I don't know. I'm pretty sure I am done with this site. It has taken a massive turn down the shady side IMO. I have used this site for almost 3 years now and it is the only 'faucet' I have used in a long time because it paid well and the rolls win % were actually pretty close to what the site said.
Now, since the site was updated the other week, hourly payouts are crap and with a weekly payout limit of 25000 means that someone rolling the smallest amount would have to roll 86 times in one week to get a payout. That means that they need to roll 12 hours each day to get your goal of 25000 in one week.. Before this change, with the 10k weekly payout I was able to meet it in about 20-30 rolls.. Also now after each hourly roll you get that annoying popup shows every time. Obviously you want people to roll and give you back the btc they won. Which leads me to the multiply btc part..
Before whatever on the site changed (for 2 years probably), my win % used to be pretty close to that 47.5% until the other week when the site was updated. Now it is at like 34% win rate over the past 40 rolls. Even the roll history isnt correct. I rolled 5 times this morning, won the first roll and lost the following 4 rolls but the site only shows my win, while my balance is at 0. Sure it could just be crap luck.
And yes, i know what you are going to say "Its a faucet, what do you expect? its based off btc price!" and yes, I know that but with the 10+ ads shoved in your face every hour, plus the miniscule hourly payout now, plus the "C'mon and multiply that btc!", plus the 25000 weekly payout. You have no choice but to attempt to roll your winnings in order to get the payout that week. Unless you happen to have 86 hours available each week to roll or you get lucky and win more than the lowest. I run several ad-supported websites do i know with all those ads the site probably makes some decent change per user. I dont use those advertisers, but still..
Yes im ranting, but ive been a fan of this site for a long time and that has all change recently.
I just want to point out that a 34% win rate over 40 rolls is a ridiculously small sample size. Any select number of rolls is going to have a degree of variance, and the smaller the sample size, the higher the likelihood of variance. You can only draw a conclusion about the win rate over a very,
very large number of rolls; in the tens of thousands at a
minimum.