Okay, I will ignore the stats from bitcoinstrip. Still I have 3 data points, that I
personally got straight from your website. These numbers are correctly taken from your site.
I know all stats started with 0 on 2014-09-09. I know the stats of 2015-01-10 so I can calculate the daily average between those 2 dates (first 123 days). And I know the stats of today, so I can calculate the average daily between 2015-01-10 and now (257 days.)
This results in:
2015-01-10 in BTC daily in BTC 2015-09-24 in BTC daily in BTC
BTC 23,565 BTC 23,565 BTC 191 BTC 10,570,963 BTC 10,570,963 BTC 41,040 BTC
NVC 1,008,077 NVC 4,365 BTC 35 BTC 1,206,989 NVC 5,226 BTC 3 BTC
PPC 1,005,193 PPC 1,658 BTC 13 BTC 1,680,837 PPC 2,773 BTC 4 BTC
NMC 1,002,993 NMC 1,655 BTC 13 BTC 1,147,817 NMC 1,894 BTC 1 BTC
DASH 105,758 DASH 1,108 BTC 9 BTC 100,300,583 DASH 1,050,977 BTC 4,085 BTC
DOGE 685,105,819 DOGE 356 BTC 3 BTC 14,664,444,075 DOGE 7,625 BTC 28 BTC
RDD 8,572,105,491 RDD 343 BTC 3 BTC 39,762,845,194 RDD 1,590 BTC 5 BTC
LTC 8,343 LTC 104 BTC 1 BTC 200,305,652 LTC 2,489,799 BTC 9,688 BTC
CLAM 8,105 CLAM 48 BTC 0 BTC 150,369 CLAM 895 BTC 3 BTC
TOTAL 33,202 BTC 270 BTC 14,132,013 BTC 54,859 BTC
Do you see how these stats look wrong?
1) I found it odd that NVC, PPC, NMC are all just about a million on the first data point, but I am willing to ignore that as it could be coincidence.
2) For the first 123 days, you had a daily avg of 270 BTC in total. And the 257 days after that, a
daily avg of 54,859 BTC. I'm sure your site got more popular, but seems extreme?
3) Note how almost all altcoins aren't popular except DASH and LTC with
HUGE amounts. LTC is claimed to have more
5x more wagered than PrimeDice's BTC daily wagered. PD is the most popular dice site BY FAR and AFAIK the most popular BTC gambling site. Even DASH is 2x more than PD BTC. Anyone active in the cryptocurrency gambling community, knows that altcoins do not have
that kind of gambling volume in BTC terms. Even JD doesn't have that with their CLAM wagered amounts. The fact that your other altcoins have barely wagered volume, shows this furthermore.
4) I find it odd that it seems like DASH got exactly 100M added (300k would be exactly correct based on daily of first 123 days) and it seems like 200M was added to LTC. But sure, this "could" be a coincidence.
5) Just the fact that you claim to have 54,859 BTC daily wagered should be enough.. That is 27x times more wagered than PD and still 4x more than JD with BTC times. Everyone who was active on JD know how crazy action there was, 100 BTC spam-bets were almost not a big deal.
6) Based on your wagered amounts, you should have an expected profit 141,320 till 565,280 BTC in ~8 months (based on 1% HE - 4% HE.) That is simply impossible.
7) You have a max bet of 1 BTC on your dice game. With these wagered amounts and expected profits, you should be able to afford HUGE max bets.
8) Just because you have a lot of different games, altcoins and some bonus program, doesn't magically make your site more popular by these insane factors.
I find it odd that you try to defend this. I personally assumed you would say there was a silly mistake and it would be fixed. That you really claim that these numbers are correct, is sketchy to me.
Those numbers and tables you are trying to bring up are wrong and has nothing to do with our database, and there is no way you could have access to that kind of information.
However, we approve there was a bug counting it. One of the games (fortune wheel) was excluded from the trigger for a short period of time (when we changed our currency rates provider) and the bets were summed up without multiplying it on an exchange rate. The issue was fixed later, but the wager forgetfully remained untouched. It took some time to analyse the code and history of FortuneJack updates.
We think exaggerating total wager would be a cheap marketing trick and would never distribute wager that high on the landing page on purpose, knowing it would raise a lot of questions in a highly curious community like Bitcointalk.
Please explain me how an exchange rate error affects the original alt coin amounts. It should only affect the BTC amounts. 
