Topic: France(ism): ban the burkinis - page 3. (Read 5669 times)

A French couple was viciously attacked by two 27-year-old Muslims for ordering ham on their pizza.

According to Breitbart, the victims left Le Mix Bar, a nightclub in Cambrésis, France and went to grab a slice at a food vendor nearby. Youness Boussaid and Fatah Bouzid approached the couple and offered them cocaine.

When they noticed the pizza the couple ordered had ham on it, the two Muslims freaked out and and told the man and woman they would “go to hell” for eating it.

They then caressed the woman's blonde hair and forced fingers into her nose, causing her to fall and lose consciousness. When her partner tried to intervene the two Muslims began beating him. Luckily, security from the club were able to stop the assault.

Boussaid and Bouzid fled in a car they rented in Belgium. The plate led to the men being identified.

WATCH: Muslims chant “Allahu Akbar” while torching buses in France

They were later identified by the pizza chef, the victims, and another witness, and photos certified their presence at the scene. They continued to deny the evidence in court.

Eventually, they were sentenced to a year and six months in prison. In addition, they had to each pay €1,500 in damages.

So we moan about a burka and a burkini..
muslims moan about collars and ham pizza..
See i have been saying that Muslims and westerners are from 2 different planets so it's time muslims packed there bags and went home back to Muslim lands..

WHAT you don't need to pack your bags your going to turn our lands into Muslim lands ..
Yes i know you think this and this is why I know we will go to war..SAD BUT TRUE..

UK Christian clergy told not to wear clerical collars in public for fear of ...
https://www.jihadwatch.org/.../uk-christian-clergy-told-not-to-wear-cleric...
12 hours ago - “Vicars are told not to wear dog collars in public as experts fear ISIS will target British church in next attack,” by Alexander Ward, Daily Mail, ..

Sounds like Islam is hijacking our vicars and want to kill them for wearing a collar I.E An item of clothing?..
And us westerners only wanted them to remove it or face a fine..

Muslims don't you think it's a bit harsh it's only a collar an item of clothing..
Oh so it's that old story..You know what we feel when you want the burka or burkini banned?..

But the thing is your in our country and we are at war with ISLAM STATEoftheshitholeyoucomefrom..

This is how thick our leaders are we are at war with ISLAM STATEoftheshitholeyoucomefrom
and we let our enemy walk around our towns and cities eyeing up potential bomb plots ..

But the worst is when you go on a day out there everywhere rubbing there religion in my face while i try not to be sick because of some dick politician changing the face of our nation for MUSLIM MONEY..

Also if your saying it's the medias fault all this Islam stuff..
Why would the media lie?..For what reason?

When i look at the news i see it's Muslims doing the killing for ISLAM..
Now when you look at the news what do you see?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3758402/Were-France-burkini-photos-STAGED-Muslim-woman-beach-no-towel-no-book-parasol-forced-remove-swimwear-police-fresh-claims-pictures-SET-UP.html

The France burkini row has deepened after claims that photos of a Muslim woman forced to remove her swimwear by armed police on a beach were staged.

French politicians and media questioned the controversial incident in Nice on Tuesday and asked why the woman was lying down on a beach with no towel, book or parasol in the full glare of the midday sun near a police post - with a photographer nearby.

They are fears France's controversial burkini ban, which began in Cannes, may be leapt upon as a propaganda tool by Islamic extremists. 

You seem to suspect quite a few strange and wonderful things.  

a) If there were no ban, there would be no controversy and thus, no headlines.  These are just ordinary people who want to go to the beach in peace.  People like you are the ones making it all about religion.
b) Right wing nationalists are the ones with the devious tactics at work here.  The ban a blatant attempt to legitimise discrimination.  It wouldn't be in everyone's faces if xenophobes stopped being so easily offended.
c) The billionaires who own the newspapers decide what the headlines are.  If the story isn't going away, it means someone with money has an agenda.  Islam isn't hijacking the news, they're being attacked by it.

If you're going to come up with crazed conspiracy theories, at least make them somewhat plausible.

No, wearing religious clothes are prohibited inside state building! But you can wear whatever you want in public place!

LOL... still they can't be officially banned in the European Union. These suits give no indication about the religious affiliation of the user. The burkinis were banned not because they were covering the body, but due to their outward religiosity. And that is why I am saying that all this nonsense must stop. Muslim ladies can wear full body swimwear and no one would be complaining.

^^They have to dress like that at their beaches.  Those are special chemical-resistant suits that prevent the skin from dissolving while they swim in the pollution.

Watch out when China tourists start to invade France beaches.

In my opinion popcorn1 raise a good question: why did they left the paradise of shakiralaw and went to the west?

Personally I think there are different angles to see this.

1st and foremost: exponential breeding is unsustainable for any population. The rate of production of what ever has difficulty to match the unleashed biological growth rate of human population... Or rephrased there is no problem with exponential population growth until there is... Which means a big drop. Furthermore when you compound that most of Islamic countries are pretty dry to say the least, the demographic pressure only intensify. Then on a more basic level it's too a lot of stress on infrastructures and public services to have an exponentially growing population.

Another aspect is polygamy. As those with access to asset take more women for themselves, there is a shortage...

Then there is a way to classify foreigners depending on different parameters:

1) like spendulus said: the hijrah people practicing takyha. They are the demographic weapon of supremacist Islam. There goal is to conquer the west and the world through demography. Breed faster than the natives and become the majority. Create no go zone with shakira rule. Expropriate the natives and make shakira law the law of the land.

2) the other wing of supremacist Islam, the jeehadees. Open warfare. Compared to the Hijra people its more action than slow grinding... However it's quite more brutal. There the goal is to exterminate all non compliant population. The fun day is when they discover what an ac-130 gunship is...



And his little brothers in the uav class...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOWK72i8bCU

They are live practice targets in live Munition shuffling. Nothing more.

3) those that want to live in the west and oppose the shakiralaw and prefer western democracy. Why wouldn't they. Some wanna be free from shakiralaw. Some wanna wear burkinis other strings. Who cares. Their brothers wanna drink beer, water or smoke hash. Who (@R3$.

At the end there is one simple question: if you don't recognize the total absolute undisputed supremacy of the us constitution and bill of rights in the territories of the United States or America, are you ready to die? Your mother or belief could be who or what ever it doesn't make a difference if your name is David Rockefeller or Mahmoud Ben Xx. You are an enemy of the United States of America. Advice: make preparation for your funeral...

That's pretty logical, except that you do not take into account the basic Islamic concept of Takiyya, which basically translates into lying for the sake of Islam; more precisely, adopting Western standards in public so as to infiltrate and destroy the enemy.

So you are actually 100% wrong, because it is exactly the extremists who would use such a tactic as authorized by their holy books.

I remember that a few weeks ago, the mayor of London outlawed some advertisements on the subway because they were too suggestive. I believe muslims, all muslims, have a real problem with the female body.

I, for one, do not have any problem with the female body. I could handle women in mini-skirts everywhere. The beach was a great place where all humans were at the same level, the old and the young, the slim and the fat, all at the same level because of the very little clothing everybody's wearing. Please, keep it that way.

And another thing i forgot to mention..
You Muslims and other nations say well it's your turn you westerners went around and done what we Muslims are doing now like you did with Christianity?

Well let me tell you something when we British went around the world killing in the name of Christianity we British also had to believe the religion so even we made our own people suffer just like ISIS is doing now all in the name of religion..

Take a look around the world who does the suffering? the kings and queens? the politicians?
The Bishops? the pope?..

So before you judge about why we don't want burkas or burkini you need to do some history and what we people had under our own religious laws in the past..
And what we had to do to get our freedom from religious laws and king and queen laws..

Now if they where living in there own muslim land they wouldn't want to wear the Burka or burkini
because they be made to wear it..And why have you left your own muslim country?..
Because of your muslim laws that's why you flee..
And then they have the cheek to come to our lands to spread there olden day backward thinking on us westerners and shout outside our government buildings about how sharia law will take over our nation..
If Christians shouted out side there Muslim rulers they be killed..So it's a good job we don't live in 1700s if you done it in the UK at that time in history you would have a spike rammed up your but hole..
Have the respect to respect our laws and not bring your own shitty laws like SHARIA ..

The USA are asking for a politician to be jailed   ..Never thought i see this action happen to an american politician..Maybe times are changing..

TREY GOWDY..You are a special guy and it is the peoples law and no one is above the law ..
USA you have a great man keep him safe ..

Trey gowdy you know the law is written by the people for the people and no one is above the law..
Not even your god and he is very religious..TOP MAN

when people say that there is a connection between burkini and terrorism they make me laugh. because extremists do not consider burkini allowed for women because it is narrow and shows their busy shape.

so France banning is for their benefit

So why is china removing crosses off buildings ..And the buildings are not owned by the state private property?..
Mind you is there any such thing in china as private property?..

Here in the UK we had catholic and protestant at each other for hundreds of years and in the 21st century it was starting to fade away peace amongst the 2 religions..

Now many different type of Muslims come over here to our lands and will start all that religious shit that we British had for hundreds of years and it was pathetic..

I would rather die before my country becomes a Muslim nation because it's a horrible religion..
And i am not scared more aware of what could happen so i can act ..

Now the best way to act if i see a Muslim with a burka or Burkini on is be ready to run ..
And i would never fly on a plane with a woman with a burka on

I hate flying on planes and it would make my journey even worse .

The day i will become relaxed is when a Jew man with the big hat and curly locks marries a Muslim woman in a burka and both let each other believe in there own religions..
Both walk hand in hand down the street both respecting each others religions...

Then we will know it's a religion of peace ..

Now in the UK we had the same problem if a catholic married a protestant or a jew or a muslim your parents would of got rid of you in a flash..
And now both religions can marry who they like ..Because the 1960 and 70s was about peace and love and flower power ..A new way to live no religion or race to separate each other..

Because if anyone knows about religion and the wars it can cause it's us BRITISH and FRENCH..
And all for what FAIRY TALES... AND while someone makes money selling weapons so they can line there own pockets ..

Mrs MAY will sort this situation out because if Britain is going to believe in a religion we will only settle for Christianity and Jewish as the main religions..

And in my eyes the only religion you should teach your children is about JESUS and Santa clause
Because by the time the kids grow up they will know that both are bullshit stories but both teach about love and kindness..So good for children..

I like the sound of MERRY CHRISTMAS come November and so does MR TRUMP

And also because they know that the types of people pushing for this ban would simply use this as a stepping stone to more wide-ranging bans including all religious head-wear in all places, not just the beach.  Why would anyone openly play along with that agenda and willingly give up the right to wear whatever they please?  It's clear to anyone this is nothing more than a nationalist ploy to attempt to legitimise discrimination against minorities.  

Speaking of legal, it's now the mayors that are in the wrong by continuing to enforce the ban when the courts have deemed the ban itself illegal.  It's still demonising one particular religion out of many.  I don't see anyone in the thread calling for bans on tznius scarves or habits, because you aren't afraid of Jews and Catholics.  And that's what this entire debate is about.  Your fears.  Your weaknesses.  Your inability to cope with those different to you.

If you actually read the interview by the person who designed the first Burkini, you'd see it was intended to allow more integration, as it wasn't practical to wear hijabs in the water, so Muslim women simply weren't able to go in the water.  You claim you want integration, but you're trying to ban something that encourages it:


And again, authoritarian bans on styles of clothing are identical to the ones in those hardline Islamic countries you claim you don't approve of.  If your plan is to fight fire with fire and become just as totalitarian as those countries, you can't claim to be any more enlightened than they are.  The authoritarian approach is not the right one and will only serve to further raise tensions.  Forced conformity is a disgusting notion and you should all be ashamed of yourselves for allowing your fears to overcome reason.

Its just a few fat old guys that is angry that a few boobs will be cowered up.

Right on the point there. France is a secular country (although the overwhelming majority are Catholics) and outward display of religiosity is not welcome. If the Muslims simply want to cover up, then why can't they wear the wetsuit, which is perfectly legal? They don't want to wear them, because they want to display their religiosity.

Wet suits are slim, stick to the skin... While burkinis are ampler... Too much and they would sink

There is no problem here.  Just let them wear wetsuits.