Author

Topic: ⚽ Football Transfers Speculation, Odds and Predictions - page 3325. (Read 498931 times)

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1952
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Arsenal have officially signed odegaard with an initial price of 30 million pounds along with a bonus of 4 million pounds, actually this is a fairly expensive price for a midfielder who doesn't even get a place in the madrid first squad, in my opinion the transfer of odegaard is a form of desperation from arteta who indeed failed to get maddison from leicester city to improve their midfield, while for the transfer of Ben white, I think the price of 50 million pounds is a reasonable price considering his performances in several seasons with Brighton & Hove Albion which is indeed consistent, but the worst thing is the transfer of ramdale In my opinion, is it worth buying a goalkeeper who can't help his team get out of relegation and even he has pretty bad performance stats worth 30 million pounds?  Grin
Bad Decision...!!

They bought Ramsdale mostly because he's English. All Premier league clubs have English players quotas and all of them struggle with it. That's the only reason why Ramsdale and Ben White cost as much as they do, and why average English players (like Holding and Chambers in Arsenal's case) are kept at the club instead of selling them to lower level clubs.

Finding 8 good English players is basically impossible, that's why PL clubs overpay the 4-5 of them they can actually use and just fill other 3-4 places with kids that won't get any concrete game time.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1226
Livecasino, 20% cashback, no fuss payouts.
It says that Manchester Utd midfielder Jesse Lingard wants to leave the team before the end of the transfer window unless Solskjaer indicates that he is in their plans. And I don't think that Solskjaer will say such thing.

Lingard had a really great season being on loan at West Ham in the last season. He got 9 goals and 5 assists in 16 EPL games. I would like to watch him there again to be honest.

Yeah with all those big buys and possibly more coming, I think he really should go to West Ham permanently. He was playing at his best, he was happy, West Ham was happy, we were all happy for him. He should go there and make a name for himself. OGS will never make him a permanent fixture with all the expensive talents he brought in.
sr. member
Activity: 1694
Merit: 268
Binance #SWGT dan CERTIK Audited
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.

Arsenal have officially signed odegaard with an initial price of 30 million pounds along with a bonus of 4 million pounds, actually this is a fairly expensive price for a midfielder who doesn't even get a place in the madrid first squad, in my opinion the transfer of odegaard is a form of desperation from arteta who indeed failed to get maddison from leicester city to improve their midfield, while for the transfer of Ben white, I think the price of 50 million pounds is a reasonable price considering his performances in several seasons with Brighton & Hove Albion which is indeed consistent, but the worst thing is the transfer of ramdale In my opinion, is it worth buying a goalkeeper who can't help his team get out of relegation and even he has pretty bad performance stats worth 30 million pounds?  Grin
Bad Decision...!!

Do you know with that Arsenal has spent the most out of all the PL clubs in this transfer window. Odegaard is a great potential signing but also should be utilised well and I think Arteta is gonna use him. He did used him quite well when he was here at loan. But do we need a goalkeeper? Unless Leno leaving soon I don't see a point here.


yes I know that, and even so far I have followed every development of arsenal in the transfer market this season, but in my opinion odegaard is a good buy but at a bad price.
I think arsenal really needs a goalkeeper to be a back-up for leno even though he doesn't leave, because it can be said that the current second goalkeeper of arsenal (Karl Jakob Hein) is not experienced enough, but what I regret is Arteta's decision to buy Ramdale, while there are still many goalkeepers who have quality but have low prices at the moment in the transfer market , I think ramdale is a bad decision for a bad buy and at a bad price too😁
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 879
Rollbit.com ⚔️Crypto Futures
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jesse-lingard-ready-to-leave-manchester-united-if-he-does-not-get-assurances-over-playing-time-cp7ppz397

It says that Manchester Utd midfielder Jesse Lingard wants to leave the team before the end of the transfer window unless Solskjaer indicates that he is in their plans. And I don't think that Solskjaer will say such thing.
This is something that every player wants, game time! And with the recent signings Manchester United has under taken Jesse Lingards game time is not guaranteed and I think it's the right move to ask the manager where his services will be required or not.
If he leaves united I hope he can play for a club like Everton,West Ham(permanent deal)
or even struggling Arsenal.

Quote
Lingard had a really great season being on loan at West Ham in the last season. He got 9 goals and 5 assists in 16 EPL games. I would like to watch him there again to be honest.
I though so too,he had a high impact on the team and hope this continues this season.

hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 602
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.
it could be not the last deal for Arsenal as Atletico Madrid sets the price of Trippier 60 million euros.
Man United were interested in him, but news of his interest declined, and now the talk is repeated about Arsenal.
They are suggesting the possibility of an exchange between Bellerin and Trippier. The Spaniard wants to leave the Gunners, according to the assurances of the Daily Mail.
Trippier is keen on getting back to England but now it seems only Arsenal interested it will be interesting to see if he accepts to join a team without European football or Arsenal still have a budget to get him.
legendary
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1472
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.

Arsenal have officially signed odegaard with an initial price of 30 million pounds along with a bonus of 4 million pounds, actually this is a fairly expensive price for a midfielder who doesn't even get a place in the madrid first squad, in my opinion the transfer of odegaard is a form of desperation from arteta who indeed failed to get maddison from leicester city to improve their midfield, while for the transfer of Ben white, I think the price of 50 million pounds is a reasonable price considering his performances in several seasons with Brighton & Hove Albion which is indeed consistent, but the worst thing is the transfer of ramdale In my opinion, is it worth buying a goalkeeper who can't help his team get out of relegation and even he has pretty bad performance stats worth 30 million pounds?  Grin
Bad Decision...!!

Do you know with that Arsenal has spent the most out of all the PL clubs in this transfer window. Odegaard is a great potential signing but also should be utilised well and I think Arteta is gonna use him. He did used him quite well when he was here at loan. But do we need a goalkeeper? Unless Leno leaving soon I don't see a point here.
sr. member
Activity: 1694
Merit: 268
Binance #SWGT dan CERTIK Audited
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.

Arsenal have officially signed odegaard with an initial price of 30 million pounds along with a bonus of 4 million pounds, actually this is a fairly expensive price for a midfielder who doesn't even get a place in the madrid first squad, in my opinion the transfer of odegaard is a form of desperation from arteta who indeed failed to get maddison from leicester city to improve their midfield, while for the transfer of Ben white, I think the price of 50 million pounds is a reasonable price considering his performances in several seasons with Brighton & Hove Albion which is indeed consistent, but the worst thing is the transfer of ramdale In my opinion, is it worth buying a goalkeeper who can't help his team get out of relegation and even he has pretty bad performance stats worth 30 million pounds?  Grin
Bad Decision...!!
sr. member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 326
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.
I agreed that €120m is a lot of money for the trio however had it been Odegaard was an English player he would had cost more nevertheless they are good signings they will improve the team, particularly error proned Leno will now have a competitor in person of Ramsdale, while Odegaard will add depth in their midfield, though despite the signing Arsenal might not the quality and strength to vie for EPL title this season, they can finish the league in a better position.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1952
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
Well, Odegaard is a decent signing for Arsenal - he proved himself on loan last season and it was a smart move to make the deal permanent. The problem with Arsenal though is that they are leading the league in net spend and they did not bring a single player that you look at and say - damn man, wish we have brought him.

120 mil pounds for Odegaard, White and Ramsdale is a whole of a lot of money for a whole of a lot of average - once again.
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...
Kane got himself into this situation by signing a long-term contract. Harry signed such a long contract for what reason? The majority of players weigh their options in the final two years or a year left on their contract. Take a look at him now. Kane has done enough for the club, now it's time for new challenges. However, Levy hasn't broken a single promise. He is willing to let him leave if the price is right.

No player is actually bigger than the club, he hasn't disregarded the Club in anyway.. he's given he's best from time, carrying a team on he's shoulders.
It's high time they let him go, A quality player like Harry Kane deserves Trophies... hopefully Daniel Levy gets to settle things out with Harry.
He would have been such a great player under Pep Guardiola at Manchester City although he's been consistent over the year giving goals to he's team when need be.
He didn't cause any of this a young player loyal to his team expect something good in the future will do same ,but it's hard to predict the future.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 379
According to reports from North London,Arsenal's new boy Martin Odegard might be in contention for Chelsea's match in Sunday.

Arsenal signed the player for a fee in the region of 30 million pounds along side Aaron Ramsdale,and the both players will be announced soon.Odegard was Arsenal's priority after he fell down the pecking other under coach Ancelotti.He was not included in the Madrid squad and wasn't given a shirt number as well. While Ramsdale will be fighting with Berd Leno for starting spot in the Arsenal team.Leno has been full of mistakes recently while keeping for Arsenal therefore it made them consider signing another goalkeeper.Aaron Ramsdale was Shefield United best player last season with his super saves.Looking forward to seeing Odegard in action against Chelsea.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1012
Kane got himself into this situation by signing a long-term contract. Harry signed such a long contract for what reason? The majority of players weigh their options in the final two years or a year left on their contract. Take a look at him now. Kane has done enough for the club, now it's time for new challenges. However, Levy hasn't broken a single promise. He is willing to let him leave if the price is right.
I wonder what the price is suitable? Or I will put it a little differently, suitable for a seller in the person of Tottenham or a buyer in the person of Manchester City, well, in the interests of Kane's future career itself. You can just deliberately wring the price for a player or specifically not agree to any price, so as not to let him go on purpose, which is successfully demonstrated by Daniel Levy. Unfortunately, we were not present at the conversation between Hurricane and the owner of Tottenham at the end of last season and it is difficult for us to judge what promises and what kind of gentleman's agreement there was then. But still, I understand a player when he signs a long-term contract with his native club, so that the club is then guaranteed to receive compensation for moving to another club, so that there is no situation like Barcelona with Messi.
legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1140
duelbits.com
I don't think Batshuayi need to sign new contract extension with Chelsea till 2023 he should have leave permanently after a loan spells at Borussia Dortmund, Valencia, Crystal Palace and now the fourth club Bekistas
Yep. If he cares about his career, he should leave Chelsea. He seems to have no chance to be the main striker in Chelsea. Moreover, he is already 27 years old, not a young football player anymore. He is getting old, and if he always stays at Chelsea, he may end his career as a loan player only. I think it is not a good situation for a professional player. He must think of the solution to join another club that wants to sign him as their regular player.

sr. member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 304
kycfree
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/jesse-lingard-ready-to-leave-manchester-united-if-he-does-not-get-assurances-over-playing-time-cp7ppz397

It says that Manchester Utd midfielder Jesse Lingard wants to leave the team before the end of the transfer window unless Solskjaer indicates that he is in their plans. And I don't think that Solskjaer will say such thing.

Lingard had a really great season being on loan at West Ham in the last season. He got 9 goals and 5 assists in 16 EPL games. I would like to watch him there again to be honest.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
It was also a 2 year loan deal with purchase afterwards because they were trying to handle with FFP as well, it is going to be a bit of a problem in the long run, but it is not going to be that hard to handle in the future because they will be basically putting that down right now and that is going to be already accounted in 2 years when they are not in trouble at all. So, why do you really feel like it is going to be this smart to do something like this?

I feel like they are handling something that is quite easy to handle way too harshly, if they are putting him down for 2 years later, then they are covering for the next 2 years, and if something goes wrong then they are not going to be available to wiggle into some transfers they may want to. I would say that they should probably get players they can afford to, or not buy players with basically future debt.

In theory, you are right but the FPP is already dead.
According to rumors, the FFP will change next month until we have more info about the superleague.
The Times speculated about a new FFP going public next month where the even of balance will be not anymore required.
hero member
Activity: 1442
Merit: 602
AC Milan held a talks with the representatives of  Bakayoko, in preparation for his inclusion on loan this season.
Bakayoko moved to Chelsea from Monaco in 2017, but he did not succeed in imposing himself on the starting line-up for the Blues, he left on loan to Milan in the summer of 2018, returned to Monaco on loan in the summer of 2019, and was loaned last season to Napoli.
According to Fabrizio Romano Milan is close to borrowing Bakayoko this summer, in light of the Rossoneri's desire to strengthen its ranks after its success in returning to the Champions League.
Bakayoko's contract with Chelsea runs until 2023, but he is not in the plans of Thomas Tuchel, the Blues coach. Romano also reported that Chelsea will soon announce the departure of Italian full-back Emerson Palmieri.
hero member
Activity: 2030
Merit: 402
Speculations about Kane transfer to City haven't still ended. It is claimed that Manchester City are preparing to make an offer worth £150m for him. This is a really insane amount to be honest. And it is said that City will go for Fiorentina's young and talented striker Dusan Vlahovic (21) if they fail on signing Kane.

These rumours are still continuing but I don't expect Kane to leave the team this season from now on.
Speculation about Kane move is getting louder, especially if Kane has suddenly been dropped from the European Conference League play-off match when Tottenham Hotspur face Pacos de Ferreira later and of course this makes Harry Kane future still uncertain until season  transfer window officially closed, but from several articles I've read, Harry Kane intends to leave Tottenham Hotspur and he has made a Daniel Levy deal last season which promised to release Kane if Tottenham Hotspur did not appear in the Champions League this season.

This problem has to be solved as soon as possible. It seems like Harry Kane is really angry at Levy now as he doesn't want to let him go now. This is just harming the relationship between them. If City are really serious about this transfer, they should just make a nice offer and this should be a done deal after that. Kane really wants to leave now. City should do everything they can.
legendary
Activity: 2464
Merit: 1102
Locatelli's story ended, finally.
The market transaction resulted in a two-year loan with mandatory redemption. As I said many times, IMO all valuations in modern soccer are too high, however I understand that the price is made by the market.
I agree that getting Locatelli with this formula is a bargain: he is a central midfielder, in perfect position in front of the defense.
Let's see how he behaves in a big team.
It was also a 2 year loan deal with purchase afterwards because they were trying to handle with FFP as well, it is going to be a bit of a problem in the long run, but it is not going to be that hard to handle in the future because they will be basically putting that down right now and that is going to be already accounted in 2 years when they are not in trouble at all. So, why do you really feel like it is going to be this smart to do something like this?

I feel like they are handling something that is quite easy to handle way too harshly, if they are putting him down for 2 years later, then they are covering for the next 2 years, and if something goes wrong then they are not going to be available to wiggle into some transfers they may want to. I would say that they should probably get players they can afford to, or not buy players with basically future debt.
copper member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 793
Aaron Ramsdale was in london today and undergo his medical check for arsenal.
if this transfer goes through, he will become the most expensive goalkeeper for whom they have paid a transfer fee

Quote
In Ramsdale, current goalkeeper Bernd Leno does not only get high-quality, but also expensive competition. Arsenal had agreed an initial transfer fee of €28 million with the Blades. Another €7 million could be due because of bonus payments, according to reports. Once these are paid, the international will overtake England’s number one Jordan Pickford (€28.5 million) and Manuel Neuer (€30 million) in the ranking of the most expensive goalkeepers in history, among others. He would then find himself alongside Thibaut Courtois and Jasper Cillessen in fifth place.
https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/news/view?id=391310

I really don't understand Arsenal's transfer policies, If feels as though they are aways overpaying for average players, it seems more often to be out of desperation, If they really want to start being competitive again, they'd need to go all out for transfer and that should be based on the request of a top coach ( that's if they're willing to go for one btw). If not, it's just going to be the same old result, just a different season.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Emerson Palmieri will now play in France. Official to Lyon from Chelsea.



Source: https://twitter.com/FabrizioRomano/status/1428424954232676363
Jump to: