⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 19.

Polkeins

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1457

Quote from: TastyChillySauce00 on February 04, 2025, 06:55:47 AM

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

A symbiotic-mutualism between Milan and Chelsea. Felix's transfer to the Milan was not surprising me, he lacks of minutes in Chelsea due to the tough competition with Palmer. He has to go to the serie a, which is a good move consider he's still young.

He can dig more experience to play at the top team of serie a. I also wonder whether there is a special relationship between Chelsea and Milan. Plenties of Chelsea players gone to Milan since a few years ago i.e Morata, Giroud, RLC, Pulisic and many more.

Morata has already left for Galatasaray, so apparently Milan are not satisfied with Morata's performance in this one and I don't think Joao Felix will do better than Morata. Conceicao is a very demanding coach and already several have left for other clubs on loan including Morata, Tomori and Calabria. So apparently Joao Felix had no other options to play on loan at a top club. Initially his transfer looked very strange, especially after his first loan spell in 2023, when Felix was not put in the squad by Chelsea's head coach at the time Frank Lampard.

TastyChillySauce00

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 1028

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

A symbiotic-mutualism between Milan and Chelsea. Felix's transfer to the Milan was not surprising me, he lacks of minutes in Chelsea due to the tough competition with Palmer. He has to go to the serie a, which is a good move consider he's still young.

He can dig more experience to play at the top team of serie a. I also wonder whether there is a special relationship between Chelsea and Milan. Plenties of Chelsea players gone to Milan since a few years ago i.e Morata, Giroud, RLC, Pulisic and many more.

Sexylizzy2813

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 455

Quote from: MarjorieZimmermanGinger on February 03, 2025, 10:55:10 PM

Quote from: Sexylizzy2813 on February 03, 2025, 06:55:03 PM

Some of these clubs don't know what they have until they lose it and Chelsea has come across this same thing of letting some of their best players go and it will later hurt them badly. The case of KDB leaving Chelsea and coming back to England to play against Chelsea, the case of Salah who wasn't regarded as anything important, left the side and came back more better than when he was at Chelsea and you think this move is good for the club? No way, Felix is one hell of a player but Enzo Maresca is busy chasing shadows instead of focusing on what he have, I feel bad for him to leave the Blues on loan. They can never get any player like Felix in a long while till they realize that he has a bigger contribution to give to the team.

Some managers think their performances don't fit the game plan or strategy that they are implementing so they let players go to other clubs. Felix didn't get much of a chance under Enzo Maresca because maybe he thought Palmer's performance was much better and if you look at Chelsea's performances under his coaching it has actually improved so his decision is considered right. Felix is indeed a great player but sometimes the coach has a different view so the decision to release the existing player is a natural thing and even other teams do the same thing, even though we see the player has the best quality. For me in football it is natural because there are players who come and there are also players who leave the club.

Someone like Felix has done what it takes to be in the first 11 of Chelsea but yet the manager doesn't see any reason to play this guy Felix and when you talk about Palmer, if not for the way he showed how good he is during the time of the other managers when he joined from City and how the fans loved how he changes the outcome of the game, if not that Enzo Maresca won't have seen him as a best option. Coming to Felix, things haven't been going well for him right from whwn he was at ATM and if he isn't good or doesn't suit Maresca's plan I don't see why Enzo always start him when they play the conference league, the thing is Maresca is confused on who to start for who and it pains me that he always prefers the guys who mess up the game for the club the more, example Jackson and some times Madueke.

giorgione

full member

Activity: 210

Merit: 124

While the other teams make absurd market blows, such as Milan with Joao Felix, Juventus sold a very interesting player to Fiorentina and it is Nicolo Fagioli, an attacker who was really attached to the Juventus shirt, this transfer reminds me that by Kean, another player who had not been able to explode at Juventus but who is now doing very well to Fiorentina

asriloni

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1024

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: KTChampions on February 03, 2025, 11:23:34 AM

Quote from: Fiatless on February 02, 2025, 09:55:29 PM

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/33137381/marcus-rashford-aston-villa-loan-transfer-man-utd/#

There are speculations that Marcus Rashford was targeted because of his high pay he receives. Since Manchester United started its cost cutting programs they have been forced to take some hard decisions. Even Rashford believes that Sir Jim Ratcliffe gave Rubem Amorin the task of forcing the English star to leave Old Trafford.

With his high wage still intact and Aston Villa's group stage success in the UEFA champions, Rashford had to grab the opportunity. And with the money Aston Villa made from the sale of Jhon Duran to Saudi Arabia, they would be able to pay their part of Rashford's salary.

It's quite funny that although Aston Villa consistently rank above United and are in the Champions League this season, while United are in the Europa League, this move is a step down. And the fact that he is going to Aston Villa is proof that no top club is interested in him anymore (like PSG once was).
It will be interesting to see if he can prove himself there or if football has completely left him.

Are you hoping Rashford to always watching his club from the bench, and always being excluded from the squad due to the technical reason by Amorim? No, it's a big no! He is still young enough and getting less minutes is a disaster for his career.

There's nothing wrong from this move. 6 months loan, same salary, and he's back again to his club at the end of season. It's not a step down for him. He still plays in PL, but only in the different club.

ajanwalker

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 256

Quote from: Silence Scream on February 04, 2025, 03:59:34 AM

Quote from: tusandii on February 03, 2025, 09:51:22 PM

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

From the beginning Joao Felix was not Chelsea's priority and from the many Chelsea players I also thought that Felix would not be able to become a main player in the squad, I think Chelsea made this player permanent still wanting to see Felix's ability and he was given several opportunities to play even though with little time and maybe that was enough to make Enzo Maresca understand that he could not meet the club's expectations and finally Chelsea loaned him to Milan, hopefully his move to the Italian League will make Felix better and more productive because so far as a striker he is still far from expectations.

I think Joao Felix can be successful in Milan. Milan is an important team in Italy and we have seen that they are ineffective in many positions in attack. I think they can overcome this with Felix. Felix will be a good option for Milan and if things go well, he can be transferred permanently at the end of the year.

Serie - A is a tougher league than the Premier League and I think Felix will not be able to hold on here either.
Milan is a very smart club. He sent 32-year-old Morata with a rental fee of 6 million euros and transferred striker Joao Felix instead.
Felix has traveled a lot at a young age, and if he continues like this, it looks like he will go to other places too.
While even Morata could not deliver what was expected in Milan in terms of physical strength, I do not think Felix can achieve this.
I think it was a dead investment for Milan.

Litzki1990

sr. member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 424

Quote from: Spaceman1000$ on February 03, 2025, 04:49:44 PM

Quote from: KTChampions on February 03, 2025, 11:23:34 AM

Quote from: Fiatless on February 02, 2025, 09:55:29 PM

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/33137381/marcus-rashford-aston-villa-loan-transfer-man-utd/#

There are speculations that Marcus Rashford was targeted because of his high pay he receives. Since Manchester United started its cost cutting programs they have been forced to take some hard decisions. Even Rashford believes that Sir Jim Ratcliffe gave Rubem Amorin the task of forcing the English star to leave Old Trafford.

With his high wage still intact and Aston Villa's group stage success in the UEFA champions, Rashford had to grab the opportunity. And with the money Aston Villa made from the sale of Jhon Duran to Saudi Arabia, they would be able to pay their part of Rashford's salary.

It's quite funny that although Aston Villa consistently rank above United and are in the Champions League this season, while United are in the Europa League, this move is a step down. And the fact that he is going to Aston Villa is proof that no top club is interested in him anymore (like PSG once was).
It will be interesting to see if he can prove himself there or if football has completely left him.

I feel the Manchester United board were clumsy About the Marcus Rashford situation, no matter how you try to look at things, there was a way they could come in to mend things between Amorim and Rashford, even before the young man left for Aston villa, Amorim didn't allow him play for a good number of games for a player that was still very feet and has potential, it wasn't looking like he had a better option in those games though, his direct disposition on Rashford was unprofessional as a coach and as a one time footballer, the whole drama for me was looking like he had a personal Vendetta against the youngster. If not for the way things where, I'm sure Rashford wouldn't have settled for an Aston villa.

Marcus Rashford has been playing for Manchester United for a long time and the player has contributed well in many matches for Manchester United at times even though the performance of this player has not been consistent. Perhaps the current manager is not interested in retaining this player because of his inconsistent performance. If this player leaves Manchester United and goes to another club, then Manchester United must replace him with a good quality player because this player was a regular striker for Manchester United. Manchester United will fail more than succeed if the manager tries to play with bench players instead of replacing them. That is why every transfer should be done according to the plan. If one player comes to the club as opposed to another good player, everyone will take it very well but if the performance is worse than good then the manager will face criticism.

Silence Scream

legendary

Activity: 1120

Merit: 1064

Quote from: tusandii on February 03, 2025, 09:51:22 PM

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

From the beginning Joao Felix was not Chelsea's priority and from the many Chelsea players I also thought that Felix would not be able to become a main player in the squad, I think Chelsea made this player permanent still wanting to see Felix's ability and he was given several opportunities to play even though with little time and maybe that was enough to make Enzo Maresca understand that he could not meet the club's expectations and finally Chelsea loaned him to Milan, hopefully his move to the Italian League will make Felix better and more productive because so far as a striker he is still far from expectations.

I think Joao Felix can be successful in Milan. Milan is an important team in Italy and we have seen that they are ineffective in many positions in attack. I think they can overcome this with Felix. Felix will be a good option for Milan and if things go well, he can be transferred permanently at the end of the year.

Farma

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1001

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: MarjorieZimmermanGinger on February 03, 2025, 10:55:10 PM

Some managers think their performances don't fit the game plan or strategy that they are implementing so they let players go to other clubs. Felix didn't get much of a chance under Enzo Maresca because maybe he thought Palmer's performance was much better and if you look at Chelsea's performances under his coaching it has actually improved so his decision is considered right. Felix is indeed a great player but sometimes the coach has a different view so the decision to release the existing player is a natural thing and even other teams do the same thing, even though we see the player has the best quality. For me in football it is natural because there are players who come and there are also players who leave the club.

That's right, the coach knows better which players are suitable for the tactics he will make regardless of whether the individual player is good but if he can't blend in with the coach's tactics then he still won't be used, that's the full right of the coach and the steps taken by Enzo Maresca I think are very appropriate and on the other hand for Felix's career it's also better when he goes to another team and gets much more playing minutes making the percentage of his career to increase much greater.

Now Enzo Maresca has been quite successful in making better changes to Chelsea's performance compared to previous seasons I think this is Chelsea's best season with Enzo Maresca and he also has a better chance if given time to process with Chelsea so I think whatever Enzo Maresca does must be supported.

mammusu

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 502

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Justbillywitt on February 04, 2025, 01:59:02 AM

Quote from: yudi09 on February 03, 2025, 09:55:41 AM

Manchester City finally brought in a new player in the midfield position. Pep Guardiola continues to try to restore Manchester City as many fans have hoped. Continuously experiencing a decline in performance, the team is working well to find out the gaps that need to be fixed in the squad.

Nico Gonzalez to Manchester City from Porto after the agreement was reached. Nico's joining Manchester City, the competition in the midfield will be even stronger. This means that Manchester City already has players in the midfield position with a mix of young and over 30 years old.

https://x.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1886415955363819810

This addition was very much needed for Manchester city. When the transfer window opened, I thought the midfield was going to be the first place Manchester city would recruit, but they didn't thinking that they could manage until Rodri is back. I believe After the Arsenal humbling, it was obvious to them that they needed to get a Midfielder. I'm very happy with this signing, because it obvious that the available players in their midfield that are over 30 are not doing the job perfectly, that's why city have been having poor results almost every weekend. Let's Hope that Nico Gonzalez will provide that needed covering in city midfield. Going by his profile, he's quite a good player and has been very instrumental to the Porto team. Let's hope he can adapt quickly to the premier League and Manchester city pattern of play.

When we all expected manchester city to get into trouble with 115 cases, but instead what we see now is that they are still very free in shopping for players and even in this winter alone they have spent almost 212 million euros to recruit new players, so this tells us that they are indeed in a safe condition despite all the allegations, the signing of Nico Gonzales will be their last signing of the season and I think after the bad results they got this season they moved quickly to cover every weakness, including the hole left by Rodry, the signing of Nico Gonzales could be a long-term investment for them especially since he is a player who is suitable to play deeper in midfield and he has proven his ability at Porto, so let's see if his signing can have a positive impact or not at all.

Justbillywitt

sr. member

Activity: 504

Merit: 490

Quote from: yudi09 on February 03, 2025, 09:55:41 AM

Manchester City finally brought in a new player in the midfield position. Pep Guardiola continues to try to restore Manchester City as many fans have hoped. Continuously experiencing a decline in performance, the team is working well to find out the gaps that need to be fixed in the squad.

Nico Gonzalez to Manchester City from Porto after the agreement was reached. Nico's joining Manchester City, the competition in the midfield will be even stronger. This means that Manchester City already has players in the midfield position with a mix of young and over 30 years old.

https://x.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1886415955363819810

This addition was very much needed for Manchester city. When the transfer window opened, I thought the midfield was going to be the first place Manchester city would recruit, but they didn't thinking that they could manage until Rodri is back. I believe After the Arsenal humbling, it was obvious to them that they needed to get a Midfielder. I'm very happy with this signing, because it obvious that the available players in their midfield that are over 30 are not doing the job perfectly, that's why city have been having poor results almost every weekend. Let's Hope that Nico Gonzalez will provide that needed covering in city midfield. Going by his profile, he's quite a good player and has been very instrumental to the Porto team. Let's hope he can adapt quickly to the premier League and Manchester city pattern of play.

Nheer

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 546

Quote from: SatoPrincess on February 02, 2025, 02:27:48 PM

Yeah the midfield role is a very important role in a team and when the midfield is ineffective the defense will suffer as well as the attack and that has been a problem for Guardiola since Rodri’s absence. Mateo Kovačić was brought in to fill this gap but obviously isn’t as efficient as Rodri was so they also need to strengthen in that area of the pitch.

The midfield is the heart of the team and when it is weak then the team suffers a lot, the opponent get to penetrate through the defense easily. This is really what Manchester City is suffering from since the absence of Rodri, Rodri absence is felt deeply because he plays the most important role and plays it perfectly by connecting every department properly. They need to sign a backup defensive midfielder to manage the team when Rodri is absent because I don’t think Kovacic can fill the gap because his style of play is very different and cannot manage the DM role all by himself, he is used to playing alongside another midfielder in the double pivot.

Quote from: Alpha Marine on February 03, 2025, 04:50:02 PM

Mateo Kovacic was not brought in to replace Rodri, he's not a DM, and he's not a ball-winner either. Although he consistently presses his opponent, he gets tired easily.
Manchester City have almost completed the signing of Nico Gonzalez just as I thought. They really need a new midfielder in the defensive midfield position.
If Nico Gonzalez fits into the team well and Pep gets the best out of him, he can hold down the DM position until Rodrid comes. With the way they play, not being able to press and bad in transition, they stand no chance against Madrid. Hopefully, the new signings make them stronger.

Kovacic was not signed for this role, he is just being managed due to Rodri absence and even though he is not as efficient he should be applauded as he as managed it well more than i expected. Kovacic is a box to box type of midfielder that’s why he can’t play efficiently as Rodri. They need a new Defensive Midfielder that can fill in for Rodri perfectly else they will keep suffering and I also don’t see them performing well against Real Madrid.

bitLeap

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 486

Quote from: KTChampions on February 03, 2025, 11:23:34 AM

It's quite funny that although Aston Villa consistently rank above United and are in the Champions League this season, while United are in the Europa League, this move is a step down. And the fact that he is going to Aston Villa is proof that no top club is interested in him anymore (like PSG once was).
It will be interesting to see if he can prove himself there or if football has completely left him.

No need to rush to judge if it has not been proven, Rashford needs to play a few matches and the results can be seen. I have the same opinion, but there is nothing wrong with letting Emery formulate a strategy that suits Rashford. Because, so far he has been absent from many matches with Man United so it is quite difficult to judge the performance of a Rashford. Maybe he has learned a lot and improved the quality of his play.

beerlover

legendary

Activity: 3108

Merit: 1199

Quote from: Fiatless on February 02, 2025, 09:55:29 PM

There are speculations that Marcus Rashford was targeted because of his high pay he receives. Since Manchester United started its cost cutting programs they have been forced to take some hard decisions. Even Rashford believes that Sir Jim Ratcliffe gave Rubem Amorin the task of forcing the English star to leave Old Trafford.

With his high wage still intact and Aston Villa's group stage success in the UEFA champions, Rashford had to grab the opportunity. And with the money Aston Villa made from the sale of Jhon Duran to Saudi Arabia, they would be able to pay their part of Rashford's salary.

I mean UCL part is just added bonus, because lets face it Villa won't be getting a win there at all, nobody assumes they can go and win it, so all Rashford will get there is just getting knocked off. However, if we are talking about payment, that would be the real real reason, because dude wanted to keep getting paid and now he is getting paid.

From what I know, United is still paying both Antony and Rashford a bit, not 100% at least anymore, but not 0% neither if I am not wrong, which is a bad deal, I wish they could just sell and get rid of them, but they will probably fail to do that. But, the main reason was that they wanted to get rid of people who didn't put 100% at training, and certainly not at games. They did that, at least two, now they are waiting for Casemiro.

MarjorieZimmermanGinger

hero member

Activity: 1568

Merit: 822

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Sexylizzy2813 on February 03, 2025, 06:55:03 PM

Some of these clubs don't know what they have until they lose it and Chelsea has come across this same thing of letting some of their best players go and it will later hurt them badly. The case of KDB leaving Chelsea and coming back to England to play against Chelsea, the case of Salah who wasn't regarded as anything important, left the side and came back more better than when he was at Chelsea and you think this move is good for the club? No way, Felix is one hell of a player but Enzo Maresca is busy chasing shadows instead of focusing on what he have, I feel bad for him to leave the Blues on loan. They can never get any player like Felix in a long while till they realize that he has a bigger contribution to give to the team.

Some managers think their performances don't fit the game plan or strategy that they are implementing so they let players go to other clubs. Felix didn't get much of a chance under Enzo Maresca because maybe he thought Palmer's performance was much better and if you look at Chelsea's performances under his coaching it has actually improved so his decision is considered right. Felix is indeed a great player but sometimes the coach has a different view so the decision to release the existing player is a natural thing and even other teams do the same thing, even though we see the player has the best quality. For me in football it is natural because there are players who come and there are also players who leave the club.

tiCeR

hero member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 867

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

Quote from: tusandii on February 03, 2025, 09:51:22 PM

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

From the beginning Joao Felix was not Chelsea's priority and from the many Chelsea players I also thought that Felix would not be able to become a main player in the squad, I think Chelsea made this player permanent still wanting to see Felix's ability and he was given several opportunities to play even though with little time and maybe that was enough to make Enzo Maresca understand that he could not meet the club's expectations and finally Chelsea loaned him to Milan, hopefully his move to the Italian League will make Felix better and more productive because so far as a striker he is still far from expectations.

He was only once a priority when he went from Portugal to Atletico Madrid for the first time and it was a very bad move from both sides. He seemed to be the next big player, but he never delivered on all these hopes and promises. It is a little bit better this season as he has now played 20 games, scored 7 goals and gave 2 assists, but I think it is still less than his coaches were hoping for and especially Atletico Madrid, which back at the time paid more than 100 million I think? I am not exactly sure, but it was an incredible amount of money for that guy while he hasn't really proven anything thus far.

He still hasn't become a starter and now his next adventure starts at AC Milan. He reminds me of Lukaku, who turned into a serious mercenary and literally played for every club in Europe in every country. I doubt that this is now the club he needs to finally get the recognition that everyone thought he would deserve.

tusandii

hero member

Activity: 1708

Merit: 522

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

From the beginning Joao Felix was not Chelsea's priority and from the many Chelsea players I also thought that Felix would not be able to become a main player in the squad, I think Chelsea made this player permanent still wanting to see Felix's ability and he was given several opportunities to play even though with little time and maybe that was enough to make Enzo Maresca understand that he could not meet the club's expectations and finally Chelsea loaned him to Milan, hopefully his move to the Italian League will make Felix better and more productive because so far as a striker he is still far from expectations.

Sexylizzy2813

sr. member

Activity: 812

Merit: 455

Quote from: Docnaster on February 03, 2025, 10:47:26 AM

Just saw this report few minutes ago that Chelsea and Portugal forward Joao Felix have reached agreement to skcnyfir AC Milan till the remainder of the season. Felix during his early days at Atletico Madrid was regarded as the future of European football but he's failed to live up to expectations and us now been loaned from one club to another. Last two seasons, he was loaned to Chelsea from Atletico and just last season, he spent it at Barcelona before Chelsea signed him on permanent basis last summer so what's the essence of loaning him out again? Well, I think this move to AC Milan will provide him more playing minutes which he can seize the opportunity to return back to his best again

Some of these clubs don't know what they have until they lose it and Chelsea has come across this same thing of letting some of their best players go and it will later hurt them badly. The case of KDB leaving Chelsea and coming back to England to play against Chelsea, the case of Salah who wasn't regarded as anything important, left the side and came back more better than when he was at Chelsea and you think this move is good for the club? No way, Felix is one hell of a player but Enzo Maresca is busy chasing shadows instead of focusing on what he have, I feel bad for him to leave the Blues on loan. They can never get any player like Felix in a long while till they realize that he has a bigger contribution to give to the team.

topbitcoin

hero member

Activity: 1876

Merit: 726

Quote from: KTChampions on February 03, 2025, 11:23:34 AM

It's quite funny that although Aston Villa consistently rank above United and are in the Champions League this season, while United are in the Europa League, this move is a step down. And the fact that he is going to Aston Villa is proof that no top club is interested in him anymore (like PSG once was).
It will be interesting to see if he can prove himself there or if football has completely left him.

Regardless of whether this is a step forward or backward, I quite agree that indeed for now it seems like a slight decline is felt because for now it seems that interest in Rashford has decreased because his performance is not as solid as before, especially with a large market value and high salary, he should actually try to be more introspective with his performance this time.

But the move to leave Manchester United is also the right decision for both parties, both for Rashford and Mancehster United because after all, by looking at the current situation it seems that there is no match between Manchester United and Rashford so forcing it will only make both clubs not in good form in the end.

Hopefully this step can make Rashford get better again and lift his lost performance because he actually has potential but the ego that previously had enlarged made his performance slowly disappear.

ajanwalker

hero member

Activity: 1442

Merit: 256

We are experiencing hectic times towards the last days of the transfer. Batshuayi, who plays for Galatasaray, was transferred to Frankfurt today.
When Frankfurt sold striker Marmoush to City, they want to fill the vacant place with Batshuayi, but I think this transfer is wrong.
Because Batshuayi was a substitute player in Galatasaray and he could not be very effective when he entered the match later. Because he mostly plays ball standing still. I did not see features such as fighting and running. The Bundesliga is a harder and faster league. I am looking forward to seeing how he will be included in the squad here and what kind of performance he will perform. Frankfurt bought Batshuayi on a transfer fee, but they will most likely part ways at the end of the year. There is no effective performance in Batshuayi. He spent his best period in Fenerbahçe in Turkey, but went to Galatasaray at the beginning of the year. It flies from place to place like migratory birds. I wouldn't be surprised if his destination soon is one of the Arabian teams.

Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 19. (Read 504525 times)