Topic: FORTUNEJACK.COM |Deposit 777 play with 1777 mBTC |Live Casino, Slots, Betting - page 473. (Read 459762 times)
March 05, 2016, 06:42:44 PM
hmmm, I finised 25 lose 60mbtc
March 05, 2016, 03:41:11 PM
How long do you estimate your anti ddos captcha screen will be activated? DiceBot will not be able to log in to your site as long as that is activated.
March 05, 2016, 03:10:17 PM
Tried this site out for the first time..didnt even realize this was a self moderated thread or else I wouldn't have deposited a satoshi here. I dont know what they set their house edge at on blackjack but winning 15 out of 92 hands is outrageously unrealistic. They can claim provably fair all they want but its all BS at the end of the day. Plus their deposit bonus is a sham because it only includes their ultra-rigged games, not the super rigged ones, unfortunately. Never will be playing here again. I advise coinroyale or hell throw it in the garbage. Self moderated thread...what a bunch of shitholes
This thread being self moderated has nothing to do with the fairness of this site. Fortunejack never censor a legit question, they will only censor troll postand Im sure your post is nothing like that. Also regarding your BJ losses, it is normal and everything can happen in gamble however with provably fair you can always check if it is fair so instead of posting nonsense please provide proof that they are rigging it
BlackJack is not provably fair, it doesn't work for me. Try to verify a bet to see if it works for you.
Just saying something is provably fair does not make it so. In what manner is it provably fair?
March 05, 2016, 01:28:37 PM
Tried this site out for the first time..didnt even realize this was a self moderated thread or else I wouldn't have deposited a satoshi here. I dont know what they set their house edge at on blackjack but winning 15 out of 92 hands is outrageously unrealistic. They can claim provably fair all they want but its all BS at the end of the day. Plus their deposit bonus is a sham because it only includes their ultra-rigged games, not the super rigged ones, unfortunately. Never will be playing here again. I advise coinroyale or hell throw it in the garbage. Self moderated thread...what a bunch of shitholes
This thread being self moderated has nothing to do with the fairness of this site. Fortunejack never censor a legit question, they will only censor troll postand Im sure your post is nothing like that. Also regarding your BJ losses, it is normal and everything can happen in gamble however with provably fair you can always check if it is fair so instead of posting nonsense please provide proof that they are rigging it
BlackJack is not provably fair, it doesn't work for me. Try to verify a bet to see if it works for you.
March 05, 2016, 12:44:31 PM
Just for some heads up about the 3BTC GTD tournament, there are only 7 players registered as of now and it needs 3 more players for the match to run. The match will start in about 3 hours and 15 minutes from my post. This is sure a great GTD for just 60 mbtc buy in , 3 places paid and at the lowest you could get 600 mbtc back.
March 05, 2016, 11:55:01 AM
What is the poker cash game rake structure?
Asked the same question some pages before and am just copy/pasting the answer I got from Fortunejack:
"If you click on chips you will see the pop up giving you the information about the rake. Namely, the dealer doesn't receive any the rake if the pot does not consist of 1mbtc. However, if the pot is over 1mbtc the dealer receives 0.04mbtc on each 1mbtc ."
/copypaste
Also take in consideration the rake CAP is set at 500mBTC
Hope this helps.
March 04, 2016, 07:22:29 PM
Tried this site out for the first time..didnt even realize this was a self moderated thread or else I wouldn't have deposited a satoshi here. I dont know what they set their house edge at on blackjack but winning 15 out of 92 hands is outrageously unrealistic. They can claim provably fair all they want but its all BS at the end of the day. Plus their deposit bonus is a sham because it only includes their ultra-rigged games, not the super rigged ones, unfortunately. Never will be playing here again. I advise coinroyale or hell throw it in the garbage. Self moderated thread...what a bunch of shitholes
This thread being self moderated has nothing to do with the fairness of this site. Fortunejack never censor a legit question, they will only censor troll postand Im sure your post is nothing like that. Also regarding your BJ losses, it is normal and everything can happen in gamble however with provably fair you can always check if it is fair so instead of posting nonsense please provide proof that they are rigging it
March 04, 2016, 02:22:42 PM
NM - Registration successful!
There is a ddos attack going on. I'm getting logged out all the time.
March 04, 2016, 02:21:33 PM
NM - Registration successful!
March 04, 2016, 02:17:04 PM
Trying to register to fortunatejack now and registration doesn't seem to be going through.
Is there an issue with new registration?
Is there an issue with new registration?
March 04, 2016, 01:46:17 PM
What is the poker cash game rake structure?
Also we need some promotions like rake race or vip freerolls to get action going.
Finally I would like to see more omaha tables opened with different stakes.
Also we need some promotions like rake race or vip freerolls to get action going.
Finally I would like to see more omaha tables opened with different stakes.
March 04, 2016, 12:50:12 PM
I made a withdrawal 4 hours ago of 90mB and now the network refuses to confirm it,
www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/71289c3ba19524b8911f15990af348086d72f12288bd83bac0b0473b9d9526c2
No responce from customer support.
www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/71289c3ba19524b8911f15990af348086d72f12288bd83bac0b0473b9d9526c2
No responce from customer support.
I see that the fee was 0.1 mbtc, this fee is less than recommended. I believe your trx was slow due to the low fee. Standard fee is 0.2 mbtc now.
FJ, please add more fee for faster confirmation, don't be so cheap.
March 04, 2016, 05:07:31 AM
Tried this site out for the first time..didnt even realize this was a self moderated thread or else I wouldn't have deposited a satoshi here. I dont know what they set their house edge at on blackjack but winning 15 out of 92 hands is outrageously unrealistic. They can claim provably fair all they want but its all BS at the end of the day. Plus their deposit bonus is a sham because it only includes their ultra-rigged games, not the super rigged ones, unfortunately. Never will be playing here again. I advise coinroyale or hell throw it in the garbage. Self moderated thread...what a bunch of shitholes
March 04, 2016, 02:51:07 AM
FortuneJack Hello ! The game is a trader now present a bug - When setting as the default currency -XDG , http://ssmaker.ru/4d8270bc/
Game BINARY TRADER is not loaded - http://SSMaker.ru/896abf2b/ , loading wheel spinning but there is no result. Here is an animated screen - https://gyazo.com/83b6e3b6fecb03cdd54216fea09fc57c . The error has been present for four days over its correction nobody works.
Vladimir Golovchenko
Game BINARY TRADER is not loaded - http://SSMaker.ru/896abf2b/ , loading wheel spinning but there is no result. Here is an animated screen - https://gyazo.com/83b6e3b6fecb03cdd54216fea09fc57c . The error has been present for four days over its correction nobody works.
Vladimir Golovchenko
Dear Vladimir,
Thank you for your input. We have credited your account with bug bounty. Have a good day.
March 03, 2016, 10:25:39 PM
Yes it's indeed a strange payout structure: if showed in percentage it is
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
The payout structure is actually fine and good enough. It may seems like a weird number however the first structure as used by Fortunejack will give more to players assuming that if you are not finished as the second or the first rank. This payout structure was actually based on number of players imo incase if you forgotten
you didn't get the point , we are discussing a different thing
just look to the screenshot I posted in the previous page and you will know what we are talking about
for this tourney it's fine to have the current structure since the GTD prize is way bigger than the actual buy ins
but I'm afraid that the current structure will remain in the biggest tourneys like the 3000 GTD
it doesn't make sense when the pay jump from 5th to 4th is bigger than 4th to 3rd
for example if 5th place will take 10 chips and 4th 15 , then 3rd should at least win 20 or more not 16 chips or anything between
hopefully you got the idea
March 03, 2016, 03:25:54 PM
Third should definitely be weighed more than 4th,makes whoever is in 3rd or 4th just flip in hopes of moving higher into potentially 1st or 2nd. Almost like a reward for not going for it at final table.
March 03, 2016, 11:18:30 AM
Yes it's indeed a strange payout structure: if showed in percentage it is
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
The payout structure is actually fine and good enough. It may seems like a weird number however the first structure as used by Fortunejack will give more to players assuming that if you are not finished as the second or the first rank. This payout structure was actually based on number of players imo incase if you forgotten
To be more clear what I find strange is the too little difference between 3rd and 4th position and not the lower/higher reward to the first two positions.
About the bolded part: maybe it's my poor english but I couldn't get what you mean with it. Anyway that payout structure was referred to those 41 entrants registered at the moment the screenshot was taken. I know that the more entrants the more place paid (generally according to a payout structure but couldn't find it on FJ).
Agree.
They should really just copy pokerstars or full tilt for all tournament structures. These sites have been around for 15 years and the info is available, just use it.
March 03, 2016, 11:14:02 AM
Yes it's indeed a strange payout structure: if showed in percentage it is
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
The payout structure is actually fine and good enough. It may seems like a weird number however the first structure as used by Fortunejack will give more to players assuming that if you are not finished as the second or the first rank. This payout structure was actually based on number of players imo incase if you forgotten
To be more clear what I find strange is the too little difference between 3rd and 4th position and not the lower/higher reward to the first two positions.
About the bolded part: maybe it's my poor english but I couldn't get what you mean with it. Anyway that payout structure was referred to those 41 entrants registered at the moment the screenshot was taken. I know that the more entrants the more place paid (generally according to a payout structure but couldn't find it on FJ).
March 03, 2016, 10:59:34 AM
Yes it's indeed a strange payout structure: if showed in percentage it is
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
1° - 43%
2° - 23%
3° - 13%
4° - 12%
5° - 9%
whilst I would consider a typical payout somehting like this (assuming 5 position paid as it appears in lobby):
1° - 45%
2° - 25%
3° - 15%
4° - 9%
5° - 6%
This kind of payout is winner-oriented and could be varied if they would like to split more amongst the non-winners
The payout structure is actually fine and good enough. It may seems like a weird number however the first structure as used by Fortunejack will give more to players assuming that if you are not finished as the second or the first rank. This payout structure was actually based on number of players imo incase if you forgotten
March 03, 2016, 08:51:54 AM
FortuneJack Hello ! The game is a trader now present a bug - When setting as the default currency -XDG , http://ssmaker.ru/4d8270bc/
Game BINARY TRADER is not loaded - http://SSMaker.ru/896abf2b/ , loading wheel spinning but there is no result. Here is an animated screen - https://gyazo.com/83b6e3b6fecb03cdd54216fea09fc57c . The error has been present for four days over its correction nobody works.
Vladimir Golovchenko
Game BINARY TRADER is not loaded - http://SSMaker.ru/896abf2b/ , loading wheel spinning but there is no result. Here is an animated screen - https://gyazo.com/83b6e3b6fecb03cdd54216fea09fc57c . The error has been present for four days over its correction nobody works.
Vladimir Golovchenko
Dear Vladimir,
Thank you for your input. We have credited your account with bug bounty. Have a good day.
Jump to: