+1
EDIT: Wait, does +1 count as a zero-value post?
However, the policy is being abused to censor valid options for bitcoin BTC users to consider.
Would banning you be an abuse? You know, seeing as you just plagiarised a post from earlier in the thread:
Bitcoin forum moderation policy is being abused to censor valid options for bitcoin BTC users to consider.
Oh, and these guys:
In response to the reply that was just deleted, I never shattered a single rule and i don't have any complaints apart from the issue with KWH. Mytime on here has been all right. I am simply declaring what I came across following KWH threw his small match because I do not accept his fake claims.
In light of the answer that was quite recently erased, I never broke a solitary run and I have no grumblings other than the issue with KWH. My chance on here has been okay. I am just expressing what I pursued into KWH had his little tantrum since I don't concur with his false proclamations.
In response to the reply that was just deleted, I never broke a single rule and i have no complaints other than the issue with KWH. My time on here has been just fine. I am simply stating what I ran into after KWH threw his little fit because I do not agree with his false statements.
Oh, and also this guy as well:
Good day. I noticed that there is a new incentive to delete the "joined" type posts (concerning the airdrops), and I am all for it. My question is if it is OK to post "received the airdrop" type posts.
On one side that is not a very valuable post, but on the other side it is polite to thank the dev and to show to the others that the airdrop is legit (especially these days....).
Good day. I noticed that there is a new incentive to delete the "joined" type posts (concerning the airdrops), and I am all for it. My question is if it is OK to post "received the airdrop" type posts.
On one side that is not a very valuable post, but on the other side it is polite to thank the dev and to show to the others that the airdrop is legit (especially these days....).