping that the player will do better in the future. Because of the club having an understanding of what they want it has always help the club to do well in every season.
If Manchester City decides to bring average players and a coach that is not well experienced, I promise you will see the club close to the relegation zone, because Manchester City is good it does not mean if an average player should be signed into the club it does not guarantee that the average player will inherit the good performance former good players.
Not only Manchester City but also Chelsea as an example how money get most important thing for both teams success won many trophies after acquisition and have much money. Abramovich success make Chelsea become big fourth of Premier League teams and Manchester City dominance winning many Premier League trophies after having much money. If Manchester City decides to bring average players and a coach that is not well experienced, I promise you will see the club close to the relegation zone, because Manchester City is good it does not mean if an average player should be signed into the club it does not guarantee that the average player will inherit the good performance former good players.
Teams football history is not really important now because money can make unpredictable team success lead top achievement, I sure if new teams get huge investor in the future will be top team and dominance with domestic league competition. After Manchester City which one new teams will change the old dominance team for winning domestic league trophies?
The initial foundation is indeed very important but besides that we must also realize that such things cannot be maintained all the time and indeed we have seen many clubs that even used to be a very good club but slowly their consistency to be a big club must be displaced for several reasons that make their consistency and club name fade over time.
Even we know for the EPL there are a lot of clubs that were very good in the last few decades but slowly it was replaced with a new spirit or indeed money that controlled.
Now maybe the latest if you know there is the name of the Santos club in Brazil which has even given birth to many legends such as Pele and Neymar even they now have to be relegated after more than 1 century never felt the bitterness of a decline in performance so in this case the synergy must be maintained because in the end the legacy or whatever it is still when there is no really good synergy it can make them lose a hope that makes the club go out.
Even we know for the EPL there are a lot of clubs that were very good in the last few decades but slowly it was replaced with a new spirit or indeed money that controlled.
Now maybe the latest if you know there is the name of the Santos club in Brazil which has even given birth to many legends such as Pele and Neymar even they now have to be relegated after more than 1 century never felt the bitterness of a decline in performance so in this case the synergy must be maintained because in the end the legacy or whatever it is still when there is no really good synergy it can make them lose a hope that makes the club go out.
I would appreciate if you show me some instances buddy.
Example is when Leicester City won the EPL in 2015/2016. Now in Championship.Blackburn Rovers left relegation in 1992 and won premier League in 1994/1995, but relegated later.
I think only Arsenal has not relegated from Premier League before since many decades ago before 1992.
You can take a look at this table, you will know that many if the clubs have related before
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unrelegated_association_football_clubs
But some clubs are good and now retaining good title for many years because of the reason that I stated above which is better sponsorship offers and better players because they have money to buy the players to play for them. They also have they best managers.
Football indeed is a gme of passion. A passion that drives you to win at all cost and not loss. I come to understand that when it comes to football the roots and foundation of a football team matters. A team that is not built with a strong foundation. In terms of reputation, pattern, performance and strategy may affect the players that will be playing in that team years to come. What am saying in essence is that football may be hereditary. I believe you may or may not gree to the fact that some football clubs have passed down the spirit of not able to win league titles in as much as the current players of that team tries. They always end up bottling the league at the end.
Let's use club like Manchester City as an example, Manchester City is a club that really knows the kind of players they want, same thing with the kind of coaches they want. Manchester City always go for quality and they do not fall below their standard of managing a player hoping that the player will do better in the future. Because of the club having an understanding of what they want it has always help the club to do well in every season. If Manchester City decides to bring average players and a coach that is not well experienced, I promise you will see the club close to the relegation zone, because Manchester City is good it does not mean if an average player should be signed into the club it does not guarantee that the average player will inherit the good performance former good players.
Do not get this wrong. You will see some clubs in relegation now. If you go back in the past, you will see them in the first league which is the top league in the country. If you need examples, I can make make research about it and tell you. I am talking about decades to a century.
Some clubs are always at the top most of the time because they are richer and buy best players. The have better sponsors and they go better.
I would appreciate if you show me some instances buddy. Some clubs are always at the top most of the time because they are richer and buy best players. The have better sponsors and they go better.
No doubt money can influence the performance of a team because they have the money to buy expensive players but there is no assurance that that player will perform well in the team. Manchester united had bought two players last season Antonio and one other guy but what are they doing now? Also, Chelsea bought so many players as well still there have not been much an improvement. Expensive players and bad management will still lead to the downfall of the team.
What is more important is how well can the manger use those players to bring success to the team.
Do not get this wrong. You will see some clubs in relegation now. If you go back in the past, you will see them in the first league which is the top league in the country. If you need examples, I can make make research about it and tell you. I am talking about decades to a century.
Some clubs are always at the top most of the time because they are richer and buy best players. The have better sponsors and they go better.
Some clubs are always at the top most of the time because they are richer and buy best players. The have better sponsors and they go better.
For a single person I can accept that is a heritage because some of the most known player today are the cost their parents or their relatives were into footballing and they are skilled and dedicated ones for that matter. Then go back to team or as club in a football when they don't have structure and solid foundation it makes it very difficult to achieve some common league why because there are lots of incompetent players that was brought into the club all less it's being change to have a newly signed up players otherwise such team won't experience much growth but as time keeps going you will later find out that there is need for a total structure.
Football indeed is a gme of passion. A passion that drives you to win at all cost and not loss. I come to understand that when it comes to football the roots and foundation of a football team matters. A team that is not built with a strong foundation. In terms of reputation, pattern, performance and strategy may affect the players that will be playing in that team years to come. What am saying in essence is that football may be hereditary. I believe you may or may not gree to the fact that some football clubs have passed down the spirit of not able to win league titles in as much as the current players of that team tries. They always end up bottling the league at the end.
Jump to: