Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 2441. (Read 496929 times)

The thing is, with the conditions and authority he has now at PSG and at the price he is at it is quite difficult for him now to leave. Unless there really is a really crazy club to make up for this striker.
Actually his quality is very good but while he was in Ligue 1 I was actually quite pessimistic in seeing Mbappe's development because this has become normal and there was nothing special when in Ligue 1 which in fact there is no competition in it.

I see no good reason why Lukaku would want to return to Chelsea after a very disappointing performance at the club. I think Lukaku prefers to remain at Inter Milan where he feels at home and feel loved. His performance in the Seria A cannot be compared to that of the premier league. I strongly doubt Lukaku would want to play for Chelsea anymore judging from his fall out with the previous Thomas Tuchel.

Mbappe is a player with talent and potential. But he is selfish. He wants to be the most important player in the squad. So I'd say Mbappe needs to pick a club that has fewer star strikers. If Mbappe is considered as Benjema's replacement, Mbappe may move to Real Madrid. However, if Mbappe plays in the Real Madrid squad with Benzema, I think Real Madrid's performance will deteriorate further. Because Mbappe can't adapt himself to Messi and Neymar at PSG.

Mbappe must venture in a league that is more elite than Ligue 1 for more challenges in his career. He is still young, he is also a very talented player, if Mbappe moves to Real Madrid it will not be difficult for him to get a place in the first squad because of his above average quality and skill. Benzema presence in the Real Madrid squad is not an obstacle for Mbappe to penetrate the main squad, when measured in terms of quality and age, Mbappe is superior to Benzema. But if Mbappe is more concerned with money than his career, he will stay with PSG because he can get luxuries there.

"In the future" is something that is quite tough when we are talking about Ronaldo. I mean he is already old enough, getting him next season for example would be even older player, and yes he is still decent enough but I would prefer if they got someone younger. I get that they lost their chances for Haaland, but there are other strikes in the world that they could get and take advantage of their young age.

With Ronaldo that is maybe 1-2 season covering the issue, maybe not even that much and he would be straight up bad for them because even if it's Ronaldo we are talking about, even he can't beat father time and he will eventually get worse.

Both are better but it's better if he will be still staying at PSG rather than going to the real madrid. This caused by he may not have the same amounts of time to play in the main squad. I meant the competition in real madrid between any players is very strict at this moment. He may also become substitution for another player like benzema. PSG gives him what he wants and he was always playing in the main squad. he was also getting paid with big salary by owner of PSG.
that must be enough for him to stay in PSG rather than going to the real madrid

I would say Nagelsmann should change his formation. But it seems he won't do it. Because after the formation change, the team also needs some time to stabilize. So maybe Nagelsmann will decide to change the position of Sadio Mane in the next match. I think he will probably use Muller as the main striker. Sadio Mane is more likely to be on the left wing. Probably will keep the same position as Bayern Munich played against Barcelona.

The Leverkusen team is not strong this season I know it too. But this team's performance is erratic. I don't think Bayern Munich can win if they don't play well. Bayern Munich must perform very carefully in this match.

Did someone say that Psg is a better Clun that Real Madrid and also said that Benzema won't be happy for Mbappe to go Real Madrid? I can say that you are not sensitive to what is happening in football. Benzema happens to be the most angry person as Mbappe deal failed. Benzema is old and can't lose his kingship to anyone. Do you watch Benzema and Mbappe in France to know that both can play with each other without problems?
Can you tell me why you said that PSG is a better team than Real Madrid?

Mbappe will want to move to Real Madrid to fulfill his childhood dream of playing for Real Madrid, tbh Real Madrid have the capability to sign Mbappe, this transfer is very likely to happen in the future. I will love to see Mbappe in Madrid and linking up with the likes of Rodrygo, Vinicius and the rest of the young and talented Madrid team and I have a feeling these players will blend in very fine and will form a more formidable partnership at all positions for Real Madrid.

Manchester city definitely have a rare gem on their hands, it is so shocking when you think of how much Haaland was bought for and how much quality he brings to this Manchester city side. It is a really good bargain Manchester City have with Haaland, he is such a terrific player, scoring goals for fun and keeping City at the top of the league. With Haaland city now looks formidable and difficult to complete against.

Man United often buy players too expensive, so I'm not surprised if Man United buy Antony for too high a price. Maybe because Man United made
a mistake by buying Antony close to the transfer market closing, so Ajax raised the price of Antony. In fact, if Man United bought Antony at
the beginning of the summer transfer window, I'm sure Ajax would sell Antony at a price that wasn't too high. Man United wasted a lot of time with
the negotiation process to get Frenkie de Jong, which ultimately Man United failed to get De Jong. Hopefully Antony can make a big contribution to
Man United, so Man United does not regret spending a high transfer fee.

It's the same with Newcastle which in my opinion is too expensive to spend a transfer fee to bring in Isak, indeed some Premier League clubs
who have very strong financial strength often buy players at unreasonable prices. In contrast to Man City which I think is smarter in issuing
transfer fees, like you said they brought in Haaland and a few other players for a more reasonable price. Even Man City rejected Brighton's request
for Marc Cucurella's exorbitant transfer fee. A team should not be too obsessed with players and pay too high a fee, later if the performance of
the player purchased is not as expected, they will feel regret.

I don't really see any reason why Mbappe would want to go to Real Madrid. Even though Real Madrid have won the CL a few times recently, PSG are a better team. And Mbappe's salary can also easily be paid by PSG. Now he plays at the forefront along with Messi and Neymar, isn't that what everyone wants? Benzema will not be happy with the arrival of Mbappe, because he is the number 1 striker there, and Mbappe wants that too. Mbappe is seen as the best striker in the world right now, but as long as PSG don't win the CL it has little value. And what should Mbappe cost? We're talking about 200 million or maybe more.

Honestly Man City paid a reasonable sign-on fee for the signing Haaland from Borussia Dortmund compared to Man Utd sign-on fee of Brazil winger Anthony £86m from Ajax whose market value is not in the top 10 mentioned above, though he has not been given enough chances to prove himself, nevertheless I don't think his market value will worth that of Haaland at the end of the season, another similar new signing was Isak from Real Sociedad worth 60 million pounds by Newcastle whose market value no where in top 10, I believe some of these clubs embarked on panic signings thus paid outrageous fees for those players.

I think it would be beneficial for both if Ronaldo joins Bayern Munich. Ronaldo is still one of the best strikers in the world. Bayern Munich now needs a regular scorer. And I think Ronaldo will be able to score a lot of goals with Bayern Munich's strong squad. But Bayern's contract with Ronaldo will not be profitable for more than 1 or 2 years. And in the meantime, Bayern Munich will have to find a replacement for Ronaldo.

I would like to know the method of calculating this rating. Is Neymar worse than Vlahovic or Kane and not worthy of being in this ranking? Neymar is close (only a few goals left) to surpass Pele's record for goals for the national team, and he is far from old. Another confirmation that all these ratings are subjective.
It would also be interesting to look at this ranking in terms of salaries paid to the player - it is obvious that Mbappe, with his astronomical salary, would be far from the first place. Because the ratio of cost per player to the result that the player generates would be very weak.

I didn't understand your point of view. In your opinion, when did Bayern have to change Lewandowski? In a year, in two? Or then when it would already become obvious (for example, due to the failure of the season) that he is no longer as good as before? Serious clubs do not wait for problems, they solve them in advance.
As for Ronaldo, as funny as it may be, he will be the only option for top clubs that want to get themselves a qualified centre-forward this winter.

Therefore, bringing Ronaldo to the Allianz Arena is clearly impossible for now because Bayern's philosophy is very different from Ronaldo's playing style.
We know that some of the officials there didn't want to bring him in transfers last season and now it will be the same because they realize that bringing in Ronaldo could be a blunder for themselves.

Money is becoming a joke these days. I would like to imagine how much cost a player like Ronaldo9, Roberto Carlos, Ronaldinho, Zidane and the other old gold folks if we compare them to the one listed in the table? €300m? more maybe?
I don't have an objection about the ranking but seeing the amount of money posted there, I feel it is very overrated..

Maybe indeed he is better at Inter because Chelsea seems to still be applying the same scheme as before but if circumstances force him to have to be at Chelsea maybe he should also try with Potter now. Regardless, it is very difficult for Inter at this time to buy Lukaku because the price is still very expensive for Inter to buy. the chance of extra time on loan is still possible but do Chelsea want to do that?

Sometimes i can't imagine how much City bought Haaland for; when i look at Erling Haaland's market value in this ranking, and compare it with what City paid Dortmund (€60m) to acquire his services, then i think from City's perspective it was an absolute bargain, and a wonderful piece of transfer business from the Etihad club, i know they aren't selling Haaland anytime soon, absolutely not; but i can imagine if they are to put Haaland up for sale right now, he'll be on for above €100m. City are definitely going to have Haaland for a very long time, and he's going to score a plethora of goals and win numerous titles with City.

Can Mbappe to Madrid happen sometime in the future? After the saga of a few months ago.