What I know is that what could be applied to hockey and other sports games could also be applicable to soccer betting as well, which is why I commend you on testing this out. However, this strategy looks odd and it shows some kind of "gambling within gambling" kind of pattern which I am not particularly comfortable with. The best way to bet on sports is to know the full information about the two teams playing and use your discretion and instinct to make your bet. This is still subject to some luck factors as well, and not about a certain pattern that your friend taught you.
Besides, if a team can score a goal and could keep it till the end of the match often, it only means that the team is not weak but strong which is a factor that will reduce the odds of that team against the other. This is never to my advantage and I do not do small odds in my sports betting which has been one of the ways to help me manage my gambling activities well and not be wasting my time like so many people do it randomly.
In other words, this style's risk is too high for me.
Topic: Football/Soccer Winning Strategy - page 2. (Read 535 times)
I think it's nothing different with betting on favorite teams because you're trying to bet on match with higher chance to win with low odds. I'm not really like to bet on low odds, so I either gamble on underdog or parlay bets.
It's more sadden to see low odds bets are lose than high odds bets since low odds betting mostly gamble using most of the bankroll.
It's more sadden to see low odds bets are lose than high odds bets since low odds betting mostly gamble using most of the bankroll.
If you have 1/2 chances in hockey or you have 1/3 in soccer.
Just bet on "draw no bet", so you only need to pick from two options. 
Well, you could say that it is a technique that I don't know how it can turn out, it is innovative, but innovative for me, I don't know much about Hockey, that sport is too good because it is rough and all rough sports fascinate me. Unfortunately I was never able to practice this sport because in my country there is no infrastructure for that, but at a time when they put in ice rinks I went skating many times and the truth was that it was Excellent for me, I don't know but if they had put in a team or worked on it I would have been an amateur player, but I don't understand that game very well, however if that's the case with the strategy they gave you, it's worth trying , Everything in life is a risk, and we have to take them according to our financial capabilities.
It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it. So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.
So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
ubilant success, turning $5 into $40 over two days of bets surely seems like an accomplishment worthy of pride. Yet this is not mere luck but the fruition of a strategy shrewdly devised. Curiously, your muse is not a mentor in the art of sports betting but one who provides subtle pointers, not a complete guide but enough to set you on your way.
Your adopted strategy involves seeking out sports such as Hockey where scoring is typically low and the first goal winner usually prevails. You then scout for a casino offering live play and place a Parlay on 2-3 games, best not to exceed that number as more matches translate to heightened risk. More sire, with three games placed there are only two possible outcomes in which all bets lose so you have less chance.
You even use this approach in soccer betting: sitting back until live matches appear on your screen and waiting to pounce when a team is already ahead 1-0 with promising odds. Remember not to stake a single bet but include other games in your multibet; also ensure that the matches are in the second half so you can place bets without forgetting these simple rules.
The difference with soccer is that the match can end in a draw and in such this strategy is much less effective overall. If you have 1/2 chances in hockey or you have 1/3 in soccer. Also I'd say that whenever someone scores the odds are immediately lowered for live bets so I don't think this is that great of a strategy.
Perhaps it's more based on luck so if you so far have been winning that's a good sign but don't let it ride forever. Eventually it would also go down at some point.
Perhaps it's more based on luck so if you so far have been winning that's a good sign but don't let it ride forever. Eventually it would also go down at some point.
Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
This is why we mustn't gamble with excessively large amount, even if the possibility of wining the ticket is high. A game of 2:0 where the home team is on the lead in the first half, can experience a turn around and later end 2:3 it has happened before and more are yet to still happen. If the home team receives a red card in the other half of the game, it would be very easy for them to conceive a goal or even series of goals from their opposition team. That's one of the reason why the game is a bit tricky and interesting. Your ability to make good predictions is what determines your chance of winning mean while it is still obviously a game of luck.
Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
Happens all the time that a team doesn't score in the 2nd half.
DRAW is depressing really. I have a lot of losses with draws when the other team in the last few minutes, scores 1 point and they are 1:1.
Selecting matches before the game starts means you are familiar with the teams. The better chances you have when you know the sports. And you can tell whether the odds or the casino aren't fooling you. Of course, this system more likely going to work better for people who know more about soccer and a fan, especially in the national league.
Can i ask you question:
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
What if the team that scores in first half didn't score the second half what is the result gonna look like?
Like, while betting do we have to give the winning team direct winning since you can't factor the team to win or what if the results comes out 'draw' and you already given HOME or AWAY to win.
I think in my opinion it's a very tough bet, so why not select just few game on before the match starts. Let say one can decides to select only 3 matches which they scores more than 2 goals whenever they play and give them over 1.5 and 2.5 respectively with this your winning is sure, if the total odds give you 4 odd then it's a good game and the winning is sure.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Too many conditions must be met first such as the match must be 1:0 or 0:1, ensure the odds are not more than @1.3 and ensuring that bets are placed in the second half. You know that actually betting with odds of @1.1 doesn't make you an absolute win, right?
I'll be watching a few games this weekend to see how accurate this strategy is, and I have 1 question about the percentages, so far have you gotten at least 90% wins from this strategy?
You may try it on different platforms https://www.betcoin.ag for instance has 63 live soccer games while some other casinos have just 28 live matches so there are lots of teams to pick from even when you are in local betting platforms, there are more than 10 live soccer games.
I'm still observing the strategy you explain here, and until now I haven't found that this strategy is good enough because we don't have a definite guarantee that a bet with odds of even @1.01 will win. Then regarding FIFA that you said, whether it's an e-games bet or a real football match, honestly I don't get the point you mean
.Tomorrow is the weekend, and there will be lots of major European league matches, it's the right time to test whether your strategy is working or not. BTW, thanks for sharing.
~
because what happened was that I analyzed the games before they started and saw that team x had a greater chance of beating team z, but during the live game team z dominated the game and scored the goal first and I bet on team z, but when it reached the 80th minute, team x scored a lot of goals and won the game. This happened so many times that it made me think that the best option was to bet before the game started because it would have decent odds and less risk of making the same mistake as in the past. while betting live if you have low odds and high risk
because what happened was that I analyzed the games before they started and saw that team x had a greater chance of beating team z, but during the live game team z dominated the game and scored the goal first and I bet on team z, but when it reached the 80th minute, team x scored a lot of goals and won the game. This happened so many times that it made me think that the best option was to bet before the game started because it would have decent odds and less risk of making the same mistake as in the past. while betting live if you have low odds and high risk
But if this is a valid pattern, then when team Z scores a goal, you should bet on team X, since team X’s quotes become much more attractive compared to the beginning of the game when the score is 0-0.
By the way, I love making such bets and the original favorite most often takes its toll, the problem is that this is live betting and you need to spend a lot of personal time on it. Moreover, you don’t determine the moment when it’s convenient for you, you have to adapt to the schedule of games.
In the past I did this and if I was lucky the first time I turned my 1$ into 10$, I bet on live games. First I analyzed the game a lot and then I watched the game while analyzing how each team was defending and attacking, after a team scored a goal and I concluded that that team had the conditions to win, so I bet on that team and managed to get it right. After I won a bet, I took all the winnings and put them into another live bet. I did this until I won 10x the amount I deposited. But then came the sequence of defeats that I started to question about the effectiveness of this strategy
because what happened was that I analyzed the games before they started and saw that team x had a greater chance of beating team z, but during the live game team z dominated the game and scored the goal first and I bet on team z, but when it reached the 80th minute, team x scored a lot of goals and won the game. This happened so many times that it made me think that the best option was to bet before the game started because it would have decent odds and less risk of making the same mistake as in the past. while betting live if you have low odds and high risk
because what happened was that I analyzed the games before they started and saw that team x had a greater chance of beating team z, but during the live game team z dominated the game and scored the goal first and I bet on team z, but when it reached the 80th minute, team x scored a lot of goals and won the game. This happened so many times that it made me think that the best option was to bet before the game started because it would have decent odds and less risk of making the same mistake as in the past. while betting live if you have low odds and high risk
-snip- And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
I only dare to include up to 5 matches in a parlay bet if 2-3 games are not enough odds for a bet list.So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
I've done it before and it's worth a try. Betting during a live match by trying to see if the score is still not above 2, there is a chance of winning the bet even though the odds are low for the team that is ahead. For matches played by well-known teams, it is not necessarily the right target, but in matches teams from the league are not taken into account, just look at the standings table and the statistics of the goals they scored and then make a decision to place a bet on the team that has a 1-0 lead. So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
^ Doesn't have to be 1.3m could be 1.20 or 1.25 as long as below 1.3. If you are adventurous enough you can try 1.50.
But as I said, the strategy is no guarantee but this is worth trying.
Too many conditions must be met first such as the match must be 1:0 or 0:1, ensure the odds are not more than @1.3 and ensuring that bets are placed in the second half. You know that actually betting with odds of @1.1 doesn't make you an absolute win, right?
I'll be watching a few games this weekend to see how accurate this strategy is, and I have 1 question about the percentages, so far have you gotten at least 90% wins from this strategy?
Not really 90% I think I lost countless bets as well but over all I'm winning with this strategy. There are tons of soccer games on every betting platform. I tried this on FiFA, those teams are just too pro I guess that even the underdog in the first half can beat the fave in the 2nd half.
You may try it on different platforms https://www.betcoin.ag for instance has 63 live soccer games while some other casinos have just 28 live matches so there are lots of teams to pick from even when you are in local betting platforms, there are more than 10 live soccer games.
But as I said, the strategy is no guarantee but this is worth trying.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Too many conditions must be met first such as the match must be 1:0 or 0:1, ensure the odds are not more than @1.3 and ensuring that bets are placed in the second half. You know that actually betting with odds of @1.1 doesn't make you an absolute win, right?
I'll be watching a few games this weekend to see how accurate this strategy is, and I have 1 question about the percentages, so far have you gotten at least 90% wins from this strategy?
Not really 90% I think I lost countless bets as well but over all I'm winning with this strategy. There are tons of soccer games on every betting platform. I tried this on FiFA, those teams are just too pro I guess that even the underdog in the first half can beat the fave in the 2nd half.
You may try it on different platforms https://www.betcoin.ag for instance has 63 live soccer games while some other casinos have just 28 live matches so there are lots of teams to pick from even when you are in local betting platforms, there are more than 10 live soccer games.
It worked for some time that I turned my $5 to $40 in 2 days of betting. This is just a test of it as I learn this from someone as well. He didn't teach me the entire strategy but just gave me a hint on how to do it. So maybe if you can improve this sports betting strategy, you may as well contribute to this evolution.
So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game. And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Note: Not Guaranteed But Worth Trying.
I didn't quite understand the meaning of the strategy to be honest. The trick is that the team that leads is most likely to win? Yes, this is true, but this probability is already reflected in the coefficient. And by the way, the closer the end of the game is, the smaller the odds for the leading team to win, so it seems to me that it will be difficult to find what you advise (1.3 odds plus the second half of the game).
So what I did is apply this same strategy on Soccer as well. Remember to do this on live matches.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
So when you see game 1-0 and the team that score 1 has the odds of 1.30, I guess this is a good bet already. Just add another of these live games for your multibet and hope to win. Also, make sure it's already 2nd half.
Too many conditions must be met first such as the match must be 1:0 or 0:1, ensure the odds are not more than @1.3 and ensuring that bets are placed in the second half. You know that actually betting with odds of @1.1 doesn't make you an absolute win, right?
I'll be watching a few games this weekend to see how accurate this strategy is, and I have 1 question about the percentages, so far have you gotten at least 90% wins from this strategy?
There is no different strategy here in comparing to the popular prediction strategies which usually insights that the lesser odd you go for and lesser number of games you picks is the more advantage you would stand chances of winning but in all it never works.
In football match which I know very well, a team can be on 2-0 but before the end of the game it ends in the odd times it could end up 2 - 2+ with a winning advantage of the team that was initially loosing.
The rightful strategy to be confident in winning in the gamble can never be revealed because such never existed.
Talking about sport bets such as football, you can only secure some chances to win when you bets on the big teams against smaller teams but yet not still a 100% assurance.
In football match which I know very well, a team can be on 2-0 but before the end of the game it ends in the odd times it could end up 2 - 2+ with a winning advantage of the team that was initially loosing.
The rightful strategy to be confident in winning in the gamble can never be revealed because such never existed.
Talking about sport bets such as football, you can only secure some chances to win when you bets on the big teams against smaller teams but yet not still a 100% assurance.
Nothing different with bet favorite teams, of course the winning percentage is high, but we don't know when our luck will run out.
1.3^3 = 2.197, I still earn 0.197 even though I loss in the next match.
Even if you win 3 times in a row on bets with odds of 1.3, then 1 loss is enough to destroy all your winnings.
It's incorrect, if I win 3 times in a row, I would still in profit even though I loss in one match.1.3^3 = 2.197, I still earn 0.197 even though I loss in the next match.
As for the probability of victory for a team that has already scored 1 goal, then it is necessary to collect reliable statistics. Has anyone collected such statistics?
Actually the poster above your post already pointed out the statistic.What you said is true, but I think that Julien_Olynpic was more talking about the ballpark and how much margin there is left for a player, which is pretty close to zero.
The only scenario where I think using these margins as a winning strategy is when we look at high stakes players and how they generate extra benefits through their rollover. But as far as I know if bookmakers detect strategies like that and someone perfectly sticks to it, they could just limit your account to certain thresholds and take away some of the potential to add benefits to narrow margins.
A player who is only betting small stakes would literally have to pursue a full time job finding 1.3's that make sense to make an extra dollar at the end of the day. You would also have to be able to catch several 1.3's at the same time that fulfill the aforementioned requirements. I have never tried it, but I am sure that it is not that easy to find three 1.3's at the same time and to not have any interferences with the submission. Someone would have to closely monitor several leagues at once and probably several sports in order to be able to play a good number of parlays on a day that fulfill the conditions.
OP, you only told us about your wins on two days, so I would like to know the results of the other days that you didn't mention, or is these two days your first try, and you haven't tried it again. It might work for you at the first time, does not mean that it is a good strategy that can always give you wins.
You talked about using this strategy in football, when the game is in the second half, have you forgotten that recently, the teams that are always on the lead in the first half, sometimes loses the gmatch in the complete 90 minutes due to substitution of players and the team losing can take advantage of the second half to play better than the did in the second half.
Gambling is a game of luck, and whatever strategy that we implement that works for us, is based on luck and not our strategy of understanding how the game works or coming up with any trick of winning.
You talked about using this strategy in football, when the game is in the second half, have you forgotten that recently, the teams that are always on the lead in the first half, sometimes loses the gmatch in the complete 90 minutes due to substitution of players and the team losing can take advantage of the second half to play better than the did in the second half.
Gambling is a game of luck, and whatever strategy that we implement that works for us, is based on luck and not our strategy of understanding how the game works or coming up with any trick of winning.
Nothing different with bet favorite teams, of course the winning percentage is high, but we don't know when our luck will run out.
1.3^3 = 2.197, I still earn 0.197 even though I loss in the next match.
Even if you win 3 times in a row on bets with odds of 1.3, then 1 loss is enough to destroy all your winnings.
It's incorrect, if I win 3 times in a row, I would still in profit even though I loss in one match.1.3^3 = 2.197, I still earn 0.197 even though I loss in the next match.
As for the probability of victory for a team that has already scored 1 goal, then it is necessary to collect reliable statistics. Has anyone collected such statistics?
Actually the poster above your post already pointed out the statistic. 
So here are his words: Find a sport like Hockey where teams normally just score a few and usually the first team that scores wins the game.
I understand this and it is not unusual. It is actually a winning strategy even in football betting to check for teams that doesn't score much goals to bet on them on under and also to look at scoring teams like Manchester city to bet on over. You are likely to win bets like this if you have analyzed it and bet it as single bet but some gamblers don't like single games because the potential winning amount will be lower.
And then find a casino that lists live matches. And then Parlay on 2-3 games. Don't go more than that or it gets riskier he emphasizes.
It is quite a winning strategy to bet on fewer games because if you bet on multiple, you are likely to be unlucky that some of the games will not turn out successful but 2/3 games are easy win and professional bettors are cashing out more on this way of betting than those who go on multiple.
Jump to: