The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.
I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.
Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win
We know this, they don't.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .
This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.
You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.
I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.
I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.
Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.
I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.
You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!
Once again, the Hand ID that you submitted for examination we gave you the answer that you had the push. The previous game you lost because you had 14 and the dealer 21. Please read carefully our text and refrain from disseminating the wrong information. You have to accept the fact that you had the push.