Topic: [FREE RAFFLE] - Custom UniJoin Card, (S/N 6). Only by invitation! (Read 1267 times)

redacted

spamming ?? i ask only the membe before, what he mean with the posting regarding my name, that is all, ok!

Why are you two spamming this thread? The raffle is over, we have a winner, so there is no need for this. Just look at a few posts above.

What is with my place C for Willi9974 ?

Yeah, it's still very new 

I was wondering why he called you that - did realize you had a forum name change.

Thank you very much Unijoin 

I'm glad I was lucky, I really wanted to win one of your cards, as Unijoin is a service I really appreciate!

I will PM Cygan very soon.


Thank you guys! 

congrats to iwantmyhomepaidwithbtc2 and thank you UniJoin for the raffle!

Congratulations to our superhero @paid2.

https://mempool.space/block/000000000000000000032ba23706563c2d8f8e622eb65bd8d9c4f8234e2c3266

It looks like we have a winner!

Please contact Cygan! He will take care of delivery of the prize.

We also just loaded your card with bitcoins!

The winner will be announced using a block 819925


Good luck to all! If a 1 is rolled, we will try again.

Do you want to bet the money and find out?
Let's bet 10k$ and i will hire lawyers to make a 10 pager of explaining OF WHAT WAS WRONG.
Starting that the picture has at least two False words.
It was not free for the community.
period.
if you will want to escalate this in finding out what was wrong and helping you to achieve that knowledge you will have to place btc at where your mouth is.
Telling it was nothing wrong in marketing is BS.
And to answer to your "start your own thread" i could say "create your own forum and invite those people there".

Now i am as a collector for decades, reading this find not very OK.
It is well played.
"release" without opportunity to achieve in public is not a release lol, NONE of the true collectors would take it as RARE. NONE.
And when he said "YOU" , he doesn't meant me right? a member of community.

My point was to describe the posts correctly. Will leave it now.

I'll post this here. Considering that we have a full number of participants, I invite UniJoin to determine the time of drawing the winners. Maybe until then, the thread could be locked, to prevent trolling here.

---

If anyone wants an explanation or discussion about the conditions in this kind of raffle, let them start their topic about it.
A company that gives away something of value, where their name and brand are clearly indicated on the gift, of course, is a form of marketing. There's nothing wrong with that.

Said what i wanted. Mostly about leadership in the forum, fake mods, feedbacks, and "who is your daddy" bs.
For the end. i am not a better person than anyone of you and vice versa. And every new person is the same valuable for community as the old one.

Answering to your suggestion for me to open another thread is same as asking for me to waste my time or giving attitude like i was working for you
If you want to do something good you better move this thread somewhere offsite to be visible by "invited" people only.

Revoking my right to stay silent now.

Thanks.

StackBTC



No , bitcoin does't do this. Math always has an EXACT reason.

The biggest mindfuck in this thread that he reserved the right to eliminate person in public, with showing a disrespect, on the INVITE ONLY thread.
So, my advice would be, if you have such retard rules, better to NOT SEND the invitation to the person that you want/planning to eliminate.
HOPE IT MAKES SENSE

edit: just to make sure i was not eliminated or wasn't pretending to this raffle neither i had an invite. Just saying that this thread have used "smart" marketing trick. One of the oldest in the book.

I am convinced that for some reason you are in a trolling mood today, therefore I will not discuss in detail the arguments you bring in support of your thesis other than to say that you are at least inconsistent with what you profess.

What am referring to is you (and me) joined this FREE raffle without any issue :


you even had been granted two spots in it because of your past purchases and you had nothing against these rules that regulated it


You even bumped it (so you actively promoted it and also its rules).


So you producted a storm of words for raffles whose rules somehow penalizes you and you have no problem joning and promoting FREE raffles whose rules favour you.
Please stop your delirium and above all stop derailing threads and if this issue really matters for yoi ( but your actions says otherwise) eventually open a thread in meta or scam accusation or where do you think it's best.

________________

edit : fixed some typos

Really? That's nice.
Reserving a right to do what ever i want for the next 10 years.

Thank You
YES REALLY



imagine that you would give that reply to someone who would be asking "did Stack really bought those cards from you 2-3 years ago"

Let's pretend what you see i have not bought from you. And lets pretend i have a perfect provenance of how i acquired these items/cards. Really helps me as collector. Thanks

"after several transactions and time have elapsed" WTF? Nobody is going to marry you. You are rating actual trade, not picking your life partner dude. What if new people see that you rated old member "paid on time" , what the f*ck is that mean? is that mean that newbie paid "not on time" or what is EXACT reason of why newbie was not rated of making a successful trade? What do you think the feedback is actually for? is it for "life" ? Feedback in the trade is a provenance that the goods were achieved by the successful trade, nothing else. YOU ARE NOT GRANTING THE PERSON WITH YOUR LIFE. You only saying that "he paid" , because you know why? BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING ELSE BUYER HAS TO DO - JUST PAY.
Or do you think you are responsible for someones actions , and if yes, point me to someone who took full responsibility for another person just because they had feeback to him on a random trade .

All feedback system is true monarchy scheme. Not rating the others means less opponents to have for yourself, less , members of higher ranking or less chance for yourself to be eliminated from DT. we are not idiots, again.


"your time line preference" - You could have died in those 2-3 years. Let's be realistic. And yet i am happy collector waiting for the "receipt" that i did that trade and i paid on time or at least that i paid/bought at all. I can bet if the DT member would be buying from you for the first time he would be rated in few minutes after the payment. This is a light version of "buying back" the feedback.
So let me ask you yourself: Really?
All or none, should be the right mindset. Sadly you don't have such.
I wish next time when you will be buying groceries and willing to get the receipt they would tell you "Sorry ser we give receipt only after several transactions and time have elapsed".
And do not forget to go and check if every hotel that you visited and rated well to be still operating and, also,  i wish you not to find that they served some of their customers badly, because by your logic you would be responsible for that.

My point is that if someone are not qualified for the entry, could you please make that those people were not shown his ad too?
This can be easy fixed with creating private/secret thread that only those people with invitation would be able to go there, chasing their free stuff, and absorb the ads given.
(Or another scenario for "invitation" people only- go absorb the ads and later find out that you was eliminated without a reason because "right to eliminate without a reason" was reserved )
But for us mortal people, please do one simple thing: If certain people get less. Please make those certain people to give less too. Make us to see less.

Thanks

and the forum rules state they can decide how they want to do their raffle provided they are not requiring merit to partake.
so its not his rules - its the forum rules and they are compliant with them - so why are you complaining again?

enough derailment - you want to rail against the system - create a thread concerning raffles and their processes - see what the community thinks there vs de-railing this thread.

Does it look to you that he posted this on his private webiste?

He came here. Public network. Nobody cares his rules. We have forum rules and that is enough.

If he want to have his rules he is FREE to make his own webiste and pitch what ever he want THERE.

Their raffle - they can decide how to give it away or who to include - exclude.

I usually exclude anyone with an account create date less than the current year, sometimes longer. Sometimes, I limit it to people I have done business with. There are sometimes specific people I exclude.

Censorship is to say you have no ability to be included - that there is nothing you can do to be included. IE the race question you posed. One cannot change their race. But one can perform a translation service, one can have their account for a longer time etc etc

Even Bitcoin does this - look at the fees, if your fee is too low, your transaction will have to wait. You want to be included, pay a higher fee. No different then this raffle, you want to be included, do the translation. (note: this is the 6th card they have given away - the other 5 did not require someone to have done translation services)

as for the feedback thing - really? you have 3 transactions with me - 2 of them in the past 60 days. I leave feedback after several transactions and time have elapsed. Now I am forced to leave feedback based on your time line preference? I don't think so.